GNU bug report logs -
#24846
error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.10: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x40
Previous Next
Reported by: Yan Markman <ymarkman <at> marvell.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:36:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug
Done: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 24846 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 24846 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Yan Markman <ymarkman <at> marvell.com>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 15:36:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Sometimes coreutils commands fails
and I'm looking a clue what could be root cause or where to debug
SETUP:
1. System Device is ROUTER
2. Silicone has 2 CPUs of ARM9
3. coreutils (GNU coreutils) 8.24 - 2015
4. File-System NFS over Ethernet/USB
5. High Ethernet traffic with high CPUs' loading (overloading)
6.
PROBLEM:
Sometimes (hardly reproduced) coreutils commands (for example - "ls", "date")
Stop to work and return the below error
/usr/bin/coreutils: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libgmp.so.10: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x40
DEBUG NOTES:
- Traffic stopped CPUs are in~100% IDLE
- The NFS is working and available
- No any Out-Of-Memory seen, a lot of free memory
Thanks for helping
Yan Markman
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:10:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 01/11/16 10:47, Yan Markman wrote:
> Sometimes coreutils commands fails
> and I'm looking a clue what could be root cause or where to debug
>
> SETUP:
>
> 1. System Device is ROUTER
>
> 2. Silicone has 2 CPUs of ARM9
>
> 3. coreutils (GNU coreutils) 8.24 - 2015
>
> 4. File-System NFS over Ethernet/USB
>
> 5. High Ethernet traffic with high CPUs' loading (overloading)
>
> 6.
> PROBLEM:
> Sometimes (hardly reproduced) coreutils commands (for example - "ls", "date")
> Stop to work and return the below error
>
> /usr/bin/coreutils: error while loading shared libraries: /usr/lib/libgmp.so.10: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x40
I see you're using the single binary build.
Weird that the problem is intermittent.
Can you memtest your RAM?
Perhaps there are multiple gmp versions on the system and sometimes the wrong one is used?
(that's really stretching)
BTW it would be better to configure your coreutils build --without-gmp
That is done for the coreutils-single package in Fedora for example,
as the relatively large overhead of GMP for just factor and expr
is not a good tradeoff in the single binary use case.
cheers,
Pádraig.
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 11/01/2016 09:09 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> BTW it would be better to configure your coreutils build --without-gmp
Perhaps --enable-single-binary-exceptions=factor,expr should be the
default if GMP is used?
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:09:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 01/11/16 16:32, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 11/01/2016 09:09 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> BTW it would be better to configure your coreutils build --without-gmp
>
> Perhaps --enable-single-binary-exceptions=factor,expr should be the
> default if GMP is used?
Interesting tradeoff.
That would increase the single binary install by about 10%
(factor(86K), expr(40K)), while keeping the same functionality.
Maybe something like:
if --enable-single-binary && !--with-gmp && HAVE_GMP
--enable-single-binary-exceptions=factor,expr
I'll think about it.
cheers,
Pádraig
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 17:16:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Thanks Pádraig
I think that described failure is only a symptom of more generic problem.
just occasionally failing on coreutils::ls command.
So I would like to understand what exactly this message says.
This message is reported by " ld-2.22.so" but I have no LIB-source-code.
- Have you got an idea what the code 0x40 (PLT reloc type 0x40) means?
- Should the "coretuls" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition and pumped back upon "ls" command?
- Should the "libgmp.so" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition?
Thank you very much.
Yan Markman
-----Original Message-----
From: Pádraig Brady [mailto:P <at> draigBrady.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 6:09 PM
To: Yan Markman; 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24846: error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.10: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x40
On 11/01/2016 09:09 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> BTW it would be better to configure your coreutils build --without-gmp
Perhaps --enable-single-binary-exceptions=factor,expr should be the default if GMP is used?
On 01/11/16 10:47, Yan Markman wrote:
> Sometimes coreutils commands fails
> and I'm looking a clue what could be root cause or where to debug
>
> SETUP:
>
> 1. System Device is ROUTER
>
> 2. Silicone has 2 CPUs of ARM9
>
> 3. coreutils (GNU coreutils) 8.24 - 2015
>
> 4. File-System NFS over Ethernet/USB
>
> 5. High Ethernet traffic with high CPUs' loading (overloading)
>
> 6.
> PROBLEM:
> Sometimes (hardly reproduced) coreutils commands (for example - "ls",
> "date") Stop to work and return the below error
>
> /usr/bin/coreutils: error while loading shared libraries:
> /usr/lib/libgmp.so.10: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x40
I see you're using the single binary build.
Weird that the problem is intermittent.
Can you memtest your RAM?
Perhaps there are multiple gmp versions on the system and sometimes the wrong one is used?
(that's really stretching)
BTW it would be better to configure your coreutils build --without-gmp That is done for the coreutils-single package in Fedora for example, as the relatively large overhead of GMP for just factor and expr is not a good tradeoff in the single binary use case.
cheers,
Pádraig.
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 18:15:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
On 01/11/16 17:10, Yan Markman wrote:
> Thanks Pádraig
>
> I think that described failure is only a symptom of more generic problem.
> just occasionally failing on coreutils::ls command.
> So I would like to understand what exactly this message says.
> This message is reported by " ld-2.22.so" but I have no LIB-source-code.
You can see this in the glibc source code.
> - Have you got an idea what the code 0x40 (PLT reloc type 0x40) means?
It was expecting reloc type R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT (0x16) or R_ARM_TLS_DESC (0x0D),
but got R_ARM_LDRS_PC_G0. I don't know how that could happen.
> - Should the "coretuls" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition and pumped back upon "ls" command?
> - Should the "libgmp.so" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition?
Yes that could happen under mem pressure.
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 19:34:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
MANY MANY THANKS
Yan Markman
Phones: 33898, 054-4732819 (972-54-4732819)
-----Original Message-----
From: Pádraig Brady [mailto:P <at> draigBrady.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2016 8:14 PM
To: Yan Markman; 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24846: error while loading shared libraries: libgmp.so.10: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x40
On 01/11/16 17:10, Yan Markman wrote:
> Thanks Pádraig
>
> I think that described failure is only a symptom of more generic problem.
> just occasionally failing on coreutils::ls command.
> So I would like to understand what exactly this message says.
> This message is reported by " ld-2.22.so" but I have no LIB-source-code.
You can see this in the glibc source code.
> - Have you got an idea what the code 0x40 (PLT reloc type 0x40) means?
It was expecting reloc type R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT (0x16) or R_ARM_TLS_DESC (0x0D), but got R_ARM_LDRS_PC_G0. I don't know how that could happen.
> - Should the "coretuls" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition and pumped back upon "ls" command?
> - Should the "libgmp.so" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition?
Yes that could happen under mem pressure.
Information forwarded
to
bug-coreutils <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24846
; Package
coreutils
.
(Sun, 28 Oct 2018 07:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
tags 24846 notabug
close 24846
stop
(triaging old bugs)
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 01/11/16 17:10, Yan Markman wrote: >>>> I think that described failure is only a symptom of more generic
>> problem. just occasionally failing on coreutils::ls command. So
>> I would like to understand what exactly this message says. This
>> message is reported by " ld-2.22.so" but I have no
>> LIB-source-code. >
> You can see this in the glibc source code.
[...]
>> - Have you got an idea what the code 0x40 (PLT reloc type 0x40) means?
>
> It was expecting reloc type R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT (0x16) or R_ARM_TLS_DESC (0x0D), but got R_ARM_LDRS_PC_G0. I don't know how that could happen.
>
>> - Should the "coretuls" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition and pumped back upon "ls" command?
>> - Should the "libgmp.so" be resident in RAM or could be swapped out under any condition?
>
> Yes that could happen under mem pressure.
On 2016-11-01 1:33 p.m., Yan Markman wrote:
> MANY MANY THANKS
Given the above, and with no further comments in 2 years,
I'm closing this bug.
-assaf
Added tag(s) notabug.
Request was from
Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 28 Oct 2018 07:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug closed, send any further explanations to
24846 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and Yan Markman <ymarkman <at> marvell.com>
Request was from
Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 28 Oct 2018 07:16:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Sun, 25 Nov 2018 12:24:07 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 203 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.