GNU bug report logs - #24842
24.5; `help-make-xrefs': False link-type determinations

Previous Next

Full log

Message #86 received at 24842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Stephen Berman <stephen.berman <at> gmx.net>
Cc: "9445 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <9445 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
 "24842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <24842 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [External] : Re: bug#24842: 24.5; `help-make-xrefs': False
 link-type determinations
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:58:01 +0000

> > Yup.  So here's the recipe to reproduce the problem:
> >
> > (defun foo1 ())
> > (defvar foo2 ())
> >
> > (defvar foo nil
> >   "
> > `foo1'\t- on-demand action function
> > `foo2'")
> >
> > So I'm reopening the bug report.
> 
> But looking at this thing again, the DWIM code trying to parse doc
> strings and adding links just can't get this case right.
> 
> It's, reasonably enough, interpreting "function `foo2'" as a function
> (even if it's on two lines), and then seeing that it isn't, so it
> doesn't add a link.  I think the answer here "don't do that, then" --
> i.e., you have to write this in a different way to help the DWIM logic.
> 
> So I'm re-closing this as a "wontfix".

That's just saying that you haven't found an
easy solution.  It's not saying that there's
no bug or that it can't be fixed.

I think there's more in this bug thread than
your latest recipe for reproducing what you
think the problem is.  But I won't insist on
that perception.

The priority shouldn't be to close bugs.  It
should be to report bugs, so they can perhaps
be fixed by someone who has the interest and
energy.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.