GNU bug report logs - #24837
26.0.50; term.el: In char mode, displayed and executed commands can differ

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Philipp Stephani <p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:11:02 UTC

Severity: important

Merged with 21609

Found in versions 24.5, 26.0.50

Done: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>
Cc: p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com, 24837 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 21609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+psainty=orcon.net.nz <at> gnu.org
Subject: bug#24837: bug#21609: bug#24837: 26.0.50; term.el: In char mode, displayed and executed commands can differ
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:35:33 +0300
> Cc: p.stephani2 <at> gmail.com, 24837 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 21609 <at> debbugs.gnu.org,
>  bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+psainty=orcon.net.nz <at> gnu.org
> From: Phil Sainty <psainty <at> orcon.net.nz>
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:11:17 +1300
> 
> On 10/10/17 04:32, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> +*** New user options `term-char-mode-buffer-read-only' and
> >> +`term-char-mode-point-at-process-mark'
> 
> > I have a difficulty understanding why the user would like to change
> > the values of these options from their defaults.  How about revising
> > this text to describe (a) the default behavior, and (b) when would
> > someone want to change that by tweaking these options?
> 
> I'm likewise not sure whether users will *actually* want to do this.

In that case, the text should say something like

  Customize these options to nil if you want the previous behavior.

> In any case I'll see if I can improve the wording...

Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 268 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.