From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:33:54 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24828 <24828@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24828 <24828@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el Reply-To: bug#24828 <24828@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 18:33:54 +0000 retitle 24828 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window brok= e which-key.el reassign 24828 emacs submitter 24828 =C3=93scar Fuentes severity 24828 minor thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 30 14:21:27 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2016 18:21:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujX-0006mm-8f for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:27 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38338) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujW-0006mX-3x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujQ-0007fP-C6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:52157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujQ-0007fL-96 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57538) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujP-0002nB-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujM-0007ee-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:19 -0400 Received: from smtp11.acens.net ([86.109.99.135]:31875 helo=smtp.movistar.es) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0ujL-0007dx-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 14:21:16 -0400 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0204.58163A12.005E, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from qcore (217.125.182.189) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 57A452E30464663E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 18:21:35 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 19:21:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) As the subject says. Maybe an alias is in order? I don't know if there are more cases like this. In GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, X toolkit) of 2016-10-21 built on qcore Repository revision: 0929e061fb544c0f4c10ff0412a41cf7e8148270 Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11804000 System Description: Ubuntu 16.10 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 30 15:35:02 2016 Received: (at 24828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Oct 2016 19:35:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0vsk-0000Fd-BI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:35:02 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:65348) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0vsi-0000F6-Us for 24828@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 15:35:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.7.83]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MdaCy-1cFAw42fNs-00PNHe; Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:34:52 +0100 Message-ID: <58164B56.5040109@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 20:34:46 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?w5NzY2FyIEZ1ZW50ZXM=?= , 24828@debbugs.gnu.org, justin@burkett.cc Subject: Re: bug#24828: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el References: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> In-Reply-To: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gzq+NxMhkvd/uCCwCjm41HeMR5cjoTDhECenBaUe0yKC/MUPxDc TblQUx+w/DZXqcPY2wTXK+Vf7j4zPwvggE6NSI+CoYsNZ9jPYLK1bs6GmV/3INmJRnumuFC Myut3xXVsckl2P2jTooCGufFf+9Ae/jWr0ITz/1hFqR/mLmUzL/HFMLuZCO8K/v+3i+9/In w94rJ3eBNqnZR8LS5NB7g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:FKTLc6XoWBc=:+DcVlDG1W9Ej9Gza78wvlI +5HLzDnXuTayr11ccQ6uXFz/lqttriUqjmIqiLDYV01kqEIWg5W5H4mXMRCozHtSfs3m63x5A Q+EYTwPX9DxoZeztIS44UVHEypNBwaM9S2RoGCAJt0dLlRqDfRxWb4H5rsSq1er+U8kyCb2QA eVpU7GvwwLykL82gZjQhpIobX5043Geu0DA/TZGFSfdbQKaZvWrPRS7B9J3mOyeB89C7wawpE 4I5OenQoN7vY2ngsVojNmxlBZxXDLWhiTdO1QDF65Bg7J2L5O+q7yhTUDLXfswAjF/X3OLw78 Dw3szz3qjHMOarDUnl3O6pCsfJSTicHpPhEUmR37CYVx+LK1tkKPhXizA5SHksuxcQvD4/tDc 25uNHv3t2tQKTDVMAUSmpt8uNy2+I6f6Cvx5dv+qDLdu+unZ/oLGFhsLyE53BLONUTw3HJznn vTbr6x4wKIGlvWqFsIwSwnB0mk0aCYFE2WuGaqb0fhRAbOnS3YJa+IZeYrBG+q2XYvwjG2ehz UEq6YwD1jskxFpRzPayzyVQYCzMMjiPch2uwbAThJ9e/d6KPctD+JCFHx1BUn7I9t3stgmS+J /JNPVw3MCBvlhh+rh9Zd2Tx/k8ruvyHoMolxvn8ls7laVOdtwGdwqUnnBB1GpslI+jLL5D1eD nDxINhb3F1fdI0DPs9WFTGyc7gtEOv86QiQpXDaL72m7bgpy/aVPWQlFoMOC2Sxi3/jiXECwd oHMpClf3/3MoCuEMpUI4l0hg0dlO0sQGxBZiUgUSMJhN2/Wvu3c+xOofONTFEKq04+/ewZLsN QXbFVFTgM1Nz+xFfCWG9ogEFAEaow== X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el > > As the subject says. Maybe an alias is in order? > > I don't know if there are more cases like this. Hmm... all this is obviously my fault. As a matter of fact, I wasn't aware that side windows were anywhere used at all. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.83 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24828 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el > > As the subject says. Maybe an alias is in order? > > I don't know if there are more cases like this. Hmm... all this is obviously my fault. As a matter of fact, I wasn't aware that side windows were anywhere used at all. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.83 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el > > As the subject says. Maybe an alias is in order? > > I don't know if there are more cases like this. Hmm... all this is obviously my fault. As a matter of fact, I wasn't aware that side windows were anywhere used at all. The problem is that =E2=80=98display-buffer-in-major-side-window=E2=80=99= , which I renamed to =E2=80=98window--make-major-side-window=E2=80=99, actually is = an internal function which should not be used outside of window.el. With other words: If there is anything =E2=80=98window--make-major-side-window=E2=80= =99 does which =E2=80=98display-buffer-in-side-window=E2=80=99 doesn't, then I should fi= x that in the latter rather than exposing the side window internals. I added the author to the list of recipients. Maybe he can tell us more. If there's no other way, I'll obviously make the alias. Thanks for the report, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 31 03:42:52 2016 Received: (at 24828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2016 07:42:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37609 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c17F6-0003On-6I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:42:52 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:51234) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c17F4-0003Oa-CC for 24828@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 03:42:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([212.95.7.104]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LnPnu-1cWJaf1DIM-00hg39; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:42:43 +0100 Message-ID: <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:42:35 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Burkett , 24828@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#24828: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el References: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> <58164B56.5040109@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MpEFMVvWlhCgSt4690gszrFRQAGUvMzcu0RsCzybPNCZhzrPg5N tpom4pwIXeXxTpyBfGcAmPYcKBDg/sYSU4C++htXqq+jjjnPZMmx+N20idu6jFTmGj4D7sJ hLtY/iiKK0vFE/Vuou+hZuf/8o5Nc2RX1zp9yLz3OFpChdctEFPeNtooWyq/7wiMxd+T0zX oTMHmceGAy15l1eIvdj9g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:J1VY0K2hDX8=:AZUCiqD3arV98XSmZPRFum IjcExXI6pTvvSKcPR90TjtAOoLPm1JxIi211tiEjyMkJ/GerZX8CPeSckyVLAHhEH48eNCd9x dYwCSrk2NWVVy1XT+pvDKfDO1kNpIpxXIO8GvZst6V6TxGu0MbBNa8bol1EaPP3pkzLBF/4ft K/KgMnwlmwYo+h1Wm+tHIblHtSl9gKXtNJaHUc7K+Cs0fgWb3DAZeJb97pCNqfAcBkdF/3+Yg ZSNXxro0IgP7LRrMgC4WsNaGUMTz3RjDOuKS3agfPMNZYCRMXQZXj4Zph0/VmK/tRab8oGqpZ VldMXPXavme2rlQe4cBkYPMYsb6KFg2RtnFRo2lej2SKcZ315pEHzsMAs3wkhcMpb2TlME6my 7nzW/JT8O/blnXKDJ52LAJmdLLZk7itlrU7jjL/X18J7yUog95EE3m0lMkn/CNUo4EUmYWZX1 jazp6i+VIZ88kemiqAwmAaAN3IQdWZ7GduE2I6vThrYgmtgKt91PglFiGp/Pm7oAFXQCB7EQZ wX7Vccg8V1FtSHwUI+dGv4KoIKxd3Fbuq7isniLUdsGqnA3urSYvl5ekrR6QwkRRUq74dvrin wgjzkTuJTd/zsXXM+TUnCcakuJr8xdo/DZ2MTl6EqNTtQZgI8Pux5iHwuRI8b5ORII3YPFxsy y4JjenWfQfsmg/gaZF2VWa5X+qhSK2T7NeeOvwlV6YCnTcJvPrmBp7mzlMoConEEsj/XCdrEY VaiZQqAqnf12DxFz1c7dwfsXoCucL+aFM7CjmX8zvaL8gd3Ax5+aTv5+Gf7Ek0z2wpeRJPxcA ElcgGRz X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I wasn't aware that that function was internal, since it appears to > function like the other display-buffer actions. Unfortunately so. It was my fault to pretend otherwise. > If I remember right that > code was written by a contributor, and I don't remember the motivation for > choosing that one. If it really is internal then I will investigate > changing to the proper method when I have some more time. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.20 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.104 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24828 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > I wasn't aware that that function was internal, since it appears to > function like the other display-buffer actions. Unfortunately so. It was my fault to pretend otherwise. > If I remember right that > code was written by a contributor, and I don't remember the motivation for > choosing that one. If it really is internal then I will investigate > changing to the proper method when I have some more time. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.104 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.20 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > I wasn't aware that that function was internal, since it appears to > function like the other display-buffer actions. Unfortunately so. It was my fault to pretend otherwise. > If I remember right that > code was written by a contributor, and I don't remember the motivation= for > choosing that one. If it really is internal then I will investigate > changing to the proper method when I have some more time. I see. The problem is that the structure on the right ;; +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+ ;; | regular window | | regular window | ;; | | +------------+------------+ ;; +------------+------------+ --> | side-win 1 | side-win 2 | ;; | side-win 1 | side-win 2 | |------------+------------| ;; | | | | which-key window | ;; +------------+------------+ +------------+------------+ was never really supported. I initially wanted to allow that but later found out that I cannot reliably split side windows in both directions. It might work with Emacs 24 in a few basic use cases but will surely break with more complicated setups. So you essentially will have to fall back on ;; +-------------------------+ ;; | regular window | ;; | | ;; +------+-------+----------| ;; | side-| side- | which-key| ;; | win-1| win-2 | window | ;; +------+-------+----------+ or ;; +-------------------------+ ;; | regular window | ;; | | ;; +----------- +------------| ;; | side-win-1 | which-key | ;; | | window | ;; +------------+------------+ sooner or later anyway. For this, =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 should eit= her supply a side window slot value for customization and/or tell the user how to customize =E2=80=98display-buffer-alist=E2=80=99 for displaying the which= -key window. Then the user can decide which windows she wants which-key to share with (the completions window looks like a good candidate because it's ephemeral too). Note that side windows were initially designed as more persistent but I can easily see that the =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 use case might come i= n pretty handy too. Hence it should be possible to make the side-win-1 and side-win-2 windows temporarily very small in order to give the which-key window sufficient space. From what I've seen, =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 is a fine mode, very ne= atly written. It should be in ELPA. In any case, keep up the good work. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 31 13:57:42 2016 Received: (at 24828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2016 17:57:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38280 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Gq6-0002Zi-Bz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:57:42 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:36459) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1GR3-00020p-T1 for 24828@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:31:50 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id o68so171062445qkf.3 for <24828@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=burkett-cc.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v7PdykbB3GQbDhlGSV5gt4OKJq1wcPfUnaheKVu6+gU=; b=q6v4d+FiJbB1Nudd9eh+kcSN6ORLCPjTr9VcDtxWQCiIcoNq7RmrSG1x+7Wm10mFSa 8jYIEOkzGNspq821QvhaMyArJS03xFBey0WPldHMMUcuArfeJy3yvu8LwjA2SBCwfBH+ EoYt8iQBG8cj9sSCFSaLBEFOXU7Zkzt/VwKykrcFZZ0PnX9OJF6LE9FUfCqhdFFoiVPU r13ccrdBRiYlaQUxRc7u/PHpMKu5NHz3OB7U1HyNUr41C2row9ym8Ty0w1AckGLJyQOD xUFgDx4KalNo0dHqFQxgI+EpivjK4wf2Em7nR1Dy2qsudCImXmhbXWwn2aASQFJLG5Fc 0V5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v7PdykbB3GQbDhlGSV5gt4OKJq1wcPfUnaheKVu6+gU=; b=hhi5h3Hr6jc0+TlHhHNKBr+ZOBXITCOezzwI3v1L/WFnGUyjtoFbyTqMOo06jkd88Q hP7w5EDWHqRCMOcBm2Odzx1KI24A5gPKktv/GmZMpcpL0nBXUf7rzqOic5ykRPtxx+0w /jVqUehG0dIhBdUAzb1D/w4rjjMkjnpOojKi7CvEsWCEPO4OtKV0QlA8oSE6qLdHvXRU h5sYOBn2Jzse3LCHaajlbgkSac+v8x7HlIWpfH7IjBie0XCWBSG7Gkzz3jqDEjdwoLH4 dtoyEJcH7wJm/l1cDAp6DFsgaLtAxGtomEWI2Yzjx95fDyrzh1gQhnUP/VNIaT2m2qL7 Sn1g== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfAbUMA4oKJJASTEHhn7aHCR/OJqMpejBeGpuezI+KhaRZPfvwEEDkXSTgMTCnmLw== X-Received: by 10.55.176.134 with SMTP id z128mr17220976qke.243.1477935104303; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com (mail-qt0-f170.google.com. [209.85.216.170]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q62sm13707504qkb.4.2016.10.31.10.31.43 for <24828@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w33so36357060qtc.3 for <24828@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.200.57.54 with SMTP id s51mr19743813qtb.68.1477935103099; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:31:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.42.227 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:31:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> References: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> <58164B56.5040109@gmx.at> <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> From: Justin Burkett Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:31:12 -0400 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24828: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el To: martin rudalics Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113a01e8d26b8c05402c94db X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24828 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 13:57:41 -0400 Cc: 24828@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) --001a113a01e8d26b8c05402c94db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Martin, Thank you for the explanation (and for the kind words). I will follow your suggestions. Best, Justin On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:42 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > I wasn't aware that that function was internal, since it appears to > > function like the other display-buffer actions. > > Unfortunately so. It was my fault to pretend otherwise. > > > If I remember right that > > code was written by a contributor, and I don't remember the motivation > for > > choosing that one. If it really is internal then I will investigate > > changing to the proper method when I have some more time. > > I see. The problem is that the structure on the right > > ;; +-------------------------+ +-------------------------+ > ;; | regular window | | regular window | > ;; | | +------------+------------+ > ;; +------------+------------+ --> | side-win 1 | side-win 2 | > ;; | side-win 1 | side-win 2 | |------------+------------| > ;; | | | | which-key window | > ;; +------------+------------+ +------------+------------+ > > was never really supported. I initially wanted to allow that but later > found out that I cannot reliably split side windows in both directions. > It might work with Emacs 24 in a few basic use cases but will surely > break with more complicated setups. So you essentially will have to > fall back on > > ;; +-------------------------+ > ;; | regular window | > ;; | | > ;; +------+-------+----------| > ;; | side-| side- | which-key| > ;; | win-1| win-2 | window | > ;; +------+-------+----------+ > > or > > ;; +-------------------------+ > ;; | regular window | > ;; | | > ;; +----------- +------------| > ;; | side-win-1 | which-key | > ;; | | window | > ;; +------------+------------+ > > sooner or later anyway. For this, =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 should eit= her supply a > side window slot value for customization and/or tell the user how to > customize =E2=80=98display-buffer-alist=E2=80=99 for displaying the which= -key window. > Then the user can decide which windows she wants which-key to share with > (the completions window looks like a good candidate because it's > ephemeral too). > > Note that side windows were initially designed as more persistent but I > can easily see that the =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 use case might come i= n pretty handy > too. Hence it should be possible to make the side-win-1 and side-win-2 > windows temporarily very small in order to give the which-key window > sufficient space. > > From what I've seen, =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 is a fine mode, very nea= tly written. > It should be in ELPA. In any case, keep up the good work. > > martin > > --001a113a01e8d26b8c05402c94db Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Martin,=C2=A0

Thank you for the explana= tion (and for the kind words). I will follow your suggestions.=C2=A0
<= div>
Best,=C2=A0
Justin=C2=A0

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:4= 2 AM, martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
> I wasn't aware that that funct= ion was internal, since it appears to
> function like the other display-buffer actions.

 Unfortunately so.=C2=A0 It was my fault to pretend otherwise.

> If I remember right that
> code was written by a contributor, and I don't remember the motiva= tion for
> choosing that one. If it really is internal then I will investigate > changing to the proper method when I have some more time.

 I see.=C2=A0 The problem is that the structure on the right

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +-------------------------+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0+-------------------------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0regular window=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0regular window=C2=A0= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0+-----= -------+------------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +------------+------------+=C2=A0 =C2=A0-->=C2=A0 =C2= =A0| side-win 1 | side-win 2 |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; | side-win 1 | side-win 2 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0|------------+------------|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|=C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0which-key window=C2=A0 =C2=A0 |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +------------+------------+=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0+------------+------------+

was never really supported.=C2=A0 I initially wanted to allow that but late= r
found out that I cannot reliably split side windows in both directions.
It might work with Emacs 24 in a few basic use cases but will surely
break with more complicated setups.=C2=A0 So you essentially will have to fall back on

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +-------------------------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0regular window=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +------+-------+----------|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; | side-| side- | which-key|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; | win-1| win-2 | window=C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +------+-------+----------+

or

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +-------------------------+
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0regular window=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 |<= br> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +----------- +------------|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; | side-win-1 | which-key=C2=A0 |
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; |=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 | window=C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0|
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 ;; +------------+------------+

sooner or later anyway.=C2=A0 For this, =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 should = either supply a
side window slot value for customization and/or tell the user how to
customize =E2=80=98display-buffer-alist=E2=80=99 for displaying the which-k= ey window.
Then the user can decide which windows she wants which-key to share with (the completions window looks like a good candidate because it's
ephemeral too).

Note that side windows were initially designed as more persistent but I
can easily see that the =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 use case might come in = pretty handy
too.=C2=A0 Hence it should be possible to make the side-win-1 and side-win-= 2
windows temporarily very small in order to give the which-key window
sufficient space.

>From what I've seen, =E2=80=98which-key=E2=80=99 is a fine mode, very n= eatly written.
It should be in ELPA.=C2=A0 In any case, keep up the good work.

martin


--001a113a01e8d26b8c05402c94db-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 31 14:23:53 2016 Received: (at 24828-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Oct 2016 18:23:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38287 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1HFR-0003Bh-MY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:23:53 -0400 Received: from smtp09.acens.net ([86.109.99.133]:31990 helo=smtp.movistar.es) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1HFP-0003BU-Q9 for 24828-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:23:52 -0400 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0202.58178C31.006F, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Received: from qcore (217.125.182.189) by smtp.movistar.es (8.6.122.03) (authenticated as 981711563$telefonica.net) id 57A60142047366E9; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 18:23:45 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#24828: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el References: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> <58164B56.5040109@gmx.at> <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:23:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:42:35 +0100") Message-ID: <871sywcr7z.fsf@wanadoo.es> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24828-done Cc: 24828-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Justin Burkett X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) which-key.el was "fixed" with the following commit message: Remove use of display-buffer-in-major-side-window According to emacs bug #24828, this is an internal function and should not be used. Following the advice from that report, switch to display-buffer-in-side-window and add an option for the user to specify the slot value for that function. Closing this bug. Let's hope that there are no more packages out there that use this function(s). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 03:41:59 2016 Received: (at 24828) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 07:41:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38505 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Thn-0004qN-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:41:59 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:54866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Thm-0004q9-8I for 24828@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:41:58 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTkNU-1cRqH90CXo-00QPt8; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:41:51 +0100 Message-ID: <58184736.5040609@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:41:42 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Burkett Subject: Re: bug#24828: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el References: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> <58164B56.5040109@gmx.at> <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ZHXeq6HJofzleb1Kv9EaF57P2FBz6j6xfqYWqinvEYGztgEV5ud ML1ECDp87FlWI3F/NOmNdo9oBWA7tLX5M3SJKGoQ25QuX1VbS5ohTcWKPLSPsVB73IwiKNf kbD6P49a8kNel/eOirK/tFviA0Xz0c6KsiSTPySnoPSvqE1hT8Mq83Hewu2n05o/lPMrZmi nucuBYBKt38HEVaFgAuZA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kmNVdZtXzmo=:uHkp+BAEctgQ12LDwdFwnm SRD7n1moIu0qJqFDaRvawspo8VaF07fY6u1/fGUB7gqVcT3SchkTzKSo2EOreptdbxmwd3EJW QepwSCbMue2bv4kZkhyhU3wY+Yye4d6UQFyANJco+gL90sMnjT2t0heSP7gyoXtvmt3KO2hR9 29ur+WAFNJ0QQPWVJFmVi65uczXFEOOeZf8gzmKBrStfAjCZGWv56guKrtuWKF+8D/N9IAEeP leEdpHUnGim0uDD4E8HhpBoyhrrvCZ+aNxsrqHXLgJsqynFiCNIq5fXEVHwvGuVnz4fk81GDb UhMFGseOsY59zlCzVjUL7/4IcD8UlpE1Mp4UXbCcpgT5oB6vpHnHGyXGbVixgO8cfX9HSqfEq hHw9+Q9WsPpxXTlZ77BOouh3krkhstAVv7jCJwKcqPwCrOr20CmbH1g3AmproHdGI9i3vupIA X4CG/Je3QgIIMFw71XzT0jxmhrEzzMXYkCJPoVlvHlj1X7EhsYBjVEX0qb34yzqGGpEwdh2m3 aUBfpwc8ppCIw3U7Y2c+C7djJO/IOaAp8fahT6LZPPajnNZW3GN2K2jaXzaJ2dp4uEEVShwCT CcsweTzN/CveVbqXarjHaSzHooC3gTe3t4Jfh3oDNrB+dJRLh7sif6kOYT1HSXc+9S3rXqD5T IFNu2wO0fwkxF3mXPYnDFUReL8FIB797dBm9zCJR51VnOREYKXxFF0WxBEEa776HYwICDgVm4 +k5nA8yN20PHTpfrdOgU0bpXDO35tZ0gmHKzI4wJFShSTeoYTcd6x+kCy5NQNPS7Ig2NWNw16 JjD5LZuYgmCRWfXaVs/93sb1bCatA== X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you very much for fixing this on your side. BTW, you might eventually want to make the first sentence of doc-strings always occupy the first line of the doc-string. This makes them work better with things like ‘eldoc-mode’. Also the doc-strings of ‘which-key-side-window-max-width/-height’ do not quite match their customization type - IIUC the latter always ask for a float. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.105 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24828 Cc: 24828@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thank you very much for fixing this on your side. BTW, you might eventually want to make the first sentence of doc-strings always occupy the first line of the doc-string. This makes them work better with things like ‘eldoc-mode’. Also the doc-strings of ‘which-key-side-window-max-width/-height’ do not quite match their customization type - IIUC the latter always ask for a float. [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.105 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) Thank you very much for fixing this on your side. BTW, you might eventually want to make the first sentence of doc-strings always occupy the first line of the doc-string. This makes them work better with things like =E2=80=98eldoc-mode=E2=80=99. Also the doc-strin= gs of =E2=80=98which-key-side-window-max-width/-height=E2=80=99 do not quite ma= tch their customization type - IIUC the latter always ask for a float. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Nov 01 03:42:06 2016 Received: (at 24828-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2016 07:42:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Thu-0004r6-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:42:06 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:50682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c1Tht-0004qV-9J for 24828-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:42:05 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.105]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M243n-1cqySr0UHr-00u1OM; Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:41:58 +0100 Message-ID: <5818473D.8010507@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 08:41:49 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?w5NzY2FyIEZ1ZW50ZXM=?= Subject: Re: bug#24828: 26.0.50; Renaming of display-buffer-in-major-side-window broke which-key.el References: <87a8dld7fy.fsf@telefonica.net> <58164B56.5040109@gmx.at> <5816F5EB.30409@gmx.at> <871sywcr7z.fsf@wanadoo.es> In-Reply-To: <871sywcr7z.fsf@wanadoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Id8oGdVq7F3s1gSEN0QqvXS5KvI5meIWRkRoYwbbmFWlNJheuVa sRumoKvzdnj7NBR0C4Xc9+Oa5aBk19y5iYiLmSTYo3L9v5BuaQbN5ma3KqVAwo8O1evHY3O D9G3n1htjF3o4zjtZ4lZQc2/dD7sQ2DkYg37VrjJM034Skd/lvdeBNEwtqzaDIVV+uHLAX+ nvChbwu5TdUKEpM2tmnBg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:58f32ofaYOM=:m/2Z0g33ZGNUHxBDSn2cA1 j3dZhOSdbqAI09ohNyGjFNg1GSHUG9D76HI11jp4NuxpJCrAbS2Iynt/BWHczPcNyQ4f8j+Q6 1ai9KiqFBGtxyzdWsA/ryYtCw6UcbTvH8ICrp8exXRH4oatTQYYVE/sAQIyGr00qNuKF9hw5o SmGhfW3/3zqZjWe+h+6MpqRxZvyIT0t8SrEiegt3lLwfBjZgc23y4lFfPlgxNbz2Fk0sdchQ4 LDi7wp5PciT1hoFHQXy+eD9U1GVTJZsVyv6iE9jpQz9/rr8lE8ptO2pOErxBDNWy5Kwnf5elm PYaXbGqHA1RkAGBQGzL5U1rMbvo0vzgXi3H7bXsfAazs90EDM+I4V0uWcUhpx8FzWjL3uhjl1 QTJRWWfr0XwB37hRmqvynbtFVu5u+arCY3At3FM48hc8RhkH6xBQk/uHFdlXDfPtutc8JNiWx TyD/5vrnOE8lKEUBPq52iGsU6P662+95g+3bw9gfmWKFZkuKf6zMvfTJVyZZiXnXBAMxUXk7S S+z+dJOqQeJEdFHJoMFwvVyJKFlulIzoGwl2Sni6+IgIrCxG7fJpeccbjkMAfhxNiLTMnU7QU o7uPGeQijyZpeVCCN/7cXgmOS9sU++wnTzGpNROUMy9CyERRCt7+3wjXST12mPO3DVMTx67Dy GRj8Are+1/h1c+vP+J/V7JABdWggcuziVWO052YZ0MYMnu0LyGd7Tb5HLeornthWp9bK5o09a nxdvPzD6qNfD1rOvVFjtlc158gFwrgXGbevqcrvyLEZZlxJwdPZ52lfF2RwGBMCXJIOusgHG0 0oxaNeZxmNzholGZ2DFbgk9jTkP/w== X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Closing this bug. Thanks again for reporting it. > Let's hope that there are no more packages out there > that use this function(s). [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.105 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24828-done Cc: 24828-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Justin Burkett X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Closing this bug. Thanks again for reporting it. > Let's hope that there are no more packages out there > that use this function(s). [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.105 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.19 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > Closing this bug. Thanks again for reporting it. > Let's hope that there are no more packages out there > that use this function(s). Fingers crossed. martin From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:33:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Apr 17 12:30:14 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2018 16:30:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57715 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8TUk-000463-9I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:30:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38138) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f8TUj-00045k-5b for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:30:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8TTh-0001Sa-0M for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:30:08 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48027) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f8TTg-0001ST-TG for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:29:08 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f8TTg-0004Qr-K7 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:29:08 -0400 Subject: control message for bug 31194 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:29:08 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) unarchive 24828 forcemerge 24828 31194 From unknown Sun Jun 22 11:33:54 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator