From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:14:50 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24819 <24819@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24819 <24819@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Intermittent 00-repl-server.test failure in 2.0.13 Reply-To: bug#24819 <24819@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:14:50 +0000 retitle 24819 Intermittent 00-repl-server.test failure in 2.0.13 reassign 24819 guile submitter 24819 Rob Browning severity 24819 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 29 13:41:29 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2016 17:41:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36783 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0XdJ-0005YF-GI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59871) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0XdH-0005Xs-Vx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0XdC-0005ib-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0XdB-0005iT-VN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50817) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0XdA-0007Oc-L8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0Xd7-0005gU-IF for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:20 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:58182) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c0Xd7-0005gQ-Dy for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:41:17 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E5D020072 for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:41:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id ADE4014E078; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:41:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: bug-guile@gnu.org Subject: Intermittent 00-repl-server.test failure in 2.0.13 Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:41:15 -0500 Message-ID: <87a8dn2guc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) I noticed that 00-repl-server.test had failed on some of the debian buildds like this: Running 00-initial-env.test Running 00-repl-server.test FAIL: 00-repl-server.test: repl-server: simple expression - arguments: (expected-value "scheme@(repl-server)> $1 = 42\n" actual-value "$1 = 42\n") After suspecting some kind of race, it turns out that I can reproduce the failure locally (eventually) like this: cd test-suite while GUILE_LOAD_PATH=. \ ./guile-test tests/00-initial-env.test tests/00-repl-server.test do : done I don't know what's causing the trouble yet, but I augmented read-until-prompt to print every line it reads to stderr, and nothing appeared amiss there, at least. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 29 14:19:31 2016 Received: (at 24819) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Oct 2016 18:19:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36803 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0YE7-0006Wj-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:19:31 -0400 Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:41596 ident=postfix) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c0YE5-0006WY-KB; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 14:19:29 -0400 Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 218E820061; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:19:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C94A614E078; Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:19:27 -0500 (CDT) From: Rob Browning To: 24819@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#24819: Intermittent 00-repl-server.test failure in 2.0.13 In-Reply-To: <87a8dn2guc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87a8dn2guc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 13:19:27 -0500 Message-ID: <8760ob2f2o.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24819 Cc: control@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) merge 24819 24769 thanks Rob Browning writes: > I noticed that 00-repl-server.test had failed on some of the debian > buildds like this: > > Running 00-initial-env.test > Running 00-repl-server.test > FAIL: 00-repl-server.test: repl-server: simple expression - arguments: (expected-value "scheme@(repl-server)> $1 = 42\n" actual-value "$1 = 42\n") Looks like these two bugs refer to the same problem. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Nov 04 17:50:32 2016 Received: (at 24819-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2016 21:50:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45157 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2mNc-00085N-Gc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:50:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37528) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c2mNb-000856-C8 for 24819-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:50:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2mNV-0003Hh-JB for 24819-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:50:26 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43206) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c2mNK-00034P-V9; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:50:14 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:48404 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c2mNK-0003b8-6h; Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:50:14 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Rob Browning Subject: Re: bug#24819: Intermittent 00-repl-server.test failure in 2.0.13 References: <87a8dn2guc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 22:50:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a8dn2guc.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Sat, 29 Oct 2016 12:41:15 -0500") Message-ID: <87k2ci7w4s.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24819-done Cc: 24819-done@debbugs.gnu.org, 24769-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) Hello! Rob Browning skribis: > I noticed that 00-repl-server.test had failed on some of the debian > buildds like this: > > Running 00-initial-env.test > Running 00-repl-server.test > FAIL: 00-repl-server.test: repl-server: simple expression - arguments: = (expected-value "scheme@(repl-server)> $1 =3D 42\n" actual-value "$1 =3D 42= \n") The reason is that =E2=80=98repl-reader=E2=80=99 in boot-9.scm goes like th= is: (lambda* (prompt #:optional (reader (fluid-ref current-reader))) (if (not (char-ready?)) (begin (display (if (string? prompt) prompt (prompt))) (set-port-column! (current-output-port) 0))) (force-output) (run-hook before-read-hook) ((or reader read) (current-input-port))) Thus, if there=E2=80=99s already data available on the current input port, = it does not print the prompt. That situation can arise in 00-repl-server.test if we write =E2=80=9C(+ 40 = 2)=E2=80=9D too quickly. Fixed in 2fbde7f02adb8c6585e9baf6e293ee49cd23d4c4. Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:14:50 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator