GNU bug report logs - #24766
26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe

Previous Next

Full log

Message #41 received at 24766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 24766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for
 indent-relative-maybe
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2016 13:09:42 -0600

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Thanks, this is fine, except that the new function's name should be
> better as indent-relative-first-indent-point or somesuch.

That name does better describe how (indent-relative t) works, but I
figured that indent-relative-whitespace is a better name for what people
seem to use it for (indent according to the whitespace on the previous
nonblank line).

Though if you still disagree then `indent-relative-first-indent-point'
seems fine (if not a bit long).

I suppose this diff goes over the accepted limit for non-assigned
submissions? I mailed my copyright forms about a month ago but
unfortunately the FSF hasn't informed me that the process is complete
yet.

[indent4.diff (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.