GNU bug report logs - #24766
26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:02:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 26.0.50

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 24766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#24766: 26.0.50: [PATCH] Confusing behaviour for indent-relative-maybe
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:27:43 -0600
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>
>> Cc: 24766 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:43:57 -0600
>> 
>> What about changing `indent-relative-maybe' and adding an extra argument
>> to `indent-relative'? Since `indent-relative-maybe' has had that
>> docstring for a good 15 years, and the name fits the new behaviour more.
>> 
>> Then in Emacs core we can replace the single instance of it with
>> (indent-relative t). The corresponding diff:
>
> I'd prefer a backward-compatible change, i.e. make the new argument be
> the 2nd one, and keep the current behavior when the 1st arg is non-nil
> and the 2nd is nil or omitted.

That's what I did, but I used a new name for the old argument and the
old name for the new argument. I did so as the old name fits the new
behaviour more.

This is a backward-compatible change for indent-relative, but it does
use the new behaviour for indent-relative-maybe. Is that alright with
you?

> Also, please add the necessary text to the doc string to document the
> new argument.

Sure, I'll do that once the code changes are agreed upon.

> Thanks.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 355 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.