GNU bug report logs - #24720
Performance impact of -no-pie

Previous Next

Full log

Message #34 received at 24720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>
Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org, eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu, 24720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24720: Performance impact of -no-pie
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:04:35 +0300

> From: Alex <agrambot <at> gmail.com>
> Cc: rgm <at> gnu.org,  eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu,  24720 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 13:45:47 -0600
> 
> > The default switches are known, so they don't need to be spelled out
> > in the report.  It's the non-default ones that needs to be shown.
> 
> I agree that they don't need to be in the report, but just having them
> in a variable (e.g. system-configuration-options) would make it easier
> for users to see what the default switches are.
> 
> For example, I would have compared system-configuration-options between
> the slow and fast builds and noticed that the fast build had '-O2' while
> the slow one didn't, and this report wouldn't have been filed.

You have that information in config.log, so I'm unsure why you
couldn't find it if you looked for it.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.