GNU bug report logs -
#24696
Xorg segfault
Previous Next
Reported by: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:44:01 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: moreinfo
Done: Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 24696 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 24696 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24696
; Package
guix
.
(Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
.
(Fri, 14 Oct 2016 19:44:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
I installed guix sd on my desktop machine yesterday, and tried to add
the %desktop-services so I could use openbox.
When the system boots, Xorg segfaults. I have an ati graphics card that
doesn't work with free drivers, so I expected the server to fallback to
vesa or something else. I attached the xorg log and my system
configuration.
Let me know if you need anything else (I am not on this mailing).
regards,
Julien
[Xorg.0.log (text/x-log, attachment)]
[config.scm (text/x-scheme, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24696
; Package
guix
.
(Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:33:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 24696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Hello,
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> skribis:
> [ 27.673] (II) LoadModule: "ati"
> [ 27.674] (II) Loading /gnu/store/r9l8k52a9alvycl7qd4sm3kxp5d682g5-xf86-video-ati-7.7.0/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
> [ 27.737] (II) Module ati: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
> [ 27.737] compiled for 1.18.1, module version = 7.7.0
> [ 27.738] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
> [ 27.738] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 20.0
> [ 27.738] (II) LoadModule: "radeon"
> [ 27.739] (II) Loading /gnu/store/r9l8k52a9alvycl7qd4sm3kxp5d682g5-xf86-video-ati-7.7.0/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
> [ 27.929] (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[...]
> [ 28.167] (II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets:
[...]
> [ 28.615] (II) FBDEV(0): hardware: ATI Radeon 5b63 (video memory: 262144kB)
Xorg seems to be using the ATI driver, which was just recently added to
the default set of Xorg drivers (commit
3126fd8820e8c30e27ef978d66dced8763d04905).
Could you try reverting that commit and see if it gives you a working
Xorg over VESA/FB or something?
Is xf86-video-ati known to be unstable?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Information forwarded
to
bug-guix <at> gnu.org
:
bug#24696
; Package
guix
.
(Mon, 17 Oct 2016 08:25:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 24696 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> skribis:
> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:32:21 +0200
> ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu> skribis:
>>
>> > [ 27.673] (II) LoadModule: "ati"
>> > [ 27.674] (II)
>> > Loading /gnu/store/r9l8k52a9alvycl7qd4sm3kxp5d682g5-xf86-video-ati-7.7.0/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
>> > [ 27.737] (II) Module ati: vendor="X.Org
>> > Foundation" [ 27.737] compiled for 1.18.1, module
>> > version = 7.7.0 [ 27.738] Module class: X.Org Video
>> > Driver [ 27.738] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version
>> > 20.0 [ 27.738] (II) LoadModule: "radeon" [ 27.739] (II)
>> > Loading /gnu/store/r9l8k52a9alvycl7qd4sm3kxp5d682g5-xf86-video-ati-7.7.0/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.so
>> > [ 27.929] (II) Module radeon: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > [ 28.167] (II) RADEON: Driver for ATI Radeon chipsets:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > [ 28.615] (II) FBDEV(0): hardware: ATI Radeon 5b63 (video
>> > memory: 262144kB)
>>
>> Xorg seems to be using the ATI driver, which was just recently added
>> to the default set of Xorg drivers (commit
>> 3126fd8820e8c30e27ef978d66dced8763d04905).
>>
>> Could you try reverting that commit and see if it gives you a working
>> Xorg over VESA/FB or something?
>
> Unfortunately, Xorg doesn't start either. I attached the new Xorg log.
OK so the problem may be unrelated.
Did you have success with previous versions of xorg-server or the
drivers?
(FWIW I use 1.18.1 successfully with xf86-video-intel.)
>> Is xf86-video-ati known to be unstable?
>
> I don't think so, but it cannot work with my graphics card without a
> binary blob.
So what do you use on other free distros? VESA? Anything special is
needed in xorg.conf?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
Request was from
ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 01 Nov 2016 21:13:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent
to
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
Julien Lepiller <julien <at> lepiller.eu>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Mon, 17 Dec 2018 10:59:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #18 received at 24696-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Closing because I can't reproduce it anymore.
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
to
internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Mon, 14 Jan 2019 12:24:05 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 153 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.