From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:49:58 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24642 <24642@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24642 <24642@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 26.0.50; Missing mode-line on initial frame Reply-To: bug#24642 <24642@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 04:49:58 +0000 retitle 24642 26.0.50; Missing mode-line on initial frame reassign 24642 emacs submitter 24642 martin rudalics severity 24642 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 08 12:17:53 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Oct 2016 16:17:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48904 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJs-00051Z-RP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50761) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJq-00051M-NJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJk-0005Ce-CX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:45 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: **** X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJk-0005B2-A6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:44 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJi-00074L-3d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJd-00056z-T2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:41 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:51391) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuJd-00055Q-IY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:17:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.17]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoKHN-1bCwqs0mef-00gFm0 for ; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 18:17:35 +0200 Message-ID: <57F91C19.1080204@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 18:17:29 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bug-Gnu-Emacs Subject: 26.0.50; Missing mode-line on initial frame Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2J1iiiMukiUixFTYc6C2FACZrXN/eO+rLTqJUV66VOJMGd7m5aT B2OW1rCxolcNKomwYfbAnzNSbaOTOUacaXT1plPFZjX0uc6aYWF2kOaa8DoAzmq4dm9c2bq cNW4haj2fvkemSWzIqgWTJmTmCgwFMT3q0vcCy1V8Z1Qn//lu8vmpFbKFJIwlRjO7wOFirx XzmRJhQUEWmeBfttgrj8g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:cyIZzLwO09s=:3HPzmpdJiWfxZPBkwby8s2 R2OZ3RX3pBAaoD9UrgHJJpt8BvMojwQ2dzAO6Eo2ZusYX6+PIi1NxGlBAI1eDjebZIg7bZPDt ghVPxPPj0Hc8ftvf4xBRlGFsyW408Qny2mmY1fSDWjU/nh0UTO0wA/0BxPlVDW4nwFjcCJfgJ /sDMLO8N9iRjZrFHKawzL77YWK6ySa/VK4YZZKYP2MoCJ7r8F9oepZ3/Mihu3D9JjB7Nk0AEF ibxGlEFosN7YqGWEvt+6GbLg6ZqswriIp3tXkU+A+KoFuGHAn+8TyfEj1/+K9gZcYMFNuNbeD qmyjFMv5ncJyfck4VBpNC2ANIkN0xe4etQhPOluDwtwQvWD42noDQOKTgGQrzZVm32nJuaFcT rGIPTyLcg1EmYQtUkQv9VPkg2BgF98Gg89XhdFHhhNdJ0GNH/iicunQqtfuo/AheK6T4BLubV wA5/fwnbvSHJb3QgL84mfjiNqObnSDGNHmAM0HtqaEyusZbIwv9wexRNeDV70TKkHJBz24O8q yoiseEGDKtelRLw8/S0GIZPmmKybvAg+PxHlD7hfaKr9HZwQJCOCesftrsLsqB9qjEcrJJ4TU 8WOxpaVp08lUuEN5l9D9Tcs+RL+kmzdVIBzbvQbtQ0ibJlFDHmEt5z3Ciig2otXgeuNDvFAVB SOI1mB2iL+wVf3Jv52v+zMuT85W6O3k+6tVJ2DkCLvIVw55E/vU8ZgDD3IBw87dSeQeBsg29v /+mhYGkI3z7W+ZrXOI2MuqRMYl4SFmwXho6psAjfEqrHHmff5qIKMNfGASAyh3cnUPs917A71 DPgmqnipDAN+mHXJrnm3KhryQnauQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) With the following file missing-mode-line.el (defvar old (selected-frame)) (defvar new (make-frame '((minibuffer . nil)))) (set-frame-width new 1640 nil t) (set-frame-width old 400 nil t) (set-frame-position new 0 0) (set-frame-position old -1 -40) and emacs -Q -load "~/missing-mode-line.el" I get on Windows XP two frames where the root window of the smaller one has a missing mode-line. The mode-line reappears when that frame gets focus. It's a minor issue but cannot be reproduced here with Emacs 25. It's easily possible that I introduced the bug myself but I don't recall changing anything in this area. So if this rings a bell ... In GNU Emacs 26.0.50.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2016-10-08 built on MACHNO Repository revision: 9adfb021df482c6aa94a043f07acf1e8eb695bf2 Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/c/emacs-git/quick --with-gnutls=no --with-wide-int --enable-checking=yes --enable-check-lisp-object-type=yes 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3'' Configured features: SOUND NOTIFY ACL TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 20 11:23:14 2016 Received: (at 24642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2016 16:23:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36278 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8Utd-00079d-Vd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:23:14 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53404) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8Utc-00079M-LC for 24642@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:23:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8UtU-00066N-CL for 24642@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:23:07 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8UtU-00066J-93; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:23:04 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1709 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c8UtT-0001Zh-MF; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:23:03 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:23:13 +0200 Message-Id: <83k2by9l3i.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: martin rudalics In-reply-to: <57F91C19.1080204@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 08 Oct 2016 18:17:29 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#24642: 26.0.50; Missing mode-line on initial frame References: <57F91C19.1080204@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24642 Cc: 24642@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) > Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 18:17:29 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > > With the following file missing-mode-line.el > > > (defvar old (selected-frame)) > (defvar new (make-frame '((minibuffer . nil)))) > > (set-frame-width new 1640 nil t) > (set-frame-width old 400 nil t) > (set-frame-position new 0 0) > (set-frame-position old -1 -40) > > > and > > emacs -Q -load "~/missing-mode-line.el" > > I get on Windows XP two frames where the root window of the smaller one > has a missing mode-line. The mode-line reappears when that frame gets > focus. It's a minor issue but cannot be reproduced here with Emacs 25. > > It's easily possible that I introduced the bug myself but I don't recall > changing anything in this area. So if this rings a bell ... Sorry for a late response. In fact, not just the mode line was missing, but the entire frame contents was not displayed, just an empty frame. No bells rang here, but the patch below solves this for me. Does it make sense? (Don't ask me how it works on emacs-25, it looks like some lucky coincidence with timing of the WM_PAINT message and the way we set windows_or_buffers_changed.) diff --git a/src/w32term.c b/src/w32term.c index e8d66c9..ae0f741 100644 --- a/src/w32term.c +++ b/src/w32term.c @@ -4628,11 +4628,18 @@ w32_read_socket (struct terminal *terminal, } else { - HDC hdc = get_frame_dc (f); + /* Erase background again for safety. But don't do + that if the frame's 'garbaged' flag is set, since + in that case expose_frame will do nothing, and if + the various redisplay flags happen to be unset, + we are left with a blank frame. */ + if (!FRAME_GARBAGED_P (f)) + { + HDC hdc = get_frame_dc (f); - /* Erase background again for safety. */ - w32_clear_rect (f, hdc, &msg.rect); - release_frame_dc (f, hdc); + w32_clear_rect (f, hdc, &msg.rect); + release_frame_dc (f, hdc); + } expose_frame (f, msg.rect.left, msg.rect.top, diff --git a/src/xdisp.c b/src/xdisp.c index c045ced..1420a4a 100644 --- a/src/xdisp.c +++ b/src/xdisp.c @@ -14116,6 +14116,7 @@ redisplay_internal (void) if (f->updated_p) { f->redisplay = false; + f->garbaged = false; mark_window_display_accurate (f->root_window, true); if (FRAME_TERMINAL (f)->frame_up_to_date_hook) FRAME_TERMINAL (f)->frame_up_to_date_hook (f); From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 20 12:10:35 2016 Received: (at 24642) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2016 17:10:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8VdT-0008Rc-OP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:10:35 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:52816) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8VdR-0008RH-SO for 24642@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:10:34 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.96]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5r89-1cwbBi07uj-00xtHc; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:10:27 +0100 Message-ID: <5831D8FA.6090709@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:10:18 +0100 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#24642: 26.0.50; Missing mode-line on initial frame References: <57F91C19.1080204@gmx.at> <83k2by9l3i.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83k2by9l3i.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:nqbkSlKr3g6UMSYL+/GSzBR5WtPjeWOp3ZZZtAgpQxWomHNRT2b EvAs6LPQxaIZZa8Yq9EYm6fLY7snQdovlp408otGy3OVYENsWhLpyFsbFwkQirq8dWrzucY oPfvuuEo/be7V5p10Yg/Bv1jlZ/aySXcQDuKTDt/EhkqBaN6V+NsbgaZYf2nKPYbotTtuqr j/huqAua7x2mGbynnt1Gg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ADnEeVumf8M=:3wFh6kDnsUcZa6QZoEEBG2 x0w2y3KaURDHRl4XDGSCsS+yVNxLdMf+BZKkQ2B405YyTJ1e7rvzlkvV0uYn7aq8xZATHQY7F 2odjIYcSJ35wEdpbaJn8om68oj2QcL9JO/BKVeFwpYg1Hf7HEFeAIWQwEI2niDWYwLbp+ZVIR tIZZU5t32+JWAow3bRdZt3/2J0olu5Yt7pJxgRwHfuCaO5OlI/Ck+CizZ0mzp099hgthxr9Oa lDSUrbplCvGzlRFqeTuayhr+2OkpN2vFC3LMS+3IMxf06kfwZ5HgWyvpBU8WGGpRRm0oS7z9I VhCenMxuqd74uGjljBJ25fYFaiVNTo2plRVYf1D9axBs6J23ijfMvtlNblE+4lnmWfcgEodUc PQULOzUdvqL9NltUb/NlYJLoVmiyYSo8jLEWYr3XXCnmaXoHAd8x5I6OjOiJw4TJ+ZEIl1IIE Wqtnm25g/GT3RVMAd1D/uKBalbIGlB3p88dHbivdNkmA/XsV+vV0h8bGXbtLPRYV3sjfh+SIc H0y53o8KUHjoNPSlVnKz4kMFbzOok2Ab0cvNUz7GKaMZzbetCC9Fdbti0VBsp9uQEZ++9yyCq HNl2S3wptKaMDRDf5mFnW8X4PJ4zFTa5j9TXa4nhu1XQoWkoNyvr1Qg8SBU8ypzofjVAERvLJ WGGnDkOmQ5xLkZSZC1KRnO37KoeX7LeyLiMfWVaZgWI9QNvLMj4xDtW/BRj6QfRG1fGL+c3UQ 30EBG3BiLD4UvQx5PmMtTyVzXcL8LjPhMRaf7PR3DkguTZi0+/PgGlgba2Xt3n7TeNHLRcylC 2jGS9S2PosQnoIQFG0iLmWC8XsX+A== X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > In fact, not just the mode line was missing, but the entire frame > contents was not displayed, just an empty frame. Indeed. I didn't notice since the upper part was obscured by the other frame. > No bells rang here, but the patch below solves this for me. Does it > make sense? (Don't ask me how it works on emacs-25, it looks like > some lucky coincidence with timing of the WM_PAINT message and the way > we set windows_or_buffers_changed.) [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.96 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24642 Cc: 24642@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > In fact, not just the mode line was missing, but the entire frame > contents was not displayed, just an empty frame. Indeed. I didn't notice since the upper part was obscured by the other frame. > No bells rang here, but the patch below solves this for me. Does it > make sense? (Don't ask me how it works on emacs-25, it looks like > some lucky coincidence with timing of the WM_PAINT message and the way > we set windows_or_buffers_changed.) [...] Content analysis details: (2.6 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.21 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.21 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.3 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.96 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > In fact, not just the mode line was missing, but the entire frame > contents was not displayed, just an empty frame. Indeed. I didn't notice since the upper part was obscured by the other frame. > No bells rang here, but the patch below solves this for me. Does it > make sense? (Don't ask me how it works on emacs-25, it looks like > some lucky coincidence with timing of the WM_PAINT message and the way > we set windows_or_buffers_changed.) It solves the problem so please apply it. If it causes other problems, they will show up soon enough. Thanks for the fix, martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 20 12:29:58 2016 Received: (at 24642-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Nov 2016 17:29:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8VwE-0000Ya-1s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:29:58 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36462) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8VwC-0000YN-6y for 24642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:29:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8Vw3-00089J-Sl for 24642-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:29:50 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33698) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8Vw3-00089F-PP; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:29:47 -0500 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1779 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c8Vw3-0006tL-4S; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:29:47 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:29:57 +0200 Message-Id: <83a8cu9i0a.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: martin rudalics In-reply-to: <5831D8FA.6090709@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:10:18 +0100) Subject: Re: bug#24642: 26.0.50; Missing mode-line on initial frame References: <57F91C19.1080204@gmx.at> <83k2by9l3i.fsf@gnu.org> <5831D8FA.6090709@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24642-done Cc: 24642-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) > Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 18:10:18 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 24642@debbugs.gnu.org > > > No bells rang here, but the patch below solves this for me. Does it > > make sense? (Don't ask me how it works on emacs-25, it looks like > > some lucky coincidence with timing of the WM_PAINT message and the way > > we set windows_or_buffers_changed.) > > It solves the problem so please apply it. Done. From unknown Thu Aug 14 21:49:58 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 12:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator