Subject: Re: bug#24594: 24.5; `variable-pitch-mode': accept FACE arg instead of hardcoding the face

From: [email-masked]
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 20:16:12 -0400

severity 24594 wishlist
quit

Drew Adams <[email-masked]> writes:
>> I don't really see why the function should be called variable-pitch-mode any
>> more.  Maybe select-buffer-face? IIUC this wouldn't have anything to do with
>> variable pitches any more, except for the default value, maybe?
>
> Agreed.  Unless there is some particular use for limiting the accepted
> FACE to variable-pitch faces.  In that case, additional logic/control
> would be needed.

Doesn't this already exist as buffer-face-set?