GNU bug report logs - #24585
25.1; avoid hack in ggtags.el to run compilation-auto-jump timer

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2016 04:58:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: moreinfo

Found in version 25.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 24585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> IRO.UMontreal.CA>
To: Leo Liu <sdl.web <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 24585 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24585: 25.1;
 avoid hack in ggtags.el to run compilation-auto-jump timer
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 09:24:50 -0400
>> IIUC this patch just changes the ordering for same-time timers.
>> Relying on either ordering is itself a hack.  We need a better solution.
> If you eval (progn (run-with-timer 0 ...)  ; timer 1
>                    (run-with-timer 0 ...)) ; timer 2
> you expect timer 1 to be triggered first, no?

Not really.  I think any code which relies on such a property will
sooner suffer.

>> What are those two timers whose relative execution order matters?
>> Why do they care in which order they're run?
> The first timer is compilation-auto-jump which is installed (by compile)
> at the start of compilation.
> The second timer is a cleanup timer which is installed (by ggtags) when
> compilation finishes and there is 0 or 1 match.
> The second timer kills the buffer (among other things) that the first
> timer depends on.

So we can fix the bug by making the timer's code check if the buffer is
still live?


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 227 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.