From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:12:04 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24583 <24583@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24583 <24583@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: Xpra compatibility Reply-To: bug#24583 <24583@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 14:12:04 +0000 retitle 24583 Xpra compatibility reassign 24583 emacs submitter 24583 "Eugene J." severity 24583 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 01 11:53:41 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2016 15:53:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41282 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqMbc-0006SP-Jp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 11:53:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49250) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqJkW-0001jr-1h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:50:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqJkP-0005Or-4A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:50:34 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:44923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqJkP-0005ON-0U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:50:33 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40221) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqJkM-0004PH-VX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:50:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqJkL-0005NS-J4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:50:30 -0400 Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]:35547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bqJkL-0005N0-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 08:50:29 -0400 Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 192so126058073vkl.2 for ; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 05:50:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mRlrsXeeAkws+gK8eK267spaepMy1Ps9pL0YRKYnsr0=; b=smHnphL4DskqG2VvrQiN+oUaxyHdfa/qhADkN0VeFDUZqvxIzjFVAqTGZoXmd9SOgc 28nCx88EEApqCFJ1sAKyJugqUqSKxjvTIGVg8LlBGeBCdgtuBh4XFCkan5hdNd6AikIT vKppK+cynsx0c559Zlm40/iZ1KPmqGMcAbR9ZjlryicVqPrDR0GouHMHpF/BPh2W6Th7 8dtQC0T8heAsHwZ7K+83YUQhimYazmpEG8c8+h+rNPc6abMDmvI6z3e1ZfRJ1ObxV2Ny 8oZ6tqkhPJcx6Z2uxp4EYu0nJ6XjctOeVnZqS8t6xeB+cuSicqbRPCDMHFzse/aoeQY+ w9bw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mRlrsXeeAkws+gK8eK267spaepMy1Ps9pL0YRKYnsr0=; b=BvbhBjurv22bAEsl5opWw8fqEkR9r9s6/5DhUsZspanoSjB+T6VRZWma/723Xe//hI FyDr8q6KYx9Tnk09wuycDswdg6cw1biV1AE9m58hhvH/Vat8s9Wag8GtbS8gQ8AJmlbr oDztNh1mVc2npv98fjnXovJgLHWkANjmvFbjbepcrXcVqrXpzo2w8Bun7SIFWfaRse4e 3UbtXqPdQ3fkbbnUGwcmwy0PM+gkAK+lQbWyXjeaHjBvNo34cPRyVLty/qayaW0wVV+C AxckdPwznjyOiD0lgG6B5d+fajNjF8E/zRSoeSBEKcak1Ua71oAefX8jPphgVGTpGRPT EOKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnddD4lSlx0Jn+jJ77V6rxuwnLqXGSCYhfRmi6Hm1QYpTXzAfQidKB895KLfLZB8q53QGn2rkF2Y/9Nyg== X-Received: by 10.31.166.213 with SMTP id p204mr7280817vke.16.1475326227923; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 05:50:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.38.70 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Oct 2016 05:50:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eugene J." Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2016 15:50:27 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Xpra compatibility To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11425cbabe4a42053dcd2770 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 11:53:38 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --001a11425cbabe4a42053dcd2770 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 All recent versions of Emacs seems to have the bug ( http://xpra.org/trac/ticket/1327) when used with xpra. If you have any insight to share it will be greatly appreciated. --001a11425cbabe4a42053dcd2770 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
=C2=A0All = recent versions of Emacs seems to have the bug (ht= tp://xpra.org/trac/ticket/1327) when used with xpra.

If you have any insight to share it will be greatly appreciated.
--001a11425cbabe4a42053dcd2770-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Oct 01 14:49:57 2016 Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2016 18:49:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqPMD-00028K-CT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:49:57 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:58634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqPMA-000284-1V for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 14:49:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.54]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDQp3-1bgq3C17wT-00GrRz; Sat, 01 Oct 2016 20:49:47 +0200 Message-ID: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2016 20:49:42 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eugene J." , 24583@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:UP8MXCPR2tWJP3aTfrPFyvHC9su2gyIjEEMVWzxQMlq0uSlJ5UN yltpf0SmiRoaWetqBgcnFw7v3zqj9M4Dg8JEDCEcoRnmdibAEJW0QS8Mk8BnkLv4+wspsbz qwDZ7Yc+sbSs6eh9TGI6JAD7SFYSitq6ZmPnUhSXCHAbpIFIwZKTMGp36oo2MeOgB7JDfSB sEO7tM4Vj2fsh3mchLG5A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xtHpjyvzxRs=:QBvMa8GcG8aj+pvrxHG+Et XuYB6RGTDylInDcyp/kTTY/aHJJH+XhywEBYkjOZDgltmmOKGF3iJRkSE9WblLw/P1DjZx1RQ hgkHWMkDH7i3cbFcWHewStBl8O/p1ArIHpZJ8xkBD5GYO45Q4SoXNEbC209FerJa9QbkvVCKO gR3c5uguNlXix0cMi0xy7c5dGm8bzy20cF+PYAlDbTaOLXVqyb5lt2DtiV9d+5EJSuFGwCnli 1UPnTzyHPY6zeR1Uqgdbjspk1p56qyXOnZO+zQcdHYR/LJKKWIYb+/ijoVkMowAlu3mx6nUvo 0xeffbonchR4ST+LHA4XWYFfJRmydQCVwt4u0SHHqLmBhsX9fgRLIS09sSsTecw++dyfV4Rtw 5kQljqBXzDB4tBkllnyBCF1Hoa7WlupftbV/fQOZKbeyDonkETol6u+QL21CV/d3iIO6QuXoC PawfsLBxenwOTsfVHlXUFoju/D/UTVIWId4pLa6uNFinYfV1OoRGKrVZqUOFYvp/2djw568s0 4uZfkFh94oNpO0T8oU1NqeAv6d5P54UMrbyyZUFy6Shfl2XX/hPY9Cze/wCzjrlmvmXXsSC9v CF1YdUGcr7DZCNNIh546rp9CyE75Gd400NOhQpO1siQV2rMDI7J4PNW4USGkJaCkSouiYDc6S nhZOga9OgbeX9CQrsZvL6OqVtUlv+NARea3HqcYERVaGdBttC6f+uDSzGUjh/RCVTIPM4/1fk B6GxHLf/659LQdai53/RALw8tVgQv4eMRSgRtA6Eez9n8OnjynlqPI4xqW88Opv3V63IJeaNR PAXvypxFaZRXqfdMd+dhyIlFCgfrA== X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) > All recent versions of Emacs seems to have the bug ( > http://xpra.org/trac/ticket/1327) when used with xpra. > > If you have any insight to share it will be greatly appreciated. Can you try with =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 set to t? martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 02 04:29:38 2016 Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2016 08:29:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41497 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqc9S-0005S6-2V for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 04:29:38 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:63844) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqc9Q-0005Ru-Mn for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 04:29:37 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MJGFi-1btNIp42jy-002qSP; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 10:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: <57F0C565.6070209@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 10:29:25 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eugene J." , 24583@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility References: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ismk/l4446O6dV2+FTQ6XExaIzUQmDkxJ6+DRJEaIq9Dcu88oHy dCVSVDtwbbCcjq76PMpM4ientsApPPLZWTqTTVbmR47Bbqhp9iPC2ynwMBtuEkhw+tyHCRE wDEsWQYpBU8VadM8F05nEd0zX3FuQMtOySb51vbrwV8F9dlUtXZUoEChlbJcszZWFeEFhiS QQuXwVYJoobR0UDZj/XQA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:e4vAkjJiPaQ=:4OdUjgYIBmxl5oQweKQIyv LffilKKTjEcVh7vq3EN5oKCiZAyNY+DzK08zeMwhuDoih2Mz77lX6inrlOZzLfp/g50DXI4u7 Bb3/eo8/mGShjKGsHkObb6+hx3g6wFmsJ38e0tOFR/d0+J9atrrvPnKacXVun4Wc/CIneRVvG rm+C8W+4nF09el4UJmwUcnuKg83cgVwF89H85WhRZO3al/X3YZnGPPs1M1swUdm9bTsr8CxxN qZ3McfTKDttusZbpHNE/V0tG2/Bhkw6BlX2UY8jo6HC+kl7+sUQ/9CBmyKZOFnv1uCVe0984J x6oR00wuOqKZa8V8cbPSbkggW32RPH1wMn91E6E7zsAHqbA0/REJoe3/mIOfzf8kRjBreLvDJ AvUVHZ4jWe5k/IOgi0/FweV3lqSRKaZlNfNqlZ/WI/SZMJ6mTy90lIEpCE0qRk7kUSTEZ6ta0 giaRCTLYZZ6LtMbEuvhMcIL41thti8MfoCTToUC4xDNOPxH3oatq5ApcztNLXxF+BSoK8DUGF DT5ek0h9MlTDtI6xne9jy9/Ad/DmfaEPzdnOA+slwX+cT6zIB5FKXd2s/WU/PX2CTRNZB0arF sjDZwa3xxpN1secgnrGjU2dS31AAlt6cYjL4sEdPBqb2kxvPhR979xfVDjJDuXPJbeeh6Mr1w rHfajFCQL12bdmR0hxj1GhwT4HuOsf9ffxDUZSxuS/icSOdNhZEda0cS3tcAaS98zkaF/pP4/ iA8YjT8w3hNJNj2/5lSmLk/X3NC7I0hcxXOmxRAtwgNwtaWQ9N2qkTrrwBPsGaEgZL0R/be20 vPrhvl5yX4ofbSQb400GrPMPNK+Qw== X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Thank you very much. It helped! Please keep the bug number cc'd! > Actually I tried it once before but I forgot to restart Emacs after > changing it :( [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.70 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Thank you very much. It helped! Please keep the bug number cc'd! > Actually I tried it once before but I forgot to restart Emacs after > changing it :( [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.70 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record > Thank you very much. It helped! Please keep the bug number cc'd! > Actually I tried it once before but I forgot to restart Emacs after > changing it :( Doesn't the next frame you create after setting this already exhibit the intended pixelwise behavior? Size hints are such a pain ... martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 02 05:26:53 2016 Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2016 09:26:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41525 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd2q-0006q6-Vz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:26:53 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:64124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqd2p-0006pr-Ak for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 05:26:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.70]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LzbXq-1amzVG1Eqg-014kG1; Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:26:44 +0200 Message-ID: <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 11:26:39 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eugene J." Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility References: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> <57F0C565.6070209@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:R82j1yuXV/DPs00u5QL49iUlrmnE8DvQIPWuKOzWFb6BcL4Pnqs RtgBHYC2ruiEn0VUq78hMkgRKWrfgpILCxTflAjRQuPnwljQYdOCV0jXP9uP9stsDjBtykQ 3VF8QlSRv38YkT5svfQZaCZZldr5mARvaPh6m4XWx0CtIbVeTBln5wYUj+A7WcQGV/BZESm c7uLcCe+LaR6xSGZuGwrw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:e89MTJVg1Oc=:UhLDPUUeGEIJtBaV7SXCPj yjYgaxptGbDa+SUKDgot0u0kkLsXhZIceNwuCFHbvtTkMmxnVXH9gXKDLD2pg3R29oyOfItpo R7nTgnC08iScTUL3d0fRp0CYeS0ER9RMhsGrkRWVaW9O/ow+KPNaBaUTE2AXASpBouiLvBCa2 1d2uIx2MAafZegNIZOk8hiJYpWESkOzAmjdgFjK/fjxSixgVpWPtQoDN6t6Rah0Ar1XBYznLA 9pA9QiTDFPPQkNRZPp4fvqxZJ6KpM8EYV/NhBdkAy7Q7phiD8yQjEa+8P9tVh1Y71YVmgvXjC nWGveKacFrp+OeYF9WmKW9T4rf3vR4yA2orpvPzbnVmzqKJqLHsTUd9t6hK02gtbaJSt3oGdZ +bcTe9JuUtfwrv41a+dFcH8m5ZO9NzSjBMsxrpcn3n6ZqH6MofxOxNCUjwdi/yH+sI01u2JMC WltndELMq4jnmyYqb03y58Yay2NI8cdKO2xExJnBtQhwphl/DhBtRRu6e3RxsLZr7gMXMoSu3 y/heb02aIgMMw2h7LooHYFfjbPuew6HktvxYN3AM0MtcQG6XIpjujYvY1QuRDD3T0z5dg769m /snU1N8GmAmIEd11OpJIFr/ToyGxghQIzt890rIx+rq1ns4IzLLjmr8gm+8KTNnzeOnkcg9Za 24Q+3m0spNS9BKFW2+rzYzbWNX19SkpTCEqz8jURnwryFhvP6opBGG+FbJ1rS4h4sS/pdp5oH V8o4e8q8NWkpTl7+WopHDVqHb/BC2JdCKNoP1r1AYGD2rVoYabIxIhA5g8ONOSdSAQMbog8j/ YpDKijFRIcQ5RVIgTWhPW1CewwIhg== X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Please do CC to 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before. This might be of interest for other people as well. > Yes new frame doesn't glitch. But existing frames do, correct? [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.70 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583 Cc: 24583@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Please do CC to 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before. This might be of interest for other people as well. > Yes new frame doesn't glitch. But existing frames do, correct? [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.70 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record Please do CC to 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before. This might be of interest for other people as well. > Yes new frame doesn't glitch. But existing frames do, correct? What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80=99= for such an existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2= =80=99 to t, obviously. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Oct 03 15:02:10 2016 Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2016 19:02:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43318 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1br8V8-0003jE-IT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:02:10 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com ([209.85.217.178]:36084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bqyq5-0003KH-W0 for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 04:43:10 -0400 Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id n13so144181424uaa.3 for <24583@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 01:43:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=7+u91etjd8w+WCwcc9qfhsHQMGVl4ZpBTsRyTOkZLJk=; b=k+4eMvJ5NzQdh0DSR4OxjtXPv5Mk1wn4nVN9EDvDDGwh3U1tSOnCCEPC65zukBw0Es hafnCxkgIeZTjkojD6OFHga++EheVQAxpFWQuOkvL+5MBh99dvIqveNFUg5Fk2BKizlq 322Ky8YvVBt1REKdo+hgPaP0nBx4YnPLU7PW3uOOTC9kfPJlcVBkFeFfN8UnkoNoVQ7G +o8CUFSPihbTUb02A1tcAxTvGCB6E7uRFrlNshC8i6H7oLMVkI5HAAhv2n92zoLyO2R5 r0gMoJAi0uoPa3RHoXduGNKV/4sXj2PxosXQiOJfDkUQU1C9knl/lJWLrLS+JsHSO6TD a8iA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=7+u91etjd8w+WCwcc9qfhsHQMGVl4ZpBTsRyTOkZLJk=; b=OWFvYNe7jH9KcZHgHLnF1zK2yKbiFbEVg/x62t+adtF370QVGBXILCo/qENcx7AnYR TcSCCeCQiMCL6ckkTZ32dwDGQ3xJJ/VMvw5ivKdAKne5BxjO6BWytQqYByDBay3w/jlo +48avE37pYx5rqIYtQ8PaOJtrtcPg3VfKXk06PUTFFg8pIroZGwAYyWCWoE8hQtjQGRV tgSO8drKzMFF90hxn5XnWHklkbKrDu3HKyo9sPAYSKlNBwNWmjsV7jyY49xhKf+1CidL McRg7N1WaKNt1N8O1Z3K/phOo4VQMlDV0u3mQKdIbJMP920D5Q7e4zcdzocUBhUxKgKp FQFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RkJx4Yn0fFJKLnaVELsrVanykBbz9HZLSu7d9FFUlnIlsQq2TgBPmh/89HmVBwncptNqsYjvm7OanrhsQ== X-Received: by 10.176.81.123 with SMTP id f56mr12737171uaa.23.1475484184479; Mon, 03 Oct 2016 01:43:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.55.233 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 01:43:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> References: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> <57F0C565.6070209@gmx.at> <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> From: "Eugene J." Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2016 11:43:04 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility To: martin rudalics , 24583@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:02:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) --94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > But existing frames do, correct? yes. When I set =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t only newly c= reated frames work properly. > What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80= =99 for such an >existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise= =E2=80=99 to t, >obviously. The frame magically starts to resize properly O_O On 2 October 2016 at 12:26, martin rudalics wrote: > Please do CC to 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before. This might be > of interest for other people as well. > > > Yes new frame doesn't glitch. > > But existing frames do, correct? > > What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80= =99 for such an > existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise= =E2=80=99 to t, > obviously. > > martin > > --94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>=C2=A0But existing fr= ames do, correct?
yes. When I s= et=C2=A0=C2=A0=E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t=C2=A0only newly created frames work properly.= =C2=A0

<= div>> What happens when you explicitly = call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80=99 for such an
>existing frame?=C2=A0 = After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwise=E2=80=99 to t,
>obvio= usly.
The fram= e magically starts to resize properly O_O

On 2 October 2016 at 12:26, martin rudali= cs <rudalics@gmx.at> wrote:
= Please do CC to = 24583@debbugs.gnu.org as I asked before.=C2=A0 This might be
of interest for other people as well.

> Yes new frame doesn't glitch.

 But existing frames do, correct?

What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80=99 = for such an
existing frame?=C2=A0 After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelwi= se=E2=80=99 to t,
obviously.

martin


--94eb2c1924feb00bf5053df1ee48-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Oct 04 02:49:34 2016 Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Oct 2016 06:49:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43669 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1brJXi-0000ZA-J8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 02:49:34 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:54576) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1brJXg-0000Ys-O6 for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 02:49:33 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.6]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LwaMR-1aptVa2G7T-018Ma0; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:49:25 +0200 Message-ID: <57F350ED.1080404@gmx.at> Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2016 08:49:17 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eugene J." , 24583@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility References: <57F00546.5000007@gmx.at> <57F0C565.6070209@gmx.at> <57F0D2CF.5080702@gmx.at> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Adn1BsH4sdzob1FQ2WJDlSjUn2wGub6R/Xb5yYx1YT6KI3BbdCt qJoKBtzTdk3E2cPPGqCJbE+cak7CiFZq3jHcJJW058keMms7IrNKSRn44CBBd2qvtLb+N9t WaZ2zifaxuq/womhc0Uh4oG2bCPbW/uzCna0+W21gpgBZWLZzYWSl5GXMG59u0N/o7FhRAX 4LXOXkvEBFBL77wX2rP1w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:pQv5Jb2/pn8=:c1ECY7jNRrHloWyAWicRaK o7iYk5bqaiLKLiHJog/YDC0izwhMR/3d/SNRgF1nkc64hO8Ojj3AYH2qV1YB4oHRFbSwuMLrB lQhQLdRA4Jqzr3HsgtsCcA5qlnOEnu8N+IDCNI42MUacT9c8CYyadr1BWTTmmgYAg0igiUFP3 HTfVAbEpN/VmVFSrLBOXmUJLoQ9luscL+KjsZYB9C/7gHFp+z0fK0lNgJnPfc3XbLnbmh9yhg zIFSz8S83Auhvv/qwlxdX9H/oxhmITPqUOCxhcoZ42WEG2EvRkalrI1wUQcR09b7jhmyfgZNO w290xqMSMQMdL4yPk1MkVn4KlpSHnC4lmSZ7xZuG9w6vMGxp6PxjCMq5knlfhK+vA87MLKvpz SvqhOX0KuhUK3+alU1iRTnkXdGyJfeirBJWFeoCSGwa0H183zy+WHh41y85/uRbu+Umc9iKoZ 3K5fw/t1xF7PxeVFepjBBuIujHUc5Lk4eHn6pX8ohbWgu4P5S7X7bH0mLGfL8Xo/GcWPSUo1a 3JR2M59qVBjvWu/+C0wvPiccZTzy0RhN5yrcV9+qjcGOuretqkSSd5RVeISxqxfEVkFwjNJNS TJlTUAVS84dIsGFV0/qFVx+3bBf0YrhMWgM1+MnCwcdi4wYR7vU/ynk9xEFIr/+jd5PF8iL/W 0fEX4Yj0XUJItovIzAO6xPTm2hcyeey6yBBjs9xAmTnnhS2W48bmCJ/UhlYoX9tcbwX4FHuE2 g25W9ogZh/7CS5zdY18BsSMys4ao+QN+rOSkYciY8d0cydyTZfx5fPWjlzW839L4izGB/4kXW uKogy+k0X7dh6ck1Bbizeo5G8l5Dg== X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> What happens when you explicitly call ‘x-wm-set-size-hint’ for such an >> existing frame? After having customized ‘frame-resize-pixelwise’ to t, >> obviously. > The frame magically starts to resize properly O_O [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.6 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: >> What happens when you explicitly call ‘x-wm-set-size-hint’ for such an >> existing frame? After having customized ‘frame-resize-pixelwise’ to t, >> obviously. > The frame magically starts to resize properly O_O [...] Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.15.15 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 3.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server [212.95.7.6 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.15.15 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record >> What happens when you explicitly call =E2=80=98x-wm-set-size-hint=E2=80= =99 for such an >> existing frame? After having customized =E2=80=98frame-resize-pixelw= ise=E2=80=99 to t, >> obviously. > The frame magically starts to resize properly O_O Interesting. Maybe I'll try to do that automatically although some platforms are known to misbehave ... /* Don't set hints when maximized or fullscreen. Apparently KWin = and Gtk3 don't get along and the frame shrinks (!). =2E.. and one author freely admitted that ... XSizeHints hints; /* Sometimes I hate X Windows... */ martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Nov 07 22:27:00 2019 Received: (at 24583) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2019 03:27:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44314 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSuvM-0001Bg-NM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 22:27:00 -0500 Received: from host.gofardesign.uk ([208.79.239.190]:56935) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iSuvL-0001BR-8e for 24583@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 22:26:59 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=bZz0/YGNZ3d69mICqQ0w6IrFxJHceQF0fAy1pKO7YQg=; b=f4OZbY35AM+kA9ZrKVsL7/MjmQ XbYB7Rlj+7XUEWsN4Md04HIK80LbyPlmEDzpTxFf8OUaRaIs+GeNHl0UnUikT2snTcpb7XP/AlxEd cAx9cEhVqhaKfWGkm3vYz+GKQKF7HleQ9zGQkGG6qG3wc/XNOo+B2unyMPssvwBmdciI=; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:55468 helo=localhost) by host.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iSuvF-0002NP-3z; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 21:26:53 -0600 From: Stefan Kangas To: "Eugene J." Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility In-Reply-To: (Eugene J.'s message of "Sat, 1 Oct 2016 15:50:27 +0300") References: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 04:26:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87k18bvyit.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: host.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583 Cc: 24583@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) "Eugene J." writes: > All recent versions of Emacs seems to have the bug > (http://xpra.org/trac/ticket/1327) when used with xpra. > > If you have any insight to share it will be greatly appreciated. >From reading the above ticket, the issue has been solved by xpra. It looks like the correct version to use is xpra 1.0 or later. Are you still seeing this issue? If I don't hear back from you within a couple of weeks, I'll just assume that this has since been resolved and close this bug. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Dec 05 06:18:56 2019 Received: (at 24583-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2019 11:18:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43138 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icp9s-0005Gk-Kj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 06:18:56 -0500 Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:44980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icp9p-0005GV-Ix for 24583-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 06:18:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WB8CX6jWCapCGx1KVeYClGDwgTRehgQQudSmpCgplTk=; b=cCH+bxsEaCZG+ZojLiePL5P4TZ LrOZ8Y9VvfyBJRuPT9tr6Fq7O+LL56KA1OUNOHhryzwTR/InmT1VSZmuWxkJZt4A/sxVVkgBCLsiU xsF+VMFlTD7uJ+rhzJqn0h6FpG9JQeuqdaOYYKXG0AuS0rP625slyx/OZSs1nUwXqcLsOGB2tZUB+ BwT1B62rKCmB/kv5xOO1XFUtTkkIiV0ajMqDw+beIY6OK++91GsW4hTIqmqUSgYjv3N3acIykwm4d +Ci8yc9FIB5uE5mXZLv7VUQV6AfedThihWo8GT1fMhLhG33406PtbTkmRYTRUzZxmFjNhrDxFDYja WL/nQ/hg==; Received: from h-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:45304 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1icp9k-001HWr-2s; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 06:18:48 -0500 From: Stefan Kangas To: "Eugene J." Subject: Re: bug#24583: Xpra compatibility In-Reply-To: <87k18bvyit.fsf@marxist.se> (Stefan Kangas's message of "Fri, 08 Nov 2019 04:26:50 +0100") References: <87k18bvyit.fsf@marxist.se> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:18:46 +0100 Message-ID: <8736dzggvd.fsf@marxist.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24583-done Cc: 24583-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Stefan Kangas writes: > "Eugene J." writes: > >> All recent versions of Emacs seems to have the bug >> (http://xpra.org/trac/ticket/1327) when used with xpra. >> >> If you have any insight to share it will be greatly appreciated. > >>>From reading the above ticket, the issue has been solved by xpra. It > looks like the correct version to use is xpra 1.0 or later. > > Are you still seeing this issue? If I don't hear back from you within > a couple of weeks, I'll just assume that this has since been resolved > and close this bug. More information was requested, but none was given within 4 weeks, so I'm going to assume this has been fixed and close this bug. If this is still an issue, please reply to this email (use "Reply to all" in your email client) and we can reopen the bug report. Best regards, Stefan Kangas From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:12:04 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2020 12:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator