GNU bug report logs -
#24560
25.1; With `--font 7x13', wrong font is used for Unicode characters
Previous Next
Full log
Message #57 received at 24560 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
>> Cc: thecybershadow <at> gmail.com, 24560 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2019 18:58:26 +0100
>>
>> So if somebody says explicitly --without-xft, then HAVE_XFT won't be
>> "yes", and we set HAVE_FREETYPE to "no" without checking. And harfbuzz
>> depends on HAVE_FREETYPE being "yes", so harfbuzz depends on xft being
>> available, too.
>>
>> Is this correct behaviour?
>
> Maybe I'm simply misremembering, and HarfBuzz does need xft.
I hacked the configure script to just say
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 0976b665e6..d42f530407 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -3399,6 +3399,9 @@ AC_DEFUN
fi
fi # $HAVE_CAIRO != yes
+ EMACS_CHECK_MODULES([FREETYPE], [freetype2])
+ test "$HAVE_FREETYPE" = "no" && AC_MSG_ERROR(libxft requires libfreetype)
+
HAVE_LIBOTF=no
if test "${HAVE_FREETYPE}" = "yes"; then
AC_DEFINE(HAVE_FREETYPE, 1,
to force
Does Emacs use HarfBuzz? yes
Does Emacs use -lm17n-flt? yes
Does Emacs use -lotf? yes
Does Emacs use -lxft? no
and compilation does indeed fail:
In file included from ftfont.c:46:
ftfont.h:77:3: error: unknown type name ‘XftFont’
XftFont *xftfont;
^~~~~~~
>> In addition, I think the configure script should fail if you say
>> --with-harfbuzz and harfbuzz isn't available.
>
> Probably.
I've now added that, at least.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 32 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.