GNU bug report logs - #24539
[PATCH] Add require statement to example code for generaetors

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 24539 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 24539 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add require statement to example code for generaetors
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:37:44 -0400

From ef390eecf8ed547236c39ad99d715f4e690204ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:34:42 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Add require statement to example code

* doc/lispref/control.texi (Generators): Since generator is not
  autoloaded, we weren't documenting where this functionality is
  defined.
---
 doc/lispref/control.texi | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/doc/lispref/control.texi b/doc/lispref/control.texi
index 0cdb035..0198644 100644
--- a/doc/lispref/control.texi
+++ b/doc/lispref/control.texi
@@ -805,6 +805,8 @@ Generators
 working with iterators.

 @example
+(require 'generator)
+
 (iter-defun my-iter (x)
   (iter-yield (1+ (iter-yield (1+ x))))
    ;; Return normally
-- 
2.10.0

Message #10 received at 24539-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
Cc: 24539-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24539: [PATCH] Add require statement to example code for
 generaetors
Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 16:45:52 +0300

> From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:37:44 -0400
> 
> >From ef390eecf8ed547236c39ad99d715f4e690204ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:34:42 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] Add require statement to example code
> 
> * doc/lispref/control.texi (Generators): Since generator is not
>   autoloaded, we weren't documenting where this functionality is
>   defined.

Thanks, pushed.

Message #13 received at 24539-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 24539-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24539: [PATCH] Add require statement to example code for
 generaetors
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 14:39:42 -0400

Thank you :)

On 8 October 2016 at 09:45, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>> From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
>> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:37:44 -0400
>>
>> >From ef390eecf8ed547236c39ad99d715f4e690204ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
>> Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 10:34:42 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] Add require statement to example code
>>
>> * doc/lispref/control.texi (Generators): Since generator is not
>>   autoloaded, we weren't documenting where this functionality is
>>   defined.
>
> Thanks, pushed.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.