GNU bug report logs - #24439
ispell.el; cutom setting `ispell-library-directory'; patch

Previous Next

Full log

Message #17 received at 24439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Laimonas Vėbra <laimonas.vebra <at> yahoo.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 24439 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24439: ispell.el; cutom setting `ispell-library-directory';
 patch
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 19:51:37 +0300

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> What I meant specifically is to use the -d switch to tell ispell where
> to look for the dictionaries.  The -d switch accepts absolute file
> names, AFAIR, and will not try to look in ispell-library-directory for
> such absolute file names.

-d doesn't work, because of this code:

;; Include if the dictionary is in the library, or dir not defined.
(if (and
name
;; For Aspell, we already know which dictionaries exist.
(or ispell-really-aspell
;; Include all dictionaries if lib directory not known.
;; Same for Hunspell, where ispell-library-directory is nil.
(not ispell-library-directory)
(file-exists-p (concat ispell-library-directory
"/" dict-bname ".hash"))
(file-exists-p (concat ispell-library-directory
"/" dict-bname ".has"))))
(push name dict-list)))


> If that doesn't help, then maybe I don't understand what problem,
> exactly, are you trying to solve.  What bad things happen if you don't
> change the value of ispell-library-directory from its default?

Then it's not possible to add custom dictionaries (when using cygwin 
ispell) or dictionaries from other directory, than 
`ispell-library-directory', because they are ommited by 
`ispell-valid-dictionary-alist'.

> Even if the dictionaries that are arguments of the -d switch are given
> as absolute file names?  If so, maybe that's the problem that needs
> fixing.

Yes.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.