GNU bug report logs - #24374
Favour docstrings for Guile functions

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 24374 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 24374 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: Favour docstrings for Guile functions
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 22:34:23 -0400

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Guile has many well-documented functions that use docstring conventions,
but aren't actual docstrings.

This patch changes them to use proper docstrings. I've fixed a few typos,
and tweaked the wording on peek, but otherwise the documentation is
unchanged.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[0001-Favor-docstrings-for-describing-the-purpose-of-funct.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #10 received at 24374-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk>
Cc: 24374-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24374: Favour docstrings for Guile functions
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 10:10:45 +0100

On Tue 06 Sep 2016 04:34, Wilfred Hughes <me <at> wilfred.me.uk> writes:

> Guile has many well-documented functions that use docstring conventions, but aren't actual docstrings.
>
> This patch changes them to use proper docstrings. I've fixed a few typos, and tweaked the wording on peek, but otherwise the documentation is unchanged.

Applied.  Thank you very much!

Andy

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.