GNU bug report logs - #24313
[PATCH] Add tests for dom.el

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:27:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Done: Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#24313: closed ([PATCH] Add tests for dom.el)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:39:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:38:00 +0200
with message-id <1472402280.5159.0 <at> smtp.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#24313: [PATCH] Add tests for dom.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #24313,
regarding [PATCH] Add tests for dom.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
24313: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24313
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg <at> gmail.com>
To: larsi <at> gnus.org
Cc: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add tests for dom.el
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:26:10 +0200
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Hello,

I saw that dom.el didn't have any tests, so I wrote some.

Do they look okay to add?

-- Simen
[0001-Add-tests-for-dom.el.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Simen Heggestøyl <simenheg <at> gmail.com>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>
Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
 24313-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24313: [PATCH] Add tests for dom.el
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 18:38:00 +0200
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Michael Albinus 
<michael.albinus <at> gmx.de> wrote:
> It depends. Likely you are right, but sometimes it might be worth to
> note also what is NOT covered by a test, or to mention possible side
> effects which are tested implicitely. But it is your decision, of 
> course.

I agree with you. I went over the tests once more with this in mind and
found one instance which I think was worth a comment, but still think
the rest are trivial enough to stand on their own.

I've installed the tests with the changes you suggested last time.

Thanks again for your time.

-- Simen



This bug report was last modified 8 years and 266 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.