From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 21 13:16:22 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2016 17:16:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36045 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWMA-00071m-HG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37884) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWM8-00071a-NI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWM2-0004BS-AH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:15 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:54474) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWM2-0004BO-7K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWLz-0001q5-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWLv-0004Av-K1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:10 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:62371) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbWLv-0004Ar-AI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:16:07 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.48]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MRjd7-1bhkXn031V-00T0cr for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:16:06 +0200 Message-ID: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:15:59 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bug-Gnu-Emacs Subject: 25.1; (next-frame nil t) crashes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5je6ZzKZdvr8CSwIZ12jb5q2vOOXX+bRv5ohqZOcYhmKOIFeTSY LRNzrLekZAnGh0gx4JgNck6meAFljhi0F0aN8DgZYH4RXbICyGP2iYCI6Lvb1YbSWXC16AP dmAV1nDDcWON5kfOWzKiOF7I1t47fxGfM3VQd8uE1wM17QMQNovgCl6ut177WGZmwOPIWPp KvKyf4Rz0M8LhVlsmLohQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+78TR4v0b0M=:xR8e+xnB/YNPhRD7m4gY7U T6soAjc9/NPtIAbAy8HjN2ZC6L2eqO6alb+q/FG0IyiVfaACsM1nr+050mdxzAHFLW2iIWoOy pomknPphcQe9l+Z0B0Dw2NQlUBosm2bRo3Jr1Xv426wB7RuXzD6Kc15/XDRIPsm6qDWNIYt4h vy0tVCN9QLtI5Ud3sn5zgktRm5C62JV2ZvyU/QWD4LJeb6XleEqnWXHGlbPtq/kaEI0JKp4R6 61zo0WoFOfb2EDg4woXqHs5drlwIbI2EOBbBeeaLmRay+3qSzHfk9EZMIxLPwtOfUGnjvo5dN Vg5ok7mzddsbohQlbprSACuiXozjAcqGCEgHnZyS9l9TreebzdTyNurl0ZDt9Ao2V3qMDKArm KcNsnb3zugL4oVoldPdb8Xi4ei7ZiPQflywxGbEdCNIJTv/vlmhOvYc1yk+OiAzc2373f6QSG ZnEKZ3lEWpDgUpwF/rrWLrKl9rmEfQxDOGEPWnBzXW7gcqXhJ5yCDKP1MZZvuoeWqebw1qSXF RgbDpotG+S+JGoxvxt6a/+/xvAvkS9BjBAmShS2KmGlpn02Y+9jbv9YzTMg065oHEzGx+CK9k AkeChazz1YNBtXO865HJ/xqW3I/at1hntg06FhAhyuhhf2i15D9O36BvAFpHz7eGfOrE5v7JW dc3tEDJGRseob/jg6Y3Ypubxsfi/D4IV/bskZww2QGgPYZB4+acxtyrRtFqurAgEo5aXan37Q g4bhkR3YbmBg8eclro/GkwvPV1jGRpktDHpyj6RGKwaebNv+h1MsSe6OKutN/C0KBqUp0QwZf 6bKwL/LF0w1SxO0/ostBQJQPonqUw== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.1 (----) With emacs -Q evaluating (next-frame nil t) currently crashes as: (gdb) bt #0 terminate_due_to_signal (sig=22, backtrace_limit=2147483647) at emacs.c:354 #1 0x011f1adf in die (msg=0x1642607 "0 <= n", file=0x1642600 "lisp.h", line=916) at alloc.c:7223 #2 0x01143da3 in XFASTINT (a=...) at lisp.h:916 #3 0x0101794f in candidate_frame (candidate=..., frame=..., minibuf=...) at frame.c:1311 #4 0x01017a53 in next_frame (frame=..., minibuf=...) at frame.c:1338 #5 0x01017f06 in Fnext_frame (frame=..., miniframe=...) at frame.c:1396 #6 0x0121e882 in eval_sub (form=...) at eval.c:2169 #7 0x0121d9f5 in Feval (form=..., lexical=...) at eval.c:1988 #8 0x0122085f in Ffuncall (nargs=3, args=0x82e0e8) at eval.c:2696 #9 0x0127d391 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=..., vector=..., maxdepth=..., args_template=..., nargs=1, args=0x82e690) at bytecode.c:880 #10 0x01221620 in funcall_lambda (fun=..., nargs=1, arg_vector=0x82e688) at eval.c:2855 #11 0x01220c2e in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x82e680) at eval.c:2742 #12 0x0127d391 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=..., vector=..., maxdepth=..., args_template=..., nargs=1, args=0x82ed78) at bytecode.c:880 #13 0x01221620 in funcall_lambda (fun=..., nargs=1, arg_vector=0x82ed70) at eval.c:2855 #14 0x01220c2e in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x82ed68) at eval.c:2742 #15 0x01212c52 in Ffuncall_interactively (nargs=2, args=0x82ed68) at callint.c:252 #16 0x012206cf in Ffuncall (nargs=3, args=0x82ed60) at eval.c:2673 #17 0x01215e4e in Fcall_interactively (function=..., record_flag=..., keys=...) at callint.c:840 #18 0x012208b6 in Ffuncall (nargs=4, args=0x82f1c8) at eval.c:2700 #19 0x0127d391 in exec_byte_code (bytestr=..., vector=..., maxdepth=..., args_template=..., nargs=1, args=0x82f780) at bytecode.c:880 #20 0x01221620 in funcall_lambda (fun=..., nargs=1, arg_vector=0x82f778) at eval.c:2855 #21 0x01220c2e in Ffuncall (nargs=2, args=0x82f770) at eval.c:2742 #22 0x0121ff7f in call1 (fn=..., arg1=...) at eval.c:2552 #23 0x011515c3 in command_loop_1 () at keyboard.c:1479 #24 0x0121b4f2 in internal_condition_case (bfun=0x1150af7 , handlers=..., hfun=0x114fd8f ) at eval.c:1309 #25 0x01150591 in command_loop_2 (ignore=...) at keyboard.c:1107 #26 0x0121a696 in internal_catch (tag=..., func=0x1150555 , arg=...) at eval.c:1074 #27 0x01150517 in command_loop () at keyboard.c:1086 #28 0x0114f7a7 in recursive_edit_1 () at keyboard.c:692 #29 0x0114fa68 in Frecursive_edit () at keyboard.c:763 #30 0x0114d17e in main (argc=2, argv=0xa32658) at emacs.c:1626 Lisp Backtrace: "next-frame" (0x82ded0) "eval" (0x82e0f0) "elisp--eval-last-sexp" (0x82e688) "eval-last-sexp" (0x82ed70) "funcall-interactively" (0x82ed68) "call-interactively" (0x82f1d0) "command-execute" (0x82f778) (gdb) In GNU Emacs 25.1.1 (i686-pc-mingw32) of 2016-08-18 built on MACHNO Repository revision: 8c2946e29b38fa3e0dff6b4d402ba0fda0e03c9b Windowing system distributor 'Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600 Configured using: 'configure --prefix=/c/emacs-git/next --with-wide-int --enable-checking=yes --enable-check-lisp-object-type=yes 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g3'' Looks like an almost four years old bug. Still I think we should install the below _before_ the release. --- a/src/frame.c +++ b/src/frame.c @@ -1308,7 +1308,7 @@ candidate_frame (Lisp_Object candidate, Lisp_Object frame, Lisp_Object minibuf) FRAME_FOCUS_FRAME (c))) return candidate; } - else if (XFASTINT (minibuf) == 0) + else if (INTEGERP (minibuf) && XINT (minibuf) == 0) { if (FRAME_VISIBLE_P (c) || FRAME_ICONIFIED_P (c)) return candidate; martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 21 14:50:37 2016 Received: (at 24281) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2016 18:50:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbXpN-0000ok-7i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:50:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49243) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbXpL-0000oX-8t for 24281@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:50:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbXpB-0001ds-87 for 24281@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:50:30 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49453) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbXpB-0001dS-5J; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:50:25 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4639 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bbXp7-0006xi-CS; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:50:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:50:18 +0300 Message-Id: <83shtyardh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: martin rudalics In-reply-to: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:15:59 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#24281: 25.1; (next-frame nil t) crashes References: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24281 Cc: 24281@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) > Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:15:59 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > > Looks like an almost four years old bug. Still I think we should install > the below _before_ the release. If it's such an old bug, why before the release? We will never release Emacs 25.1 this way. "There's always one more bug." Please push to master. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 21 19:52:37 2016 Received: (at 24281) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Aug 2016 23:52:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36297 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbcXd-0004Uf-1N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:52:37 -0400 Received: from mail.workgrouplinux.net ([207.195.177.82]:33082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbcXb-0004UU-1P for 24281@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:52:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=cochranmail.com; h=from:to :cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=dkim1; bh=MvkIIBqvX+7PGB4kWtAPM5z25iY=; b=CJdPy /gHAA258N9Az8nJBz5TULXhhq/Iur2IBE84YsXQ+e3TU1j8bYKH2vImzNz4+tXYl K8s3byjF8G8D5UgibV4cETwxW6UvDAI2Bedx0x5duqXgYygSV2KcfrISwNYTqOxE IEtSJzciSI9Vf9T+KnxxNGzQVkMYhBvYZZcf3cpDFRT/AuOfSS3/WFczXYv/1lLr 0kftTDoLr1ljQJ8WKGk+l9oO3veXGBeAuLtEhgYdK3VstFU0Kwr+wCIV+SPERqde 4b3Xu5hT6PMnhkQ77nDMj5GD+W1IQVVzjpQVyrA0k/HKOKP/CdSNcos962jA/ll6 AW07BquLy1cdhYaqg== Received: (qmail 5749 invoked by uid 0); 21 Aug 2016 23:52:32 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=private; d=cochranmail.com; b=dBQFYXMt2KrSKSDfi3EMWtbvuMX8FjUab/RpOJbbGb3eNNY+nj5DOyMKY3XsGxb0sfgxMonXqsbaofXzaPAaCw==; Received: from 131-191-86-130.as.clicknet.org (HELO SoraLaptop) (robert@cochranmail.com@131.191.86.130) by mail.cochrantribe.org with ESMTPA; 21 Aug 2016 23:52:32 -0000 From: Robert Cochran To: martin rudalics Subject: Re: bug#24281: 25.1; (next-frame nil t) crashes References: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:52:28 -0700 In-Reply-To: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:15:59 +0200") Message-ID: <87fupxaddv.fsf@cochranmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24281 Cc: 24281@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) martin rudalics writes: > With emacs -Q evaluating (next-frame nil t) currently crashes: *snip* That didn't crash with git a4ba426d ("* lisp/emacs-lisp/map.el (map--dispatch): Fix docstring") on my system. Has this already been fixed? Or is it an oddity in differing configurations? -- ~Robert Cochran GPG Fingerprint - E778 2DD4 FEA6 6A68 6F26 AD2D E5C3 EB36 4886 8871 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 22 03:02:51 2016 Received: (at 24281-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2016 07:02:51 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36432 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbjFz-0006EM-PL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:02:51 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:59868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbjFy-0006EA-HS for 24281-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:02:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYKGj-1bgSEk3RL7-00V4YX; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:02:43 +0200 Message-ID: <57BAA38C.1090501@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:02:36 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#24281: 25.1; (next-frame nil t) crashes References: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> <83shtyardh.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <83shtyardh.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:3YnJ6JHcjTOjiJtyNY1jOf8ElZymghJ8F5tnOXSnwdmYPTVWoQn ilQ4ihlwr3PjjRQwBzUrn5Fx8uN+8JuDYs2MIJtsqOqU+GlNibXN3GoOW3K+fTl3voICbdr NVmE7C3nWFFaHrFF5IGLCPdcuoPKKCjdG9MXVmt+jxyOk2repsqYr4jvguCUKynjK6/Spco LoYbaKznaX4getyvnBWMQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:p7N0bCni7vs=:K6/l/bH6sxDGlRQv8U2djm 2szeAs4mqhBFBm+sSMsnVY/vLJA1p384ZQERO7VqNNH4YKcITqK3nnzTsHUV64MxLP+8Mzbvs F1VuODcu5ovaGsoP0EL8mrcqOxAa0kJPW5K5vvsfdLhP6v/NrEPj+/Lc0L1wkHPMgk7tP8iXH 0vDnnzmFGYf7I6n/XZchxtOoCpa2siLwYvjdLZpEBKd1PCwto3l9iUOJ3FpeT89Y6ypqCq/Va ks8K3fhelUhJoHCkzb8hmUXBZ3rn/MdEFTzXR2EGXX2O7y5wEWZzIeLabk3J9T59yTxtWWXUm VloFeVU2kGDYxWAe0RLhSECz4/qTiw/H/m6lhs+25/PKWmjUvI89MHlO5D7RUtmED40kohr9m eGzlBF34yyfeI0ZeYyRgLgALrBpjLc4ZFgExuJW36tr251Lclv/gy9olJ5ai+7F1t4RUu9tir l3f49Y+dXL+SDqjBVYNx0QYeKJJs87gVbhaEpEVMJFhaGSVFBbJ8Rv8/ZBDXGVh2wXz9abf7L OOcXJZNV+BEany8GZwV3jyYVeVQr88/4ZZdNnm7KnZ3jSm6/pHegJFJgvf9JdGnKF69413NHa OAd4wI7P4bfrd6WE4N0Fg41LsPkx/bePwkybFEPUQnAgXL7JBeeym9AMQqJJM/3WVaRq+EIy2 QLOHxcuXxD0iGEoq9jiem5NF9iJIlGTXFCGiiOKWjS9PuCDGBbHTdtGTaetAb6ipKLPQ+qYGX c9g5aLif/w7zNBrXzIFMkI9GLcaIF0x3PQy4l8yQsksFxcXOfi5BtSsZQBoYU8yfaNFabIEZb F9g+5wq X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Please push to master. Done. martin [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [212.95.7.65 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.20 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24281-done Cc: 24281-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > Please push to master. Done. martin [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [212.95.7.65 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.20 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.20 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > Please push to master. Done. martin From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Aug 22 03:03:07 2016 Received: (at 24281) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2016 07:03:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbjGE-0006Fe-Us for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:03:07 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:62616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbjGD-0006Ec-JC for 24281@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:03:05 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([212.95.7.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Mhhr5-1bojhE2dz1-00Mvch; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:02:55 +0200 Message-ID: <57BAA396.2020100@gmx.at> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:02:46 +0200 From: martin rudalics MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Cochran Subject: Re: bug#24281: 25.1; (next-frame nil t) crashes References: <57B9E1CF.3080407@gmx.at> <87fupxaddv.fsf@cochranmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87fupxaddv.fsf@cochranmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kydleN23/KxGOhczwtBG3FMRTVYKFwfrfKayGGZi4i5J+p5lhNE 9ez7YKiU4iIIFBjwxca25BZsMB8ohSnxYfbkfEk1U1wH+QznkjtE1l++BifAiZfKRzKM22S XhHWZRz8VWjKSuwp8CUUPqhENN2qpnvEogWv9sW7unfl8Kw/056/Bo+5ZkXW1jPRrnqkyU7 yBpZAXpivDTy6NrJiwvOw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:PjN5gEi9QlI=:yqw4qUETTspNvLXMF5qJtb zvN5KqS0mzydZy72KkTbffZAay7NEt8Wy+lutJQSxu3QSdGQiaKGpvYZKz3W9nPgs0WtxXKsZ KXyqNgsXlWk6vPCMu7jKOo50C4HB6vwXj2+HaQ/JzLkPOLHKDcvX1CQ5ERM2JQubuALFHrarr qLTlWgpTXNmDfLJqkNl0C4SJ1CrkJoxpG8mW4cJkDjd5Gbk8zdZg5YubJCklPYwbtD1MchbOr QCM6PRFOSHz9uYiNUzIxui9XeIx7fSkrWY1Tr6oTMD4ndrCv/nEt5fc5+vt0iUR8dacTOtgrY r6d+qTsQ0CbFLoHRKqCYhqGwYKgK7Rl2KPhkaIIl/DbYTkWGn379aYHdzbtfc/QAMKKPPT8oP A1ITng8cwOPDa/8CiNlSATwHMISY7qTE9VwsomFtoVN7kQ9Xu/c/ZuqJ22shqPRCW3eWHx7DV TRG3gw9vUXXyg6mwaylvF2ek9fszdrNOApXWeEqVTOBTtI/xHP8NEF7M9xIwr9Bj9EMzjozWE cgj4luboCCna3+pNFo2LWAKy7e2jSJaFmkh+Y0aWyW1R6mO3M5rAy3zKD+OdQGYBDPG9ltJv+ DOsSD5BetYDBdl//hD6HtVCFg72Ku1+BVMP2Vtu7MBp6ifOjTXuD8egFoL4J2S3qxPPMEmVT6 OEseIX54z1rG8U33fHS5nOBfZ2LmScKmER8K7p34U8G0De/Sz4JVrEHpBOjBc1HdrseJFD57d u3u3Df/L3LvNbJ/LRnFVo9J3CkIAQdnQEqdxGB9IuqmPWdIsRN3oQZPzfClVnH3JPbCQ2lyOV hP8DXnf X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > That didn't crash with git a4ba426d ("* lisp/emacs-lisp/map.el > (map--dispatch): Fix docstring") on my system. > > Has this already been fixed? Or is it an oddity in differing > configurations? I suppose yours is an optimized build. It doesn't crash there. [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [212.95.7.65 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24281 Cc: 24281@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.9 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: > That didn't crash with git a4ba426d ("* lisp/emacs-lisp/map.el > (map--dispatch): Fix docstring") on my system. > > Has this already been fixed? Or is it an oddity in differing > configurations? I suppose yours is an optimized build. It doesn't crash there. [...] Content analysis details: (2.9 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.6 RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL-CSS [212.95.7.65 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [212.227.17.22 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.227.17.22 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rudalics[at]gmx.at) > That didn't crash with git a4ba426d ("* lisp/emacs-lisp/map.el > (map--dispatch): Fix docstring") on my system. > > Has this already been fixed? Or is it an oddity in differing > configurations? I suppose yours is an optimized build. It doesn't crash there. martin From unknown Fri Jun 20 07:18:10 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator