GNU bug report logs - #24216
[NOT A BUG] parted scripting guru? SO question needs answer

Previous Next

Package: parted;

Reported by: bug-parted <at> gnu.org, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche <at> pobox.com>

Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:43:01 UTC

Severity: normal

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 24216 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-parted <at> gnu.org:
bug#24216; Package parted. (Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:43:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to bug-parted <at> gnu.org, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche <at> pobox.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-parted <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:43:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Tom Roche <Tom_Roche <at> pobox.com>
To: bug-parted <at> gnu.org, 
Subject: [NOT A BUG] parted scripting guru? SO question needs answer
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:42:21 -0700

While researching my own parted scripting problem[1], I noticed this StackOverflow question[2], which asks for but currently lacks a parted-based answer (which I currently lack the chops to provide).

FWIW, Tom Roche <Tom_Roche <at> pobox.com>

[1]: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2016-08/msg00007.html
[2]: http://stackoverflow.com/q/12150116/915044
This bug report was last modified 8 years and 310 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.