Subject: Re: bug#24195: 25.0.95; Wrong indentation after a 'less < than' comparison (c++-mode)

From: [email-masked]
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:11:26 -0400

Andreas Schwab <[email-masked]> writes:

> On Aug 12 2016, Noam Postavsky <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Alan Mackenzie <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>> Yes.  In the line "k() < l() &&", the "<" is being recognised as a
>>> template opener.
>>
>> Is it possible to say that "<" can't be a template opener when it
>> comes after a close paren? (I can't think of a case in C++ where that
>> would fail, though I'm not 100% certain there isn't one)
>
> operator()<foo>

So could we say "<" can't be a template opener when it comes after a
close paren except for the close paren of "operator()"?