GNU bug report logs - #24178
[PATCH] Fix typo about variable definitions

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: sirgazil <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Subject: bug#24178: closed (Re: bug#24178: [PATCH] Fix typo about variable
 definitions)
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 22:08:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#24178: [PATCH] Fix typo about variable definitions

which was filed against the guile package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 24178 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
24178: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24178
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: sirgazil <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Cc: 24178-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24178: [PATCH] Fix typo about variable definitions
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 00:07:09 +0200

Applied, thanks :)

Cheers,

Andy

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: sirgazil <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Cc: sirgazil <felipe.lopez <at> openmailbox.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo about variable definitions
Date: Sun,  7 Aug 2016 13:32:32 -0500

* doc/ref/api-binding.texi (Top Level Variable Definitions): Fix typo.
---
 doc/ref/api-binding.texi | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/ref/api-binding.texi b/doc/ref/api-binding.texi
index 5857e78..c3ee01b 100644
--- a/doc/ref/api-binding.texi
+++ b/doc/ref/api-binding.texi
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Many people end up in a development style of adding and changing
 definitions at runtime, building out their program without restarting
 it.  (You can do this using @code{reload-module}, the @code{reload} REPL
 command, the @code{load} procedure, or even just pasting code into a
-REPL.)  If you are one of these people, you will find that sometimes you
+REPL.)  If you are one of these people, you will find that sometimes
 there are some variables that you @emph{don't} want to redefine all the
 time.  For these, use @code{define-once}.
 
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ following case:
   (define a 1)
   (define b (+ a a))
   (+ a b))
-@end lisp  
+@end lisp
 
 @noindent
 Guile decided to follow the R6RS in this regard, and now expands
-- 
2.1.4

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.