From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:20:59 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24166 <24166@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24166 <24166@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) Reply-To: bug#24166 <24166@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:20:59 +0000 retitle 24166 With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtrac= es (but errors in string-match do?!) reassign 24166 emacs submitter 24166 Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel severity 24166 normal tag 24166 fixed thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 05 21:57:21 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 01:57:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57018 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrY-0003bB-RD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:21 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55172) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrW-0003ay-KG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrQ-0001bQ-G6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:13 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, PLING_QUERY autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:48891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrQ-0001b5-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46131) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrO-00025I-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrK-0001Zr-01 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:09 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:53657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVqrJ-0001ZR-Kv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 21:57:05 -0400 Received: from [18.189.62.146] ([18.189.62.146]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue005) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MPsu6-1baoft0MmQ-0054u5 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:57:03 +0200 To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Subject: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) Message-ID: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 21:56:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qPMtvUpBpWL7P3v2ba1wkwPqknhlFh8Go" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:cMEJ/uUqKYP2YAwVthZDRjaWtMRwDT7fSFzjd88MfZ/dfxE6750 VVR3MvYr5OBAyUs3Ukxi/+QhxANLgr9CI+/fDEoSK2q7k7fibw+KhJMgkMtw6v6fcwzUn+T mudRaa9yV+S9QFgSejH0lT/1DBtqvOg8+Xj/0Rr4Zt4IMhvKjGAi1aNjLn5KvT63w/hQYrt FV/9KgUN6QJxY+5hGljEQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:bbh4EEPbCCY=:ObQITWlA04YxODcNlz4N36 1XfAVHo/QyvxThQcSL+uHoGqpWcm91Qo6/1ViNDBcpruj1iYV1a2Axh5RBJfveNTWZe5rWk0M deXgJw/e5XMIocOCt9ltP4uK6Pk60PE40f7k+Ktfz2okg5uJsTbJwYOFWGxNprkfy4WkUL25B nKcqF9iAsX8sy+iT+p7TKGZwEnFwRbt8WkID6P8oa+3HkQHrUOfz27LK2kM7qY8Yx0pte6gQG PCpekXmfG1UKQQ6HcfpLjM3lx74EKfOG1Sz7ptqfoqYmr77RfwuhOEWU6A4kw7g18eZ40LW8b smdgf8gNf+822D6XW4fnXKGQeTlBeIFi5Qg9Ise28Vb54K/cD25SqCLWOtZr6ar5BWbl/CGqz /pkBA0bUHomDqZS1esmFjbkzSmi0EQYC5zmxeyrFMHsQCYRFoPfSxJmrbJ+xypi6ri2zW45D3 DvjdpOWGihbpjOnpfE3RuyzMRMEr1v0Lq9okKVCS1EUOM05rADYmRwUzl5qzAnJS5jyYK+1B5 qfCYCKQf6RpKKjdbvnWZg+j03pCgQAht6JnBe349BtYT4Ijq6laJ+8X7t2xu17ZCDklEh43hd bJvXavsk5g4u0liUCNyzivGY9WuXTFQFZby1uYFPnNEBxoT59/Wp1kU5Ivs0+pL/Rqk5FJEyn x0g0tDDETWdXRMbuIJnSlD4WAe2bnM/2CghGlr3Ddg2/dzPlB92xAbKn0pOLcS2AG1x8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qPMtvUpBpWL7P3v2ba1wkwPqknhlFh8Go Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="cM9RSFFB7RSJEUfxptABcFAJxQWH3Suqj" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Message-ID: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> Subject: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) --cM9RSFFB7RSJEUfxptABcFAJxQWH3Suqj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey bug-gnu-emacs, Is the following a bug? # No backtrace?! $ emacs -Q --batch --eval '(setq debug-on-error t)' --eval '(string-= match-p nil "A")' Wrong type argument: stringp, nil # Yes backtrace?!? $ emacs -Q --batch --eval '(setq debug-on-error t)' --eval '(string-= match nil "A")' Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) string-match(nil "A") eval((string-match nil "A")) ... This isn't new, but it behaved differently in Emacs 24.5: $ emacs-24.5 -Q --batch --eval '(setq debug-on-error t)' --eval '(st= ring-match nil "A")' Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument stringp nil) string-match(nil "A") eval((string-match nil "A")) ... $ emacs-24.5 -Q --batch --eval '(setq debug-on-error t)' --eval '(st= ring-match-p nil "A")' Args out of range: 0 Cl=C3=A9ment. In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.7 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.18.9) of 2016-07-20 built on clem-w50-mint Repository revision: a1a0c208e3e895a6ea0942e8e5c4077faf12c7ad Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.1180300= 0 System Description: Linux Mint 18 Sarah --cM9RSFFB7RSJEUfxptABcFAJxQWH3Suqj-- --qPMtvUpBpWL7P3v2ba1wkwPqknhlFh8Go Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXpUPoAAoJEPqg+cTm90wjG3YP/jqMGyxBWf5t4tZXu583w+SR 5JI7TH2t0bcEbE2mbYlth/knxeaut611U91UZpnSQRrNh8rRbzMG5+Ee1jJnIV6C PUMSL1AWahdjER933A1voUwuKDKg8ZdvVSTL9VEmwJvfMA1Iwf5mIAk4J0JcGM5F ZlPnqcgxyMfbGqqnp59OYS0lT/3qqjpQGjPJoPWZ/sEL0CeuiJG9renJ/HJfQ82F zc8lxCdV+Tjfuy1jbFFtQm9cMuZNcJ1xXnsoXMDCuwVx1zWOli5IDSwscTL1RDcP LJ4fEHO+17zspMkMDdC+RDbgWqEUQvm0k6yO0F5epy8iN/xqhQihbxr32QIma0rt SHwufmFQ0YAyfarVV+Pd+mcpK/C/BrOYJ4u14YVqZQ3A4TM7FnucRg4Q/kOpJ3Y9 Z15qndBR/HMtzgV/tF/R8kh4QvoL+pSHMiO1cGIy7mpv3+KtxWvulkShKoP8QtOy rw1N1BdtVVhJnWMB7aDH/U8L9gd9U5lAWfZoFHJeTlYWll/FbL0YNUgMHQoZXkx5 RFXXk+i0NnPCRcnTO2pUOgBLUbGzQSmsM+/nZnBK1iAPHdLjjg/WaJblRJBREWJC b4diLVDbLvLKtYJLrxGbB482F8qaUoZkqF6w6USPH33KJ8OFZqY8N9dijPC7Uygz phKt9YWHiTjnNskBTao4 =NnKA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qPMtvUpBpWL7P3v2ba1wkwPqknhlFh8Go-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 05 22:15:09 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 02:15:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVr8m-00041h-S6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:15:09 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:34929) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVr8m-00041V-03 for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:15:08 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id m101so314963107ioi.2 for <24166@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:15:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=5SYy2P0+thxjbzeeXcL6so7/2RUkJfm+58fndHEFrlc=; b=TcmBnYyb2oG1/HTAcjak6nMRnYZiitStOJJXoLg486KYSNNJceHCe4ghHgFa6jF4Ji VlqhJTOVN+H9wBUxWxhcMtOOU98qyxyFB2ZQeRmLsrQpiSHqj7al3HezfOipMwpbs1h2 wwVrHHb6bLveYb6t7GJH53+4/uvVs21uZsyANSME8z5x1ObGqc4gHabIBoBlj9V7UpH/ KrdsMXBY2FCtnHAgr1GTJUnSvUcpT3nEXps00XFAlQ3d2acJhRGgl2Xkk/RMv3Pwc98j rJgSdF29h5Ve0L1hrV0h2IpIP+EHoAn5WXqitVSx9zGp6rgeKzB8Hj6K/p0EH/Y3qP6F pg3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=5SYy2P0+thxjbzeeXcL6so7/2RUkJfm+58fndHEFrlc=; b=aO9eYBZTkHIIKGba71LEw+/lQ5gfNupTxWUnwQKRmtzc8A+iemwYvMdQQO6ROFXDT8 Gjx9PUp3h8b2577KMMULvReBd2eW+Pql05XkN+4cQZdNqm/667EtrfKXb+IQqQqWeWPn /edgKDxSr9b/TKHKtdmzd/i/XGlDyhWGv3e+t6m3vRy6ka5PAp+fB9pUMSMCIx2n7wA8 lkfkoW6ggSf8TsHemLwY0sQ0FRFeE+0UWRx8B2Gf9LweN9xdbSGMaodkfmbpTWYNqEYJ pl37eE/lFQo2VeGM5xqStTfumZ3lzUQqcXHaGBAySBHXynuaEEhMT1Qrz81c6JX4/OxC 6DbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv/yzxGgM4lcI4a9IkHu862Ktlm7PUXow4ZkbzN5bGBW/xnoFWdNCbqO8b3vzaEZA== X-Received: by 10.107.189.6 with SMTP id n6mr80696140iof.72.1470449702576; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 140sm5111844itl.4.2016.08.05.19.15.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Aug 2016 19:15:01 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:15:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel"'s message of "Fri, 5 Aug 2016 21:56:56 -0400") Message-ID: <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable merge 23949 24166 quit Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel writes: > Hey bug-gnu-emacs, > > Is the following a bug? Yes, it's another instance of #23949 Actually, I wonder why the trivial fix suggested there wasn't applied alrea= dy: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=v1-0001-Fix-debugging-of-string-match-p-errors.patch Content-Description: patch >From d7c19f35861f12a16e7571340f3f0802a7e85adb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Noam Postavsky Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:11:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v1] Fix debugging of string-match-p errors * lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el (debug): Bind inhibit-changing-match-data to nil so that debugger code that needs to do regexp match won't break (Bug #23949, Bug #24166, Bug#16294). --- lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el index 22a3f39..22f86e4 100644 --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/debug.el @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ debug (or enable-recursive-minibuffers (> (minibuffer-depth) 0))) (standard-input t) (standard-output t) inhibit-redisplay + inhibit-changing-match-data (cursor-in-echo-area nil) (window-configuration (current-window-configuration))) (unwind-protect -- 2.8.0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Aug 05 23:04:17 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 03:04:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57053 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVruK-0005AI-QF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:16 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33486) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVruI-0005A5-Kv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVruC-0005JW-R6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:09 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, PLING_QUERY autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:40338) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVruC-0005JP-Nh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52683) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVruA-0005aH-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVru6-0005J0-7N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:05 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:57597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVru5-0005Hw-T4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 23:04:02 -0400 Received: from [18.189.62.146] ([18.189.62.146]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LbDic-1aqnau3QDq-00kvZT for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:03:59 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Message-ID: Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 23:03:27 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AuPcvVjk8h11Brv6DrnqIfipGMrOHRPJq" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:OqYvNWk94opkDsCOqSFlCBjjeYSK2SyODi0IDChHGAN90Kez18C CX4ghHpAEoQRymKtipa3IdpUmGZVXCrzvi+FNKna1bqVQhr13yELx1zz8UQZMjpzARah3y6 OEv8clCLpeQ2WgpzLdRGZSaE0bjYdsvzw+PvthBUleYHHqtq6hoHB+FI1oEls3eM09HD3Tz BzOSVFaqtfOhqmonUb56Q== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TTp4wHyUkFI=:wooDrQKkj7v/2QQOh9pH7W RjCJvbNKxQ/4Ah0GVefCptu5PBeG7E0K14yAJsirJ67ssygVelqZWsBHKGyLC6RocUguI+4dK Aw+lMyLSGh/E4d9d7tecWYgYL7xDusWgt24fmskV2h/Rz9UtF5s6mScM+PqVLdkdeTrmB04Xm iZ0DXBd3sGMu1joBeWhNldXZl3dODwfF6OdE8lF/fCc8hHwyWedXuE9KG50hsnxH6iWGBEO7W GNiuNObNAilddcaSRUk1XzP+krWK3W4ce1giFsiBdCI37bnyXpMk6fKdMHmidvvoWogoHRmQP 6zz678qj989u5FXTfJMS3B4Pa0bZ0kftmMAn4Q1vmnCOxYaRzDm1LlrM2NGA2UYTjNYmpkJGq VZUFXbureiN/ACbvaol8Sk170AtHxk/JG2ILXD2Oi5lWGwYLe04sYe2WmabMB3fPt41Feayky YGKZcvrSO7vhu9DHu8CyteY2JQYJbdBAJTgK/MgMCig1obfuwnU+lBi1eiC6x3kEy4FRdcFAr 1IVgUiDm/On6gyBaH40ORLQadgASrzy4TUEu1L3OllxJGacS4ahs4OwNlgzKw3N1+NkeHZ+uE zjZtiAp/NZtxSmDfmQyykXu4NK08cdUik+rQdA1WinFmRjzzwsmKlTG78u2RlLjbXdC/WF/Vh 3JIA6jRrtJcJIFVCjn/7b46PCU6Fe9naexLoHp4foR2AzYELWMvm4P6vbGd6/6L4Ss7c= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.8 (---) This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AuPcvVjk8h11Brv6DrnqIfipGMrOHRPJq Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="LjbrrH435RNbt8wwMX92tAEid5gcxMCiC" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> --LjbrrH435RNbt8wwMX92tAEid5gcxMCiC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-08-05 22:15, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > merge 23949 24166 > quit >=20 > Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel writes: >=20 >> Hey bug-gnu-emacs, >> >> Is the following a bug? >=20 > Yes, it's another instance of #23949 >=20 > Actually, I wonder why the trivial fix suggested there wasn't applied a= lready: Thanks Noam. I did try to search for dupes before posting, but my debbugs= -fu is still limited; sorry about this! Cl=C3=A9ment. --LjbrrH435RNbt8wwMX92tAEid5gcxMCiC-- --AuPcvVjk8h11Brv6DrnqIfipGMrOHRPJq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXpVN/AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjfy8P/RN/ETuWnD3niHd3nDhOgb1U Eq6NTfffo0GYDotAl61HEZvR4RZMWbF1CnL+n1CaI4mgzAeRbuCxsWM6EboZJh5f wHY2suoy0iXT1JhROYA1pEfJd9RO8+SKJsxMBAC2IYCYipWsbsWp7ZKL23Kd2s4M x67e8bN9aQi/vAYhbEGW1P6Z93D+ueY4LaCra5zgiz3mVfLfE7oje/EKe61wUJFR vi/ZjBXNFLLDUgOQid8yWLb4r712JB3Wvkros18l1jTgn7la8YagJ4J9B+wprQSD ++oWs6PzLYlJX8DG3L+uUU9BxegN06YiSK87OpgOVWji9mQE7DWNpM0+t8CcLGxW 5lXhBYnS1sSmzCc/if6V14hWIshWHG4RLIFb0mhRwl7QYBQzbXd7W0butxS5ZMQ8 tWDXkRjOZVJyvqYrKxq+CY1frqc0rt1Ly5odWNnN3TWLH7Fni1zkj71EOaQRNBof zV2Wrh78hhe64DOpMp6ExdwQOIhiCn4ScCR8tys40M/CMhHpWwLds3F0992cvI+4 ZmPSp5dFojjz4WohRhV9ZB3CThTA7eU6EVtNHxTNlqkHBAHxlXvg6gZz/2usovjL lUG2tFv0tGQM/5D/47151pIQL6+gfw6vT2i8Lg3HSQGMqUL8L7S4Ix2ESRjKkvoM ISU0gsK0Fh1LYKdaweSB =qHZj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AuPcvVjk8h11Brv6DrnqIfipGMrOHRPJq-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 03:25:28 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 07:25:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57116 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVvz6-0002rj-1G for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:25:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60278) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVvz4-0002rW-4m for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:25:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVvyt-0001c4-V0 for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:25:20 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,PLING_QUERY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVvyt-0001bi-RQ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:25:15 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1685 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bVvyr-0007mV-Ms; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:25:14 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 10:25:08 +0300 Message-Id: <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net In-reply-to: <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:15:09 -0400 > Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Is the following a bug? > > Yes, it's another instance of #23949 Indeed. > Actually, I wonder why the trivial fix suggested there wasn't applied already: I think Andreas's suggestion to do this in call_debugger is more robust, because it does that for _any_ debugger whose value is placed in the 'debugger' variable, not just for debug.el. Would you please make that change? TIA From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 06:28:18 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 10:28:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57147 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyq1-0000VU-TL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:28:18 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com ([209.85.218.42]:34209) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyq0-0000VI-EY for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:28:16 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id l203so59941552oib.1 for <24166@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:28:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=dQFOoA8psoCXTtIwlQF9SXQHm4bSEIRSO8hg1YIIXY8=; b=voOY3TpzAN92HMrtgiuviCurT3G0Qw5gPdW6t1CoTQVL8e3UROn+o4OiP+RgKDs7nS SjFxCoDSwmi5bqG0ynfnmPV1t87k8gJ84PXyTZKlv1fVRbWcp8B/ToQVxd/RoctSSQe8 L2WJMpGxIICnnchVlHs6H1AWkBEnX27MImzlI9Mta2BAXdYCS6X+L/RSkWouLKEgSmYk 5D2dbBGk+7kzU/HPwbVyLVDhG+nvAJw6xa/99eYS/tV3CU6TQdmgTGiSaprARrIf+xEH nkl/2HkTt2R0Hz6deeJLtVlLJIgZgcAgwLNkQKaM8AIsGPh/cKpop+jWcZvGii0rLy/k WIbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dQFOoA8psoCXTtIwlQF9SXQHm4bSEIRSO8hg1YIIXY8=; b=hPIHkeNwsJeWIvNVJXFRLf/rcpzTKf1wEMhXOhMeS4aC9BuIz8Rasz8oDZSDYdhnZw WhQc9s8SfsIeCkk4i32U41yzGz1tIXuEMrLpAMJC4WiGbRKF2U1bcEfxkfUr39r8VVUE SiJwUqad3l3T27Z7xVoRlSFKtc5eoT1ElOhRsz87ISHB2t7xaG9Mvcfx9UJmFyhF4jRl DgT6a7FUnljZcxFjWTp7VlSrXQTSA/fF3KL94vN9qDX9w1+t5B/hdUgF4CxQwkytWW81 Oce+n3Sn0fnGUPp4NDGudNKlEJ+B3QL9DQbHbBehk+jf++mX9Zfa/TbSPGzIR4TvzXgY 6fOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvGDSqwAPJ/75EXyAFofMUS1MT4+bwVlt14mXvA9rbdS88S8NKyqLyOvsKyo7o90qP8rMGu4+A3n9rAvw== X-Received: by 10.157.49.117 with SMTP id v50mr23467217otd.134.1470479290877; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:28:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.7.161 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:28:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:28:10 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JeCt8ipEnpC6ydb9kvoApUX-bfU Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUGl0LS1DbGF1ZGVs?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I think Andreas's suggestion to do this in call_debugger is more > robust, because it does that for _any_ debugger whose value is placed > in the 'debugger' variable, not just for debug.el. What about all the other variables that debug.el is binding? (I see that they both bind inhibit-redisplay to nil) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 06:34:22 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 10:34:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57151 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyvu-0000il-KH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:22 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54310) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyvt-0000iU-L8 for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyvk-0002ql-Vq for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:16 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,PLING_QUERY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyvk-0002qT-Sf; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:12 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1863 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bVyvi-0007Cy-Oi; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:34:11 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 13:34:06 +0300 Message-Id: <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Noam Postavsky In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:28:10 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:28:10 -0400 > Cc: Clément Pit--Claudel , > 24166@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > I think Andreas's suggestion to do this in call_debugger is more > > robust, because it does that for _any_ debugger whose value is placed > > in the 'debugger' variable, not just for debug.el. > > What about all the other variables that debug.el is binding? (I see > that they both bind inhibit-redisplay to nil) Sorry, I don't understand how those variables are related to the issue at hand. What am I missing? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 06:49:49 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 10:49:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57155 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVzAr-00014d-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:49:49 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f53.google.com ([209.85.218.53]:35537) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVzAp-00014R-Iu for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 06:49:47 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f53.google.com with SMTP id 4so184987261oih.2 for <24166@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:49:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kstRAVdk1ZN+ogfHEGPKb8psPwWJr6FxLhTHg8x1Q5g=; b=EuKEKVcML3gJQSELAMBQTXQY3gp+j6B8V60joutPIQXfebfEknTNDZZa2xHSOayfdh nbSFhhBfyARZmLiJnBhhDXqLlXXKxPbgVRU6dVTrADW8YllRjuluH8xWQhsDiKq/hlAa t5rOGYlhy26/eR3xzR3ZdWvr1SRwtRW/b68g1AKpjXrbEGS28Lk8yunijYFD1ctX7zSx Ih22GzqFCQFCuWMg/4o1keS77w4dk369LL8H9+BkNVyY4Ebbe9nqIhFgl3p9T4CSgwHW SFC4MFVxHPz3JR5G1AfipQuPx/f1fEemF25OW0H1ollEp95d1eXQLbW3732doISVG38V xhZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kstRAVdk1ZN+ogfHEGPKb8psPwWJr6FxLhTHg8x1Q5g=; b=bN02e22+32kBxCreaz2foBWLWgkkElvJd3pxfDyxwjHOimykr/nfedqUFUvitX+cE7 DZj/pfwD0EYi0vhAOGCkR7gN28bFMiJG3T1sUWCcZGN9xxNDYm42cjKv9D1bXeqH0aYg NSRjZBJ75eWobjPWdOkNiMlM4ggQZRltrcLFGfFKvgygo5zCq2XZRIKX4cZojcAaFgYs UPmXtKfdYT+KO1hP8Gja9nl4puDc9YvfPnccb7Nfqv+MnIV+8F6Gqsv8n2NlCGx27dZa R0BXFVKSgxdxWtzUwJ4nk4BQIiQUxTx4xt4BAx8r8IxaRjn7lzYqjnScJc/anebMUROP RAUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoout12CXkTVd6DS2gYEG7X2KeQpENKF/TvjRv58lhJnuyI8A6pe+qoFLbmyiK+uTI8v/J1aa3WMS1PMnImw== X-Received: by 10.157.24.7 with SMTP id b7mr3515343ote.35.1470480582008; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 03:49:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.7.161 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Aug 2016 03:49:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:49:41 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8zrcKnDjJl1JmONE9jSIuRzGiO8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) To: Eli Zaretskii Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUGl0LS1DbGF1ZGVs?= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Noam Postavsky >> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:28:10 -0400 >> Cc: Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel , >> 24166@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> > I think Andreas's suggestion to do this in call_debugger is more >> > robust, because it does that for _any_ debugger whose value is placed >> > in the 'debugger' variable, not just for debug.el. >> >> What about all the other variables that debug.el is binding? (I see >> that they both bind inhibit-redisplay to nil) > > Sorry, I don't understand how those variables are related to the issue > at hand. What am I missing? Not related to this issue as such, but if we want to bind inhibit-changing-match-data for all debuggers, why not the others too? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 07:20:15 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 11:20:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57165 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVzeJ-0001pB-Hc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 07:20:15 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60699) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVzeH-0001oz-Kr for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 07:20:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVze8-00039k-NS for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 07:20:07 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,PLING_QUERY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVze8-00039e-KN; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 07:20:04 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2121 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bVze5-0000bM-KO; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 07:20:03 -0400 Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:19:50 +0300 Message-Id: <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Noam Postavsky In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:49:41 -0400) Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:49:41 -0400 > Cc: Clément Pit--Claudel , > 24166@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Noam Postavsky > >> Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2016 06:28:10 -0400 > >> Cc: Clément Pit--Claudel , > >> 24166@debbugs.gnu.org > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:25 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> > I think Andreas's suggestion to do this in call_debugger is more > >> > robust, because it does that for _any_ debugger whose value is placed > >> > in the 'debugger' variable, not just for debug.el. > >> > >> What about all the other variables that debug.el is binding? (I see > >> that they both bind inhibit-redisplay to nil) > > > > Sorry, I don't understand how those variables are related to the issue > > at hand. What am I missing? > > Not related to this issue as such, but if we want to bind > inhibit-changing-match-data for all debuggers, why not the others too? Which ones specifically did you have in mind? We need to consider each one carefully, in order to determine whether every debugger needs that, or just debug.el. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 08:25:18 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 12:25:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW0fG-0005HF-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:25:18 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com ([209.85.223.179]:35994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW0fE-0005H2-1m for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:25:17 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b62so321941831iod.3 for <24166@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:25:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=zGzfTd//gZr3a7N302LilQIziTiAVOeI6w5vEEDW8+o=; b=qgFb5lwTngFoshjcDK89eYFyJo9AmGnga1q64Z7iy+McakdV69T59qnAKZ4qHc7EyZ sYWtvgWZdDcBe7TgkJSJ2dyp2T+vjlgmEpxPccsmgpjUvVADOIJW3c8gBBRi8glNqem8 q4Gs6e9CQfQIo74ZeqwJDNWMUyFzKxoYBFkGeU/cGvvqqFOTRxcMQhGYMFtBVL9k8zyT wAUwA1VKAHYvglLXmKuWtd98TFBHXQtXniUkeXZSnaqUvk0Crfz6ESwpWqSlNe4A9RCH r1C9Y+UUyJQOqMx3uaCRX1+ZEq2wrCEhGrOpytwJekz27Hf/OVoKn3C9W2YGlCAnv30G MGsQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=zGzfTd//gZr3a7N302LilQIziTiAVOeI6w5vEEDW8+o=; b=McA76CX9lmcrEclTz6KO6XIyboQ80mScXWJFI2WbibbDAjVn32lohXbdMdi3uvMbPW o53/jLCkUT4zPlJwr9XnMP7yqy1rulsJaK8YbrsMvELRESLVMwUpsdT63IUo9TNWcp+Z eDnmydg9LMln/QHf6nxiYxpekWBe1ykJqvte7VVoV7jsw6k26EmBNTNiA9oNHdjeYvNu qkIeMR1Om8ZKWi3HGBL4vlT68m5lFlBUpL6r/1LuoBrVvCuVtfhw/1SU6rBP4JpLhnRi Tk8LD6k7tqxXab0Y0bpcs4J8ZIRrJbv6ZPxTU4v5HhLDGxJRbFEGYRsI/cUDAuEIv8s3 PMbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv04ITc2LuOdF1i+9S+1TMbOB/lUCEP0Kp657QbH/mKcUxdfFSUMA07jErCq/6ryA== X-Received: by 10.107.12.85 with SMTP id w82mr95393703ioi.182.1470486310437; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i79sm10084629iod.34.2016.08.06.05.25.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:25:09 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:25:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 06 Aug 2016 14:19:50 +0300") Message-ID: <87inve6q4y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Not related to this issue as such, but if we want to bind >> inhibit-changing-match-data for all debuggers, why not the others too? > > Which ones specifically did you have in mind? We need to consider > each one carefully, in order to determine whether every debugger needs > that, or just debug.el. Well I thought all of the ones in the let-binding except enable-recursive-minibuffers (which has a comment about a specific debug.el command) and window-configuration (which is just a local lexical variable), as they don't look debug.el specific. But I don't really have the patience for careful consideration of each variable just to solve some hypothetical problems, so let's leave it for another time. Here's the new patch. Is it correct to put the DEFSYM next to the DEFVAR_LISP? I saw a few places where they were separated, but that seems odd since it's then documented twice, and I thought maybe it's just because they happened to be added at different times by people who didn't notice the existing definition. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline; filename=v2-0001-Fix-debugging-of-string-match-p-errors.patch Content-Description: patch v2 >From 9249fece6255615b63cd6848250003051f21cd1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Noam Postavsky Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 22:11:00 -0400 Subject: [PATCH v2] Fix debugging of string-match-p errors * src/eval.c (call_debugger): Bind inhibit-changing-match-data to nil so that debugger code that needs to do regexp match won't break (Bug #23949, Bug #24166, Bug#16294). --- src/eval.c | 4 ++++ src/search.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/eval.c b/src/eval.c index 33b82f7..bf5bed7 100644 --- a/src/eval.c +++ b/src/eval.c @@ -300,6 +300,10 @@ call_debugger (Lisp_Object arg) specbind (Qinhibit_redisplay, Qnil); specbind (Qinhibit_debugger, Qt); + /* If we are debugging an error within a call to `string-match-p', + then make sure debugger code can still use match data. */ + specbind (Qinhibit_changing_match_data, Qnil); + #if 0 /* Binding this prevents execution of Lisp code during redisplay, which necessarily leads to display problems. */ specbind (Qinhibit_eval_during_redisplay, Qt); diff --git a/src/search.c b/src/search.c index 5dc4d35..9b8fc58 100644 --- a/src/search.c +++ b/src/search.c @@ -3390,6 +3390,7 @@ or other such regexp constructs are not replaced with this. A value of nil (which is the normal value) means treat spaces literally. */); Vsearch_spaces_regexp = Qnil; + DEFSYM (Qinhibit_changing_match_data, "inhibit-changing-match-data"); DEFVAR_LISP ("inhibit-changing-match-data", Vinhibit_changing_match_data, doc: /* Internal use only. If non-nil, the primitive searching and matching functions -- 2.8.0 --=-=-=-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Aug 06 08:27:21 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Aug 2016 12:27:21 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW0hF-0005KF-IJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:27:21 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f175.google.com ([209.85.223.175]:35149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bW0hE-0005K3-0d for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:27:20 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m101so321760535ioi.2 for ; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:27:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wmBmlOjFbxogd3ypi3IQhwkbPw9pBrVFmqPheDEcvKQ=; b=pFMoRMQ8nTdTU+4qjrtdQvw8S4we4p2fNKtO2IRRlkxHjLlaiDRg+J5BUuJHCNJhpF mWjKuYdg+TDXFbQWKo+Yz4tyk1Xo7AtPa4F5t/fsW90ZKIdwXZfjiaXvDFgbnfL8IBuy +EHggo/31LKgg8711V2/RAZk91wD8ANK7MEddKoIZA8XELX0+oyWtDlMgZp2sCCI5Sx8 KfFmVvPA5FX3Xc0jm/w0f7Jlry7vxbAsDXhhofAZqfizB4u4K4K7LRdpzdRZGhqBSGIC KYBRx+PHbINWFwYHeKdX/UzEAPK5n1JO0YGXXk8cYfLfeimeDxmuirEqEER2Ci4RVHHh 4zow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wmBmlOjFbxogd3ypi3IQhwkbPw9pBrVFmqPheDEcvKQ=; b=CnQIfzPqREjpIsLONus3+7X9+Y0ggs+aswhI8prULUK27/aIYg6f0NzXoEXuGZ8/I4 QPdQlooF0X+KpjxXhihl1lF/U59sw03LEyAi7WrPNBoOgrpTaGcDfr+R44+nMBinDhGT qRP1Kr1BtnLjxooBk1wFJvgUKrc2hb2RHw2jTiawjScsUwPgvsqzt5zQHWvGP2RL2IMe bu1vdOPKWg8rWrJJs2dloxV88A5i8mOPsJ+Cbcrm0wggTNWWElT3u1EPeXdlfsDThAoN h2PpNVPDoeEVCQ7Kjl+qLEFJeavr6G64heBOQg4L+ZasAIDeRXVmsieqROoQ+aksFqAW 7JRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousJQfgN/thDPbLXR9GvldOFRYA+/NrY22Yu3fZlZpyGpRMb3FU2hjpW2kCbvRuqEQ== X-Received: by 10.107.50.79 with SMTP id y76mr83528930ioy.46.1470486434547; Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d67sm10094239ioe.5.2016.08.06.05.27.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Aug 2016 05:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:27:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net's message of "Fri, 05 Aug 2016 22:15:09 -0400") Message-ID: <87fuqi6q1i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) # Forgot to bcc the control server before, # because I wasn't using debbugs.el! merge 24166 23949 quit npostavs@users.sourceforge.net writes: > merge 23949 24166 > quit > > Cl=C3=A9ment Pit--Claudel writes: > >> Hey bug-gnu-emacs, >> >> Is the following a bug? > > Yes, it's another instance of #23949 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 07 10:12:35 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2016 14:12:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59148 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWOod-0005hD-Oc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:12:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59355) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWOoc-0005h1-DA for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:12:34 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWOoW-0003l4-Hk for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:12:29 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,PLING_QUERY, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bWOoR-0003kq-5V; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:12:23 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3445 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bWOoP-0004rT-Nj; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:12:22 -0400 Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:12:18 +0300 Message-Id: <83y448is71.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net In-reply-to: <87inve6q4y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (npostavs@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> <87inve6q4y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.2 (-----) > From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com > Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2016 08:25:17 -0400 > > Here's the new patch. Thanks. I have one minor comment below. > Is it correct to put the DEFSYM next to the DEFVAR_LISP? It isn't incorrect, and even eval.c already does that. > + /* If we are debugging an error within a call to `string-match-p', > + then make sure debugger code can still use match data. */ Please mention in the comment that string-match-p binds inhibit-changing-match-data, and that it is only one example of that. Otherwise, LGTM, thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 07 10:27:52 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2016 14:27:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59154 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWP3Q-00063c-92 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:27:52 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:34276) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWP3N-00063I-Um; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:27:50 -0400 Received: by mail-io0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q83so338659572iod.1; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 07:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=uSQoKB/3duPn9MSOaewrlwDlWhjehJrkNeKkddxKapE=; b=0a/nn5YyrtJ4CgPrvah5eFTN1rbxq9+jUHS+DPxI442xVqsmMj2dLhASu0n5N44ove M1XhLPHIgjExvyiuA+9RmgP2lV8qHPDLeD69siOzhSsxeU9pFy5b4C7s0kzl/WWjEI4l b2zJqynvINjLZKehd11R/v8tusH8Whhhb0Ao6uieNwvNobY2rtZXULKqN8QpquQPwiKj OiwJkSuB9GYZ7KSdkY5OgkQE8YkP3nc1pvsBH6VzNdx1q/DA5NuMeyI5QvjBqhp1R3ln O6OpsdT5h03lThas/rREQzO6dTfBHCGb6ZjRGFkBssgBXvMNU5gvPtwR4ry+Xw/rw9OP b0OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=uSQoKB/3duPn9MSOaewrlwDlWhjehJrkNeKkddxKapE=; b=h4khF0zBGCOufNZgpBduRleYlbL83J7aoyTaJAClvD2qhEjElaGLCPP61PfGGB/tsK UnYrPPiCN2NCiTxby/v+mIX88FpctrvKxaIKUVhqV9pkj/i1nU/l8LL2GJ6yh8P0WMaU v9xp7E92aByg/5PfM0ixeU+ZUJwcNWOpltrqjggDYS10dmovH0Hgnl2veRnV9zWLJxqe eZUYZtJG+jvAdGcaz8wMSe6pfQ0ox4m8MZfhYo22a1cTXfs1r+3nNxGy601EHHWyoOfI C6cgk08D3WGoXE8GSgGGCEG90rBi8ceF8U+xq76URKJm8ghhln9J2VeMbt96zRib5kjC ujkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuQD2L7N4DKtgbZbuDbCRLCb0zs9fHwkbUJLGRgpwTJ03/UbF/idKfzmezzeCqZaA== X-Received: by 10.107.59.20 with SMTP id i20mr91669920ioa.145.1470580064462; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 07:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v11sm12288035iod.43.2016.08.07.07.27.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Aug 2016 07:27:43 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> <87inve6q4y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y448is71.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:27:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83y448is71.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:12:18 +0300") Message-ID: <87h9aw64di.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org, clement.pitclaudel@live.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) tags 24166 fixed close 24166 25.2 quit Pushed as 7fb75680 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Aug 07 11:44:20 2016 Received: (at 24166) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Aug 2016 15:44:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59184 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWQFQ-00010u-5k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:44:20 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([217.72.192.75]:52688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bWQFN-00010f-Fy for 24166@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:44:18 -0400 Received: from [18.189.62.146] ([18.189.62.146]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue104) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYvSd-1bik3C08Hr-00VjGg; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 17:43:57 +0200 Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, Eli Zaretskii References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> <87inve6q4y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y448is71.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9aw64di.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 11:43:42 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87h9aw64di.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WADU8R1cIoMU8crJOnnevOt8OoeCq4EH9" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:d0dlvsYZUNPlwohl1I5h+cYjGjyvQr6z+X46BVqbUA8UeJ4Is+i wZDFCYA/6DPiKPOPMPtrrAMv7qFYhHvmN+4t1IHv8+LwUh4vghSH2kou5TN1/fdvbfkJ+BK tXQ9aGRx+0FFj3rXCUaq90gXt7dwJC4C+rOFynSeBF5P8IdkBKFIoAn/H7l7VYrxk1Biuvt J13mHh6Lduv9e1r6dP/pQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:mZbDuSwu5Ts=:FUpdpKNtkGWdzIygVY/lRf tawWTjQswWKrpI+d17Lm8kEE0p/Z81ZS05YteqAQ+TG5pOcOta/DDB6MERjFxqIRKnLDMZafX Sgxj6lYhRQvVZV4J5WykF4hOBNqCyD1ABwHttCD3GMb4NC6bd5L1tlL+q2NhPaLTZeWyGn0TR ibUXoY2gyP+l7yzPWt1fV9cnpyQ3otHCn1q00sEz7H26nlk2u7x7/6DJzyFKgz46iV5M8LS06 lL+ON31j2TM/cSo5EkGME1MRY2D7xae2JJpc8bMEdjPNzSUtyYvIEhnVREl3Q3iKUVPW0hhrr Kzr3/59Bi1ESp/wcmZwhtD6cxj1OUXpiel5VKSu8CXWNX20EHAeNG7UV3WkZk0FCs2zmWBUbx 5kv0ymhGIvkxlAeeRTyb2UduKZPOHcDd7E+Q3fuhFt6UQZEZknMEv0wNPH9Ps2oTJEpkDfvKw nPTBEu9juEpm1It/S5nQik4SCMHsB/9xQn3EEUHxUUYfoTN6aHxkWUQ4xPUsQXN5QD4GvOTw8 0Qd653dr5abA1CDoKLXrbvL2GcSj+N67Rz1Y9qWwyOpLOgSXocLV05KRhYl9ZNPLOjeEQlNDW DL79PhGubWsKxqcwvKOl4AuHtb6ufMCyr+HzNxnq14fiRTvWrVvPyxhwATxZD8jN0fAfGl2rW iYEr+H/i+Zra4o7R8ZIbqgJHC6S9hNIEkweZORUmbg/ALbR2u2KAiIxBSMz3sYHI8iHk= X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 2016-08-07 10:27, > tags 24166 fixed > close 24166 25.2 > quit > > Pushed as 7fb75680 Yay! Thanks everyone :) [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.192.75 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.pitclaudel[at]live.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.72.192.75 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 0.3 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24166 Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On 2016-08-07 10:27, > tags 24166 fixed > close 24166 25.2 > quit > > Pushed as 7fb75680 Yay! Thanks everyone :) [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [217.72.192.75 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [217.72.192.75 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (clement.pitclaudel[at]live.com) 0.3 PLING_QUERY Subject has exclamation mark and question mark This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WADU8R1cIoMU8crJOnnevOt8OoeCq4EH9 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="quSetPmHG5iqhEOqqemGELcfGoPIOalP3" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit--Claudel?= To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net, Eli Zaretskii Cc: 24166@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#24166: With --eval, errors in string-match-p do not produce backtraces (but errors in string-match do?!) References: <25c2c856-ff1f-6e73-037a-65abae882673@live.com> <87lh0a7idu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <8337mil5pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a2jie9.fsf@gnu.org> <83popmjga1.fsf@gnu.org> <87inve6q4y.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83y448is71.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9aw64di.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <87h9aw64di.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> --quSetPmHG5iqhEOqqemGELcfGoPIOalP3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016-08-07 10:27, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > tags 24166 fixed > close 24166 25.2 > quit >=20 > Pushed as 7fb75680 Yay! Thanks everyone :) --quSetPmHG5iqhEOqqemGELcfGoPIOalP3-- --WADU8R1cIoMU8crJOnnevOt8OoeCq4EH9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXp1c5AAoJEPqg+cTm90wjk1AQAKZDABrDT1P6ilR0sti3iPJQ DzcvBgKcKFuvChfwd8ZugGa7svnnUTXTvC6o5K0MX8A5QSgCN0xTjDoOZ8bxTUk5 NiqW4//1lAl5fncTKPr8k4+Vi7Jv3EbKJx8Lo7Z5OEBHtjYWp0EdxLnIKNdc6w/U AXRQNmEkd/2oN85U9KWE/OGO9/7gIKLzFYWw/Czolda9LvtVdiVecWcZy3T87fqZ pgZlcD4KSFDaAByVTsKwAFzzGvHczYtJzH3ChPzpyM4g1dbI+W/HQXsw1eCGLX7o LgHybQ+iAtk5LAIeGMBhp3HrZBq+K83STdZEn7E2fN8ILhtmbJedq93+MBxAredL TwWBOP2Hi6x1jyPbtV9RkrjjPZdhZ5zxbRt6SPvNthYeCIgFc6sLM5UBx00CnM6H cDb2V97Q1hLt6fR1rYT3Y73N1wbiuEUbKOsZPeGrJT00d+AABBaTtIW/bzVDApIp FWPTwgxrZW1wyEBY5F0byNnKdq9fng5Dt3zMuHVcslhOuYNUMcqb8lUPbtk2a82h aDnHw1/kOngMEPaqQaeBaRHmWEbzqaO5y5UwUTMnlFeq15xhwpnjWDW9Np12I04Y T2/TNiDiMRj3Z6/PmiGkIUmCaDnLV49dMmUdWYBCz1C5ubgJHjl7JShjeHcxxaiF Z8WEEERvok+/vKk0qBDJ =xqMO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WADU8R1cIoMU8crJOnnevOt8OoeCq4EH9-- From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:20:59 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Dec 03 21:49:42 2016 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2016 02:49:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51761 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDMs2-0004Js-AJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:49:42 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDMrz-0004JW-G1 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:49:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDMrs-0001yx-95 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:49:34 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDMrs-0001yr-52 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:49:32 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cDMrr-0005b2-Kh; Sat, 03 Dec 2016 21:49:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <22595.33851.293095.70553@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 21:49:31 -0500 From: Glenn Morris To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Clean up predictable issues due to Emacs version number change X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.9 (-------) # Ref: # http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-11/msg00238.html # http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-09/msg00692.html # http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-01/msg01215.html # Some attempt has been made to check for things backported after the fact. # Erring on the side of a later version number seems preferable anyway. unarchive 10 fixed 10 26.1 notfixed 10 25.2 unarchive 96 fixed 96 26.1 notfixed 96 25.2 unarchive 1149 fixed 1149 26.1 notfixed 1149 25.2 unarchive 1150 fixed 1150 26.1 notfixed 1150 25.2 unarchive 2270 fixed 2270 26.1 notfixed 2270 25.2 unarchive 2405 fixed 2405 26.1 notfixed 2405 25.2 unarchive 2589 fixed 2589 26.1 notfixed 2589 25.2 unarchive 3137 fixed 3137 26.1 notfixed 3137 25.2 unarchive 3393 fixed 3393 26.1 notfixed 3393 25.2 unarchive 4589 fixed 4589 26.1 notfixed 4589 25.2 unarchive 4920 fixed 4920 26.1 notfixed 4920 25.2 unarchive 5001 fixed 5001 26.1 notfixed 5001 25.2 unarchive 5262 fixed 5262 26.1 notfixed 5262 25.2 unarchive 5305 fixed 5305 26.1 notfixed 5305 25.2 unarchive 5314 fixed 5314 26.1 notfixed 5314 25.2 unarchive 5479 fixed 5479 26.1 notfixed 5479 25.2 unarchive 5650 fixed 5650 26.1 notfixed 5650 25.2 unarchive 5661 fixed 5661 26.1 notfixed 5661 25.2 unarchive 5727 fixed 5727 26.1 notfixed 5727 25.2 unarchive 6817 fixed 6817 26.1 notfixed 6817 25.2 unarchive 7385 fixed 7385 26.1 notfixed 7385 25.2 unarchive 7522 fixed 7522 26.1 notfixed 7522 25.2 unarchive 7751 fixed 7751 26.1 notfixed 7751 25.2 unarchive 8634 fixed 8634 26.1 notfixed 8634 25.2 unarchive 8693 fixed 8693 26.1 notfixed 8693 25.2 unarchive 8925 fixed 8925 26.1 notfixed 8925 25.2 unarchive 9342 fixed 9342 26.1 notfixed 9342 25.2 unarchive 9730 fixed 9730 26.1 notfixed 9730 25.2 unarchive 10487 fixed 10487 26.1 notfixed 10487 25.2 unarchive 10540 fixed 10540 26.1 notfixed 10540 25.2 unarchive 10723 fixed 10723 26.1 notfixed 10723 25.2 unarchive 10794 fixed 10794 26.1 notfixed 10794 25.2 unarchive 10980 fixed 10980 26.1 notfixed 10980 25.2 unarchive 11357 fixed 11357 26.1 notfixed 11357 25.2 unarchive 11400 fixed 11400 26.1 notfixed 11400 25.2 unarchive 11788 fixed 11788 26.1 notfixed 11788 25.2 unarchive 12048 fixed 12048 26.1 notfixed 12048 25.2 unarchive 12377 fixed 12377 26.1 notfixed 12377 25.2 unarchive 12378 fixed 12378 26.1 notfixed 12378 25.2 unarchive 12636 fixed 12636 26.1 notfixed 12636 25.2 unarchive 12939 fixed 12939 26.1 notfixed 12939 25.2 unarchive 13269 fixed 13269 26.1 notfixed 13269 25.2 unarchive 13571 fixed 13571 26.1 notfixed 13571 25.2 unarchive 13745 fixed 13745 26.1 notfixed 13745 25.2 unarchive 13949 fixed 13949 26.1 notfixed 13949 25.2 unarchive 14256 fixed 14256 26.1 notfixed 14256 25.2 unarchive 14341 fixed 14341 26.1 notfixed 14341 25.2 unarchive 14484 fixed 14484 26.1 notfixed 14484 25.2 unarchive 14554 fixed 14554 26.1 notfixed 14554 25.2 unarchive 14577 fixed 14577 26.1 notfixed 14577 25.2 unarchive 14687 fixed 14687 26.1 notfixed 14687 25.2 unarchive 14844 fixed 14844 26.1 notfixed 14844 25.2 unarchive 14854 fixed 14854 26.1 notfixed 14854 25.2 unarchive 14915 fixed 14915 26.1 notfixed 14915 25.2 unarchive 14919 fixed 14919 26.1 notfixed 14919 25.2 unarchive 15021 fixed 15021 26.1 notfixed 15021 25.2 unarchive 15047 fixed 15047 26.1 notfixed 15047 25.2 unarchive 15171 fixed 15171 26.1 notfixed 15171 25.2 unarchive 15324 fixed 15324 26.1 notfixed 15324 25.2 unarchive 15445 fixed 15445 26.1 notfixed 15445 25.2 unarchive 15506 fixed 15506 26.1 notfixed 15506 25.2 unarchive 15909 fixed 15909 26.1 notfixed 15909 25.2 unarchive 16136 fixed 16136 26.1 notfixed 16136 25.2 unarchive 16200 fixed 16200 26.1 notfixed 16200 25.2 unarchive 16276 fixed 16276 26.1 notfixed 16276 25.2 unarchive 16294 fixed 16294 26.1 notfixed 16294 25.2 unarchive 16345 fixed 16345 26.1 notfixed 16345 25.2 unarchive 16390 fixed 16390 26.1 notfixed 16390 25.2 unarchive 16406 fixed 16406 26.1 notfixed 16406 25.2 unarchive 16483 fixed 16483 26.1 notfixed 16483 25.2 unarchive 16513 fixed 16513 26.1 notfixed 16513 25.2 unarchive 16579 fixed 16579 26.1 notfixed 16579 25.2 unarchive 16746 fixed 16746 26.1 notfixed 16746 25.2 unarchive 16891 fixed 16891 26.1 notfixed 16891 25.2 unarchive 16904 fixed 16904 26.1 notfixed 16904 25.2 unarchive 17039 fixed 17039 26.1 notfixed 17039 25.2 unarchive 17067 fixed 17067 26.1 notfixed 17067 25.2 unarchive 17119 fixed 17119 26.1 notfixed 17119 25.2 unarchive 17582 fixed 17582 26.1 notfixed 17582 25.2 unarchive 17707 fixed 17707 26.1 notfixed 17707 25.2 unarchive 17716 fixed 17716 26.1 notfixed 17716 25.2 unarchive 17738 fixed 17738 26.1 notfixed 17738 25.2 unarchive 17989 fixed 17989 26.1 notfixed 17989 25.2 unarchive 17999 fixed 17999 26.1 notfixed 17999 25.2 unarchive 18008 fixed 18008 26.1 notfixed 18008 25.2 unarchive 18024 fixed 18024 26.1 notfixed 18024 25.2 unarchive 18026 fixed 18026 26.1 notfixed 18026 25.2 unarchive 18028 fixed 18028 26.1 notfixed 18028 25.2 unarchive 18089 fixed 18089 26.1 notfixed 18089 25.2 unarchive 18092 fixed 18092 26.1 notfixed 18092 25.2 unarchive 18110 fixed 18110 26.1 notfixed 18110 25.2 unarchive 18202 fixed 18202 26.1 notfixed 18202 25.2 unarchive 18203 fixed 18203 26.1 notfixed 18203 25.2 unarchive 18204 fixed 18204 26.1 notfixed 18204 25.2 unarchive 18211 fixed 18211 26.1 notfixed 18211 25.2 unarchive 18279 fixed 18279 26.1 notfixed 18279 25.2 unarchive 18527 fixed 18527 26.1 notfixed 18527 25.2 unarchive 18587 fixed 18587 26.1 notfixed 18587 25.2 unarchive 18634 fixed 18634 26.1 notfixed 18634 25.2 unarchive 18635 fixed 18635 26.1 notfixed 18635 25.2 unarchive 18686 fixed 18686 26.1 notfixed 18686 25.2 unarchive 18692 fixed 18692 26.1 notfixed 18692 25.2 unarchive 18809 fixed 18809 26.1 notfixed 18809 25.2 unarchive 18810 fixed 18810 26.1 notfixed 18810 25.2 unarchive 18829 fixed 18829 26.1 notfixed 18829 25.2 unarchive 19114 fixed 19114 26.1 notfixed 19114 25.2 unarchive 19152 fixed 19152 26.1 notfixed 19152 25.2 unarchive 19209 fixed 19209 26.1 notfixed 19209 25.2 unarchive 19214 fixed 19214 26.1 notfixed 19214 25.2 unarchive 19215 fixed 19215 26.1 notfixed 19215 25.2 unarchive 19255 fixed 19255 26.1 notfixed 19255 25.2 unarchive 19368 fixed 19368 26.1 notfixed 19368 25.2 unarchive 19424 fixed 19424 26.1 notfixed 19424 25.2 unarchive 19497 fixed 19497 26.1 notfixed 19497 25.2 unarchive 19587 fixed 19587 26.1 notfixed 19587 25.2 unarchive 19638 fixed 19638 26.1 notfixed 19638 25.2 unarchive 19722 fixed 19722 26.1 notfixed 19722 25.2 unarchive 19754 fixed 19754 26.1 notfixed 19754 25.2 unarchive 19801 fixed 19801 26.1 notfixed 19801 25.2 unarchive 19851 fixed 19851 26.1 notfixed 19851 25.2 unarchive 20038 fixed 20038 26.1 notfixed 20038 25.2 unarchive 20158 fixed 20158 26.1 notfixed 20158 25.2 unarchive 20181 fixed 20181 26.1 notfixed 20181 25.2 unarchive 20304 fixed 20304 26.1 notfixed 20304 25.2 unarchive 20408 fixed 20408 26.1 notfixed 20408 25.2 unarchive 20460 fixed 20460 26.1 notfixed 20460 25.2 unarchive 20485 fixed 20485 26.1 notfixed 20485 25.2 unarchive 20520 fixed 20520 26.1 notfixed 20520 25.2 unarchive 20654 fixed 20654 26.1 notfixed 20654 25.2 unarchive 20702 fixed 20702 26.1 notfixed 20702 25.2 unarchive 20724 fixed 20724 26.1 notfixed 20724 25.2 unarchive 20878 fixed 20878 26.1 notfixed 20878 25.2 unarchive 21002 fixed 21002 26.1 notfixed 21002 25.2 unarchive 21014 fixed 21014 26.1 notfixed 21014 25.2 unarchive 21024 fixed 21024 26.1 notfixed 21024 25.2 unarchive 21155 fixed 21155 26.1 notfixed 21155 25.2 unarchive 21169 fixed 21169 26.1 notfixed 21169 25.2 unarchive 21171 fixed 21171 26.1 notfixed 21171 25.2 unarchive 21225 fixed 21225 26.1 notfixed 21225 25.2 unarchive 21231 fixed 21231 26.1 notfixed 21231 25.2 unarchive 21252 fixed 21252 26.1 notfixed 21252 25.2 unarchive 21269 fixed 21269 26.1 notfixed 21269 25.2 unarchive 21359 fixed 21359 26.1 notfixed 21359 25.2 unarchive 21427 fixed 21427 26.1 notfixed 21427 25.2 unarchive 21552 fixed 21552 26.1 notfixed 21552 25.2 unarchive 21576 fixed 21576 26.1 notfixed 21576 25.2 unarchive 21577 fixed 21577 26.1 notfixed 21577 25.2 unarchive 21601 fixed 21601 26.1 notfixed 21601 25.2 unarchive 21678 fixed 21678 26.1 notfixed 21678 25.2 unarchive 21679 fixed 21679 26.1 notfixed 21679 25.2 unarchive 21684 fixed 21684 26.1 notfixed 21684 25.2 unarchive 21706 fixed 21706 26.1 notfixed 21706 25.2 unarchive 21759 fixed 21759 26.1 notfixed 21759 25.2 unarchive 21851 fixed 21851 26.1 notfixed 21851 25.2 unarchive 21852 fixed 21852 26.1 notfixed 21852 25.2 unarchive 21853 fixed 21853 26.1 notfixed 21853 25.2 unarchive 21881 fixed 21881 26.1 notfixed 21881 25.2 unarchive 21936 fixed 21936 26.1 notfixed 21936 25.2 unarchive 21962 fixed 21962 26.1 notfixed 21962 25.2 unarchive 22117 fixed 22117 26.1 notfixed 22117 25.2 unarchive 22140 fixed 22140 26.1 notfixed 22140 25.2 unarchive 22170 fixed 22170 26.1 notfixed 22170 25.2 unarchive 22172 fixed 22172 26.1 notfixed 22172 25.2 unarchive 22227 fixed 22227 26.1 notfixed 22227 25.2 unarchive 22315 fixed 22315 26.1 notfixed 22315 25.2 unarchive 22325 fixed 22325 26.1 notfixed 22325 25.2 unarchive 22329 fixed 22329 26.1 notfixed 22329 25.2 unarchive 22348 fixed 22348 26.1 notfixed 22348 25.2 unarchive 22478 fixed 22478 26.1 notfixed 22478 25.2 unarchive 22530 fixed 22530 26.1 notfixed 22530 25.2 unarchive 22531 fixed 22531 26.1 notfixed 22531 25.2 unarchive 22576 fixed 22576 26.1 notfixed 22576 25.2 unarchive 22583 fixed 22583 26.1 notfixed 22583 25.2 unarchive 22586 fixed 22586 26.1 notfixed 22586 25.2 unarchive 22592 fixed 22592 26.1 notfixed 22592 25.2 unarchive 22594 fixed 22594 26.1 notfixed 22594 25.2 unarchive 22595 fixed 22595 26.1 notfixed 22595 25.2 unarchive 22596 fixed 22596 26.1 notfixed 22596 25.2 unarchive 22627 fixed 22627 26.1 notfixed 22627 25.2 unarchive 22632 fixed 22632 26.1 notfixed 22632 25.2 unarchive 22648 fixed 22648 26.1 notfixed 22648 25.2 unarchive 22664 fixed 22664 26.1 notfixed 22664 25.2 unarchive 22720 fixed 22720 26.1 notfixed 22720 25.2 unarchive 22724 fixed 22724 26.1 notfixed 22724 25.2 unarchive 22764 fixed 22764 26.1 notfixed 22764 25.2 unarchive 22799 fixed 22799 26.1 notfixed 22799 25.2 unarchive 22800 fixed 22800 26.1 notfixed 22800 25.2 unarchive 22814 fixed 22814 26.1 notfixed 22814 25.2 unarchive 22824 fixed 22824 26.1 notfixed 22824 25.2 unarchive 22827 fixed 22827 26.1 notfixed 22827 25.2 unarchive 22837 fixed 22837 26.1 notfixed 22837 25.2 unarchive 22841 fixed 22841 26.1 notfixed 22841 25.2 unarchive 22890 fixed 22890 26.1 notfixed 22890 25.2 unarchive 22928 fixed 22928 26.1 notfixed 22928 25.2 unarchive 22940 fixed 22940 26.1 notfixed 22940 25.2 unarchive 22964 fixed 22964 26.1 notfixed 22964 25.2 unarchive 22968 fixed 22968 26.1 notfixed 22968 25.2 unarchive 23020 fixed 23020 26.1 notfixed 23020 25.2 unarchive 23071 fixed 23071 26.1 notfixed 23071 25.2 unarchive 23116 fixed 23116 26.1 notfixed 23116 25.2 unarchive 23139 fixed 23139 26.1 notfixed 23139 25.2 unarchive 23159 fixed 23159 26.1 notfixed 23159 25.2 unarchive 23167 fixed 23167 26.1 notfixed 23167 25.2 unarchive 23262 fixed 23262 26.1 notfixed 23262 25.2 unarchive 23290 fixed 23290 26.1 notfixed 23290 25.2 unarchive 23374 fixed 23374 26.1 notfixed 23374 25.2 unarchive 23390 fixed 23390 26.1 notfixed 23390 25.2 unarchive 23401 fixed 23401 26.1 notfixed 23401 25.2 unarchive 23411 fixed 23411 26.1 notfixed 23411 25.2 unarchive 23459 fixed 23459 26.1 notfixed 23459 25.2 unarchive 23608 fixed 23608 26.1 notfixed 23608 25.2 unarchive 23703 fixed 23703 26.1 notfixed 23703 25.2 unarchive 23730 fixed 23730 26.1 notfixed 23730 25.2 unarchive 23829 fixed 23829 26.1 notfixed 23829 25.2 unarchive 23850 fixed 23850 26.1 notfixed 23850 25.2 unarchive 23863 fixed 23863 26.1 notfixed 23863 25.2 unarchive 23883 fixed 23883 26.1 notfixed 23883 25.2 unarchive 23914 fixed 23914 26.1 notfixed 23914 25.2 unarchive 23949 fixed 23949 26.1 notfixed 23949 25.2 unarchive 23998 fixed 23998 26.1 notfixed 23998 25.2 unarchive 24122 fixed 24122 26.1 notfixed 24122 25.2 unarchive 24133 fixed 24133 26.1 notfixed 24133 25.2 unarchive 24166 fixed 24166 26.1 notfixed 24166 25.2 unarchive 24257 fixed 24257 26.1 notfixed 24257 25.2 unarchive 24308 fixed 24308 26.1 notfixed 24308 25.2 unarchive 24432 fixed 24432 26.1 notfixed 24432 25.2 From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:20:59 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:24:16 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator