Subject: Re: bug#2412: spurious "Sign failed" errors

From: Chong Yidong <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 21:02:58 -0400

Daiki Ueno <[email-masked]> writes:

> Thanks for testing.  I've checked in the patch.

Please add a prominent comment about why this change was done.  Future
changes to accept-process-output may make it unnecessary.  Thanks.