GNU bug report logs - #24117
25.1; url-http-create-request: Multibyte text in HTTP request

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Sho Takemori <stakemorii <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 08:28:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 25.1

Done: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #107 received at 24117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
Cc: stakemorii <at> gmail.com, larsi <at> gnus.org, schwab <at> linux-m68k.org,
 24117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24117: 25.1; url-http-create-request: Multibyte text in HTTP
 request
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 17:35:28 +0300
> Cc: stakemorii <at> gmail.com, larsi <at> gnus.org, 24117 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Dmitry Gutov <dgutov <at> yandex.ru>
> Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:12:40 +0300
> 
> On 08/09/2016 05:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> >> You can't encode it properly without parsing it first.
> >
> > You don't say what you meant by "encode properly".  It's just a
> > string, and there are ways to make a string unibyte without any
> > parsing.
> 
> Different parts of an URL are supposed to be encoded in different ways.
> 
> For instance,
> 
>    http://банки.рф/фыва/
> 
> turns into
> 
>    http://xn--80abwho.xn--p1ai/%D1%84%D1%8B%D0%B2%D0%B0/

Are you saying that url-generic-parse-url performs this encoding, and
that using a unibyte buffer causes that to fail?

> So I think the encoding of the URL parts should be performed inside 
> url-http-create-request.

Fine with me, but when I suggested that, you didn't like the
suggestion.  If you changed your mind, let's do that.

> On the master branch, host is passed through IDNA encoding, but
> real-fname is untouched. On emacs-25, I think we should convert both
> to unibyte.

Not sure I understand why there should be a difference between the two
branches.  Encoding an ASCII string doesn't do any harm.

> Not sure encode-coding-string is the way to go (why would we assume 
> UTF-8?).

Because using UTF-8 doesn't lose anything, you basically get the same
byte stream as stored internally (because 8-bit bytes are not supposed
to happen in URLs).

> (Why doesn't (encode-coding-string "aaaa" 'ascii) work?)

It's 'us-ascii, not 'ascii.




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 13 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.