From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: Danny Milosavljevic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 22:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.14695719247189 (code B ref -1); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 22:26:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2016 22:25:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmy-0001rs-BU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmx-0001rg-5M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmr-0001CH-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:17 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmr-0001C7-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmo-0003pQ-Rl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmi-00017s-Ve for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:13 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:34995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmi-000164-PY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (77.116.159.65.wireless.dyn.drei.com [77.116.159.65]) by dd1012.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 612C01CA06E3 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:02 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. $ guix lint perl-io-socket-inet6 ; echo $? ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.go ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.go ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.go gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 464 is way too long (96 characters) gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 483 is way too long (92 characters) 0 ^--- ooops From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24083.146965304910290 (code B ref 24083); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 20:58:02 +0000 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2016 20:57:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtR-0002fu-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43343) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtP-0002fh-J9 for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtH-0000aX-DG for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtH-0000ZP-9o; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:19 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:55884 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtF-0006bR-Ho; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:17 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 10 Thermidor an 224 de la =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) (These are warnings, not errors.) Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: Danny Milosavljevic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24083.146965394911807 (code B ref 24083); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2016 21:12:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSW7x-00034M-9Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:12:29 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:36598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSW7v-00034E-K9 for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:12:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (178.113.78.129.wireless.dyn.drei.com [178.113.78.129]) by dd1012.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E7691CA057F; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:12:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:12:22 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20160727231222.66849389@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >=20 > > guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. =20 >=20 > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Too bad :) I wrote a little helper script which was supposed to prevent me from postin= g packages that don't build or lint. Then I found out that the lint actuall= y doesn't fail on warnings. So now my script is only half as useful (the bu= ilder does fail on build error). It would be nice to have a way to also check the lint status. From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24083.16166244302219 (code B ref 24083); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:21:02 +0000 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2021 22:20:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36313 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPBrZ-0000Zj-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:20:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:37513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPBrY-0000ZS-FP for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:20:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id x16so348264wrn.4 for <24083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:20:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SACZidwT32HfOYkZ6wPFyozXQuTROsHHyiK8y2GFhqc=; b=UvZGptFgl/qx1nqkywY4SQ1YO0PSLw05rORLLiYMHVplF88RNU+YEqYo/Cx7KwdTtc Morhl6GXky6C+EesrDqwR6ksTEUmKBaWcn3l45qSgQjLG8IB1lngWFkAX5AXGNRPrsSy JA7hjpvjuOVE7ej5VM1UmN2ef9HG4AEuGRSH8w9uZ2eErPzPKJo5/tdSVvHyWKj5+p8e TNWT4vvtfsBC2mIrLXlqvJ/INhikoCWsousxd+ssFrUwDZhQU8mI3FZhmryIS08bwcM+ yNTIoQtqC6a6AQngrRPlusZ65k37km+J7GrqMm1cwTR4+3zOPBqYic03E/hj64QF/JS0 WSuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SACZidwT32HfOYkZ6wPFyozXQuTROsHHyiK8y2GFhqc=; b=gub5Kv+Cd71wkQaMyeNtlUFDG/Qhqf4xd8BJdolREfm+Bu2jWPhycPAv9OrT0TI1vd yLbl9dqvYEicLUE5PBKZGXwfdG29R3xN6JnwdffgkxTaA4BGG45MK93sVvGNQv2EKyEr 1CkNQoZnBqWfVImO/w2Ha1spHqZ/im5J4yWaIZHLP47vOpEqpiR4Hs+QwOhHJC1GhpF3 q3tJK4O/R7dQpVODbskF+kKMVnhFe83NlswsY4yo46eNh9V3PZ/QX6+N6Ppl+zQqPvsg MgPVDGan4qfwRhQUaCc+vr9hXPGDPH3xBQtAtBprF+aqghWUDRKnGN4uMEbtVPwfjoY6 7xTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JHqhshR54MORq/ipTfkaR4fOWDIZHMPXmKRUcmzoGnfGSkqnv PvlohJpBo0HY3JWx/xkQiF50a+nqrnA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+IeHnBiNRpC6MhtS6BWzcIp+S6agyVLNDalWpzzVvHl0NWE7y8yhymOz6qc6b7rn13UT4Gw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:108b:: with SMTP id y11mr5830032wrw.196.1616624422644; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q9sm4790530wrp.79.2021.03.24.15.20.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> <20160727231222.66849389@scratchpost.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:19:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160727231222.66849389@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:12:22 +0200") Message-ID: <86tup09ovb.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 23:12, Danny Milosavljevic = wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wr= ote: >> Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >>=20 >> > guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors.=20=20 >>=20 >> It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) >> (These are warnings, not errors.) > > Too bad :) > > I wrote a little helper script which was supposed to prevent me from post= ing > packages that don't build or lint. Then I found out that the lint actually > doesn't fail on warnings. So now my script is only half as useful (the bu= ilder > does fail on build error). > > It would be nice to have a way to also check the lint status. The good news is that the initial example =E2=80=99perl-io-socket-inet6=E2= =80=99 now does not report any linting error. :-) Well, on the other side, it is still the same behaviour. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix lint julia ; echo $? gnu/packages/julia.scm:301:0: julia@1.5.3: line 301 is way too long (107 ch= aracters) gnu/packages/julia.scm:303:0: julia@1.5.3: line 303 is way too long (106 ch= aracters) gnu/packages/julia.scm:226:13: julia@1.5.3: can be upgraded to 1.6.0 gnu/packages/julia.scm:227:12: julia@1.5.3: source not archived on Software= Heritage 0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- What do we do. On one hand, =C2=ABit never pretended to exit with non-zero when warninf=C2=BB and on the other hand it could be annoying. Well, since it is 4 years and 34 weeks, I consider it is not a big deal and so we can close. WDYT? All the best, simon From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 21:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24083.162327503713735 (code B ref 24083); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 21:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 21:43:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lr5zR-0003ZT-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:43:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:52992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lr5zM-0003Yo-Kv for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:43:53 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id f17so4929150wmf.2 for <24083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YlTpw25l2XG+ZpznaqBYvMp3AZGZdyv3ptWRWeEkSsk=; b=Dg96RqQmF0+wz3uMSJ8eLNT95kMRFdr6jlam/aH2TgY/L9eva0muSv9Z2WNbFRfsCE SeU07Sx6LFryh40cUxkgJ/51AIb7JVUJHtRDgqvqknS9hjOsRk9+ZuTmfXe8jsWJuOHF 8FxGvw8xcSPhfQ8yfkoqVAey8U/GqBnD2jkep8yVc0XtUi6BbXk8cO1AqI0/99Xt3yX5 r913tfirQgfq4fWjacsB6KzGTtb1HxKXe9vxR0BZHSD8drfGnQlsnTUwGiCUcMmypVvx KM38p64f7rz09M+ZP67hO3o/AQdzZCxXiJhVyUbPyT20eS0sHX25tiMWvaRicJMLzfEK j8Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YlTpw25l2XG+ZpznaqBYvMp3AZGZdyv3ptWRWeEkSsk=; b=iF3sLpQGWVK1AyupSpQkK/+fNXRDP+NrTX0pX+cXX5HCynzR/Vuvx7G82+yS6p629D EzJVd6cDKMVzzrmMy/Z90z2q6H9yc3U9+RD+fLVtXciGG2I5PTNNiNgdCFRyc4OxuP91 rhXNUQyzl9mlNjTfb26sf1fwI4CmzeKvQI5uJM6q+ZJ+nQZ3pver2X+CvbUWPiSaiCgZ dqoODmTLq9nvs0YSaEhzlO9VCntuMmh0hyHsAQBXU0kW27ePoQNUx0V99vkH1J/VAK9O b2GQJ8sq63LDSuENvZWEmfM/Sfl4hVIlKBUmB80taTzqlR74Mlpz+NqVtOSIe97frLfK WIuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kaNdbADyKEhL4TBHhdTV+o7tqgi9/qaDsO+PIddxHrwY6M8bZ SR/xpR2kB20WSEURm79fBqB1cj2n10A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz26SmK+nmPDztwstx9jj17KGlvLBDzz+1aWB6c+pwkbWvxbkWNdApiOzX9BdqpDYWxRQi6rw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:47d7:: with SMTP id l23mr1855545wmo.49.1623275026924; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm1138900wrt.21.2021.06.09.14.43.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:41:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200") Message-ID: <86sg1qlnri.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Do we modify the returned code? If not, can we close? Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 05 07:09:38 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2021 11:09:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0MTq-0008SQ-IV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:09:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:40759) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0MTn-0008Re-QI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:09:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id l5so4864032wrv.7 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:09:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=gDgY4obRv/ZjTD9IHyrYi2i/rJdF95YpwHU2j+QyQqA=; b=NXDQZyvZSaS0HXD8g5hOV4x5tMITlwsgRkKKx16+YO3POhDoPMDIAfu/MQ3fRhkwp+ g2H2dwXB0te1e1KI9GF05j5Q8fgpPXDV/xYMrkNgmtYWbHWNVNR1XvH8QixoRvJF2Kgm /8ek4hkwhBLVqY+ycUzsjr6dO+z+Awmew9ZmT91sbQc5y27mDeenbaCYX6hVK5eCNwU8 X/+T+Ujxg3t1MvJh2WuCM0VqiieCFtZcB8MjXiRlN7KQdU02oCJDsNallFQczAeqeRVo pusD1wPSW+NgazTm6c+i7mw9PwX4NE3TQfKF0t+nS4FvKcj26gdY/m0nZ/nC6h+iIt/a I3YQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=gDgY4obRv/ZjTD9IHyrYi2i/rJdF95YpwHU2j+QyQqA=; b=rKjZibZnBFQyk+MdNH/ziliOjjU05KvN495RyIoTmF5jPGWR+eP7erwkRqGelE6+wE Ah1eIk/RYi3Wk6ejLQQcOoaBBiqPlLpBAXvbxrVRHZ3VTYIu53hQ/osdTYm8VXK0Iy2k S8tyaS2+o6BrXlbkgm3TReGbvyrW2ju9s2l+PWERKNGUunpIZf5HSY6mkVWz9Gm6JeH1 Yu2viit/DJRgPTQenCbZUyqnQ8Uqz3IvnxXbilboV/39wmXUilZx+2mKZ8Pbzhu0UoKU IAJvDmFzx5X6Vfs7rfLFlyLzQ2aMECg/OOoZdqvBV5HlBZ/Lu1zbYFK/Y/rl1ffrix3X Ww/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NKvVWWW/3kaOG9INt5BZwbGYpI3pwhuq5F6wc/mzHNfApj7iK iK21cTbzSI46TFTINzUTOLLP5LDEvxI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1acUxkwEUIGjWDiuvQBkMLn94GWOk405mplssJZJs9AnOw5AdHo2gyEpzc2VqaZAPH6iaUg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6409:: with SMTP id z9mr15023667wru.350.1625483370306; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t17sm12459995wrs.61.2021.07.05.04.09.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:08:56 +0200 Message-Id: <87tul9j9vb.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: zimoun Subject: control message for bug #24083 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 24083 + moreinfo quit From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24083.162616873728171 (code B ref 24083); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 09:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 09:32:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Em1-0007KG-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:32:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:44720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Em0-0007K3-K4 for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:32:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id f9so23916142wrq.11 for <24083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nTjOE/dYbnxo5j8zTspOMyS8F+Mxmtey3rpVKhmu0QQ=; b=U5fkEIfmYFKsTPNfiNj8/2EUlRt85wc6V7RHxSReFvZ2uMfO04JRHgbXbmNQePTO4Y fjkvexKPb+kXtLn7M8U7n7qZh8CYfE+ng7YuMHjrJQ1pEH3SoIZqHRZjY/j3d59l49aN EzTk7+v4zHbs2HPCFnTFNUyrZr/wpFaVzBBIYMSVNGosrAMwnrLzOQ+PXnqklmMvMM+j ppMceSDLG+UOIjO8KmhHsgiB8szp9QLV2mSS1yDbDBJOXAnv5LTQxHuGKvGCOw27kxa4 7KN92KfdRwG7Ix8QkihpCHEuQ9HLblBwBJ1b7cE5jToHfmWDuVGeRn1KqnRlTFWljaEL 0QmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nTjOE/dYbnxo5j8zTspOMyS8F+Mxmtey3rpVKhmu0QQ=; b=dsRqgcGqeq7kDRhMbU1Ai/UOJwvf+Wuq6fUqvmIbIZgjMpaRQI4cERfYI543MZAxOq SawCltmccLSs0dl11bl77t6xmnL4wnWNEgd95Pu+ox8Wjot+sze/18LCsZppqwLbNq5P BEWX/GxJQhcaHcU9r9b6eA2gynQhzzA7Lplx3g9pEk15A1E8J8EJ8a53Ng4P7SudCLUG +KacpxsDLbkXSRUBNKQtCyz1yogr5mOkMLBLutnYFC0o/zwe91fNGGOCRQWmaaLHac8V D1jtDB7cWKFgnE6ZSXCNNTkIgLy9sBNC9P4+ynh73hty7poruAF43pWw5rFcc6YAoE1g bO0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dcKEk1OTH5Yb1XCptZp7gNdTmeDd/GnjufZcUGY5vKz4cs6Mv k70YlEswB4YC4X+7aVUERs7vxIoF9Ig= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysl43OGU+9GoSs3C6B2gHIhNAlPSUQxhvoZidE932w5qfIeucyYkxTddoeq2lUKZ7KJonDCA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:67cc:: with SMTP id n12mr4433291wrw.131.1626168731011; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2sm11147858wmg.6.2021.07.13.02.32.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200") Message-ID: <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code. WDYT? Cheers, simon From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Resent-From: Danny Milosavljevic Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24083 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: zimoun Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24083-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24083.1626171628646 (code B ref 24083); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 10:21:02 +0000 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 10:20:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3FWe-0000AM-18 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 06:20:28 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:43292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3FWc-0000AD-La for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 06:20:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (84-115-233-88.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [84.115.233.88]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3D5033609C1; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:20:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:20:21 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic Message-ID: <20210713122021.258f00f7@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 zimoun wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > > =20 > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. =20 > > > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > > (These are warnings, not errors.) =20 Sure, it makes sense. I'm just doing " |wc -l" now. > Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code. > WDYT? Agreed. But I would suggest to document in the manual that the exit status is not set, though. --Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAmDtaOUACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUG+Qf/RM3wpPg0f3Wpe+DsUwX2zlMc4mDy5+0ysQRcDw30pArq3VJwTTus1AQF QUlW75yyywSTgzs6Nckehd/h1Ux9K9DMJvqOjnkR6oqZEnubsl1MSDNIbF7E15yK V19GYO8xz9w1Go0k/mHiC8TgMSYKxWF1IbAvSPjbMH0V2yMlZQ8xlQ+FI39m8AZQ LDxYW5UmJD374ZJKhGTamTZfNOqxS+b3fLGUjCIUKB06p2pU8m/p7cyFhdgEdVk2 zIALmQ545wnUNw4fD+JfdXhn6PEmph0+BYvq7Wfio1CTI1dt42n4wP7EEgnJvhPO jtPzDyr2VujTQenjA58tqPAXlcKuDg== =ED3l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ-- From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:42 2025 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.505 (Entity 5.505) X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org From: help-debbugs@gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System) To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: bug#24083: closed (Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors) Message-ID: References: <87edp4x3iv.fsf@gmail.com> <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> X-Gnu-PR-Message: they-closed 24083 X-Gnu-PR-Package: guix X-Gnu-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Reply-To: 24083@debbugs.gnu.org Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:58:02 +0000 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1680281882-6105-1" This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1680281882-6105-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Your bug report #24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors which was filed against the guix package, has been closed. The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. If you require more details, please reply to 24083@debbugs.gnu.org. --=20 24083: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D24083 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact help-debbugs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1680281882-6105-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 24083-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2023 16:57:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piI43-0001ZR-68 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:23 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53]:38682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piI40-0001ZC-T8 for 24083-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:21 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id kr22so2786273qvb.5 for <24083-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:57:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680281835; x=1682873835; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gihrHMBP4bKFLrZ8+KVejmTzKA3l7k7dLdE1tSS9zjI=; b=fjm0b8JikL27BwC1GDkCoTwXD1HmxGeeSsT5tC3d/5BDp38SBh2psNIUC3LLQmNUrH +GQ8XDjEOlZiyySGNnDcjjNoF3TO1Qm14F9E7SkneVYKu5fFNU/nW4O20yJr71c6guTv /GbogrBhX0IQRufJdhf4b9G2LavXACyGLN4z+ySTngNhEitp8awKWSYmR0kkUVQ4QBdG c5v27WoZLqjEI2GFtY+lkM9dzjaMS+S3YVOd5qw731vkMXN5l7fwdmoxjhpyt7Wyj8cX wQcpkyyYxpp180CkBz4CPzPi7t7sImQDPqxkbALocKOXyy2RCW+UT3b/9AEMG2VGWVZI tOvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680281835; x=1682873835; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gihrHMBP4bKFLrZ8+KVejmTzKA3l7k7dLdE1tSS9zjI=; b=Uf3JVHfYTzxIh5TZ77XGQwkYvCsnFpcM2OvYe5z1JDP2BolqdnnwF+pFXNZkDsvnI1 B3pZkXvGwCtS36teyDNb+kdqoJ3MlfBKPGzvMga+Qs9hrCUBHBlT6MWnLC94evyYFI9A nWxprZ00pq0j3wNlU89S/UKBnx4EuqKmURrrxW8iDXoS2sPqTwh5HHL2VOMHD32mcV0u pUIeEZNG6jwbtVoOL60war//LXwIyJQ31SO9O6X8KMATwcVQENB5m9liyL15DBO4dvZr bMuMND9pNwS2IsUCHZy91SqAtSUTtXRBlAOYX4S01rwmhZtizG0TmIcua1aZQT+11P32 yD4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9efGsjA//CcyNIJtOgBIH6t07HhvIOGYlNEFrPClVYA9TF6XCZl XrOT6j2ni7sJruVfGMm66DkzrsYGh1h0Yw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZyR2d1SwtDo4Qpnt1vhF6ihvUHO+NnKtN1YaHJg63eTHCzSUTjkO2M8OnE/P7fodnHBVk47w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2604:b0:5e0:30cc:830b with SMTP id gu4-20020a056214260400b005e030cc830bmr14666824qvb.0.1680281834585; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-149-138.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.149.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7-20020a37aa07000000b0074a0a47a1f3sm807266qke.5.2023.03.31.09.57.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> <20210713122021.258f00f7@scratchpost.org> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210713122021.258f00f7@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:20:21 +0200") Message-ID: <87edp4x3iv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083-done Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 24083-done@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 > zimoun wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: >> > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >> >=20=20 >> >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors.=20=20 >> > >> > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. := -) >> > (These are warnings, not errors.)=20=20 > > Sure, it makes sense. I'm just doing " |wc -l" now. > >> Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code. >> WDYT? > > Agreed. > > But I would suggest to document in the manual that the exit status is > not set, though. Acting on the proposed and agreed closing action :-). --=20 Thanks, Maxim ------------=_1680281882-6105-1 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2016 22:25:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmy-0001rs-BU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmx-0001rg-5M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmr-0001CH-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:17 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmr-0001C7-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmo-0003pQ-Rl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmi-00017s-Ve for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:13 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:34995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmi-000164-PY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (77.116.159.65.wireless.dyn.drei.com [77.116.159.65]) by dd1012.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 612C01CA06E3 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:02 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Message-ID: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. $ guix lint perl-io-socket-inet6 ; echo $? ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.go ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.go ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.go gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 464 is way too long (96 characters) gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 483 is way too long (92 characters) 0 ^--- ooops ------------=_1680281882-6105-1--