From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 26 18:25:24 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2016 22:25:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38517 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmy-0001rs-BU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59732) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmx-0001rg-5M for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmr-0001CH-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:17 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmr-0001C7-0P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:17 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmo-0003pQ-Rl for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmi-00017s-Ve for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:13 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:34995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSAmi-000164-PY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:25:08 -0400 Received: from localhost (77.116.159.65.wireless.dyn.drei.com [77.116.159.65]) by dd1012.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 612C01CA06E3 for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:02 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: bug-guix@gnu.org Subject: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Message-ID: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. $ guix lint perl-io-socket-inet6 ; echo $? ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/networking.go ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/mail.go ;;; note: source file /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.scm ;;; newer than compiled /x/home/dannym/src/guix/gnu/packages/ldc.go gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 464 is way too long (96 characters) gnu/packages/networking.scm:437:1: perl-io-socket-inet6-2.72: line 483 is way too long (92 characters) 0 ^--- ooops From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 27 16:57:29 2016 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2016 20:57:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48522 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtR-0002fu-1p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43343) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtP-0002fh-J9 for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtH-0000aX-DG for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:22 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34096) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtH-0000ZP-9o; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:19 -0400 Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:55884 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bSVtF-0006bR-Ho; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 16:57:17 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 10 Thermidor an 224 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:25:02 +0200") Message-ID: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083 Cc: 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) (These are warnings, not errors.) Ludo=E2=80=99. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 27 17:12:29 2016 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2016 21:12:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48540 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSW7x-00034M-9Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:12:29 -0400 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:36598) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSW7v-00034E-K9 for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 17:12:28 -0400 Received: from localhost (178.113.78.129.wireless.dyn.drei.com [178.113.78.129]) by dd1012.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0E7691CA057F; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:12:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:12:22 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?B?Q291cnTDqHM=?=) Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Message-ID: <20160727231222.66849389@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083 Cc: 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >=20 > > guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. =20 >=20 > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Too bad :) I wrote a little helper script which was supposed to prevent me from postin= g packages that don't build or lint. Then I found out that the lint actuall= y doesn't fail on warnings. So now my script is only half as useful (the bu= ilder does fail on build error). It would be nice to have a way to also check the lint status. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Mar 24 18:20:30 2021 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2021 22:20:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36313 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPBrZ-0000Zj-Nz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:20:29 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com ([209.85.221.44]:37513) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lPBrY-0000ZS-FP for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:20:28 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id x16so348264wrn.4 for <24083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:20:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SACZidwT32HfOYkZ6wPFyozXQuTROsHHyiK8y2GFhqc=; b=UvZGptFgl/qx1nqkywY4SQ1YO0PSLw05rORLLiYMHVplF88RNU+YEqYo/Cx7KwdTtc Morhl6GXky6C+EesrDqwR6ksTEUmKBaWcn3l45qSgQjLG8IB1lngWFkAX5AXGNRPrsSy JA7hjpvjuOVE7ej5VM1UmN2ef9HG4AEuGRSH8w9uZ2eErPzPKJo5/tdSVvHyWKj5+p8e TNWT4vvtfsBC2mIrLXlqvJ/INhikoCWsousxd+ssFrUwDZhQU8mI3FZhmryIS08bwcM+ yNTIoQtqC6a6AQngrRPlusZ65k37km+J7GrqMm1cwTR4+3zOPBqYic03E/hj64QF/JS0 WSuQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SACZidwT32HfOYkZ6wPFyozXQuTROsHHyiK8y2GFhqc=; b=gub5Kv+Cd71wkQaMyeNtlUFDG/Qhqf4xd8BJdolREfm+Bu2jWPhycPAv9OrT0TI1vd yLbl9dqvYEicLUE5PBKZGXwfdG29R3xN6JnwdffgkxTaA4BGG45MK93sVvGNQv2EKyEr 1CkNQoZnBqWfVImO/w2Ha1spHqZ/im5J4yWaIZHLP47vOpEqpiR4Hs+QwOhHJC1GhpF3 q3tJK4O/R7dQpVODbskF+kKMVnhFe83NlswsY4yo46eNh9V3PZ/QX6+N6Ppl+zQqPvsg MgPVDGan4qfwRhQUaCc+vr9hXPGDPH3xBQtAtBprF+aqghWUDRKnGN4uMEbtVPwfjoY6 7xTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530JHqhshR54MORq/ipTfkaR4fOWDIZHMPXmKRUcmzoGnfGSkqnv PvlohJpBo0HY3JWx/xkQiF50a+nqrnA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+IeHnBiNRpC6MhtS6BWzcIp+S6agyVLNDalWpzzVvHl0NWE7y8yhymOz6qc6b7rn13UT4Gw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:108b:: with SMTP id y11mr5830032wrw.196.1616624422644; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q9sm4790530wrp.79.2021.03.24.15.20.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 15:20:22 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> <20160727231222.66849389@scratchpost.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:19:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20160727231222.66849389@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 23:12:22 +0200") Message-ID: <86tup09ovb.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083 Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 23:12, Danny Milosavljevic = wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wr= ote: >> Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >>=20 >> > guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors.=20=20 >>=20 >> It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) >> (These are warnings, not errors.) > > Too bad :) > > I wrote a little helper script which was supposed to prevent me from post= ing > packages that don't build or lint. Then I found out that the lint actually > doesn't fail on warnings. So now my script is only half as useful (the bu= ilder > does fail on build error). > > It would be nice to have a way to also check the lint status. The good news is that the initial example =E2=80=99perl-io-socket-inet6=E2= =80=99 now does not report any linting error. :-) Well, on the other side, it is still the same behaviour. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ guix lint julia ; echo $? gnu/packages/julia.scm:301:0: julia@1.5.3: line 301 is way too long (107 ch= aracters) gnu/packages/julia.scm:303:0: julia@1.5.3: line 303 is way too long (106 ch= aracters) gnu/packages/julia.scm:226:13: julia@1.5.3: can be upgraded to 1.6.0 gnu/packages/julia.scm:227:12: julia@1.5.3: source not archived on Software= Heritage 0 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- What do we do. On one hand, =C2=ABit never pretended to exit with non-zero when warninf=C2=BB and on the other hand it could be annoying. Well, since it is 4 years and 34 weeks, I consider it is not a big deal and so we can close. WDYT? All the best, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 09 17:43:57 2021 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jun 2021 21:43:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34804 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lr5zR-0003ZT-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:43:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:52992) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lr5zM-0003Yo-Kv for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 17:43:53 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id f17so4929150wmf.2 for <24083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YlTpw25l2XG+ZpznaqBYvMp3AZGZdyv3ptWRWeEkSsk=; b=Dg96RqQmF0+wz3uMSJ8eLNT95kMRFdr6jlam/aH2TgY/L9eva0muSv9Z2WNbFRfsCE SeU07Sx6LFryh40cUxkgJ/51AIb7JVUJHtRDgqvqknS9hjOsRk9+ZuTmfXe8jsWJuOHF 8FxGvw8xcSPhfQ8yfkoqVAey8U/GqBnD2jkep8yVc0XtUi6BbXk8cO1AqI0/99Xt3yX5 r913tfirQgfq4fWjacsB6KzGTtb1HxKXe9vxR0BZHSD8drfGnQlsnTUwGiCUcMmypVvx KM38p64f7rz09M+ZP67hO3o/AQdzZCxXiJhVyUbPyT20eS0sHX25tiMWvaRicJMLzfEK j8Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YlTpw25l2XG+ZpznaqBYvMp3AZGZdyv3ptWRWeEkSsk=; b=iF3sLpQGWVK1AyupSpQkK/+fNXRDP+NrTX0pX+cXX5HCynzR/Vuvx7G82+yS6p629D EzJVd6cDKMVzzrmMy/Z90z2q6H9yc3U9+RD+fLVtXciGG2I5PTNNiNgdCFRyc4OxuP91 rhXNUQyzl9mlNjTfb26sf1fwI4CmzeKvQI5uJM6q+ZJ+nQZ3pver2X+CvbUWPiSaiCgZ dqoODmTLq9nvs0YSaEhzlO9VCntuMmh0hyHsAQBXU0kW27ePoQNUx0V99vkH1J/VAK9O b2GQJ8sq63LDSuENvZWEmfM/Sfl4hVIlKBUmB80taTzqlR74Mlpz+NqVtOSIe97frLfK WIuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kaNdbADyKEhL4TBHhdTV+o7tqgi9/qaDsO+PIddxHrwY6M8bZ SR/xpR2kB20WSEURm79fBqB1cj2n10A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz26SmK+nmPDztwstx9jj17KGlvLBDzz+1aWB6c+pwkbWvxbkWNdApiOzX9BdqpDYWxRQi6rw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:47d7:: with SMTP id l23mr1855545wmo.49.1623275026924; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r6sm1138900wrt.21.2021.06.09.14.43.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 14:43:46 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:41:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200") Message-ID: <86sg1qlnri.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083 Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Do we modify the returned code? If not, can we close? Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 05 07:09:38 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2021 11:09:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44222 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0MTq-0008SQ-IV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:09:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com ([209.85.221.42]:40759) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m0MTn-0008Re-QI for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 07:09:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id l5so4864032wrv.7 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:09:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=gDgY4obRv/ZjTD9IHyrYi2i/rJdF95YpwHU2j+QyQqA=; b=NXDQZyvZSaS0HXD8g5hOV4x5tMITlwsgRkKKx16+YO3POhDoPMDIAfu/MQ3fRhkwp+ g2H2dwXB0te1e1KI9GF05j5Q8fgpPXDV/xYMrkNgmtYWbHWNVNR1XvH8QixoRvJF2Kgm /8ek4hkwhBLVqY+ycUzsjr6dO+z+Awmew9ZmT91sbQc5y27mDeenbaCYX6hVK5eCNwU8 X/+T+Ujxg3t1MvJh2WuCM0VqiieCFtZcB8MjXiRlN7KQdU02oCJDsNallFQczAeqeRVo pusD1wPSW+NgazTm6c+i7mw9PwX4NE3TQfKF0t+nS4FvKcj26gdY/m0nZ/nC6h+iIt/a I3YQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:to:from:subject; bh=gDgY4obRv/ZjTD9IHyrYi2i/rJdF95YpwHU2j+QyQqA=; b=rKjZibZnBFQyk+MdNH/ziliOjjU05KvN495RyIoTmF5jPGWR+eP7erwkRqGelE6+wE Ah1eIk/RYi3Wk6ejLQQcOoaBBiqPlLpBAXvbxrVRHZ3VTYIu53hQ/osdTYm8VXK0Iy2k S8tyaS2+o6BrXlbkgm3TReGbvyrW2ju9s2l+PWERKNGUunpIZf5HSY6mkVWz9Gm6JeH1 Yu2viit/DJRgPTQenCbZUyqnQ8Uqz3IvnxXbilboV/39wmXUilZx+2mKZ8Pbzhu0UoKU IAJvDmFzx5X6Vfs7rfLFlyLzQ2aMECg/OOoZdqvBV5HlBZ/Lu1zbYFK/Y/rl1ffrix3X Ww/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530NKvVWWW/3kaOG9INt5BZwbGYpI3pwhuq5F6wc/mzHNfApj7iK iK21cTbzSI46TFTINzUTOLLP5LDEvxI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz1acUxkwEUIGjWDiuvQBkMLn94GWOk405mplssJZJs9AnOw5AdHo2gyEpzc2VqaZAPH6iaUg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6409:: with SMTP id z9mr15023667wru.350.1625483370306; Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfiuh02 ([193.48.40.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t17sm12459995wrs.61.2021.07.05.04.09.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 05 Jul 2021 04:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2021 13:08:56 +0200 Message-Id: <87tul9j9vb.fsf@gmail.com> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: zimoun Subject: control message for bug #24083 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 24083 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 05:32:17 2021 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 09:32:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39463 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Em1-0007KG-K2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:32:17 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f50.google.com ([209.85.221.50]:44720) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3Em0-0007K3-K4 for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 05:32:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f50.google.com with SMTP id f9so23916142wrq.11 for <24083@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nTjOE/dYbnxo5j8zTspOMyS8F+Mxmtey3rpVKhmu0QQ=; b=U5fkEIfmYFKsTPNfiNj8/2EUlRt85wc6V7RHxSReFvZ2uMfO04JRHgbXbmNQePTO4Y fjkvexKPb+kXtLn7M8U7n7qZh8CYfE+ng7YuMHjrJQ1pEH3SoIZqHRZjY/j3d59l49aN EzTk7+v4zHbs2HPCFnTFNUyrZr/wpFaVzBBIYMSVNGosrAMwnrLzOQ+PXnqklmMvMM+j ppMceSDLG+UOIjO8KmhHsgiB8szp9QLV2mSS1yDbDBJOXAnv5LTQxHuGKvGCOw27kxa4 7KN92KfdRwG7Ix8QkihpCHEuQ9HLblBwBJ1b7cE5jToHfmWDuVGeRn1KqnRlTFWljaEL 0QmA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nTjOE/dYbnxo5j8zTspOMyS8F+Mxmtey3rpVKhmu0QQ=; b=dsRqgcGqeq7kDRhMbU1Ai/UOJwvf+Wuq6fUqvmIbIZgjMpaRQI4cERfYI543MZAxOq SawCltmccLSs0dl11bl77t6xmnL4wnWNEgd95Pu+ox8Wjot+sze/18LCsZppqwLbNq5P BEWX/GxJQhcaHcU9r9b6eA2gynQhzzA7Lplx3g9pEk15A1E8J8EJ8a53Ng4P7SudCLUG +KacpxsDLbkXSRUBNKQtCyz1yogr5mOkMLBLutnYFC0o/zwe91fNGGOCRQWmaaLHac8V D1jtDB7cWKFgnE6ZSXCNNTkIgLy9sBNC9P4+ynh73hty7poruAF43pWw5rFcc6YAoE1g bO0w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532dcKEk1OTH5Yb1XCptZp7gNdTmeDd/GnjufZcUGY5vKz4cs6Mv k70YlEswB4YC4X+7aVUERs7vxIoF9Ig= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJysl43OGU+9GoSs3C6B2gHIhNAlPSUQxhvoZidE932w5qfIeucyYkxTddoeq2lUKZ7KJonDCA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:67cc:: with SMTP id n12mr4433291wrw.131.1626168731011; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:32:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p2sm11147858wmg.6.2021.07.13.02.32.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Jul 2021 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT) From: zimoun To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2016 22:57:15 +0200") Message-ID: <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083 Cc: Danny Milosavljevic , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > (These are warnings, not errors.) Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code. WDYT? Cheers, simon From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 13 06:20:28 2021 Received: (at 24083) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2021 10:20:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3FWe-0000AM-18 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 06:20:28 -0400 Received: from dd26836.kasserver.com ([85.13.145.193]:43292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m3FWc-0000AD-La for 24083@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 06:20:27 -0400 Received: from localhost (84-115-233-88.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [84.115.233.88]) by dd26836.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3D5033609C1; Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:20:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:20:21 +0200 From: Danny Milosavljevic To: zimoun Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors Message-ID: <20210713122021.258f00f7@scratchpost.org> In-Reply-To: <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083 Cc: Ludovic =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= , 24083@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.7 (-) --Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 zimoun wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: > > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: > > =20 > >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors. =20 > > > > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. :-) > > (These are warnings, not errors.) =20 Sure, it makes sense. I'm just doing " |wc -l" now. > Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code. > WDYT? Agreed. But I would suggest to document in the manual that the exit status is not set, though. --Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAmDtaOUACgkQ5xo1VCww uqUG+Qf/RM3wpPg0f3Wpe+DsUwX2zlMc4mDy5+0ysQRcDw30pArq3VJwTTus1AQF QUlW75yyywSTgzs6Nckehd/h1Ux9K9DMJvqOjnkR6oqZEnubsl1MSDNIbF7E15yK V19GYO8xz9w1Go0k/mHiC8TgMSYKxWF1IbAvSPjbMH0V2yMlZQ8xlQ+FI39m8AZQ LDxYW5UmJD374ZJKhGTamTZfNOqxS+b3fLGUjCIUKB06p2pU8m/p7cyFhdgEdVk2 zIALmQ545wnUNw4fD+JfdXhn6PEmph0+BYvq7Wfio1CTI1dt42n4wP7EEgnJvhPO jtPzDyr2VujTQenjA58tqPAXlcKuDg== =ED3l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ulvLl5u9H3g0/QKH50OU8nJ-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri Mar 31 12:57:23 2023 Received: (at 24083-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2023 16:57:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34408 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piI43-0001ZR-68 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:23 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-f53.google.com ([209.85.219.53]:38682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piI40-0001ZC-T8 for 24083-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:21 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-f53.google.com with SMTP id kr22so2786273qvb.5 for <24083-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:57:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680281835; x=1682873835; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gihrHMBP4bKFLrZ8+KVejmTzKA3l7k7dLdE1tSS9zjI=; b=fjm0b8JikL27BwC1GDkCoTwXD1HmxGeeSsT5tC3d/5BDp38SBh2psNIUC3LLQmNUrH +GQ8XDjEOlZiyySGNnDcjjNoF3TO1Qm14F9E7SkneVYKu5fFNU/nW4O20yJr71c6guTv /GbogrBhX0IQRufJdhf4b9G2LavXACyGLN4z+ySTngNhEitp8awKWSYmR0kkUVQ4QBdG c5v27WoZLqjEI2GFtY+lkM9dzjaMS+S3YVOd5qw731vkMXN5l7fwdmoxjhpyt7Wyj8cX wQcpkyyYxpp180CkBz4CPzPi7t7sImQDPqxkbALocKOXyy2RCW+UT3b/9AEMG2VGWVZI tOvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680281835; x=1682873835; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id :in-reply-to:date:references:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=gihrHMBP4bKFLrZ8+KVejmTzKA3l7k7dLdE1tSS9zjI=; b=Uf3JVHfYTzxIh5TZ77XGQwkYvCsnFpcM2OvYe5z1JDP2BolqdnnwF+pFXNZkDsvnI1 B3pZkXvGwCtS36teyDNb+kdqoJ3MlfBKPGzvMga+Qs9hrCUBHBlT6MWnLC94evyYFI9A nWxprZ00pq0j3wNlU89S/UKBnx4EuqKmURrrxW8iDXoS2sPqTwh5HHL2VOMHD32mcV0u pUIeEZNG6jwbtVoOL60war//LXwIyJQ31SO9O6X8KMATwcVQENB5m9liyL15DBO4dvZr bMuMND9pNwS2IsUCHZy91SqAtSUTtXRBlAOYX4S01rwmhZtizG0TmIcua1aZQT+11P32 yD4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9efGsjA//CcyNIJtOgBIH6t07HhvIOGYlNEFrPClVYA9TF6XCZl XrOT6j2ni7sJruVfGMm66DkzrsYGh1h0Yw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZyR2d1SwtDo4Qpnt1vhF6ihvUHO+NnKtN1YaHJg63eTHCzSUTjkO2M8OnE/P7fodnHBVk47w== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:2604:b0:5e0:30cc:830b with SMTP id gu4-20020a056214260400b005e030cc830bmr14666824qvb.0.1680281834585; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:57:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hurd (dsl-10-149-138.b2b2c.ca. [72.10.149.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t7-20020a37aa07000000b0074a0a47a1f3sm807266qke.5.2023.03.31.09.57.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 31 Mar 2023 09:57:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Maxim Cournoyer To: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: bug#24083: guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors References: <20160727002502.4acf8f47@scratchpost.org> <87mvl2x0ic.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmvmoa6q.fsf@gmail.com> <20210713122021.258f00f7@scratchpost.org> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 12:57:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210713122021.258f00f7@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2021 12:20:21 +0200") Message-ID: <87edp4x3iv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24083-done Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 24083-done@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi, Danny Milosavljevic writes: > On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 11:05:49 +0200 > zimoun wrote: > >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 at 22:57, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: >> > Danny Milosavljevic skribis: >> >=20=20 >> >> guix lint doesn't actually fail on some errors.=20=20 >> > >> > It never pretended to exit with non-zero when warnings are emitted. := -) >> > (These are warnings, not errors.)=20=20 > > Sure, it makes sense. I'm just doing " |wc -l" now. > >> Because of that, I propose to close without modifying the returned code. >> WDYT? > > Agreed. > > But I would suggest to document in the manual that the exit status is > not set, though. Acting on the proposed and agreed closing action :-). --=20 Thanks, Maxim From unknown Sat Sep 06 02:32:53 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2023 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator