Subject: bug#24082: [PATCH] Use ‘cvs update’ instead ‘cvs status’ for CVS *vc-dir* buffers

From: Dan Nicolaescu <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 20:59:37 -0400

Dmitry Gutov <[email-masked]> writes:

> Hi Dan,
>
> Do you remember why you added 'cvs update' based implementation of
> vc-cvs-dir-status, but decided to leave it commented out, in commit
> 769303ae?

I think it was getting closer to a release and didn't want to take any
risks. 

       --Dan