GNU bug report logs - #24073
24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline inviisble

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Paul Rankin <hello <at> paulwrankin.com>

Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:13:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 28080

Found in versions 24.5, 25.2

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #35 received at 24073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Paul Rankin <hello <at> paulwrankin.com>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: 24073 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#24073: 24.5;
 outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline
 invisible
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:22:07 +1000
Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net> on Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:47 -0400:
> :) Don't like pcase?

I fear what I do not understand.

> > Would something like the following work? Maybe with a
> > (condition-case ...) ?
> >
> >     (let ((source (find-function-noselect 'outline-on-heading-p)))
> >       (with-current-buffer (car source)
> >         (goto-char (cdr source))
> >         (eval-defun nil)))
> 
> Yes, that's about the same, though I would still suggest (eval (read
> ...)) over eval-defun for non-interactive code.

Ah yes, I should have read the docs: "Read one Lisp expression as text
from STREAM" - I assumed it would eval the whole buffer... Thanks

I'm gonna assume if the package has (require 'outline) then it's safe to
assume the existence of outline-on-heading-p too... It appears that
(find-function-noselect 'missingfunction) will just hang Emacs anyway.

> >> By the way, shouldn't that be
> >>
> >>                   (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) return))
> >
> > I think this will fail when outline-invisible-p returns foo in the
> > initial example. We want to only return t when outline-invisible-p
> > returns outline, not foo or otherwise.
> 
> Oh, then your original was okay, it just had a bit of dead code.
> Simply (lambda (return) (eq return 'outline)) should suffice.

Then this will fail if/when outline-invisible-p is fixed to return t
when I wanna future-proof this, so users don't notice the transition.
Sorry my previous reply neglected to mention returning t.




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 202 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.