From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline inviisble Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146952078217289 (code B ref -1); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:13:02 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2016 08:13:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37584 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxU5-0004Uk-LK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:13:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50880) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxU4-0004UX-A8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:13:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxTy-00027H-0n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:54 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:43622) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxTv-000279-O9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxTt-0005IB-HU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxTq-000267-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:49 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:52333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRxTn-00024Q-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:46 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD289205E3 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=MhB xDz7DlWxZwbfGGQb6Hq571yo=; b=eOd30WmmJ1178iDOPtOjZdsDRsNBi/JmWET AZ7sS8fiZymgKTz+DaJu6CR8RDTk860W8W5J596zxd6kT2XcE7wXrDWpxWlTuHIB rxln3wutbdgZwXE9Txrhgn2jecVTGBGEdFfsCnxUnLmvyIS2BpqjjWmnM7pjFAY7 TyttuJkM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=MhBxDz7DlWxZwbfGGQb6Hq571yo=; b=n1C9/ aUIupk7/3cdDIUmmfB454moIuEdXHvW7FpnKKVzI/SEYlFJmVvQkoLAx3HigEhOA KsTtch3NKHSy7LQiAWmaL35n+96SLts0pMvdV1rxWC8M75sj6Q0ybzolma+mZkGB Gngx7hWrqu4QWks/XlHY27Dk75IDtg9wTvVwLg= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 7BCF81E380; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 04:12:33 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: eXBUd0LWElb1qrTSenlCdwgM+3ndfd6i7XRPU49ljdT0 1469520753 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3c2832c2 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:12:33 +1000 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) When attempting to use `outline' to collapse a heading that begins with a character with any invisible text property, the heading is mistakenly treated as invisible, when only a heading with the `outline' invisible text property should be considered invisible (i.e. collapsed). To reproduce: 1. emacs -Q 2. insert ";;; heading" 3. M-: (outline-on-heading-p) => t 4. C-a 5. M-: (put-text-property (point) (1+ (point)) 'invisible 'foo) 6. M-; (outline-on-heading-p) => nil Expected results: (outline-on-heading-p) => t Actual results: (outline-on-heading-p) => nil Solution: The function outline-on-heading-p checks bolp for an invisible property, but not specifically the `outline' invisible property: (defun outline-on-heading-p (&optional invisible-ok) "Return t if point is on a (visible) heading line. If INVISIBLE-OK is non-nil, an invisible heading line is ok too." (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (and (bolp) (or invisible-ok (not (outline-invisible-p))) (looking-at outline-regexp)))) Instead, it should check for only the `outline' invisible text property: (defun outline-on-heading-p (&optional invisible-ok) "Return t if point is on a (visible) heading line. If INVISIBLE-OK is non-nil, an invisible heading line is ok too." (save-excursion (beginning-of-line) (and (bolp) (or invisible-ok (not (eq (outline-invisible-p) 'outline))) (looking-at outline-regexp)))) -- Paul W. Rankin www.paulwrankin.com From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline inviisble References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.146952536024480 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 09:30:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2016 09:29:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37606 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRyfw-0006Ml-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:29:20 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33038) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRyfv-0006Me-Gv for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:29:19 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18446206BF for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:29:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:29:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=u+b QTs1l6DjF7BXknavBbRqCWG0=; b=o7ZQ7Udlq+aNRMa35vMShYUuzLq7y+rmvwq Ccy0WL8iQvilZfsjyDjNVNhxFiQorIGh3zcukqXcgSkWjlwtri3drMc/me+8UuP9 9yqnPi4rwzkdmWmvFjjQxCZXXH+5Wya0xhR4WJH0DZXFU/6pXylHojSrdJ7GMo5e rm3GCt7Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=u+bQTs1l6DjF7BXknavBbRqCWG0=; b=Et4TF 0TXekPoUYTwBblfDOzyreuZC9/7J/kM9I3bq5fhmyR4FAyhQlKXRxVGWlyLnLzjp 5mD9oiT6u6DLseyBxYl75KlLjXkxb0TC8NVRzMCA/0mM90AsTwdxZN/Icf+s5Lgc 84PniKoU3iZQo5N5Qrp2zLVCNt/4WLvTlX/jw4= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id D2EE31E380; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 05:29:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1469525358.431094.676962713.03BA4FD6@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: /NHOr/dlQjdO3VdtdYo3c0ZXU59SKSYEDoESjSoTe//2 1469525358 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3c2832c2 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:29:18 +1000 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) A better solution is to make `outline-invisible-p' return t only if invisible text property is `outline' (defsubst outline-invisible-p (&optional pos) "Non-nil if the character after point is invisible." (eq (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible) 'outline)) From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline inviisble Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.146954610530476 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 26 Jul 2016 15:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2016 15:15:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bS44T-0007ur-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:15:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55689) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bS44N-0007ua-NX for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:15:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS44D-0001qU-Dh for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:14:50 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS44D-0001qQ-AX; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:14:45 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1707 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bS44C-0001bo-PL; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 11:14:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:14:34 +0300 Message-Id: <834m7ctorp.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <1469525358.431094.676962713.03BA4FD6@webmail.messagingengine.com> (message from Paul Rankin on Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:29:18 +1000) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469525358.431094.676962713.03BA4FD6@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) > From: Paul Rankin > Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 19:29:18 +1000 > > A better solution is to make `outline-invisible-p' return t only if invisible text property is `outline' > > (defsubst outline-invisible-p (&optional pos) > "Non-nil if the character after point is invisible." > (eq (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible) > 'outline)) For outline's own use, sure. But this function is also used by Org, so I think we need to coordinate with Org developers about such a change, to make sure we don't break Org in the process. Btw, can you describe the real-life use case where you bumped into this issue? Thanks. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline inviisble Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 05:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.146959819020146 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 05:44:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2016 05:43:10 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38603 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSHcc-0005Es-L2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:43:10 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:40850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSHcZ-0005Ej-Tw for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:43:10 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DDD2021B; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:43:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:43:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=Q+Zh8bWmTb6ZQIzvC51xiPMPdWw =; b=sqcPKB5YVDPmz4/ZOwK4ARs+TFkAZiw5sTCN67VgG3lyKErOhz74JQIzTGy ldOG2dvW5MZTJdpDUowxnf55yCcqRcz42cJSeBCweCK7Afomr8VRFUegZJ/aKN7J fPXwLOZKSUn/R6SpVFWHeCxBkjrj47zf62t62nUcA5RIxUIU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=Q+Zh8bWmTb6ZQIz vC51xiPMPdWw=; b=WvTP66K90IZrGQsKa2Me7Z6XshdQ/EmVVAa1BJ6vneRwnWP CzanM7tDimAO6zCrIUN8m6WCNf/741+/hBQEfZ0o+S15diTWec+tJnZsvxHAT31x fuYXGZgDHz7/D3w3Lbi7s6OIVzkfPaVGxQwgriaF6Vj2DVSWj4sbqaTQaNQQ= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 236DF1E380; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:43:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1469598187.1612746.677915337.370D508A@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: xhIAwZAAyKxM+BxlEAB5MlkuAbcXv1BXEc4jvVUUnvVa 1469598187 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-217db728 Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:43:07 +1000 In-Reply-To: <834m7ctorp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469525358.431094.676962713.03BA4FD6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <834m7ctorp.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:14 +0300: > For outline's own use, sure. But this function is also used by Org, > so I think we need to coordinate with Org developers about such a > change, to make sure we don't break Org in the process. I'll leave this in your hands. > Btw, can you describe the real-life use case where you bumped into > this issue? I author a major mode for a format wherein some outline headings are prefixed with a non-printing "forced" character. I've given the user the option to hide these non-printing "forced" characters by adding an invisible text property and keyword to the regexp group (the "forced" character), then using `add-to-invisibility-spec' to add that keyword. The invisible property is managed by Font Lock. It will probably not shed any further light, but here is the real-life code: https://github.com/rnkn/fountain-mode/blob/0707b4753fabdc07cbe04030b1559671d87c57f2/fountain-mode.el#L3691-L3699 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 04:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.146967995919929 (code B ref 24073); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 04:26:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2016 04:25:59 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48720 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSctT-0005BN-HS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:25:59 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:55425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSctO-0005BB-HF for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:25:57 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9357520507 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:25:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=B/M FP8ke8bpoFG48F1VtLbg3WUI=; b=Dtnytjndh76jVh6Tl4DBrsfYjvB7B82nmQB w0vxdIiMxw/sE4iOm11CTZWuNmIoRy3AB+xEuBpwCH/VWShGjcg3JrF3r68d/IRS QbG/GAA4DeWko0mxleZ7FLCTaKhWl5ec8IKY6UM1P2/2k6yRA4n7jt/YgStnADha d51hU3xg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=B/MFP8ke8bpoFG48F1VtLbg3WUI=; b=cH9bC G4p4xElC8SN9kflWNQa8AQccoIvyW+3OTXbFwKyUyKS2TCPCSu3tGCVGogRUXgiP wANxJH7MTkcH4RUuKWtnhaVVsp9SE4J+qy96kwoSPyrZoW4MYNVTrt7FVneZ6K2u 5Uyo+gLi1FdliOsZiTWVgdCcIfBaHbsM5DEXWE= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 4AC1C1E380; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:25:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: JSZCKf7fpCq0nR4NkPlIxXATVvkr7TMIll9tbI8bQspl 1469679952 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-aabce84e Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 14:25:52 +1000 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) I've tried to create an advice patch for the benefit of users affected by the bug to make outline-invisible-p return t for either 'outline or t, nil otherwise... (advice-add 'outline-invisible-p :filter-return (lambda (return) (eq return (or 'outline t))) '((name . "fountain-mode-patch"))) However, it appears that other compiled functions in outline that call outline-invisible-p do not respect this advice, e.g. 1. navigate to heading affected by above bug 2. M-: (outline-on-heading-p) => nil 3. navigate to (defun outline-on-heading-p ...) in outline.el 4. C-M-x 5. repeat 1. and 2. => t Do compiled functions not respect advice added to functions that they call? -- Paul W. Rankin www.paulwrankin.com From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 02:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.146975803425180 (code B ref 24073); Fri, 29 Jul 2016 02:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2016 02:07:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49854 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSxCk-0006Y4-I9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:07:14 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f45.google.com ([209.85.218.45]:36341) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSxCf-0006Xm-Qj for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:07:12 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f45.google.com with SMTP id w18so88436178oiw.3 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:07:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=QuffGTQHn7RMGAher7hvltNNq1gfBw+Z4JWWpM6n99E=; b=KgwsntBXcIek7LumhsWKC2RUQOThESPldIWyKkgprcJ87+Ppfzv43d1OS4nQv591Gt gBI3c+ZV7GQKgC+vyzEdHGHh7rn9qn11It+8pybzVchfgVcdaUVBU5TKs23XqlEbtrpg fVIn065YIARtEAMQvpap4vqDQt3WIt6AYv0LGaO2V/XmM7J/botbqTKUKV/HEGk44dv3 twOj6u5po1v9YMQVqVDDI4YhYCjq/OxW8G+DEfetXcBrDu3jIfyT64RWrliIqPNVbm/H DOjO1BbbxuOAXDynaXYtYVmRf90/4dakGxAWq6Y1gdu6LRH6F4efJ60RMdusiMU8+7/o p9/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QuffGTQHn7RMGAher7hvltNNq1gfBw+Z4JWWpM6n99E=; b=ItAhzTlbep3SA9EdLps4oGclgdhshcitySoZe/90jaralCY/XDFwpVj0Eszd/gDfYL YzhWLpyEeYoBryccHeQWH7iEM2c7QzbvlAZCEA6bX6thoV10v1Ragt7m180R6j5WzxME LByOGCJYlJtUmOcE9X9xLPes7fQWTue1VtMl5wl53wBaFfcUDZgfRByaLEkH6rlW5A0O SZpzElaMmox8cA/qYsKXO/bn6NCw9wBmKmhPIGorUzZS7NA30IqFd6aMSqzbki+Mgk00 XyI9GEcSnDI2CuvAn6w2JPyfL6KXvJhpiKJIRhGfuSppnT7cScidZjef/2xGX3hDbY5J /aAg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouukuQHNtg/u6x5Q9DlOHDPEqe+HOyn88JfNd+f6OGOSHdlOw/OKbTn9SS9j5ijykzIrHMU9L7OFzwncgw== X-Received: by 10.202.102.75 with SMTP id a72mr23045046oic.40.1469758024261; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:07:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.7.161 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 19:07:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:07:03 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5RcxPy4-6EVOlWPVXVFNdTMF_aQ Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Paul Rankin wrote: > I've tried to create an advice patch for the benefit of users affected by the bug to make outline-invisible-p return t for either 'outline or t, nil otherwise... > > (advice-add 'outline-invisible-p :filter-return > (lambda (return) (eq return (or 'outline t))) > '((name . "fountain-mode-patch"))) > > However, it appears that other compiled functions in outline that call outline-invisible-p do not respect this advice, e.g. > > 1. navigate to heading affected by above bug > 2. M-: (outline-on-heading-p) > => nil > 3. navigate to (defun outline-on-heading-p ...) in outline.el > 4. C-M-x > 5. repeat 1. and 2. > => t > > Do compiled functions not respect advice added to functions that they call? I think it's because outline-invisible-p is a defsubst, so when compiled, callers don't actually reference the symbol `outline-invisible-p' at all. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147004427017325 (code B ref 24073); Mon, 01 Aug 2016 09:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2016 09:37:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52549 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bU9fS-0004VN-Gg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:37:50 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:55047) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bU9fQ-0004VB-HH for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:37:49 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BB200E5; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 05:37:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Aug 2016 05:37:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=FNyEzLWR21yeZzy6Kqu04koTzOA =; b=Dyql0UD+XN5426nBz6vweZ8TlErZIKhnbJvnHs4wlbRVfalGI/iLHo0wqkD c+FC1v/hvLa5rqiv7zaBbeMlwW0zVwG0qnRbvGWnNp2y2PLdusiLm56tgb3Jx+vB +m4K1Ot0h1R4PLdMib3by/aYKD60V3W5WvX2Dd5v3ZlHXKU4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=FNyEzLWR21yeZzy 6Kqu04koTzOA=; b=sgh02AE6bEGgTy3L5NMAZkR8bvy//GqgeBs7moB0Do/iQfs Qp4XaD+K+S5FwmUaGmvrMug2NFA6O7DRw1zY8Gj419rzPxj11xS273yrc461OIrR w6OPnNzqVZBJN1nkJ48pTcMQtvTMCuWX11G0n5YuI7D2u7V29jy/yCcMfnJg= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id BD6AA6A4C1; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 05:37:47 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: jJThVWHoGT5k8MHTQmona4JErbYRORGta8Wd7XHrtVXo 1470044267 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-501c3c37 Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:37:47 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Noam Postavsky on Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:07 -0400: > I think it's because outline-invisible-p is a defsubst, so when > compiled, callers don't actually reference the symbol > `outline-invisible-p' at all. Ah yes. Thanks. A predicate function that doesn't return a t or nil and misuses defsubst! For shame outline... for shame.... Is there any way for a package to work around this with outline in its present state? From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147006097823872 (code B ref 24073); Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Aug 2016 14:16:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53052 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUE0w-0006Cy-Ej for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:16:18 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]:34575) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUE0v-0006Ch-E1 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:16:17 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f50.google.com with SMTP id j8so38537926itb.1 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:16:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=RXp8WpjjKY1zHdPrnZpimqPsiMm8VNZ/v10TyzMu7fo=; b=CkLuOFHCGmhrmjWcctMjZ7HuH9ayySXab/bmY8Cc1r2ljy8Z/IqabBsKx/dFaBez13 wy2ooZb9+6QmEmg43dmsT+znoq/oOwD+BuKo7xWHm7ICL8rem3w9kFvRTnx25Fa3eraP QZ4Cxo6M6H4RRCBD62NTfopzbgWLwzdNAsL3M2n+ZkewimqiuGXLi+8cTZCGvDvu4i+R M5vxAmZQY1+PYf+eIAY4evsYn6VpFkDKQEBP+yfpkAG6bGvoWlX3FRs1fQBMqtqlwewi va+uqzZ+OdZSuWvVrHuY0SLVA4HWvwz0yzmSf1CTy4112VthA04etEmnQ4LvcPQ5Fykq jQ+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=RXp8WpjjKY1zHdPrnZpimqPsiMm8VNZ/v10TyzMu7fo=; b=me3/Sd47WsPB4zUdj1oY7Ce5j1krStRbOrP92uXuOSd4xIPxVAn2vDsw519SgYPIHD 2g3pHpD1nlDOWYw87xy1uGylR8OhhIHiku3CakFga5d3IyKZ1DHE8ghSjQ9ooVLvR8r0 rLe2tSMkBjVadlgoQCm8RnYzYBj33Z6UZ50tmD7Y22jsHNrv1jLzIZsnwuwn89/Szo+Q y9jz0Y0GpVrziSa5vetLRa5GyYhnKrC5/b4YLKFqpwBmaCTPGEHTsP21ndBdKl3bhkQV +DMCkCL/JL8Yt9zvalEC6pobsNW+RFIea+l4TR72ZHfXvdyu3iQPP2Dn4tPrgvpa10C0 TnVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvjRBUDQnWMwxHInzoR/WWl2GJKBWsXrKe5qg13K4Qqio5S27/s66LNKF4k+WHc1w== X-Received: by 10.36.69.36 with SMTP id y36mr13549411ita.72.1470060971643; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:16:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony (206-188-64-44.cpe.distributel.net. [206.188.64.44]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o15sm10861376ith.2.2016.08.01.07.16.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Aug 2016 07:16:11 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:16:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Mon, 01 Aug 2016 19:37:47 +1000") Message-ID: <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Paul Rankin writes: > Noam Postavsky on Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:07 -0400: >> I think it's because outline-invisible-p is a defsubst, so when >> compiled, callers don't actually reference the symbol >> `outline-invisible-p' at all. > > Ah yes. Thanks. A predicate function that doesn't return a t or nil > and misuses defsubst! I don't think it's necessarily a misuse of defsubst, that just happens to be one of the limitations. > > Is there any way for a package to work around this with outline in its present state? Well, as you saw, re`eval'uating outline-on-heading-p (so that it becomes uncompiled) seems to work, you could try doing that from lisp: (pcase (find-function-noselect 'outline-on-heading-p) (`(,buffer . ,position) (with-current-buffer buffer (goto-char position) (eval (read (current-buffer))))) (_ (error "Couldn't find `outline-on-heading-p'"))) Or advise :override outline-on-heading-p instead of outline-invisible-p. > (advice-add 'outline-invisible-p :filter-return > (lambda (return) (eq return (or 'outline t))) By the way, shouldn't that be (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) return)) > '((name . "fountain-mode-patch"))) From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.14701084399931 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:28:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 03:27:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53273 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMR-0002a7-AQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:19 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:44752) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQMP-0002Zz-OQ for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:18 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5586B20755; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:27:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=D24AwAoj+vfDCVPQ4uuRBSoQrrI =; b=WOuPNGxMTkxqth9iOGyYSKkpLP7Ykd1KORF5Y752JZP141/+lw5nXTtQn8o iM9UAHbbkWjEjQQXEiRCMHLQDbCdc7PwaQ5noSNvmxQmWUSZUP/PE9JPe5jdvR3r CzbhkBj5lQJXfY62OcBOtfUBLNTGz4EBFhnefjqIl0M2gcts= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=D24AwAoj+vfDCVP Q4uuRBSoQrrI=; b=tli4JDm2xctMMtoBpj5KB04+R+V7DSDaMlEcsUOFqaGbTx7 yUhwVrYeDD8r14zFK56B+opDl3LyLWwZ5IOe8c1YzwWfvTLKad1EEnDn7zFiLx1E P08d5b/IoQKxgx5Vs1aTgD8vUpL9BiCiMF35qq1m3kU2bjaG2NV98mBU5koo= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 246F06A4C1; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: aagyBHaocggGd4NTApDUMLPN6+yP/5uZJe9ewMy6nCjd 1470108437 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-501c3c37 Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:27:17 +1000 In-Reply-To: <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) npostavs@users.sourceforge.net on Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:16 -0400: > I don't think it's necessarily a misuse of defsubst, that just happens > to be one of the limitations. Jks ;) > Well, as you saw, re`eval'uating outline-on-heading-p (so that it > becomes uncompiled) seems to work, you could try doing that from lisp: > > (pcase (find-function-noselect 'outline-on-heading-p) > (`(,buffer . ,position) > (with-current-buffer buffer > (goto-char position) > (eval (read (current-buffer))))) > (_ (error "Couldn't find `outline-on-heading-p'"))) Whoa this is terrifying... Would something like the following work? Maybe with a (condition-case ...) ? (let ((source (find-function-noselect 'outline-on-heading-p))) (with-current-buffer (car source) (goto-char (cdr source)) (eval-defun nil))) > Or advise :override outline-on-heading-p instead of outline-invisible-p. But I want to act with a light touch... > By the way, shouldn't that be > > (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) return)) I think this will fail when outline-invisible-p returns foo in the initial example. We want to only return t when outline-invisible-p returns outline, not foo or otherwise. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147010966312010 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:48:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 03:47:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53277 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQgB-00037e-0W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:47:43 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com ([209.85.218.51]:34838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUQg9-00037R-3G for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:47:41 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id 4so9822365oih.2 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:47:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=JfjdcUeDTjHrbGJUkiwjXoDNpgxtbVrt1IUH1cxGmdA=; b=Um2O5Qq5DjJAmdLoz/EqALKf6XgFLs1Y126GZMXnbb9xeSuSkzzSIHHDDJ3flhTANV c5IdWrkazMjYvNcHMeeW9/f+6cl/LZ4m4yq7da5GjG6Cw+b9gjxM9GaKGy7cLZbRjs48 lK2aDbZ0n7tjfbX22IHev6Yv7ZX9PuR0iF6Lo2CCH1FLqRaGecg/aG2SHDLlHtarCMXa i1W4h2BoIa5Q0t8zJME/9Wp+heaNB2rTrr49TXoc/x16CRvi/8nLo8LQUBBg+WnFYyr5 w0OpvfB4IGhbZ9GniJTlu/NycR0RVI4dKRobBorXeDRXpifTUsLdcMnI4Y4oJViRVYOB F1xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JfjdcUeDTjHrbGJUkiwjXoDNpgxtbVrt1IUH1cxGmdA=; b=JpjbN2DdrqQqxUMTGqz8xdT7ECxg5JWcdvI9V8reMithZpHg/MBI2HQypN1L5VgY08 HxAzYqwv2izMlmgaYagvoMDIyIOxqIUIDUXxRVe1srHDql8AvyQCp1eJ7MrVVtYJ8w8N uyjQdkfESCacnY3QiBQRFq5GioLj56Wy6hfEIVZleUe86oPwfUazCoL4UM4dHztjXi4o h17ph8vZY6M9wL4Hhebt6ogtVfrwH+v5eBqkN4ybiQt+9KhKHr+pkgId5l6MPVchVebu mFoAsUQBaC41ae3URXYKCDIUsV3VpsDJoo81dCcdO63YPOFn6t7dluRCX1GIm7WqPZdz pYvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvyC4F0j4kcYpADVr3epemvYu4nmKkc+6oms7mOAPUIDuod4lw74Fx1YCHbqhYTNBV10SMpngR7l2jgEg== X-Received: by 10.202.93.197 with SMTP id r188mr15989363oib.88.1470109655444; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:47:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.7.161 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:47:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:47:34 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EY2jowFVuTVBoqmzkUgrQE5vV6k Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Paul Rankin wrote: > Whoa this is terrifying... :) Don't like pcase? > > Would something like the following work? Maybe with a > (condition-case ...) ? > > (let ((source (find-function-noselect 'outline-on-heading-p))) > (with-current-buffer (car source) > (goto-char (cdr source)) > (eval-defun nil))) Yes, that's about the same, though I would still suggest (eval (read ...)) over eval-defun for non-interactive code. >> By the way, shouldn't that be >> >> (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) return)) > > I think this will fail when outline-invisible-p returns foo in the > initial example. We want to only return t when outline-invisible-p > returns outline, not foo or otherwise. Oh, then your original was okay, it just had a bit of dead code. Simply (lambda (return) (eq return 'outline)) should suffice. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 04:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147011173115136 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 04:23:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 04:22:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53291 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bURDX-0003w3-9a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:22:11 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:44007) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bURDV-0003vw-AX for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:22:09 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D4C2049B; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 00:22:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 00:22:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=aGHt778aexuNsF+TXS5EZG5i+cI =; b=DrgVbOe/jm8Jzy7M5Uac269kaQuFf++hJ/0LABiMs0OAgJCYCAFOXbHzw0m S0pzawJkQSsSiJ1eDFcUXIwXkfycdTsZn45U7S6dG69GVYwYsvojzDSuulv6WJM4 0/zNK5YdXmfaiVxdFQp5VLGAxm//8xNoX9cuXbW7soePe2uw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=aGHt778aexuNsF+ TXS5EZG5i+cI=; b=QeM1lG+eO+4GnyzcPma66aOIpsglS7GyRyKHRzXRMDo9h/U d95iVilO2ilvdn2Y1Jt49GmoVVuEIZxaTmqgT/lM09TxpH8CD37CorMOppTgka8P g/b+LJADAg3yXgYhmv5oMjVezWbinNa0Hg1df4/EKaqFoIonOLlFJfFQaH1o= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 730B81668C; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 00:22:07 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1470111727.2442030.683311433.12321E0F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 1qdDUPp6QEtbH/Uk3sJxIyHEvKk8qQfnA6InkheTR3Vn 1470111727 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-501c3c37 Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:22:07 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Noam Postavsky on Mon, 01 Aug 2016 23:47 -0400: > :) Don't like pcase? I fear what I do not understand. > > Would something like the following work? Maybe with a > > (condition-case ...) ? > > > > (let ((source (find-function-noselect 'outline-on-heading-p))) > > (with-current-buffer (car source) > > (goto-char (cdr source)) > > (eval-defun nil))) > > Yes, that's about the same, though I would still suggest (eval (read > ...)) over eval-defun for non-interactive code. Ah yes, I should have read the docs: "Read one Lisp expression as text from STREAM" - I assumed it would eval the whole buffer... Thanks I'm gonna assume if the package has (require 'outline) then it's safe to assume the existence of outline-on-heading-p too... It appears that (find-function-noselect 'missingfunction) will just hang Emacs anyway. > >> By the way, shouldn't that be > >> > >> (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) return)) > > > > I think this will fail when outline-invisible-p returns foo in the > > initial example. We want to only return t when outline-invisible-p > > returns outline, not foo or otherwise. > > Oh, then your original was okay, it just had a bit of dead code. > Simply (lambda (return) (eq return 'outline)) should suffice. Then this will fail if/when outline-invisible-p is fixed to return t when I wanna future-proof this, so users don't notice the transition. Sorry my previous reply neglected to mention returning t. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147012242632140 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 07:20:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53339 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUTzw-0008ME-0F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:20:26 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:57922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUTzo-0008Lz-8l for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:20:18 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F632071E; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:20:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 03:20:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=GvcqqhAruZeJDJX1WiW7KDJMGUc =; b=ys4FiPsOWbzorKEQp+ucNBJJAyy0+1+t2dyMcZpUhBTmbKlyepspD47R5NK q/Wq8NH1DS9AH0h5w/YRVm4Oi0Mtpk6VXMV8uxNkJt2ElRRaH43zHU3zaop1Ug+J 2Vhj4FekVdBut+GC/QS0b0oM9n2Q/PryIJInBnv8oFOSwg2Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=GvcqqhAruZeJDJX 1WiW7KDJMGUc=; b=CuC17Xhap6HV0ucQMIoPeCAUdeUlRNWCl6oWclnfPWNT6vM ntIf8j1weZyKErAZPZEMMRY+vkwE2ldBfg4zTaS1hWyWB3u6+kc3KYBesOx+DiHI M6nJpLQ/JZgHeauXuCXotJUsH+IekwE5ZTedPLSyuLn1A3LIIkhwaeJCTDF4= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 99FDF6A5C8; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 03:20:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1470122411.2246578.683407105.655B380C@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: cw0f3j0p87MvXnBUsWz1rRgsEiEH3u4WMYgUxEQXBGMQ 1470122411 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-501c3c37 Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:20:11 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) I've added the following into my major mode to patch outline until the bug is addressed... (with-eval-after-load 'outline (advice-add 'outline-invisible-p :filter-return (lambda (return) (eq return (or 'outline t))) '((name . "fountain-mode-patch"))) (dolist (fun '(outline-back-to-heading outline-on-heading-p outline-next-visible-heading)) (let ((source (find-function-noselect fun))) (with-current-buffer (car source) (goto-char (cdr source)) (eval (read (current-buffer)))))) (message "Function `outline-invisible-p' has been patched")) But I'm a bit concerned if users install Emacs without uncompiled Lisp source, will this result in an error that Emacs simply can't find the library outline? From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147014809611179 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:29:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 14:28:16 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53726 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUafz-0002uB-Dz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:28:16 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:34023) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUaft-0002tY-79 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:28:09 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id l65so238544007oib.1 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:28:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=zfijcLtlctRx/dZv/UtkpPKVlwbAIL5at2Y7/Bnv/KM=; b=YAuu0C4QHypZZ+P51xU9/wPTJycgE6jeMKhSBsex6oH36hjwo45zDOWvTvs2OOGmlO Vekm5KRn4rYX0IpZhP09r6F3wrsbAEOoDfBaya4o+H6JTmw19zTxyoVujGA8uh15GfDR S162s5/F4WGM2rjWaPtfJpt6pB12wE5RILkSB0TEuSBg2d1K8AGikUat6FkqmFLRQJTb eBDXPD9Snjz3Fy4Amjo8vp/oP0h5WZU4truxQJdap/zgufNjKqJI/mJ4g+IAJfGasxqx 5WFadfrSpam4niH9qMwyflJh7rojzQFvrmcXCB7txxVvM2gRhyt+2XxTqfaBF6jP/IPd PWgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zfijcLtlctRx/dZv/UtkpPKVlwbAIL5at2Y7/Bnv/KM=; b=hQ/zLfSyRbjd/WMtpChwKMZ5KqZWja9noY4ihed5NzM+vST6Kuc7Xw8ysi63tIHN6M wp4ZkK1o1xlMDavO7JZXjEQ7xPiURpN3AaVy3OdK1XIZ8uNZU8D6SQe9LLa2BVI6/+qi 6jyq4I9kmm8fiIcL3x3lO6KuSHn34510ogebPBpXljOAlo7KRmkdk95FgzCK1+SW+R8b k1KmTONbZT7GGrMfz9tDVh/+BaS4oENv4ThmEdOv1i6+7IQgke//13Xm4qw38mRAaFjn QnRS57U5Jm1WXDeGK7xkNBjrsn8LuA56FSO1ven9LhOgWbbuboQTnjO2S7AQpDodxUtf /WLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvtYhBKuS+gMECXuAI/7swgJc4J2BOHXhczF4uV6aoc5+UompRn09USD/ls2+MGrMidwa842MxMOnCDsg== X-Received: by 10.202.102.75 with SMTP id a72mr37799211oic.40.1470148079544; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:27:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.7.161 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:27:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1470111727.2442030.683311433.12321E0F@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470111727.2442030.683311433.12321E0F@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:27:58 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: sDhwRLUCyJYlmyNcMMNkQkx4Nbs Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Paul Rankin wrote: > It appears that > (find-function-noselect 'missingfunction) will just hang Emacs anyway. That's a bug, but it seems to be fixed in Emacs-25, it signals void-function. > >> >> By the way, shouldn't that be >> >> >> >> (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) return)) >> > >> > I think this will fail when outline-invisible-p returns foo in the >> > initial example. We want to only return t when outline-invisible-p >> > returns outline, not foo or otherwise. >> >> Oh, then your original was okay, it just had a bit of dead code. >> Simply (lambda (return) (eq return 'outline)) should suffice. > > Then this will fail if/when outline-invisible-p is fixed to return t > when I wanna future-proof this, so users don't notice the transition. > Sorry my previous reply neglected to mention returning t. Oh, then you need (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) (eq return t))) Alternatively maybe I can tempt you into learning pcase ;) (lambda (return) (pcase return ((or `outline `t) t))) From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147014830111536 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 14:32:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Aug 2016 14:31:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53730 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUajI-0002zv-Bs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:31:40 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:35199) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUajC-0002ze-JH for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:31:35 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 4so28845585oih.2 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:31:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=xxpSsgFyfuCZsFMkuMB+p3L9Gggx9SdMNFoFxDnGGr8=; b=dArLiK0u4H66K6uAs1HPDThysJHSgg/djLeGHWcVCxNXN2/n9qMe+J18v+CasjpO7b /H86q3hmEl268BMoa2SgYVvUPtaOqTHSDFcFdNTqZoiQO1VesZwLb1fcsYNJeeme7cKb 3PjI0NAzMIa1SIVWAHileT/16bqGEbYwCilDeUjsbLaObStu9wODLlVFSxglePkJ4qhK 0bx7+/I6smIabkAnDyh7LgL9YS/E6cALEKY/p/Pv7pLtlhCHCFRg5kRBa2NP046x+00N AoGdui6WHYxepK9yCXBTAbq91GCNwrG/shJ32OkZXwoW5UdpfcmUYmKdFe4QdQ7BVAbA lGXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xxpSsgFyfuCZsFMkuMB+p3L9Gggx9SdMNFoFxDnGGr8=; b=TOkz3mUIfUeMAjDSKeCw5sLToOo6+epdYvy4J5LlISu40xn3oNpJkki2eQ+SNLzo4N 4DYYupfCNaIdRP5o9Y8xFLHYoC0NXKz0HcN8YlFEdXv6RkzTuA+foRfNl1QiN0WNAkcf s9gNU5c7izdOhCq6TPdPuMvQSngttOBKdZp4h/fbDTru3Fk1/lsz36bRJ22Rl1tr3fOq 40WkuCeW9MCB/uuYc999H1vJTH4iIKeGqfo9+OUFL1+yCx7YuVcXuBCq6G3Wn9+CAFJV H2bVL2FR7NwV/siJKU6AktbdlzDxGVZdoz2MvVbuTKQLBtzoEJNQStlee6KIQxWDWhdx F3kA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousIg9xCSs44idY05Z8RLbnIm6EeIShVUfg+gQQyOfpNHmz0fK/uvCzp8xi3d1sBevPBF7ZCeNou7ePwhg== X-Received: by 10.202.102.75 with SMTP id a72mr37813494oic.40.1470148285068; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 07:31:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.7.161 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 07:31:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1470122411.2246578.683407105.655B380C@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470122411.2246578.683407105.655B380C@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Noam Postavsky Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:31:24 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: OFB8PvmsAbRpszVFB8VnK2sr4CE Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Rankin wrote: > I've added the following into my major mode to patch outline until the > bug is addressed... > > (with-eval-after-load 'outline > (advice-add 'outline-invisible-p :filter-return > (lambda (return) (eq return (or 'outline t))) > '((name . "fountain-mode-patch"))) > (dolist (fun '(outline-back-to-heading > outline-on-heading-p > outline-next-visible-heading)) > (let ((source (find-function-noselect fun))) > (with-current-buffer (car source) > (goto-char (cdr source)) > (eval (read (current-buffer)))))) > (message "Function `outline-invisible-p' has been patched")) > > But I'm a bit concerned if users install Emacs without uncompiled Lisp > source, will this result in an error that Emacs simply can't find the > library outline? Yes, perhaps you want to wrap the loop body in with-demoted-errors, or similar. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 24.5; outline-on-heading-p sees any invisible text property as outline invisible Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 03:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Noam Postavsky Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.14701943132231 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 03 Aug 2016 03:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Aug 2016 03:18:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53991 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUmhV-0000Zv-IO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:18:33 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:60665) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUmhT-0000Zn-Ln for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:18:31 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD8E20363; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:18:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 02 Aug 2016 23:18:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=dGMBOXRCfNcm9n5TCWg0M5By6So =; b=DPYy6SqHkDL9G05nGeCrKdN320odRycKlkgxsqPkTr2fnAdckODVNIdcB9X fmli9Mm9aEM2L9lgAZ8f2yxRBP4D0nelRPUqRO9ee4zo8bbZEdQFQdYYBE1jrgnk aBtTi/5aqPaYlSIaTVgz1DVyH4QJSElZ9gfBBJHZyH5s2fdA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=dGMBOXRCfNcm9n5 TCWg0M5By6So=; b=Norq1a2BVDebSN7IO/rQM9tGK34PuQmVucCLEEC29afV5e1 rfzkIwoNYKcS/73NLzvs9s0LQdjVuBu7XAjzBZvkTbFmnRIZUn6mnZqxwSU3xyYN 3Cy90rd9wwwMOk8A0oJIY0uTBNIYj8BDmQEPKnTU34++9HBt4EJGD8+ZIxug= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 3B7BA1628F; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 23:18:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1470194311.168022.684415921.0ED86705@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: M4lICAg8bnoqiFS6cv6EyTSDVqqVKxURWYZcbJixZjcC 1470194311 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-501c3c37 In-Reply-To: References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1469679952.1866840.678960241.470C9887@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470044267.1052174.682381049.26455152@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87fuqoa82i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1470108437.2199166.683287713.52EC58A4@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1470122411.2246578.683407105.655B380C@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 13:18:31 +1000 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Noam Postavsky on Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:27 -0400: > >> Oh, then your original was okay, it just had a bit of dead code. > >> Simply (lambda (return) (eq return 'outline)) should suffice. > > > > Then this will fail if/when outline-invisible-p is fixed to > > return t when I wanna future-proof this, so users don't notice > > the transition. Sorry my previous reply neglected to mention > > returning t. > > Oh, then you need (lambda (return) (or (eq return 'outline) (eq return > t))) Alternatively maybe I can tempt you into learning pcase ;) > (lambda (return) (pcase return ((or `outline `t) t))) What a rookie error on my part! Yes, of course. I'll look into pcase, but I don't like the aesthetic of the backtick or underscore.... Noam Postavsky on Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:31 -0400: > > But I'm a bit concerned if users install Emacs without uncompiled > > Lisp source, will this result in an error that Emacs simply can't > > find the library outline? > > Yes, perhaps you want to wrap the loop body in with-demoted-errors, or > similar. Will do. Thanks for your help! From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.1472605958990 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:13:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2016 01:12:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44819 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1beu50-0000Fu-Bc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:12:38 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:51674) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1beu4z-0000Fl-2h for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:12:37 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25FC203D0 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:12:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=LQU tWJ3uwJ6gMkiGR8abLI3PXaY=; b=TRoVmG3krqoCxleW6BzCnwWe8cIAALfiAdm cicLfwdtObiCSTyKMpHV1rp5vCkyNM8t8vftpDj2677OMScwOCHLz3ypc7XXjipp BinhxF7vIYTRcSuJFOOdvABAkUKlIM0CD/PBSF2/II/zejpKueDfF6wQfpRDmQsg AQJyI6no= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=LQUtWJ3uwJ6gMkiGR8abLI3PXaY=; b=I7opO fwUjbmdC/rTLd1bwRtiZlXQUfkV5z8Mc+pT08ak2KGqedky+JDLEFP3SuWp4j+7t CwUWQkzLENn9kN0E9pQg/cG+PPIGGuWmM4LHusedBJMJ8zWj9QvlirdLzgiOF/E6 8GnJSMuoQC5J1fY5s1lLAnB+jLqP+upb2jYSkM= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9115C1617A; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 21:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: zFGJpzI7TCrQQczyIudbcHppbcYbQUVlNlmjykXMyv7g 1472605956 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-5778c97d Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:12:36 +1000 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) I've just seen this bug is still in outline.el in 25.1-rc2. The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holding it up from being included in 25? From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:42:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.14726112859817 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:42:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2016 02:41:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bevSv-0002YH-IO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:41:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57438) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bevSu-0002Y5-FQ for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:41:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bevSk-0003ZZ-BY for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:41:19 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:35732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bevSk-0003ZP-8S; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:41:14 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2413 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bevSh-0006mt-86; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:41:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:41:10 +0300 Message-Id: <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> (message from Paul Rankin on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:12:36 +1000) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) > From: Paul Rankin > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:12:36 +1000 > > I've just seen this bug is still in outline.el in 25.1-rc2. > > The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holding it up from being included in 25? Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already released. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147261218011116 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2016 02:56:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44852 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bevhL-0002tE-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:56:20 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:33168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bevhK-0002t5-Bo for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:56:18 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6159205ED; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:56:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:56:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=1V5oDdupyn7/CdJFboJEdr5DCEA =; b=K+wIdampoSw2IDEDYPw/A/Db4i80AH9Azi789uEhdl6jLZsVgBYti1/3uZn 2/uqospMcB2hpJmXLZktSgBRnMoolRT2dDICVNLooosd0hCLpGHMfJAIDax3vy/R 9/UpGpwavXqG9KmS0Vp5eJWjn4LgKlc/vncloRK/eEbPBzy4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=1V5oDdupyn7/CdJ FboJEdr5DCEA=; b=bg9Xizzz4x32nUPc3fn5KOSafDsIoVuSRkWPTq7cVDOD2fp wxig47+Oh4lZS3457zbVuHCzuBbL2t9LZpzE3XeJzpgzUt7RzhTJIB4BYjxmvszb MNKW6H2QiCo26HkHvMFzzgNbLbht9TwDbtWjbZ7jp9YvUblmVhfHD8bHw+gM= X-Sasl-enc: 312uKB9IHbFFufy0e5yO7RwO3NT2U4rNJHdK/hBLXRUG 1472612177 Received: from [10.185.27.97] (pa49-197-196-109.pa.qld.optusnet.com.au [49.197.196.109]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 44054F29CC; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 22:56:17 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Paul Rankin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G36) In-Reply-To: <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On 31 Aug 2016, at 12:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Paul Rankin >> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:12:36 +1000 >>=20 >> I've just seen this bug is still in outline.el in 25.1-rc2. >>=20 >> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holding= it up from being included in 25? >=20 > Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already > released. Okay. 25.2?= From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: John Wiegley Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147263401113530 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:01:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2016 09:00:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bf1NS-0003W9-Mz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:00:11 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:33240) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bf1NQ-0003V3-Db for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:00:09 -0400 Received: by mail-yb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a7so15122784ybi.0 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=sOwxYER16L6Q+S/lnT2szJClo9W6/AgEAVWyPDaOA68=; b=EQ1nm6uD3sCaROPfkOvImXz2WSyRHQgqAFAAxyBvisO4dsrDbv/S7aQxrm5rZx4IqJ VdJjW5ROyTHrVXBSaKNfuHMIfODJ+ries3OYVQqm9zg/No/jCRN2OyLjIijQZoIEjWKN W/VbTn6bXvvoP3aYSMl4Kl0U5VEwa5MkZ5WwObNWcx2qcAzDkAVAogdYS/pBLD2l/WQo mYpg0R8RNi9UgpuBrwr3xFe59UsS40OB1i82GYMoSibWil7eYaTBRBCQBq2xtyAyFCEK eCobeqtrpGjGDyFOifbcNhmDfcCvzD2/C1iNtFf10l4Ip+SqBrMKfSsZ1Fdk0eIFpYP6 aaIQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=sOwxYER16L6Q+S/lnT2szJClo9W6/AgEAVWyPDaOA68=; b=bwIQTMMiM21wlKEUz5EQCYMIoeeYHHDF9OTDsP3rN+l3NukqKg2EQbw+p+kMsBZfeg Nb9eYUwnc3QQlgC8ZPucqdfReow2aZCsRBS2GSndk9PNU8zOHNUlhr8Xr7qw1EXxrxGu yXgTpKmZM8za+5ZU80/wiCQnOHuuX59tWrPcqh+OJUlZPBXTZqvM1gx88pL4Ri6uifYv 4+Z3E0r0Tybi/5EBu/YJQq9n9A0ZY+CBLyosvpz18SUF8iPhg0CbItP0p/X1XCo+XPSM 7ytCrqYCQGW8JewwyydJ3unFnM3jSIdMaHnanTtLCYsDG5RmZlhy3uKkLxoPF4P9n9kX 4NTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNy2cI/28egwW+59ZVIy/5LpfBLBzr9XZYBeBkVCPhapnpiDCN8/eakRMGqqnqSng== X-Received: by 10.37.212.19 with SMTP id m19mr6966438ybf.150.1472634002895; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-69-149.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.69.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y15sm11189014ywa.51.2016.08.31.02.00.02 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:00:02 -0700 (PDT) From: John Wiegley X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 77651227C3B5; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:00:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000") Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 01:59:57 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) >>>>> "PR" == Paul Rankin writes: >> Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already >> released. PR> Okay. 25.2? Sure, 25.2 will be open for commitments on the emacs-25 branch in a couple of weeks (fingers crossed). -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:13:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin , Eli Zaretskii Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147263473814623 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:13:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2016 09:12:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bf1ZC-0003nn-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:12:18 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bf1ZA-0003nf-2W for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:12:16 -0400 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B17920723; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:12:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:12:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=lZnUSpdfBARize3tyf65yB+euwg=; b=iyKTL adQkl64vBlYuWgIUj3I1is5hEfWNkyiGUtE9SQLbAzOMeQFRLKitUF2UsxY6RIz7 CFd8Nule4F8ZS++OAdGlZTPSUFiR28LBGFjMvsgFLo4btdZ5Us1hqOeUf0SLeoWJ OFARytPlD/cW6Som0LQq54ppfNWR/peo//pbS4= X-Sasl-enc: yk/4zfMSG2jFkgwK/o3vuimfTopcS/p7Cxp9zPcLAAaQ 1472634733 Received: from strawberry (31-211-216-84.customers.ownit.se [31.211.216.84]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 636DBF29D6; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:12:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Petton In-Reply-To: <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:12:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn095ml4.fsf@petton.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Rankin writes: > On 31 Aug 2016, at 12:41 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >>> From: Paul Rankin >>> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:12:36 +1000 >>>=20 >>> I've just seen this bug is still in outline.el in 25.1-rc2. >>>=20 >>> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holdi= ng it up from being included in 25? >>=20 >> Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already >> released. > > Okay. 25.2? You can push a fix to master. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXxp9nAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQ+JkIAKziqiyo5Xq4UsGjWPPaFPyt 2YtPPlXBgU1u+LrT6g0LwRS6/07r1UHwCZQut7jF0shf/CrryQ5ig21Uhf+ZXaYs o5DXVb8iXmSgrQmnUSqGWtI6KbzG7AljmenC9QLxJavJua19/dfj9dEV8LjCB81J ma326xQ6z81JuZ7E/lqlhAb+frbg/NFOlP5lM+l3iy6x6kKtR+Pu/dKp4oWKzpFB NjbHXbAmq1eRN7dPINUYUL/wOw/935+mUOvY+HVRWFF6xpNLxgjPycxfE0QnqJX8 V5LQMOc/3XMvowmdHmYmYapAK6ffaCNxfowFJsJGy2Wq7/RwwnQnQl7acuyhUTY= =aK7+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147265356731862 (code B ref 24073); Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Aug 2016 14:26:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6Sp-0008Hl-1O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:26:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59352) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6Sj-0008H6-IQ for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:26:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6SZ-0008P4-Oh for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:25:52 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6SZ-0008Oh-LB; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:25:47 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2913 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bf6SX-0003Hu-Rf; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:25:46 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:25:45 +0300 Message-Id: <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> (message from Paul Rankin on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.5 (------) > From: Paul Rankin > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000 > Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holding it > >> up from being included in 25? > > > > Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already > > released. > > Okay. 25.2? I don't see why not, provided that Org developers give us their blessing. Please bring this to their attention on the Org list, or ask them to speak up here. I don't want us to make any changes that could adversely affect Org without consulting them first. Thanks. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 04:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147287753720518 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 03 Sep 2016 04:39:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Sep 2016 04:38:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48187 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bg2jJ-0005Kr-GX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 00:38:57 -0400 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:52842) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bg2jI-0005Ki-80 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 00:38:56 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E1720415; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:38:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Sep 2016 00:38:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=VEHVo3VvoemFq5utBRT5Rx8+dCo =; b=s86LqtqJeyBa5zD4hTtSC/D+W7tPlo2qvMgJmNr2dNHwO1N8uh5fwX1ala6 LUTMLrVIG9lBDFsJwdE8us6UoVM+pdbLW9J5UtAMDVl/tlbdgn3+R+d1HJmf7ICL VTvjInnTbu2Mw60mNfgYZ9kzyoZHr+SDOutqB+Jzpd6Ahe6g= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=VEHVo3VvoemFq5u tBRT5Rx8+dCo=; b=YZVp4PH9ja1Obe+C4qsOfJ4TkD5vJB70mks+YpZ0lk+f6Cd CRCjgwXINgjVqgEr5/fRMp5kmWq3I6+mPDs4csXuCH3PP9abC3839TwyMYZF159Q ylG+Fib/CrxocK4S52eCeJUq82R1VKcpRCsBNe0axk1va1838jvzRMxTCFI0= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 98C516A563; Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:38:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: FsRDIvNMn+JTgLLPLcacV3oeyBj3+0N/Scx35SSEi5ku 1472877535 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-7215d481 Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:38:55 +1000 In-Reply-To: <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:25 +0300: > > From: Paul Rankin > > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000 > > Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > >> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holding it > > >> up from being included in 25? > > > > > > Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already > > > released. > > > > Okay. 25.2? > > I don't see why not, provided that Org developers give us their > blessing. Please bring this to their attention on the Org list, or > ask them to speak up here. I don't want us to make any changes that > could adversely affect Org without consulting them first. Dear Org Mode maintainers, Looping you in on a proposed bug fix for `outline-invisible-p'. Briefly, the problem is the function returns non-nil for any invisible text property when it should only do so for the outline property. As a defsubst, it is difficult to patch for other affected programs. Diff pasted: --- /usr/local/Cellar/emacs/25.1-rc2/share/emacs/25.1/lisp/outline.el.gz +++ # @@ -388,9 +388,9 @@ nil 'move)) (defsubst outline-invisible-p (&optional pos) - "Non-nil if the character after POS is invisible. + "Non-nil if the character after POS has outline invisible property. If POS is nil, use `point' instead." - (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible)) + (eq (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible) 'outline)) (defun outline-back-to-heading (&optional invisible-ok) "Move to previous heading line, or beg of this line if it's a heading. Diff finished. Sat Sep 3 14:35:22 2016 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin , Bastien Guerry Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147420960431793 (code B ref 24073); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2016 14:40:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34448 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bldGG-0008Gj-1e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:40:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50906) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bldGD-0008G9-FG for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:40:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bldG7-000149-9r for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:39:56 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bldG2-0000zn-O2; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:39:50 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2922 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bldG0-0001R5-4l; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:39:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:39:52 +0300 Message-Id: <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> (message from Paul Rankin on Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:38:55 +1000) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) Ping! Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide your comments? TIA. > From: Paul Rankin > Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:38:55 +1000 > > Eli Zaretskii on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:25 +0300: > > > From: Paul Rankin > > > Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 12:56:13 +1000 > > > Cc: 24073@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > > >> The fix seems trivial to me so I'm wondering if there is anything holding it > > > >> up from being included in 25? > > > > > > > > Yes, the fact that Emacs 25 is for all practical purposes already > > > > released. > > > > > > Okay. 25.2? > > > > I don't see why not, provided that Org developers give us their > > blessing. Please bring this to their attention on the Org list, or > > ask them to speak up here. I don't want us to make any changes that > > could adversely affect Org without consulting them first. > > Dear Org Mode maintainers, > > Looping you in on a proposed bug fix for `outline-invisible-p'. > > Briefly, the problem is the function returns non-nil for any invisible > text property when it should only do so for the outline property. As a > defsubst, it is difficult to patch for other affected programs. > > Diff pasted: > > --- /usr/local/Cellar/emacs/25.1-rc2/share/emacs/25.1/lisp/outline.el.gz > +++ # > @@ -388,9 +388,9 @@ > nil 'move)) > > (defsubst outline-invisible-p (&optional pos) > - "Non-nil if the character after POS is invisible. > + "Non-nil if the character after POS has outline invisible property. > If POS is nil, use `point' instead." > - (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible)) > + (eq (get-char-property (or pos (point)) 'invisible) 'outline)) > > (defun outline-back-to-heading (&optional invisible-ok) > "Move to previous heading line, or beg of this line if it's a heading. > > Diff finished. Sat Sep 3 14:35:22 2016 > From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Bastien Guerry , Paul Rankin , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147420993932298 (code B ref 24073); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:46:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2016 14:45:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34456 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bldLe-0008Os-QB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:45:38 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:47174) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bldLd-0008Ok-FE for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:45:37 -0400 Received: from saiph.selenimh (unknown [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::b3c]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44DA917209C; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Nicolas Goaziou In-Reply-To: <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:39:52 +0300") References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Rankin , Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Hello, Eli Zaretskii writes: > Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide > your comments? TIA. This fix looks fine, obviously. You can go ahead as far as Org is concerned. Thank you for letting us know. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: bzg@gnu.org, hello@paulwrankin.com, 24073@debbugs.gnu.org Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.1474210436599 (code B ref 24073); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:54:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2016 14:53:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bldTg-00009b-Kf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:53:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54511) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bldTe-00009M-Vb for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:53:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bldTW-0005jk-KV for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:53:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49449) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bldTW-0005j6-HW; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:53:46 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2948 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bldTT-0002pX-SD; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 10:53:44 -0400 Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:53:55 +0300 Message-Id: <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> (message from Nicolas Goaziou on Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:34 +0200) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) > From: Nicolas Goaziou > Cc: Paul Rankin , Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:34 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide > > your comments? TIA. > > This fix looks fine, obviously. You can go ahead as far as Org is > concerned. Thanks. Paul, you have a go. Thank you for your patience and perseverance. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Bastien Guerry Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 15:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Paul Rankin Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.14742128804807 (code B ref 24073); Sun, 18 Sep 2016 15:35:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2016 15:34:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34482 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ble76-0001FS-9i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34747) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ble74-0001FB-9d for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ble6w-0004oL-3b for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:33 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50094) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ble6w-0004oD-0s; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:30 -0400 Received: from [95.138.181.39] (port=43530 helo=bzg.fr) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ble6v-0002iW-62; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:34:29 -0400 Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 678BF41053; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:34:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien Guerry References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:34:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:34 +0200") Message-ID: <87fuoxjk71.fsf@bzg.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -7.3 (-------) Nicolas Goaziou writes: > This fix looks fine, obviously. You can go ahead as far as Org is > concerned. +1 -- Bastien From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: bzg@gnu.org, 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, Nicolas Goaziou Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147427800712327 (code B ref 24073); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 09:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2016 09:40:07 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34798 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blv3X-0003Cl-JW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:40:07 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:35131) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blv3W-0003Cd-Ex for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:40:06 -0400 Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB48620388; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:40:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=b/CTkfZVam+yH8nfs+qaf3GO9x4 =; b=WPqp0l3+shTq/LTUGP4cLscbN8tC8uFUb388zQk0xUPLXusYWqfS6o2ZPuG nhvR0RbGFbdrikigBIynlTfrxCN+rPBDGLz4yBVY6NbY67gZR9LPVZgFRtIDCXdG 9ZRchInAzy0/gJeOzIkE309VFnaaUtcKG8yLFfLT79pFAtxo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=b/CTkfZVam+yH8n fs+qaf3GO9x4=; b=emBwO+M6M5wAOvAx/YiU/iyisUo72IVXo72Dq4cb/9oeIV/ bUWhHfZ9/AXDAmpSsAij5E4G5zD1cV8nGS+XIfXuYhaJKIpgENxejWnN1dODcp6X DK9nO9A5jBrh3fm5Hx7nCvYMLgJwUnXhIu/PsanTDBkGf4z1I3rpLiHh/7EY= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9CF386A1DE; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:40:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 52IlfUJNSadb7sdJ/81nQu4qPlOes1QIiGhZMzzEg0BM 1474278005 From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-e7f54b57 In-Reply-To: <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:40:05 +1000 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 18 Sep 2016 17:53 +0300: > > From: Nicolas Goaziou > > Cc: Paul Rankin , Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > > Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:45:34 +0200 > > > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > > > Bastien, could you or someone else please look into this and provide > > > your comments? TIA. > > > > This fix looks fine, obviously. You can go ahead as far as Org is > > concerned. > > Thanks. > > Paul, you have a go. Thank you for your patience and perseverance. Thanks Eli. So the Emacs git repo accepts anyone pushing to? From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: bzg@gnu.org, 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147430375227709 (code B ref 24073); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:50:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Sep 2016 16:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bm1km-0007Cq-Hd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:49:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50553) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bm1kk-0007Cb-Vc for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:49:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm1kb-0002Iy-HS for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:49:05 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm1kb-0002Hd-EK; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:49:01 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1327 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bm1kT-0006CE-W2; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:48:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:48:58 +0300 Message-Id: <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> (message from Paul Rankin on Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:40:05 +1000) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) > From: Paul Rankin > Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , bzg@gnu.org, > 24073@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:40:05 +1000 > > > Paul, you have a go. Thank you for your patience and perseverance. > > Thanks Eli. So the Emacs git repo accepts anyone pushing to? No, you need to get write access. If you don't have it, someone else will have to push your commit n your name. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Bastien Guerry Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Paul Rankin , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147434984816810 (code B ref 24073); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 05:38:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2016 05:37:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmDkG-0004N4-38 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:37:28 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bmDkE-0004Mr-Iy for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:37:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmDk6-0006om-3H for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:37:21 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60857) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bmDk6-0006o8-0R; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:37:18 -0400 Received: from [95.138.181.39] (port=43580 helo=bzg.fr) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bmDk3-0001Xv-S6; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 01:37:16 -0400 Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 77F5A41084; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:37:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien Guerry References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 07:37:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:48:58 +0300") Message-ID: <87wpi7yvw7.fsf@bzg.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.1 (--------) Hi Eli and Paul, Eli Zaretskii writes: > No, you need to get write access. If you don't have it, someone else > will have to push your commit n your name. I can commit this when I'm back on a good internet connection, sometimes next week. Thanks, -- Bastien From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Bastien Guerry Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Paul Rankin , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.147522282327238 (code B ref 24073); Fri, 30 Sep 2016 08:08:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2016 08:07:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bpsqV-00075F-Gt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:07:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58806) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bpsqU-00074k-Gg for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:07:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpsqM-0006ip-62 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:06:57 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60348) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpsqM-0006i9-3L; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:06:54 -0400 Received: from [90.63.245.105] (port=36240 helo=bzg.fr) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bpsqK-0001dp-7p; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 04:06:52 -0400 Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2ED6380C48; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:06:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien Guerry References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:06:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:48:58 +0300") Message-ID: <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -8.0 (--------) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Paul Rankin >> Cc: Nicolas Goaziou , bzg@gnu.org, >> 24073@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 19:40:05 +1000 >> >> > Paul, you have a go. Thank you for your patience and perseverance. >> >> Thanks Eli. So the Emacs git repo accepts anyone pushing to? > > No, you need to get write access. If you don't have it, someone else > will have to push your commit n your name. I've just pushed the fix in master. Thanks Paul. -- Bastien From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Bastien Guerry Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149086190332429 (code B ref 24073); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 08:19:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2017 08:18:23 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51879 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctVHj-0008Qz-5i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:18:23 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47178) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctVHh-0008Qq-4j for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:18:21 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32B320A54; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:18:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=171QJTzllGXMbSFug i+rjE3cxel5TvA3IA1HvSGqDXQ=; b=qAaVsLBzfvm2V8ZjoYSNVif6QP4dHCql2 Epp6lSML+Xh5vVD2rmnOtQ6YAoeDBNWMlg2ebEDCZTKjC2/GtReFM0wuEOWg8nGU FypjloMytUPwCGe6HLgMrUNy9FPEPaVcUpwhsIrHABRkww0YwK+vKEVB7gvfAB85 9fgB48a/orIX6e6tBb07wELjnrHAprG4nMnz7xVTcNf+1dJCDvWQbOV8QzTbtWph lTWtBgyH4XJnJiPPVOUJqnfdRHLC4gY+CNTlZkI9C54T+QtUHDq6IWzSTL68Tp4H ePUh+0yiLFBXGwaPCm4ojUcec9225fuoINPJDPxxf5FiEA7r3Rr/A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=171QJT zllGXMbSFugi+rjE3cxel5TvA3IA1HvSGqDXQ=; b=JMQpS7tV+mjXj67WFtrEjQ oCiwziQQ8wDC1AeKfPK5m1eLPDy1liwuslxyzgs3E4Ug0jf3sPVWuKUhPOb5AgmO I0OwjYpeUo1Kk8QvmwWnL2KlIAyNkP9OwMjTQVah2PlC6OySpOxzsL3mUspQkwW1 YHfImeVQ4/cY7xi1b+igIhv2A1HZlfK/Lhsp+XsHKAl6KKKzSrIPXsSS1/17WW+I oC4SdN0+l3kQ5ME2E31dgVaxaYNuORy0z4pt0LWPGxL1//9+9nx+x8q+56gy4ApS oostA8IzrTt9coXIKA9YdMdzC6uBJO2gv6nD2GoPXsyyF8b2zeZVQHDxYNC4wy0w == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8AF1B9E209; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:18:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-96d0475f References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:18:20 +1000 In-Reply-To: <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, at 06:06 PM, Bastien Guerry wrote: > > I've just pushed the fix in master. > I can see this fix in master [1] but I'm on 25.2-rc2 [2] and outline.el.gz still shows the old outline-invisible-p function. Sorry, can anyone let me know where I've gone wrong? [1]: https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/080a425db51e0b26b03f0f4bd06c814fc2b38578/lisp/outline.el#L390-L393 [2]: M-x version: GNU Emacs 25.2.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin16.4.0, NS appkit-1504.81 Version 10.12.3 (Build 16D32)) of 2017-02-26 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: Bastien Guerry , Eli Zaretskii , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149091931914206 (code B ref 24073); Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:16:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2017 00:15:19 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctkDn-0003h3-2C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:15:19 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:35090) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctkDl-0003gp-44 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:15:17 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f53.google.com with SMTP id y18so4127542itc.0 for <24073@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:15:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=v+MXndc/7rEBAnn89mpOB/eDuN2WyQKb6D3Iit4oYWU=; b=Gg+KtNOhJVdfq2LrRCSYhQU4x1rHK6CyY4X9Uf0JYUzLBGhjMlampz92tcR+htoamA zRJg0SUQp3IxgDusL7qZwWCCzmLnIcDKWyGIDmnRbj98hWkhGy4w+un+2Kf9UKWD1FpD k/cHCJnTtq/5hPWJDLcH4MqH+Cf5EWq0mDmoRIXY+9fnyjIPgrLpLG6Ubf+BzQDNEVUV uCOKpjAMi91RAdI2D66AiEyORdHw619s/IBYGkSAQt1PnoXi1pWEVBVqvpcA5DWlefGK rYcnqf+HCl5ErycJpQY/315GsL1NVZDKdAUw3SxgIrCReEkl0cB9+suOxil261FoF1Oe OAoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=v+MXndc/7rEBAnn89mpOB/eDuN2WyQKb6D3Iit4oYWU=; b=aoJj5kednuLcQR5kW16DLXI23I96UZVtp58LVAe7jNNAb5i4cbpVULCnbZphe5M490 1b9xS8y/S5hZFzOE6PZ+eZm02mh7FwSmdd7XcID0oSc0u8QfKD3OKor9ykOguX0DZnR7 8a88NSK7KhPp2hUlQ5PsEfpw9JoEEFhbfztaSa+yrVUJC7NPFxZuZGrMMFSz5221uCqE WnBrXUPBW6W5oftXTTJsjEppljk+R31GiH68mu1jlfsySsE2NONN2J2tYqYYOiw8AYml CyxlZ0apeZGHQG4RZ08GTELop4j89cr0qFZpYLzb4kMYylgn/oANP9GQFZQmVuumYdHR j0ag== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H14Ntl9574pdGR2zckgggWIhThpP1EdrkQie4adhE5bWMcO2r5TR0nviCvNL8gYQQ== X-Received: by 10.36.216.213 with SMTP id b204mr1152477itg.66.1490919311613; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id v185sm422541itf.11.2017.03.30.17.15.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:16:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2017 18:18:20 +1000") Message-ID: <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Paul Rankin writes: > On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, at 06:06 PM, Bastien Guerry wrote: >> >> I've just pushed the fix in master. >> > > I can see this fix in master [1] but I'm on 25.2-rc2 [2] and outline.el.gz still shows the old outline-invisible-p function. > > Sorry, can anyone let me know where I've gone wrong? Essentially we kind of missed the boat, and we're back in the same situation as [53] this time for 25.2: it's about to be released so it's a bit late to make non-critical code changes. The code in master will become 26.1. [53]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24073#53 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 06:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Cc: Bastien Guerry , Eli Zaretskii , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149102884710569 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 06:41:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 06:40:47 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54969 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuCiN-0002kP-8R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 02:40:47 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:39869) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuCiJ-0002kE-9J for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 02:40:45 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A1720AF9; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 02:40:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 02:40:42 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=s1dPa34DHp/a6FVgA os8sxnOGkh3K0FnhcpbmEzpBU4=; b=aU3rfWQdVG6aDAWp5wH1eT7cPdrMCDP5Z 0KNmR6E8fBponApyF73CCkX4fq9DXG+EqsaU7gjmkqeIzr+3xtz5qHoRnmMcj7I0 9ZBY3Sjt/SWaTF828OniEEGLGM3/GgYyzVvBYLGBf5q4obUBvA9HylKX5JZ/+/Gj ip4ybLWot1I4oV59jNJB4Vhtceatxh1Y2SNJLX8WRTASLPXxLR57D9IJbc+c3XQR WEN/RYKLOze5XWBnzTUNOSvQGkeEDxJ0eut0WL+xRtxZ67kJOq0nobva/im0GvOj k0McyDSENfPlQsQi7Mz//AgYt9c/DansWOHnhE2SMmHPYSiAuSEDA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=s1dPa3 4DHp/a6FVgAos8sxnOGkh3K0FnhcpbmEzpBU4=; b=D4+mCH7VkMZksgBSNfj4I3 HUBrtejvsTDL5oDyD7dpJX9Mff99hO8M2/qrh8nn3mzOGtVqSvHA+vmIkGRcorGp ION36Si37W8iyE0SYzqxjfz7Jb8S+nO+DUBbVMXY+0VfyrN6bD4OgjW3Nn11xZgy rbdbiiCoJT5iv2vNTdcIS+eqJv7KKR6JOlMkEi1aveZqnfsaHknkzlvoip2lHNRi YzprCWNPRnBf6F505O9UAP0iNxIcSA9wWDq6QACAmYi9VoDJ80s22IWS+88+s+9q +x71PmIgxmbM6QJLqul2adXcAIL4VewhFsbMTctHJQsULpL0XnUem/9GpJT7nBOw == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6F8A49E210; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 02:40:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc8b445 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 16:40:42 +1000 References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, at 10:16 AM, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: > Paul Rankin writes: > > > I can see this fix in master [1] but I'm on 25.2-rc2 [2] and > > outline.el.gz still shows the old outline-invisible-p function. > > > > Sorry, can anyone let me know where I've gone wrong? > > Essentially we kind of missed the boat, and we're back in the same > situation as [53] this time for 25.2: it's about to be released so > it's a bit late to make non-critical code changes. The code in master > will become 26.1. > > [53]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=24073#53 Hmm this just raises more questions for me... If I'm following correctly, the patch to outline.el was applied to master on a commit 9cc59ffbbb2f20fbbf1c72d2e0c9dc47c7906a99 on 30 September 2016. Then the "emacs-25.2-rc2" tag was applied to commit fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 on master on 22 February.[1] If I browse the master tree at fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 the patch to outline.el is *not* there.[2] But if I browse the current master tree, the patch is there.[3] So the patch was on master, then it was not, and now it is (but not in release candidate). Hence I'm super confused about the Emacs dev team's git workflow....? [1]: https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/9cc59ffbbb2f20fbbf1c72d2e0c9dc47c7906a99/lisp/outline.el#L393 [2]: https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717/lisp/outline.el#L393 [3]: https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/blob/master/lisp/outline.el#L393 From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149103122213966 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 07:20:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54985 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuDKf-0003dC-Pa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 03:20:21 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:36384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuDKc-0003cy-2q for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 03:20:18 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vw8sD36MNz1qqkj; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 09:20:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan01.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vw8sC2kDZz3jgY6; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 09:20:15 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan01.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yxshDu3Z2u9g; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 09:20:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: OEcGtnagomeuUwPBIH6AZ86DHBPXwSBHy7IMLQ9V0ZPU2qOjBozlafTGaPcM0QHj Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-20-140.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.20.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 09:20:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5C472C4D17; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 09:20:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Yow: I want to dress you up as TALLULAH BANKHEAD and cover you with VASELINE and WHEAT THINS.. Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:20:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2017 16:40:42 +1000") Message-ID: <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > If I'm following correctly, the patch to outline.el was applied to master on a commit 9cc59ffbbb2f20fbbf1c72d2e0c9dc47c7906a99 on 30 September 2016. Then the "emacs-25.2-rc2" tag was applied to commit fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 on master on 22 February.[1] fe91ff27c5 isn't in master, only in the emacs-25 branch. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149103396918064 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:07:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 08:06:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuE2y-0004hI-UI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:06:09 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:53792) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuE2w-0004hA-PK for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:06:07 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D37920B5D; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 04:06:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:06:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LcfR1+Koh4IED77xn KeOAD5FbI5sDUmeR//GhL50MFw=; b=kVZpGtNj9LqBK2ly9I1sDcx8SpxOChpRp AWeo6iET9pq5chC7c4LC2tY/XPzHNZi/R3NGETk4gr5VYh1GIgBK9MbRriKXlbAI A0bPpwiq6r1+8DF7ARGnZHaNZa3z0fPGnhZ/jbJACRjGFiW5eSjZzqlQzD3mP14Q tvYzW4J5Jm1jKjxCcMvuSZrsk+uibi4MbtoLauB7MrSnfMCqk7kpKrvYsC2TRimd ZDNaJWoInxisjvWGWb9WDiBvf5GI9zgZP5h2LKUmfFE9TrPaczCyUqL7/JeSpaU/ +S+YgT8UbD8nPgyM2SjPD6yTS7KfGrCctDPSlpSy9gdXR1sc8emEQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=LcfR1+ Koh4IED77xnKeOAD5FbI5sDUmeR//GhL50MFw=; b=mLqWSeEZo91IKpEEikQFSx jao6TfcKUYMUaS3HAhkjWf9WUTeh+Uahvo5CXZ5ufffN6mOMPGsBcrO3KRGbw4V+ T9XeZv1hnTFEaCOkSGfI+qQdENenEAIkR2MqbGev/xNIenZAWrowuR5o1Ms7d1Wj l/rNGrrXqINfP/c+DooM1TAYFLuI8dHP+x4ToVHX719TtJqaX7NWzDOqhn0K6hvu UQvC0/JjOhNY1MO9tztAZKpELmw0t4CxuI7+0EmO4x3tWZbL9gxGy0e0hNwhot6O 6lxIzAT+BhLh752TuRYSGCgZdpktMslD2XZEUanDIoA5PVWNMUMzTZdh/Ev6gd1Q == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 567319E215; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 04:06:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc8b445 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:06:06 +1000 In-Reply-To: <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, at 05:20 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > > > If I'm following correctly, the patch to outline.el was applied to master on a commit 9cc59ffbbb2f20fbbf1c72d2e0c9dc47c7906a99 on 30 September 2016. Then the "emacs-25.2-rc2" tag was applied to commit fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 on master on 22 February.[1] > > fe91ff27c5 isn't in master, only in the emacs-25 branch. > > Andreas. > I thought maybe GitHub was deceiving me, but nope, here is the commit on savannah in master: http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717&h=master #confused From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149103484019363 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:21:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 08:20:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuEH2-00052F-7o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:20:40 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:51633) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuEH1-000527-0A for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 04:20:39 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vwBBs440Wz1qr42; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:20:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan01.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vwBBs1dTMz3j37C; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:20:37 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan01.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NjbEG_3C6kkO; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:20:36 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: ETY/QLJZHKfwWqv3yD68WhaI8v4uxGoab9cgvUexhZBax5YBeLp/BHxJq1GS68oH Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-20-140.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.20.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:20:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 535342C4D87; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 10:20:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Yow: I'm an East Side TYPE.. Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:20:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2017 18:06:06 +1000") Message-ID: <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > I thought maybe GitHub was deceiving me, but nope, here is the commit on savannah in master: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717&h=master Where does it say that? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149103791423884 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:12:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 09:11:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuF4c-0006D8-7k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:11:54 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:38146) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuF4Y-0006Cz-Sw for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:11:52 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE4720784; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 05:11:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:11:50 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=hvv0IEJcr7fa7LIkS z5WjPdxHj6X8sdTS6l5OrAEu8A=; b=qG4vfRSsi/n4wI53xoFo2pBfK3jlD8kk8 buCzdpXrFgbVd+pR2Sa01xDQ5F4Y3f35u/au8m29WngVVXry7Hcizyu+HkHWSCKd f57MjGOrsgeJ54R4K+sut9EDFcl6VLX7Ok2UtSuMUO5Tw52RzQVx3ShKoTyZT+7y 4fSNhoZvbe2R7YhF5y/Sx4ZmraVZt7Oi1PGUwvYAkgBbbbU+Ime4er5HomOjKLH8 QUQ1rZDfu5AyhoDjHPyMi9+uXIlBLoe5/qmDjNZm0SV8YxRPmjdu9Sdde3rSbuCH CPxLONIdqHL2urrr4hpv657DYYJziVq0zw+0YYsjmRUkKyTxXyd2w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=hvv0IE Jcr7fa7LIkSz5WjPdxHj6X8sdTS6l5OrAEu8A=; b=Pd8boA9uSidd36To0tBTmQ 3wXRkj1EHebULKPxqExt4PhxkR5hXVlVf3lskUD3Z2L/60gL8zTkDalMzFQociID uoUntrjUpD2TuPRVnJAiQkWDZGFfp/IAxBBZLel9bdOLk6D6b0z8SiSN2LmLr4bE KU8ZEcrZklFPIsk9qAp/HKZTvpGt1++l/67iaz/V80A3eN9L83ESLRxA7utVJWM7 9r78XAFiDPqtllLG0BBwItj9ZtNy7H7mNTI2zV8W1fQcQI1smafNhT/UwUYYLpBe 5k1Dg/E7DEpYjIN+d9yF09amrF8tpCsyiIJp6aivUL7BV0Oig4Y9tevkSIpyLnCQ == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id E5CD89E210; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 05:11:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc8b445 References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> In-Reply-To: <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:11:49 +1000 X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, at 06:20 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > > > I thought maybe GitHub was deceiving me, but nope, here is the commit on savannah in master: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717&h=master > > Where does it say that? > > Andreas. Top right corner. And on GitHub it's just under the commit message. But if you trust neither of these, you can verify for yourself with: $ git branch -a --contains fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/emacs-25 remotes/origin/feature/mhtml-mode remotes/origin/fix-bug-21072 remotes/origin/master remotes/origin/scratch/record remotes/origin/scratch/tzz/nettle From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149103944826175 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 09:38:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 09:37:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuFTM-0006o6-E1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:37:28 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:44736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuFTL-0006ny-A6 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 05:37:27 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vwCvT0Xs1z1qqwT; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:37:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan01.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vwCvS5YCgz3j374; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:37:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan01.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlcePcShF-O7; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:37:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: GLqY4HXtppi+jYvuRHDvCqb80FsT4laQT0Er6J4MPMphFbTx+JF276qRlKzLb00B Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-20-140.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.20.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:37:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B74842C4EE8; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 11:37:22 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Yow: I'm DESPONDENT... I hope there's something DEEP-FRIED under this miniature DOMED STADIUM... Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:37:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2017 19:11:49 +1000") Message-ID: <87wpb4piy5.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, at 06:20 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: >> >> > I thought maybe GitHub was deceiving me, but nope, here is the commit on savannah in master: >> > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717&h=master >> >> Where does it say that? >> >> Andreas. > > Top right corner. It doesn't say that. You can switch to any branch you like. > And on GitHub it's just under the commit message. But if you trust neither of these, you can verify for yourself with: > > $ git branch -a --contains fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 > * master > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > remotes/origin/emacs-25 > remotes/origin/feature/mhtml-mode > remotes/origin/fix-bug-21072 > remotes/origin/master > remotes/origin/scratch/record > remotes/origin/scratch/tzz/nettle That's only after emacs-25 has been merged into master. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149104192029749 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 10:19:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 10:18:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuG7E-0007jk-7Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 06:18:40 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:54398) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuG7C-0007jc-0z for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 06:18:38 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC1520A5A; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 06:18:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 06:18:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1AwuT2FfGaoFcZRoQ SHUp5NERkeFZX2D2zFkMsUZJZY=; b=geO4uC04oyUX2air96LBzjQc1XRgNKMbn 3ZC1lyVdB3/+je014pqIhc7oSp5DFnLsj0bKIMVhm8VkmFOUZ+xnDOMwwPg5W2bN XEhemMUDfSipUGplS8vSTlmq8lzyw0W4LrHY4y4Zg8e9ABm2J9tSRvNqnLBnbQt/ 3APCaxSB2RA5UnJzibAyldk0l+AOn5RjGMf3+eOgQUEuztqgJrd3tm5K7c9ziWoL TXMXNBFcP/4FRBU5NrDCCj+WE3z/tfmgw4WHU/6gjIrHnSdQcxjFeB5pvxgZ3g8q w8J0NbejE3pv0LIp70C1FyiBywUoeZcw8veI+dPQ8FHiSE8vjgvTw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=1AwuT2 FfGaoFcZRoQSHUp5NERkeFZX2D2zFkMsUZJZY=; b=CxSdrc604dHB5ENzJiPkJG 6nH4F35UzkT040UjssltD8ut8OUxyBcEjmmDBsiANEnOKOQICBoRjKzteefWfdNq kSZkutiDUuFYjKY/VAAuZAJIohSDUTviuu7C+Zvt0dZPwmxsApchEHptMYZBqeCv iE+kERDL6I1fS4BkVA+5j4z2pq77keKFZdjQHe69/y/h1tPNqee7+LT7afUPGsDr ZEY15HJ4GnpUmdgxlBC4M6y4lzT3WKnefkp/TVSDtp0ICTOgtaqPG/Zl/EQVzjap 1WhxQ2k8V/PByNC+YNe44rW2+5Nzp5qwdUZtHe0vtP5MBY6SaSH/pv0MN4qIQyNg == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 164359E210; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 06:18:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1491041917.2348139.930696624.13E83F1A@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc8b445 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:18:37 +1000 References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87wpb4piy5.fsf@linux-m68k.org> In-Reply-To: <87wpb4piy5.fsf@linux-m68k.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, at 05:20 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: >=20 > > If I'm following correctly, the patch to outline.el was applied to mast= er on a commit 9cc59ffbbb2f20fbbf1c72d2e0c9dc47c7906a99 on 30 September 201= 6. Then the "emacs-25.2-rc2" tag was applied to commit fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5= c5d5bac4017922866717 on master on 22 February.[1] >=20 > fe91ff27c5 isn't in master, only in the emacs-25 branch. On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, at 07:37 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > > > And on GitHub it's just under the commit message. But if you trust neit= her of these, you can verify for yourself with: > > > > $ git branch -a --contains fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 > > * master > > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > > remotes/origin/emacs-25 > > remotes/origin/feature/mhtml-mode > > remotes/origin/fix-bug-21072 > > remotes/origin/master > > remotes/origin/scratch/record > > remotes/origin/scratch/tzz/nettle >=20 > That's only after emacs-25 has been merged into master. >=20 Okay so we've established that the commit is in master after all =F0=9F=91= =8D Emacs development appears to go along in a kind of unorthodox way. As someo= ne familiar with git but unfamiliar with the Emacs dev workflow, my assumpt= ion was that anything in master is ready to ship out the door, with the bul= k of commits happening on feature or hotfix branches. But it appears to wor= k in the reverse, with everything going into master, and stable releases br= anching off, which seems like a good recipe for perpetual missing-of-boatsn= ess. I remember when Emacs dev switched over to git there was a lot of conf= usion about how it works, so I think this is maybe the remnants of that. Anyway, let's hope we can catch the boat next time round! From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: bzg@gnu.org, 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149104709712210 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:45:02 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 11:44:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHSi-0003As-T1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:44:57 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38195) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHSh-0003Ag-1D for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:44:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHSa-0008RE-UP for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:44:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46634) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHSH-0008Gc-2w; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:44:29 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4833 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHSG-0005dw-0T; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:44:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:44:31 +0300 Message-Id: <83wpb44ajk.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii In-reply-to: <1491041917.2348139.930696624.13E83F1A@webmail.messagingengine.com> (message from Paul Rankin on Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:18:37 +1000) References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87wpb4piy5.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491041917.2348139.930696624.13E83F1A@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Paul Rankin > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:18:37 +1000 > Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, > npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > > > > $ git branch -a --contains fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 > > > * master > > > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > > > remotes/origin/emacs-25 > > > remotes/origin/feature/mhtml-mode > > > remotes/origin/fix-bug-21072 > > > remotes/origin/master > > > remotes/origin/scratch/record > > > remotes/origin/scratch/tzz/nettle > > > > That's only after emacs-25 has been merged into master. > > > > Okay so we've established that the commit is in master after all 👍 That wasn't controversial to begin with. The issue was with the emacs-25.2-rc2 tag, not with the commit which fixed the bug in question. The commit is on master, whereas the tag was applied to the emacs-25 branch, which was later merged to master, as part of periodic merges we do. > Emacs development appears to go along in a kind of unorthodox way. It's a merge-based workflow, one of widely used Git workflows. We didn't invent it. The details are described in the file CONTRIBUTE in the tree, under "Branches". > As someone familiar with git but unfamiliar with the Emacs dev workflow, my assumption was that anything in master is ready to ship out the door, with the bulk of commits happening on feature or hotfix branches. But it appears to work in the reverse, with everything going into master, and stable releases branching off, which seems like a good recipe for perpetual missing-of-boatsness. When the branch from which the next official release is about to be shipped is close to a release, we don't allow unsafe changes to be committed to that branch, because any such change could potentially destabilize the entire branch. There's nothing new here; if you were ever involved in releasing very large and complex packages, you should be familiar with this paradigm. From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Rankin Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149104729412529 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 11:49:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 11:48:14 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55127 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHVu-0003G1-D5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:48:14 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]:41170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHVs-0003Ft-7O for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 07:48:12 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vwGpM0ZlTz1qr44; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:48:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan01.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vwGpL5h7Sz3jgYC; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:48:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan01.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RpU4EXLllIVb; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:48:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 2Y0ba81QBr8nS8fLcpbtOxiYLuUfLzgShivRBdBK4Y6zTZ7DkecqgQZKz1FXhbpr Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-20-140.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.20.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 890842C5342; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 13:48:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87wpb4piy5.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491041917.2348139.930696624.13E83F1A@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Yow: Here I am at the flea market but nobody is buying my urine sample bottles.. Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 13:48:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1491041917.2348139.930696624.13E83F1A@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Paul Rankin's message of "Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:18:37 +1000") Message-ID: <87shlspcw9.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Apr 01 2017, Paul Rankin wrote: > Emacs development appears to go along in a kind of unorthodox way. As someone familiar with git but unfamiliar with the Emacs dev workflow, my assumption was that anything in master is ready to ship out the door, with the bulk of commits happening on feature or hotfix branches. But it appears to work in the reverse, with everything going into master, and stable releases branching off, which seems like a good recipe for perpetual missing-of-boatsness. I remember when Emacs dev switched over to git there was a lot of confusion about how it works, so I think this is maybe the remnants of that. It's not unusual that releases are created from a branch. A lot of projects work like that. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Sat Jun 21 12:34:30 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#24073: 25.1-rc2 Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24073 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: bzg@gnu.org, 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Received: via spool by 24073-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24073.149104831714349 (code B ref 24073); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:06:01 +0000 Received: (at 24073) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Apr 2017 12:05:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55142 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHmP-0003jN-84 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:05:17 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:41794) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cuHmN-0003jF-A5 for 24073@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:05:16 -0400 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1289020BE6; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 08:05:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web5 ([10.202.2.215]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 01 Apr 2017 08:05:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=jOVU6gxQFBEu+i7tz QwD+5QJceRZkkjvruVgENcaDWc=; b=vyeJAPCdsjh8n+ShW91zaExnH7hPZttzO dDPj6cgBPP04BH8+yr1Ap1iz9JExiqhKslmw12KyImdgzJ6Sqv/j1CKoI8SHT69E BExIT02KDW+DSOnJ34bctdvfz/WEb1R50XmjQmvBHfWbn1jADpyY87MTbyJAHu/Q daXUtXsKChRT8b6sfrQzKUFHwty4UgM7TJz9IJ7iN6dSpbZWJgdJOZM+HP9f+O4a TVpgVyXpyMtC8jZc23fD4F+s9zQ6O+DPULKVZANB/imVpFuynVpqZ4F2oSkrFhMF wlaVASCJHkLxWEXVCgDhEG47HkZjfwIYKkk/XnM4+qrVjYd5UCBRQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=jOVU6g xQFBEu+i7tzQwD+5QJceRZkkjvruVgENcaDWc=; b=MmKJUrJBDhPpJey5PaF9t+ kCt3CofBIxQiB9kqyQGrZtHAKWKGaB1iJb5iT3HJJJxF3iDm1lvhNFTgPmuEsWzo oalwc5FPrLw5ofF+q1/iq8eBVNc4zZyL4LT3K5mQbhhJeh3nZ63HRhoakw1k818z D1ZtVPw9HJDCWU21MmR0M6u7/xTVAlT+Lf7nMup2cOex1RXD3JSTABdKCyEoHP9y CW+8Dyb0/k/42X12d/lK1bZjeOlfabLvF0zY3wZbrSxkbHgKpF859k7bDPdArK4y WVI3+6TeQuUJUo5MUlrPsHD1SZXOfsV9SrHpDoq9fp1JjmLc5sKHBIfKaRRHsq3Q == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id D57339E210; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 08:05:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1491048314.2365444.930749632.43C4F35E@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Paul Rankin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-6cc8b445 Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:05:14 +1000 In-Reply-To: <83wpb44ajk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1469520753.418402.676896009.00AAC0DE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1472605956.265564.710992545.0AE0C6FD@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83zintlkxl.fsf@gnu.org> <0085D3FE-32C4-4AFB-89DA-9DD205D8A2AB@paulwrankin.com> <83shtlkoba.fsf@gnu.org> <1472877535.1718060.714506377.6182C525@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83lgypi85j.fsf@gnu.org> <87twddnu5t.fsf@saiph.selenimh> <83eg4hi7i4.fsf@gnu.org> <1474278005.1585720.729925393.571A4732@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r38fhm2t.fsf@gnu.org> <87shshhkva.fsf@bzg.fr> <1490861900.2033376.928338448.5AC2EDDB@webmail.messagingengine.com> <874lya2tcu.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <1491028842.1395227.930599688.38B5B97F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8760ior3v6.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491033966.1408911.930645392.12EC4E9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <871stcr12k.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491037909.1419343.930674952.1A97633E@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87wpb4piy5.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <1491041917.2348139.930696624.13E83F1A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83wpb44ajk.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Sat, 1 Apr 2017, at 09:44 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Paul Rankin > > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 20:18:37 +1000 > > Cc: Bastien Guerry , 24073@debbugs.gnu.org, mail@nicolasgo= aziou.fr, > > npostavs@users.sourceforge.net > >=20 > > > > $ git branch -a --contains fe91ff27c54cc10b70a5c5d5bac4017922866717 > > > > * master > > > > remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master > > > > remotes/origin/emacs-25 > > > > remotes/origin/feature/mhtml-mode > > > > remotes/origin/fix-bug-21072 > > > > remotes/origin/master > > > > remotes/origin/scratch/record > > > > remotes/origin/scratch/tzz/nettle > > >=20 > > > That's only after emacs-25 has been merged into master. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Okay so we've established that the commit is in master after all =F0=9F= =91=8D >=20 > That wasn't controversial to begin with. The issue was with the > emacs-25.2-rc2 tag, not with the commit which fixed the bug in > question. Question was about this tagged commit in master in Feb after the bug fix co= mmit last Sep. > The commit is on master, whereas the tag was applied to the emacs-25 > branch, which was later merged to master, as part of periodic merges > we do. >=20 > > Emacs development appears to go along in a kind of unorthodox way. >=20 > It's a merge-based workflow, one of widely used Git workflows. We > didn't invent it. The details are described in the file CONTRIBUTE in > the tree, under "Branches". >=20 > > As someone familiar with git but unfamiliar with the Emacs dev workflow= , my assumption was that anything in master is ready to ship out the door, = with the bulk of commits happening on feature or hotfix branches. But it ap= pears to work in the reverse, with everything going into master, and stable= releases branching off, which seems like a good recipe for perpetual missi= ng-of-boatsness. >=20 > When the branch from which the next official release is about to be > shipped is close to a release, we don't allow unsafe changes to be > committed to that branch, because any such change could potentially > destabilize the entire branch. There's nothing new here; if you were > ever involved in releasing very large and complex packages, you should > be familiar with this paradigm. Yep, the original question was about workflow, which this answers. Thanks ;) From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jun 14 14:35:05 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jun 2017 18:35:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47974 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLD8C-0006XQ-WA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:35:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46401) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dLD8B-0006Wr-Ch for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:35:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLD85-0002PI-BO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:34:58 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dLD85-0002PE-7u for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:34:57 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dLD84-0003dk-Sb for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:34:56 -0400 Subject: control message for bug 24073 To: X-Mailer: mail (GNU Mailutils 2.99.98) Message-Id: From: Glenn Morris Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:34:56 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) # 9cc59ff close 24073 26.1 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 16 19:35:26 2017 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2017 23:35:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41693 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1di7qQ-0002Fa-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:35:26 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:35827) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1di7qP-0002FN-6C for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:35:25 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id 76so3298672ith.2 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:35:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=qQYXcpj+h/smKTiHtmiL3R46NssYKxpWIHGkNTRXQgY=; b=S41qlYR15LzlreGE2L0+CmkLN6u+1I8ltxQKDsGu7fwRMxMJq7EW5s8Z1MHB6T0DHZ 9WSkWgmxUcfczhbKC6MJovRkvPHSkfu8EByT4imj9Qkit6+I0CHGMrQlN0GLODZvsu2M GpOZHsekWTS+XDRo2tz7fjkvULAMm4Ud2kNbhOmpkCoDta2HN7oUK0iFE2Oudtb8vdbG Mn5Bm7IuG6sGOM09NkHUwK5b/NCwjbfOw0eu7SVkVrjKHC4/GHxSeb7oXMKDbvfDH7Qn eUDPgn6ckTXGouNpnMeiXLywGCALeHWnCf4cx1Cz3RW400+P72a405T3WYDA9iZD5CRc E5pA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=qQYXcpj+h/smKTiHtmiL3R46NssYKxpWIHGkNTRXQgY=; b=mc4NXFzICRpWabaVPI+DLiEDMTTFlC/93p0xm+qegpWJfT57GGAgMsTBlHwSm7sJw/ YK5u3Fcnb8nlkK6izyxSl91TkvIvmh7Ss8DqhMKXD3rQc1pHG5MXy0c2tF/U9w2WZmOd uKJdw73K9iDcwKhK/wNTtp49wX0kMyCw6xFSiIQ4KvSg0C4ip3a5PhRKnqYubXwHz8lL YrHsolZegJ4CUIMeSPkJzyw9qbxJqiFVKBAcaA0wzObbjH6vH4xwLAhK+qTV95t5QwBZ vzHeCDJjg6R0Zucq/8bxFeSmjWlcXsMyZMJB3X0wOlmAd/vUCT3IzoXt/yzm6I1M5azk fcfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5jUWqjdWFHQzzfzZ2vIbnGrR6aLi0gt3C4S9gDbmkFIfYttufA6 HotRdH8tox5kyVa4 X-Received: by 10.36.61.5 with SMTP id n5mr125406itn.154.1502926519594; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:35:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zony ([45.2.119.49]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n67sm1002543itg.39.2017.08.16.16.35.18 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:35:18 -0700 (PDT) From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: control message for bug #28080 Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 19:36:57 -0400 Message-ID: <87a82zytie.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.7 (/) # forgot to unarchive before unarchive 24073 forcemerge 24073 28080 quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Nov 02 17:03:12 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Nov 2020 22:03:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42800 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZhuy-0004VM-4i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:03:12 -0500 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:42264) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kZhuw-0004VA-Ka for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 17:03:11 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0A2LrSdx004034 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:03:04 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : subject : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=hH4oRoGCscHIOlnww8dtyepwFhquRCUCUNfLBvqHVo4=; b=FkzPZfImAONUWkkPlTvO5azYXsckiSUE9StLdfhFf6z8Yk79t/erVe2O1Rf9c2Wsyxi3 FN1eBrCIgfSxCRBdYxg0rVlbGT4BfHt0zKuFLebbQnJtqeKGLYR+DZ8Uo/Wu0URcerWP m4GBzNGYUkp/0D9aHX6BCzPX8xd8Z4OSDMq+/5TZTnAMSGKeu046cZzWTajtsXlkqD8J DFx4WksTN7GwZ86PGhhbPKnaRLggP4asKm2SIpgfXQPPGCI2kWD4T0MDJfTi8nssOnWo Jq4JZOnZDNElV5BK1JMai+ShS/tXZKElNOdS8rIWKGMovEu5Ks9Kx7qHktUDue7FFdsc qQ== Received: from aserp3020.oracle.com (aserp3020.oracle.com [141.146.126.70]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34hhvc6c0f-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:03:04 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3020.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3020.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0A2M0QJr154130 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:03:04 GMT Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3020.oracle.com with ESMTP id 34hw0fsk5b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 22:03:04 +0000 Received: from abhmp0012.oracle.com (abhmp0012.oracle.com [141.146.116.18]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 0A2M32UK018733 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 22:03:02 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:03:01 -0800 (PST) From: Drew Adams To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: unarchive 28080 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5056.0 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9793 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=1 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=685 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011020167 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9793 signatures=668682 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 impostorscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=679 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2011020166 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) unarchive 28080 thanks