GNU bug report logs - #24069
gcc man page is broken

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym <at> scratchpost.org>

Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:25:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #23 received at 24069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il>
Cc: 24069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#24069: [PATCHv2] Re: bug#24069: gcc man page is broken
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:53:34 +0200
Efraim Flashner <efraim <at> flashner.co.il> skribis:

> I believe this would cause gcc-5 to be rebuilt, which would cause a
> world rebuild, so for the moment we also need a native-inputs entry for
> gcc-5 making sure that nothing changes, ie: that we're only using
> texinfo there, preferably with a note that it should be changed in the
> future.  Also, you should take a look at gnu/packages/commencement and
> make sure that we're not adding perl as a native-input for gcc-boot0 or
> for libstdc++, wherever that happens to live (I don't remember off
> hand).

I think this should go to ‘core-updates’.

> I assume it is OK for us to build the man pages for gcc-final (if it
> happens) since this is the gcc used for actually building packages, and
> I believe the one pulled in for gcc-toolchain.

More precisely, building man pages for ‘gcc-boot0’ is pointless and
possibly adds Perl on the graph for no good reason.  So if we can
arrange to just have man pages in ‘gcc-final’, we’re good.

Efraim, could you check whether that works for ‘core-updates’?

Thanks,
Ludo’.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 262 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.