GNU bug report logs - #24051
24.5; doc of `external-debugging-output'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:02:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: fixed, patch

Found in version 24.5

Fixed in version 26.1

Done: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #46 received at 24051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 24051 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, phillip.lord <at> russet.org.uk,
 npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: bug#24051: 24.5; doc of `external-debugging-output'
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:09:33 -0800 (PST)
> > But I do wonder how we should talk about the standard error
> > stream.  I see only one other occurrence of "standard error"
> > where it means the stream (and not the discussion of standard
> > Emacs errors)
> 
> That's strange, because I see it in no less than 7 other nodes of the
> ELisp manual, and most of those nodes mention it more than once.

You're right: Subprocess Creation, Synchronous Processes,
Asynchronous Processes, Output from Processes, Filter
Functions, Displaying Messages, and Batch Mode.

Not sure what I meant by the text you cite, but the rest
of what I wrote there should make clear that, although we
use the term in several places, we don't actually say what
we mean by it.  This bit, for instance:

 On the other hand, would it be good to say something about
 the streams (the terms) "standard output" and "standard error"
 in node `Output Streams'?  We refer to both (especially the
 former) in various places, but we don't say what those names
 mean.

Some short description, at least, would be helpful.




This bug report was last modified 7 years and 112 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.