GNU bug report logs - #24038
etags missing tag for static prototypes in header file

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Stefan Kangas <stefan <at> marxist.se>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 312 <moan1223 <at> 163.com>, 24038 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#24038: etags missing tag for static prototypes in header file
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2019 06:57:42 +0200

tags 24038 + notabug
close 24038
quit

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:39:08 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
>> From: 312 <moan1223 <at> 163.com>
>>
>> I found etags fails to create some tags for static method in header file. Is this a known issue.
>>
>> for example:
>>
>> etags NestedNameSpecifier.h
>>
>> lines between 100 and 162 is ignored, those are all static prototype.
>> Don¡¯t know why this happened.
>
> Thank you for your report.
>
> What is ignored are not static methods, but any method that is not
> in-line, i.e. for which you have only the declaration
> (a.k.a. "prototype") in the header file, without the implementation.
> For example, this method is also missing:
>
>   /// \brief Determine what kind of nested name specifier is stored.
>   SpecifierKind getKind() const;
>
> although it isn't declared 'static'.
>
> The reason is that etags by default doesn't tag declarations, on the
> assumption that the user wants to see the definitions of the methods,
> not their prototypes.  If you want declarations included, you need to
> invoke etags with the --declarations option.  (That will also tag
> global variables, so if you don't want that, use --no-globals as
> well.)
>
> IOW, this is not a bug, but the expected behavior.

Eli indicates above that this is expected behaviour.  I'm therefore
closing this as notabug.

If that's incorrect, please reopen.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.