From unknown Mon Aug 18 14:26:28 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#24008 <24008@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#24008 <24008@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: [doc] write an official statement on bundling Reply-To: bug#24008 <24008@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 21:26:28 +0000 retitle 24008 [doc] write an official statement on bundling reassign 24008 guix submitter 24008 ng0 severity 24008 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sat Jul 16 11:23:11 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jul 2016 15:23:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53921 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bORQs-0007HW-Np for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:23:11 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57414) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bOQfB-00064j-WF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOQf5-00030T-TM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:48 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOQf5-00030P-QP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:47 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48385) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOQf4-0001km-MF for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOQf2-0002zp-AD for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:45 -0400 Received: from mithlond.libertad.in-berlin.de ([2001:67c:1400:2490::1]:50961 helo=beleriand.n0.is) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bOQf1-0002za-V8 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33:44 -0400 Received: by beleriand.n0.is (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 1e0f895e TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:33:40 +0000 (UTC) From: ng0 To: GUIX Bugs Subject: [doc] write an official statement on bundling Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:33:37 +0000 Message-ID: <877fclr6ta.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 11:23:09 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) It would be an good idea to have an official statement on why we do unbundle dependencies and bundling should be avoided, similar to the one Gentoo has: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Why_not_bundle_dependencies -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org SecuShare – http://secushare.org From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 28 09:49:29 2016 Received: (at 24008-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jul 2016 13:49:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSlgn-0006Tj-KC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:49:29 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36550) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bSlgm-0006TW-AN for 24008-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:49:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSlgd-0004vR-DM for 24008-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:49:23 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSlgd-0004vM-A5; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:49:19 -0400 Received: from pluto.bordeaux.inria.fr ([193.50.110.57]:48014 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bSlgb-000483-Li; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:49:17 -0400 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) To: ng0 Subject: Re: bug#24008: [doc] write an official statement on bundling References: <877fclr6ta.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:49:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: <877fclr6ta.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Sat, 16 Jul 2016 14:33:37 +0000") Message-ID: <877fc5hnz7.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 24008-done Cc: 24008-done@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) ng0 skribis: > It would be an good idea to have an official statement on why we > do unbundle dependencies and bundling should be avoided, > similar to the one Gentoo has: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Why_not_bundle_dependencies Fixed in d222522edf70cdac6cee7b4ab8fa1bfbf0a7ba9c. Ludo=E2=80=99. From unknown Mon Aug 18 14:26:28 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:24:03 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator