From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:25:09 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#23980 <23980@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#23980 <23980@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled Reply-To: bug#23980 <23980@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 03:25:09 +0000 retitle 23980 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly= handled reassign 23980 emacs submitter 23980 Chris Feng severity 23980 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 14 10:03:58 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Jul 2016 14:03:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51511 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhF8-0001a9-C0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:58 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41913) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhF6-0001Zw-Lk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhF0-0006Uj-Lc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:51 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:59064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhF0-0006UE-IE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:50 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32835) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhEy-0001rE-Aq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhEw-0006T1-BQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]:34889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNhEw-0006Se-5E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 10:03:46 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c2so30698293pfa.2 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:03:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=mDBSwDQ7Xn1pmz1QNLRK0ndZWcAXnVo8J1CSu8OER8M=; b=pkbR/1pYe3sma0s+MiiKeEBej0EGtDqyyhkH2QL6wx2/Moh00tsxZ9rj0DZV/d4KIn GGKoCaSmijB5MbLpTUPoKlQ0AcEVaT+OdeNLk9SBHeHdom5CaCImU4BB97CNQcf42FU9 BC1AwcDWNZv/6OCmf/oncA2D+KImhp62eg4tKJ9ZuDdvq7xAB9RW4OzzurN5IPqlp7KX Q+hkG2VxwGlZu2heKtOmFV8Fq1kjoZj/odoFKnKybPEpFeV3wIxsmhSZKBkpJ3DW1VTy ShPASYEPBvX9vVyTM4tZzjlctKwATqmZ/HZ80rdzADivodOqidj6ugxGhb8sRxmtbUJR Eg5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=mDBSwDQ7Xn1pmz1QNLRK0ndZWcAXnVo8J1CSu8OER8M=; b=ZZqPAOEYudbE9p7QNrxj+z8mzh7UZ/QVgS5whcnscd4HnurvAAf6iV5sRYsJvxEBjH tMKwNLe4jMbpNNcDUOfeVXe8ippgy1OpVhtyuTxLldfTIYgmM/TzaM/me1pEBf5dlAvS TtM7vk5w+8ve+NbGXt3vUt/I5hM0floPLoR3buL8XKAdnEAA2z0dWhKICFek16WmCNue tG9YRPoCQfG+wEFLDqqOhrIBXY1f4w98+Slka1z1Aar0vHQpIbZBZnRQCW/F1f2xK9lE FJv0J34bPKObw0AD5IxDhJBTpTWlWAkb2MZF9mr/RtV5BM1F1p4n48kE97nIu3mVbQzc Ufrg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIjBbG5cKL3PQGCYL4l9B05pA1Y6AWL7BbtwaDVncBd/MhzNUduJwGJK+6NBz8Zcg== X-Received: by 10.98.222.193 with SMTP id h184mr12638698pfg.61.1468505024694; Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:03:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tpx ([2402:f000:1:1501::3b42:7427]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a20sm3992919pfa.27.2016.07.14.07.03.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 14 Jul 2016 07:03:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Feng To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:03:34 +0800 Message-ID: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) I encountered a bug in the command loop that when I put an event of the form (t . EVENT) into `unread-command-events', there is a chance the event won't get recognized with the message " is undefined". I did a bit research and found that in keyboard.c `read_char' calls `read_decoded_event_from_main_queue' (which in turn calls `read_event_from_main_queue' and `kbd_buffer_get_event') but does not check if the returned event is from `Vunread_command_events'. The problem in `read_char' can be demonstrated by the following form: (progn (run-with-timer 1 nil (lambda () (push '(t . 1) unread-command-events))) (read-event nil nil 2)) => '(t . 1) There is actually another related issue, that for an event returned by `read_decoded_event_from_main_queue' other than the form (t . EVENT), we can't tell whether it's from `Vunread_command_events' or not. If it is, then we should not put it into `this_command_keys'. Any ideas on how to fix these? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Nov 19 04:39:36 2017 Received: (at 23980-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2017 09:39:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46795 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eGM4e-0005FV-9h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 04:39:36 -0500 Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:38822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eGM4c-0005FI-Jv for 23980-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 04:39:34 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b189so4399511oia.5 for <23980-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 01:39:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yOKLWLRH0UJ2WgDKJOYSAt6Y0pe1D4YwxZglm3G9JcA=; b=hHaagJ3PJtYnWGcImltWxBkH2VQBxo5cMGT7H3H81RUFq1859gw4OrWCO3I4XLVuGj HCefku5TH6bd0JpCyfUlGAJr6G+mZch+9nTihvAkYWjf7kwWUdG4OhzzyCtgVOhV1Dqx r7y20rYksG/1ClwsNFju7CiuPwEt+fkC8t7EEMPvzxK5mY8VK9aBQWTID6pJ/enAOCct KkqBk968hVBu74z0h6JI3+OojxK9Jm+ePgYM0uNv5cDiVM1eJfTzqpX26Ar1M98/dnSg buD8VZcZCn4X3Ozrzr6A85nqClBiKppvitJhCkQZH9g5Axh87VI7UR7s6Ny/JyCNxQi9 6apA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=yOKLWLRH0UJ2WgDKJOYSAt6Y0pe1D4YwxZglm3G9JcA=; b=TbVO51pG6vN7dUXn4mVwRUXNNc0NSNnq1iOyvAE+iGJpFO/wr1TKhSeIVzTiEXzqRf jOVOIIzAAdZS5OUoTBq2TnimkuI9UNE40JU9GdWldXoZSN7elsCSUia2Gh48MkS9XQsF 0SgHgKTzsjJGVIgQxF/PaS7+p990s2RwxYRXkelxsFSx0NDKG3NaTnqyinqkjZJvH1oN Il9QV5zeRs4rQ/5upndjQ4PDGQ+YDLe5LzBI1JNwnH3mLTGynZ3dlg8iDNlK/UgHjfwk IDLz9UydbQOwpWHccubpv48PIgW0BajCNaFrU9RlE04NPCxtTTM+nrdbP59zjmjDbAAO A/og== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX77OJeP3PVfpHawxcGeb+qtGoTJi85We1lJySTjA90A1jhHFI5G XH4fcsuflJUlL6uToyrhouN2a8FSo2l9Gai+O5LaPA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbU1S6MHxHqxkhGJaYVADYrjv70ftb9ffCoOYntS2g/+kLc5N2VVAcrOnRilYINaAz92fSzSmCcMNMQ0HtsLPo= X-Received: by 10.202.96.4 with SMTP id u4mr1748141oib.41.1511084368854; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 01:39:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.50.32 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 01:39:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.157.50.32 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Nov 2017 01:39:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> From: Chris Feng Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 17:39:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: 23980-done@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d5a9408084d055e52bfe6" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) --001a113d5a9408084d055e52bfe6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" The bug was fixed by 1f3f4b1296. --001a113d5a9408084d055e52bfe6 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
The bug was fixed by 1f3f4b1296.
--001a113d5a9408084d055e52bfe6-- From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:25:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 12:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 20 10:16:39 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2018 15:16:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53038 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eo9eo-0001Gg-Ok for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:16:38 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f178.google.com ([209.85.128.178]:46663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eo9em-0001GQ-Ky for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:16:37 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 34so15375082wre.13 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:16:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vl+7sU5jrRLaxgbtthdTaMXb4LjmKxB2HSF/FHkHylk=; b=EGebLabkStqBa6mICYBH9v8ux/AkC1QMMiJn6h4nZwOIWhYUPza5h4KqJXGMr/9Wvk 6HB3iUZd2hEBOc9g5MDMaeiuElgEaNMoM3F6U2J0Ew1kezmQWzCgnIImp7m/JeKOi+DH gIyJn8jVjwqDFVRyyqpxfR1J7n9eIOyvSeFd1ZQ30pcH6sVDzNfxDJuwxZDUJnq0YU4w ACYwJUsBDnq4d0L7APTEctMqoZzUY5+CsG1IGkULg+IZJa0TsA3B6QJXMrfGLX31VWgX vnPl2Apc8OPXo+Qs0OoUyAn1m/yQVPCdOHN7GhY19pm46dPT6+zcjHB1NsgontscEFUB omlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:to:from:subject:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vl+7sU5jrRLaxgbtthdTaMXb4LjmKxB2HSF/FHkHylk=; b=awa4+yyrnESwOOArzKIjjQIi1ipkI3roFCLexln4qmYzCDSkvAyeGMdUT24EjQ8HfL TxsDWxXH/GAz1L+mfA3Jacz/CZX9X5Vm1DPlxgHKuubpzey/Wu8hi9HfOecfMDoDRdAP IdYDO7Myhq+EEwWRq1zD8ISn/aVgK0+AbsPVgDB2IP4zuTYg5RajmBXBJP/u5auqN3W9 CBm/lD2683pfSukBu6T0/8U0SwrgVGVKMLBEmueWl2buxLNIg7kcFfBPE+18yo5PZq17 Pom24VK8Z0Jo48l1DTY+ncTqlqlSU8DG8LCgX7okiDuBP3ZmKJ7LImd39KH6FGIn2yLc a3UA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDt1k1Dh14xFuluYKxtBQp5dpEaTRC63ahawBq9Vr2+eN668t01 OQGQsLDuv9cxtbofINXZBadg293X X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2264x70ynOjspSCLDgteDDoh3/EnyfEnR9d/+zhez2qrTbFk5bUWoLE9Yzdf2CI8QynQjAQaUA== X-Received: by 10.80.177.244 with SMTP id n49mr694371edd.239.1519139790420; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:16:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.152] ([212.50.99.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r7sm20948066edc.23.2018.02.20.07.16.28 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:16:29 -0800 (PST) To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Dmitry Gutov Subject: unarchive 23980 Message-ID: <3434f49c-8330-5694-ae92-e1853e6b4dcb@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:16:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) unarchive 23980 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 20 10:35:25 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2018 15:35:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53050 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eo9wz-0003eY-LJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:35:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f173.google.com ([209.85.128.173]:39936) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eo9wx-0003eK-SC for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 10:35:24 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f173.google.com with SMTP id o76so15572283wrb.7 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:35:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=dfETR6WLQFx0T0PIMteBAvvTJh7KgtRnTMar+69nj1I=; b=NesY8YEkMO7eud0F/TTBlMugcaao7ZzH/lm6Qb/h3nkGE3ld7+8RYO0M4uylN5OSvJ AwqCZ3j7pvowBvQP5D/4GUpr8y+iHRy+Kbe4V7DoNsEYfXzjtSq6bse5j/kyFlERmQbi Jmjuu43Q8L7RqSQrOUZ/tj1nmgriOVKJlnpTOBCJg1SZ7A5aZNNcK5b5gva+eyiyC+P/ c31vpXqzeO4v5SbQoOW+HTQPP7Krw/wNqBjXGu1j2016Gi3lcittbaP2x/caTeBMrI+v jQ5gbm7zZIEN/0nZe1b3e4+VfrKPXFL71dlGbvmEUaZzI8rK9mSbI0ekob8RUCnUyl2D SvPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=dfETR6WLQFx0T0PIMteBAvvTJh7KgtRnTMar+69nj1I=; b=unrsmbv7cae4E1tkOeR3j4WaDf6jaVA7gmLJPyNv/O37rpP0Hb0fVs9CUmZNiI/2lm 4zIgYOLkKmT79QFRr/GepxGu4bYf7F2xVMO6jDJMMh2mzwxjpKpaHF/Kpo97ciZR0/MC HGphaGzHHKlcj3hAOEizWpkzlaWPW6HVQiFuls66wxj8xeb0CzqXM+6VWKLdN72Y9uh7 +SQoHQvu+8Pj5ujbMAYUl8X5KcxgQVSXE3x6J1/vEWWwIy13DBXm85fRb5fjx9ITYktt Bn4HuJbVPftaZmeJLY9uu0+RPSsRloy536IA9T0zrmMdCIflgRsPBIq4lYtRRLCj+dbY zYwg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBGp0jxAvZMeK8u/ZktlsHtPzat5XZFLeqrjfuvyZ9GjOUGCOXq TsW2kKwCUcAAQ/5JLi+PyOchBbTz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227/wIQ7hu0fZl+q2lAoZrxbnUFbUfX/cw6EGKZiqFCyQ/sUpUfDhQYTqaQRcfvneGUbWIYueA== X-Received: by 10.80.168.6 with SMTP id j6mr807814edc.67.1519140918179; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.152] ([212.50.99.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g2sm4460066eda.85.2018.02.20.07.35.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 07:35:16 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:35:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------D99F0290B523BEA527DDCBE6" Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------D99F0290B523BEA527DDCBE6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/19/17 11:39 AM, Chris Feng wrote: > The bug was fixed by 1f3f4b1296. Eli, any change to have this backported to emacs-26? This reason I'm asking is, this fixed a rather nasty bug resulting from the interaction between the newest company-mode (0.9.5) and flyspell-mode, both of which use sit-for. This particular combination results in a timer being run inside a sit-for, which also calls sit-for, which in emacs-26 ends up putting e.g. (t t . 45) into unread-command-events. Here's how to reproduce: - Visit the attached file. - M-x eval-buffer. - Start typing. - See " is undefined" in the minibuffer for every other keypress. Originally reported here: https://github.com/company-mode/company-mode/issues/760 --------------D99F0290B523BEA527DDCBE6 Content-Type: text/x-emacs-lisp; name="sit-for-bug.el" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sit-for-bug.el" (defvar foo-timer nil) (defun foo-pre-command () (when foo-timer (cancel-timer foo-timer) (setq foo-timer nil))) (defun foo-post-command () (run-with-timer 0.01 nil #'foo-idle)) (defun foo-idle () (sit-for 5)) (add-hook 'pre-command-hook 'foo-pre-command) (add-hook 'post-command-hook 'foo-post-command) (flyspell-mode) ;; This causes unread-command-events to sometimes contain ;; e.g. ((t t . 45)) mmmmmm --------------D99F0290B523BEA527DDCBE6-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 20 13:37:53 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2018 18:37:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53179 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCnZ-0007x2-7t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:37:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44549) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCnX-0007wm-CC for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:37:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCnP-000678-L9 for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:37:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59416) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCnP-000674-Gz; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:37:43 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3807 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eoCnO-0002Up-W0; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:37:43 -0500 Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 20:37:54 +0200 Message-Id: <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov , Chris Feng In-reply-to: <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:35:15 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 17:35:15 +0200 > > On 11/19/17 11:39 AM, Chris Feng wrote: > > The bug was fixed by 1f3f4b1296. > > Eli, any change to have this backported to emacs-26? I'd need someone (Chris?) to tell which situations cause (t SOMETHING) be put into unread-command-events. If these situations are rare enough, maybe we can risk it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 20 16:17:01 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2018 21:17:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53292 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoFHZ-0002eO-93 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:17:01 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com ([209.85.128.174]:46592) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoFHX-0002eA-40 for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 16:16:59 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 34so18327350wre.13 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:16:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XDVKgnqqxHb2Omuy21hlHUV7HhmWfVgnhNURt+SesrY=; b=uAMLyTXiqOeydnK5vw6PBLGUMbmVlLLQflfsOCXkEFopBp/AZhX+MLve79kblOgEzl RMpIkAW6LVmPBNvJHPhbM97Izu0pBNfwBkLNNWT7iI3paKtxj3E57AS6amrQ5kGLPT9H Ea+dtIflQdOoPlGkrpeRrWHqA41PNgwp6DVVjPx3bSm9yPj9CxoMBgnZD6pv1X9d20Lj 0R61l8cwmrY6UInMz/6UCH4sYsNSgHrgw6puOl3KOS4X5CzaVAIPh/oEotzW4NcPdUbq xTF4ArcQ8q1QOejy8pQb4wbw5LCKo41M6dVUNi0a1KeMSmwj/15oFmATqXS5IwrRhMv0 k2Ow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XDVKgnqqxHb2Omuy21hlHUV7HhmWfVgnhNURt+SesrY=; b=Sjjdgc8yX7yZ3vqMgkBL38glC0ajFaZSKnsacKL8QzEcUsd50HKZ6Qy6eBZI4rJf9P 9sfB4thv1caShx6hjESZN8mkLTH8SKwUluw6VZZyHvPWUCeTnzj0y8Ls/zfKpAVHr12W D+ZEvtGJx7frSmNyjzn8c7kdVobp4uVutpQ/2orEgEhb4yRGbDflHxsK9rlzyrNWcggL RNAgvQFXpwajMM1K3rLpdap6EsPv5RobsjRvlQyo8czmvy0Mc6P5TjvliIUzEHoTPGBI dD/D9o1Fv+PZZN/2koAYZnVyQA3xi4XxR7ozHjnoWPQd7h7CA4sSfhWRP8XjeiP0ZRKw ic4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPDiCVJSEqtRXLBcl3nTxAL3AfBP4AEsDwr9zL7Qnp0qeP0bqA33 IlBKAwev/caZTbqtPVBLrX1C0voe X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224xaCk6cYJ5y6JoCAqGTr0D/COxCaOWdE972vvMfGWSaimMkmhBo04FtOBPCBWp+n8pKTjZjg== X-Received: by 10.223.144.46 with SMTP id h43mr827704wrh.125.1519161412881; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:16:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k13sm23121564wrd.61.2018.02.20.13.16.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 13:16:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: Eli Zaretskii , Chris Feng References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:16:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) On 2/20/18 8:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > I'd need someone (Chris?) to tell which situations cause (t SOMETHING) > be put into unread-command-events. If these situations are rare > enough, maybe we can risk it. At least one of the places that do that is sit-for. See the long comment at the end of its definition (I don't really understand its last sentence, FWIW). From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Feb 20 23:22:55 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 04:22:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoLvj-0008TQ-24 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:22:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoLvh-0008T8-35 for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:22:53 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoLvY-0002V5-0y for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:22:47 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoLvX-0002Us-T4; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:22:43 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4189 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eoLvX-0008Oj-6o; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:22:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:22:55 +0200 Message-Id: <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:16:47 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:16:47 +0200 > > On 2/20/18 8:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I'd need someone (Chris?) to tell which situations cause (t SOMETHING) > > be put into unread-command-events. If these situations are rare > > enough, maybe we can risk it. > > At least one of the places that do that is sit-for. See the long comment > at the end of its definition (I don't really understand its last > sentence, FWIW). But then how come you have (t t . 45) there? From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 02:41:04 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 07:41:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53554 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoP1T-0005E3-W9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 02:41:04 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:55632) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoP1R-0005DR-KN for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 02:41:02 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id n7so1192343ita.5 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:41:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=ynZoV3+po2zc8VppZ7x85UcGgV2asBPRmEcVXemwxRI=; b=bUS7mbMUCfknmL/PBC8m1x/NkKp9vm72C6H7nwJMnsuaxzV4d7Ck2jOKzO969RyxG5 /kPwt98Se4GyHOgBrgk8M4rd0cPlhr2L8jmnMoR5P2pdAo+uXODxB9UgEhdC9ZL3G+rn Zddg++Wot2NyxiMT9TMpQsiuGnO9ddM6Qnqdm8VKo1yGhVpHfaW+6bTSQQEXKDmLWNNp lgRs4vynDVHGj0bOJtJb+b2ivCCHEcYoo50wTWKoVdMyq4USY+VBzE+Mobzx4MpzdZg5 eOvyWC5biy/tu1RTtUKA7uQIIZgm3Hxlbo4W3EJwSBnAXnURRJlZB8PV+GGDMo4XG7eo 5vLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=ynZoV3+po2zc8VppZ7x85UcGgV2asBPRmEcVXemwxRI=; b=lHi/FeQ4qyqOLYQjW/7o9cx6nU+4LnoEwWRZ6PaCIEaijCxluWwBVIlzP5vsstYxDm 5inLlfPdpmrd25FFRNmkyys7dKq4QqKeXYiPIwxHu/yFcXKDPgkpL6gcBv78vXd99ESy tuJvIiBEisIWyTlFFScO8pTZKLe95UQtVbLQcDgsIoNy7cBfdhc8CNZFChbzGQZDMhPN laIQrhNJRRtHPMJ7ftd+D0ie+WmMGXEi2+yn5frxPprwwXKYtIaIhT3w2NTiI+7AENjB ZuKmI2YMZ2RkpGELSEgZ8JYihIfQx1+rbOZ4bPRD7d5D4zFKB/xhAIAGijX8wRo0rIHr Pqeg== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPC9XSplYLvVulkcoqdNAMh9HpwdQsEt/V4HT/bAOxQuhBmPNA2l yuBxPThnQs9dsE0ff+KD/Pzd86aJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsrC10gpL59aHRHBqN7NquEdGyEjk94HG7iBEAOA9LdiFgZ3CWXUXnmnK5pswd7KtJaIAqXhg== X-Received: by 10.36.129.212 with SMTP id q203mr2294417itd.105.1519198855821; Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from tpx ([209.141.62.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 189sm4335460iob.55.2018.02.20.23.40.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 20 Feb 2018 23:40:55 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Feng To: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled In-Reply-To: <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Feb 2018 06:22:55 +0200") References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 15:40:35 +0800 Message-ID: <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, Dmitry Gutov X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Eli Zaretskii writes: >> On 2/20/18 8:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > I'd need someone (Chris?) to tell which situations cause (t SOMETHING) >> > be put into unread-command-events. If these situations are rare >> > enough, maybe we can risk it. >> >> At least one of the places that do that is sit-for. See the long comment >> at the end of its definition (I don't really understand its last >> sentence, FWIW). It seems to be the only use case in Emacs's source tree, but we can't tell how many packages do this trick in the wild nor can we predict that. > But then how come you have (t t . 45) there? Probably shortly after (t . 45) is unread another call to `sit-for' happens to read it out directly from `unread-command-events', and the event is further unread as (cons t '(t . 45)). Perhaps we may even get something like (t t t . 45) if lucky enough. PS. Many users will stick with the pre-26 releases in the next upcoming years so backporting this fix does not necessarily resolve the problem for company-mode. At least a workaround has to be come up with to deal with the situations where this fix is absent. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 05:47:31 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 10:47:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53649 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoRvv-0001Rn-Ar for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:47:31 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f177.google.com ([209.85.128.177]:40572) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoRvu-0001RY-74 for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 05:47:30 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o76so3112593wrb.7 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 02:47:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MvZYKb+FnMnIC1/9t7dOdzMPhRas+wjdrnwphbaNH08=; b=ALA2wkbPksFmg8kh2IL12M7e+UmrUe1LldP9l0r5r+Mpqi9i9AubgDcVnmwWx1qEL4 2ij8VqeXrHaQL8OtodHb5Q53Ja4dj1heB58By6eXrmpX3Ij8a2WfSSajXx2XZNH/hhuf 5ZNdZwZsj/wauSOq+1PmT1CvwY4CALLJZPCf+bRXxW7Y/7NU0u39PTK/Kdr3lisbbG16 FcH26A4qicGWxcBVXE9jpfXyAxBVWzpwxzdXg+B1BLxafHBNPXRg6AlC6oLaqqs2L/9G 0Heh6pskuY6OVmSMAgfB0oPlB0g6Ls+ufPqxvaAsvfvQZD5nYsjUmp4M6gmnin3zrKzP rO3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MvZYKb+FnMnIC1/9t7dOdzMPhRas+wjdrnwphbaNH08=; b=i/nOKu9p4ubw4fhEYreY3MnDoMn0mWrFtyR2pP2v47jOvoqsPvXegZI+Bu4HzSsSkW h5EQyfy522wtP7KIAZIG3p/dHbbwNXRibYiu8fL17g8chtw9X6tUS56nKgVXoA1lRiZb 51YCo7kGhbWDE2yKfYh/1EWQlN2XoJ3padUYtE9RSQMYKeEtWBbXI/YguQzLMXqbLL42 5Cxo7sFJ4Ub6F03xguJuTlbsnxe5o/ivKK1aWp160nhw3rngufqzbbtLxSnApqP4DKLU EaTFEaGNTEF4j8N1UmqQpSEq+OPhvzwlTu6g8QYHBu99qbsIcSKeP9n5KfcNQA2mcMYh H0wA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBjRv6rgpb2zxYOZGB10cznn+T+mqzaHFRo8cGH2ct9msQcdTdM MQVH3Hp+WmZHsxNn0T8DwxxrNocT X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2272DEPM0MRs2xs6W/rnwMQMjB07talZDrX1smUIv/Mrm8ic9TC4F70FuBpxBcR/j/gB38xNoA== X-Received: by 10.80.135.229 with SMTP id 34mr4273339edz.227.1519210043987; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 02:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id c22sm3704479eda.1.2018.02.21.02.47.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 02:47:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: Chris Feng , Eli Zaretskii References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:47:20 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) On 2/21/18 9:40 AM, Chris Feng wrote: > It seems to be the only use case in Emacs's source tree, but we can't > tell how many packages do this trick in the wild nor can we predict > that. They only do that with one goal, though (so we are dealing with a protocol). >> But then how come you have (t t . 45) there? > > Probably shortly after (t . 45) is unread another call to `sit-for' > happens to read it out directly from `unread-command-events', and the > event is further unread as (cons t '(t . 45)). More or less, this. Except we don't get this effect from two (or more) consecutive calls to sit-for. What triggers it, is effectively recursive sit-for calls, when the second sit-for is called inside a timer, which are allowed to run inside the first sit-for. > PS. Many users will stick with the pre-26 releases in the next upcoming > years so backporting this fix does not necessarily resolve the problem > for company-mode. At least a workaround has to be come up with to deal > with the situations where this fix is absent. I've been trying to. So far, the options are: - Advise users to lower flyspell-delay to (* 0.9 company-idle-delay). That actually leads to freezes, which I should file as a separate bug report. - Ask people to disable flyspell-mode :) - Use sleep-for instead of sit-for in the relevant place, forgoing the significant latency improvement that comes with the latter. Maybe predicated on Emacs version, and flyspell-mode being enabled. So far the last option is winning, but I'd be much more content to use it if the Emacs 26 are not going to need it. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 07:23:50 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 12:23:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53666 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoTR8-0003zM-5r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:23:50 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f182.google.com ([209.85.128.182]:44566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoTR3-0003z6-VI for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 07:23:48 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f182.google.com with SMTP id v65so3911825wrc.11 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:23:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mejqsyl8EJxGkDgwaAkUbq1Qe1wUZXDttxgjx2V2Lgk=; b=tRez8QaHE3hB2lu+s49CHsFW1j50IlHseYLrx7JWkNQgdNJa91L1ZPQNT0yAYXiUhd f6lbOrwSR74ALaTA8OWjO4G0XWLCn4SNxcrbRrxdtdynIgpJ/AOeUimBWvC37e4/RRJ5 g+rete0GONPEXX4XGg4A+zZ8siAca2gT9/Cx/Ikk+6JfLBTwOojFg2K6h7ybwfQkiZIB elUduxDQbO38DpQ4jGRwlId/SGtvEcTvECWX5eD09dUeWIzmW66dtkUH2ARby3xFTO9R DT1aEQcjOflQzMK+oq6VIIe/MUy4IycNcPsIQJ21yoCn6wAjTETks0DQkAfht5CFg1D/ lpkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:from:to:cc:references:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mejqsyl8EJxGkDgwaAkUbq1Qe1wUZXDttxgjx2V2Lgk=; b=QanEd1zQQ+szQEnQgFbjFpGfy1Ct+R+jI4KyUiCYeUx2U16cBMc5BFtBjQcd9YgRpT alR+xHTb0blof6Ui9B66LzQ0+IPsTwRjSLmRMDKA/ljnd4KQjyb6Nj37N8h94xAnlG0J uQgJlQEpZckD6tGue1RpQ/lgB0ORnKhhXE+G5fvGh7b4qFZukXZnQEtiY4uMvmKsGglq SgccN/wxCrZN1xPyV5Q60U59vBaJv8pVyuVW23dFgpsMV6YngtzbTsj2S0yec/eMovCW 7J645pIoc1I7ig48L/cppzddRI+2e4QWAt4teDbT5yazQseApRalwPx+7mYgrVuh92Lp M2VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCiHPwG7LA76Bf0jPytM+TLef+5bC7IkAP7gTf+c5ASNdA8c5Cd 4WrH53A1ECYrM3BlJh7tIIXtjYXn X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224/Ngr0B3rwc3iYUtVHFmCWCQ9ra8RAKini7xvSX1ApNqFHo+gSpbBIWJc7JM7e+QHGTWbM1w== X-Received: by 10.80.231.6 with SMTP id a6mr4850818edn.240.1519215819875; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:23:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w4sm4978094edf.76.2018.02.21.04.23.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 04:23:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled From: Dmitry Gutov To: Chris Feng , Eli Zaretskii References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> Message-ID: <5ae94d61-bf90-94ea-01f3-4d25ad93b295@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:23:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) On 2/21/18 12:47 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > - Use sleep-for instead of sit-for in the relevant place, forgoing the > significant latency improvement that comes with the latter<...> Or maybe significant-ish. To the tune of 30ms. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 12:48:53 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 17:48:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54738 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoYVh-0005jc-LW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:48:53 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60470) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eoYVg-0005jP-2Y for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:48:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoYVX-0002No-Ic for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:48:46 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eoYVX-0002Nd-Ek; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:48:43 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4687 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eoYVW-0000qI-TR; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:48:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:48:56 +0200 Message-Id: <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:47:20 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:47:20 +0200 > > So far the last option is winning, but I'd be much more content to use > it if the Emacs 26 are not going to need it. I'm _really_ uneasy about putting this on the release branch. sit-for is notorious for subtle problems that take a lot of time to be exposed. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Feb 21 16:45:43 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2018 21:45:43 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54977 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocCt-00057s-1k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:45:43 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f181.google.com ([209.85.128.181]:37516) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eocCq-00057f-NX for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:45:41 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f181.google.com with SMTP id z12so8550812wrg.4 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:45:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qUNwbGdtPejkxCILAJgrl/pKxTIMT8mHXMhsmTUBd+4=; b=BUtg9SEJ8CP4JpV9RlYfZ6yLty/4+pBWTtpbXgmX1tLmO4v4yKvQ/B1b5ETqf1qocS Aw+O/nc6rK+DFJ/hV+jkp4YOaaSuN91ztGGO9D5+Fknif2y9c1MHmYZmKI01Qzf1q8Zx wc7sNZdsZTDxzj94A/fRMkJ2l2o4covf0Rl4rSJaDxETvUcHmPdtCczWZuwtQTMHUZpG CzyRU1QBvwCdwWygG5Cu8f2i3CqQFXNAM9lLnkhqV/Lr0X7HJR4D2/07/KWksUV41w4R duuEuKkcpABj21IMK9iWkPzAv0/L6E8aLQLCHo+KxC+wOcKmdBMU6UUmdw0jpghpVa4R 3Z0w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qUNwbGdtPejkxCILAJgrl/pKxTIMT8mHXMhsmTUBd+4=; b=JyppZPGZw6NkNOjFdZygcrEPsg8GW2XtOpI7FFA8PAwdcTcdLxrRDwJFm1oobFoBzn Q8TomclVPuFlWtH3HBcWnwM3t7eUqqPsCkPAYlNoM9A7MxAXJfGxGnuJBv8V2AyIfq1a YCQ0tP0BRGP+hcMoV5zRyiajiqOtNNx0BgTOYXVUT4H2a6Pe/mLfzKHs64iW1sCF7pBp N2c7civsdSuRUHzWNsMizy11wS67emE6KHb9uuDhxCcWa56+dtZma69srcCy++jqbNlp Bu7XXNmT+5KiId4kzs5tFuZbNvc0xO1OVccjoCAj5qdI2Yr2BgeJH1qAfyAY/9yT25bn 5yig== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAWWOufYLnWAWKVjzPuACa1jI6PeENMDj/cvHewK/7SefQkPOYK OVSBzqXLNnHShs1k0p8GkXZSDcvm X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225vR4rsQ7MVxCWY3k2O+BpQqZxFOOOHQpAgh6UvsVDgmBvtCvn3Ovl4OHv9x5NKvCkvQmVcuQ== X-Received: by 10.223.190.17 with SMTP id n17mr3996153wrh.189.1519249534425; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:45:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([185.105.174.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm23432023wrb.15.2018.02.21.13.45.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:45:32 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: Eli Zaretskii References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:45:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:59.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/59.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) On 2/21/18 7:48 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 12:47:20 +0200 >> >> So far the last option is winning, but I'd be much more content to use >> it if the Emacs 26 are not going to need it. > > I'm _really_ uneasy about putting this on the release branch. sit-for > is notorious for subtle problems that take a lot of time to be > exposed. Well, ok. I can live with that. Maybe consider it for inclusion if we end up having more pretests? This patch has been in master for a few months, and it's two lines long, so it must be *somewhat* safe. I've pushed the workaround (last option) to company-mode in the meantime. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Feb 22 02:39:34 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2018 07:39:34 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55243 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eolTa-0002WS-Hv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:39:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eolTY-0002WA-4P for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:39:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eolTP-00087N-TA for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:39:26 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34037) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eolTP-000875-Pi; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:39:23 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1669 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eolTO-0001Ll-Rt; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 02:39:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:39:37 +0200 Message-Id: <83h8q95v7q.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:45:30 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) > Cc: chris.w.feng@gmail.com, 23980@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:45:30 +0200 > > > I'm _really_ uneasy about putting this on the release branch. sit-for > > is notorious for subtle problems that take a lot of time to be > > exposed. > > Well, ok. I can live with that. > > Maybe consider it for inclusion if we end up having more pretests? This > patch has been in master for a few months, and it's two lines long, so > it must be *somewhat* safe. Yes, a good idea. From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:25:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:24:06 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 19 08:50:02 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2018 13:50:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54076 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZcEb-0005Ch-Uo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:50:02 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:40027) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZcEa-0005CD-Ap for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:50:00 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id g22so10967163edr.7 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:50:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:subject:to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vl+7sU5jrRLaxgbtthdTaMXb4LjmKxB2HSF/FHkHylk=; b=la6g6vD7rEt7ZjoK7xpQHtEle02wDpfMH2gpg4r/CC/dMcRvLktqXrwnGjOqHTHfc3 Ufn81mWh4Vwat7cYlCfh5jU/NA6tKitvyeXhZsyNcXJfgNIhVBGvQG2P4VsE6MC36OOh N0ViKy28WNcL3FnyavlJ//JxlwX4fnajNBlz5r1+ljhcTY3peeBkyOkEiGPyE50hz9eX 6bEMlSNd4uXhIfVQ7X8gM/EOGd2V+RChqyRfmpr7a9cU+OuALkynvzPorvYt46wD/lKd +kzaLP3Q8BT11sLvEet0ipQmCBHfALsrVAYX/uoOWpm5tzVoKdhRdStk2ghfoUByvV93 W7OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:subject:to:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vl+7sU5jrRLaxgbtthdTaMXb4LjmKxB2HSF/FHkHylk=; b=cy0SdI37b++4CeJd95GXjI4+8lGfICMwWXQAuWTzllerZ7yGxn2ocQ2QH5/LF49l74 OQR3Xp/7Or4KpGXpwXBhtkKzawT598xDKcNgCsiEpMYIYIYSK9nVGJJpG3AmckiRFMGp cH4vbiuAVTSEZAMEJ+ruKkKxf9jgFkUZQAoYclo/dSj6uypt+Q2v+s6mUcAD18lvpvrY SHUCU0mUiRc7v1Ql+MiqxUYM2JkKbg2RZbHrTgVeFMhlXdE8ddLxCpiAGaeAbCKbuHQN HftAbM+tvlwEQQOYhKVWwHTOJg71V2iYaZtD+GUwffyCJJZBwZYiSTmR8QE8on0ZM9My AoeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbHFU4V9M3f63pEme3XxdjC5KBpiS5xaxLrAI5TaoJd8cY/9zcN pzvsrr0BUmiPfbw0dkQNiHLfhiT5 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/XdyO0iZb1oTqatXXjE26CITaXffAtvWkgC0XBlQWA6Bb+r2ZVOYm0KZUaYbjm6wB+X8pAKeg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:13d6:: with SMTP id a22mr19172138edx.39.1545227394171; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm5422913ede.55.2018.12.19.05.49.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:49:53 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Gutov Subject: unarchive 23980 To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <818e8f5e-3528-bac4-17da-8ce1249ac543@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:49:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) unarchive 23980 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 19 08:54:48 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2018 13:54:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54082 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZcJE-0005Jp-Mk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:54:48 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com ([209.85.221.67]:40605) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZcJA-0005Jb-Ru for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:54:46 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id p4so19618358wrt.7 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:54:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HZX9MAoIQFpq0JeseMALjCDBZVJpXLKNT6hKi43iia8=; b=LP3S0qiPNbPJ/nkvTg8kA1yW7IqdUBxEkB6z1GTPoL1dkm4eCZXd0SEF4VchmfQn+R 76FBXIR5PjzNypHos5vCIl8WCLX+fjawP+hlp4hHBU40vYbYP7ai/1xLK4MWwe6pFI15 CpAFx+ILmwDEhYbrSEGfyjGWXmj/iwpA097NqSJrRW+Q61WI4CU/4mLlbUWKYmCXSIns G9SNNVnC0njwJ/kRP5nAxmXXDm+mCSjnBl6M59cBB0/XWfVIOfgL8H9Q2fL96gKP/a02 KzYt5jhO+3QZZx00GkpAmYZvP44xicFM0hYe1/+7T2BWkVSzUvy54r5lUwJ7lKVgM6Ti EQtQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HZX9MAoIQFpq0JeseMALjCDBZVJpXLKNT6hKi43iia8=; b=elqmzz3e9UYGSHBc8wjwuSf6lpfLeak9h8eQI6ga4CzYsmHD6cBQsbR00KpdZEHNTp K0OjVJGTQYKwtpFtM2antlAP7SeTOH2i2VoVi1r3laWtJMJ8SUYt3K8z6LGfBjZ/bkaL 5y8Fj8TxrSZN0bS4nF3XNgsYcxLmvXed2w3zKdarrNjm5Y2zFKlx7THjQtz+7upRkGP0 /eFZISXexI4gbigZcMfCa+97DE0hO5QwjLdJUS4TV9DUaPjalaJIE1FYkJkqybhC/dsU 7GHbmwVK8h19l5vkNSVnGwOmcbwovdnJpyMjLvQA303lZE7pxbY0od3e5RqdpPf04PZc 5UQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWaGIprIuzij+QJEdXBTmIeG5XIOQP0HMo5Qgg3z4R8iUVPTT9I5 bKkoN+2whoYIlwDrpSZ+urI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UgoXdJYZ6xDMKJZqpHkiE+WkploCPc+wDvXPwpBrT8eHtWcqULV9kl0I8sh7t9fiKSC0LWbQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:8b83:: with SMTP id o3mr19651417wra.81.1545227674103; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:54:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j8sm8898187wmd.0.2018.12.19.05.54.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 05:54:33 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: Eli Zaretskii References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> <83h8q95v7q.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <37124b3a-54d8-4da8-22c0-7d739ec0a4b8@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:54:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83h8q95v7q.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Hi Eli, On 22.02.2018 9:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Maybe consider it for inclusion if we end up having more pretests? This >> patch has been in master for a few months, and it's two lines long, so >> it must be *somewhat* safe. > > Yes, a good idea. Any chance we can backport it now? I have hard-to-reproduce bug report from users of third-party code (company-mode plus elpy) which, I am told, is definitely fixed by applying this patch to emacs-26: https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy/issues/1396#issuecomment-448142207 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 19 10:27:33 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2018 15:27:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54976 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdkz-0001Lk-8B for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:27:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48652) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdkx-0001LX-6T for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:27:31 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdkk-0004K4-Ic for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:27:24 -0500 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdkW-0003py-Vb; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:27:07 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1078 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gZdkU-00082Y-Vt; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 10:27:04 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 17:27:14 +0200 Message-Id: <83h8f9czal.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Dmitry Gutov In-reply-to: <37124b3a-54d8-4da8-22c0-7d739ec0a4b8@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:54:31 +0200) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> <83h8q95v7q.fsf@gnu.org> <37124b3a-54d8-4da8-22c0-7d739ec0a4b8@yandex.ru> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.0 (------) > Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 15:54:31 +0200 > > On 22.02.2018 9:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> Maybe consider it for inclusion if we end up having more pretests? This > >> patch has been in master for a few months, and it's two lines long, so > >> it must be *somewhat* safe. > > > > Yes, a good idea. > > Any chance we can backport it now? I have hard-to-reproduce bug report > from users of third-party code (company-mode plus elpy) which, I am > told, is definitely fixed by applying this patch to emacs-26: > > https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy/issues/1396#issuecomment-448142207 Risky... but okay, let's do it. Thanks. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 19 11:08:02 2018 Received: (at 23980) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2018 16:08:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55006 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZeOA-0002Mm-CU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:08:02 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com ([209.85.208.41]:33822) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZeO6-0002MA-PW for 23980@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:07:59 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id b3so17457666ede.1 for <23980@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:07:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=alRKs0zcPx0UH2RJHaM0D1FCZMdJGeFYRRBOuPGIzzg=; b=MKocD9GUFhk0KSZc5DhfRJr7iZUQyJbxW7Ctrx6iBJlZalL+iFGUz8kBK4LM1N7KEA 0dmLWSpc53rwD6qNsE77ajNBsyUNmebv+1m6+XpQGMknaHBOoOofnbSOw+S4UtKwq0MW 8RH0wTKGmElBlvKH3Eg+Rsg4rFDZW+2bHW9KYKHggCH2qmEKnX89cDA6Zz6cc70EM4wL 3ZlwjkmXhQIa+r21eo5NIgg7d529E2FD+KImB6PV1oP+y2oXW20f+USINp+YOUzUVeRw 6l1oFOqI7TUNqwanMoEHsnjoSMvm4PpMKIIiVtmsF38luECyZB09oxw1fXPLiDF0kW0k sIQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=alRKs0zcPx0UH2RJHaM0D1FCZMdJGeFYRRBOuPGIzzg=; b=BgJeCXqaTPHhZ0oEiov1Wcn79bIglDPKdaRQjsnaXx60Af9km0jd9e5CH6oWc9vdsX WCnuiuYI+YG0sQZ856EFCznUafV/BB8YuQ+1Qk3jh6r6/BsRHqNf/mzbnRM02pOCrcFE wRz3wu7oCDtcUlQHflkmOFxcWxL9vnOGxedbD9dlw8E98ZvkqODHnX72QGPAYjtE/cpc Qy+cejAMcAZoU9o8MQ5VQz5mRYMK+RBwr+eoJn0pRYERh5XMqNKUQwhx+kCAg6qzMqnO T4WZvJ2aemOwWzj7YR4NQa/XzF2NlO2HJwq47gYQaCoJ2/dZlRHVbZ7g3fIY13oiyxvB zGrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbWpYjpybg+1rgJwcIqMOHjnsTXoH3dZs+ZtFmdDYnZkK4edJs8 IwQdhH7Yk2LSwDITJbaWgOg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/V8Kac72zoDE/4SQ/bIjDMMugUUpdhiqzBB1y92MEgekJtm5s/j2m8b6vbs9iodkGvaU+oS9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a50:b0e5:: with SMTP id j92mr19145426edd.188.1545235672977; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:07:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j4sm1545610edh.69.2018.12.19.08.07.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:07:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: bug#23980: 25.0.95; Events put in `unread-command-events' can be wrongly handled To: Eli Zaretskii References: <8660s871vt.fsf@gmail.com> <92f514d5-ca5e-e341-a625-8c94a85cb679@yandex.ru> <83y3jn7bi5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8qb6kf4.fsf@gnu.org> <87po4yaiz0.fsf@gmail.com> <6830cf80-1964-bf58-16ab-31ab1fbed3ea@yandex.ru> <834lma6xo7.fsf@gnu.org> <9925174d-421a-04ae-f833-5a4cf10d7fd4@yandex.ru> <83h8q95v7q.fsf@gnu.org> <37124b3a-54d8-4da8-22c0-7d739ec0a4b8@yandex.ru> <83h8f9czal.fsf@gnu.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <1cd31226-917c-8db5-7094-bd9200faef2d@yandex.ru> Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:07:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <83h8f9czal.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23980 Cc: 23980@debbugs.gnu.org, chris.w.feng@gmail.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On 19.12.2018 17:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Any chance we can backport it now? I have hard-to-reproduce bug report >> from users of third-party code (company-mode plus elpy) which, I am >> told, is definitely fixed by applying this patch to emacs-26: >> >> https://github.com/jorgenschaefer/elpy/issues/1396#issuecomment-448142207 > > Risky... but okay, let's do it. Thank you, done! From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Dec 19 11:11:03 2018 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2018 16:11:03 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55012 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZeR3-0002RD-R0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:11:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f42.google.com ([209.85.208.42]:45034) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gZeR2-0002Qx-8W for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:11:00 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f42.google.com with SMTP id y56so17419930edd.11 for ; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:11:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:subject:to:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=52L89m8GgrHZ8rFinEC9L4Q07ix1OqQJ9CLyyXngkNo=; b=uhryH3vsaA285HEASBli5QsvQzTo0lZqWl22J+HqB3SXr8rtWadUSiyJ9OF8ly9sgu NDm9GVN1chso5h40lmb9jououJuo6EldWF6SPswYdTfcTColKYv9qArjwu1UfjDjKaiA saAGp31aLV7M5Ca7MyjtBjcO+53tMPqtOWhXFIXnOg+NZ4rMiby700qbiWfiCzba+D2E t3twAu9mY3DfakGyvACZT0OckjkX9cUIGoOpv/Wx+4w0iXlGqQir3R53nV5VyyN2kvuF HJf4S5sKYfFzMRH57wDc4HIQeZt8JLWA8z/kn0ugeXuGyjO3AZN4aMWIL5D82lqmUWMT cg1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:subject:to:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=52L89m8GgrHZ8rFinEC9L4Q07ix1OqQJ9CLyyXngkNo=; b=C5+aMM3IcZ7DmV4B6m8FeWLrGtwQtD0k7wvgaLsR5XHO1A6BIjdx6WfTgXFOndVXD/ 3ZXOPwNXPDRRQEcefUC0sOoF13MH62tgchWVPWzhpov9RCNSayR9Fh4Xo047Ad6xkpP6 La2H5llgdazZ0OksNuzJE+9scHWCo/H3a9KhoByW1aMlruRZVhkSMCOJlbSdg5FgcPs1 u8c3EPkhPL3KxoidEsnNvUTznhMFvz1YAR1QDOMYVsfyyEpUTxcWsKA71xfip4HxgttN 0Fl2hoxLgcUtGc9lb07Kq9NTUAelOFBuqlarMj4Obx8/xt99DOfJdCKMQCrZXLsJnnlF HSfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbnnD0Tc9lwuflMqpyAcNBlhnmXkbarP5ykiEw3kP9Pcz7wS5dB vtSKTonCaFvRMSEe6fPdaI6OeRSh X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WAF1/Pq+As1Wh7jWW4DTv1cNzT9Wd777uM0UIQl0moTGGZIiApLgDwfJ6Cihfq2EdFFc71Kw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:b3c9:: with SMTP id t9mr20850523edd.270.1545235854392; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:10:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.195] ([109.110.245.170]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w28sm5896724edd.38.2018.12.19.08.10.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Dec 2018 08:10:53 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Gutov Subject: set fixed version To: control@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 18:10:52 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:64.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/64.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) close 23980 26.2 From unknown Tue Jun 17 20:25:09 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 12:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator