From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:43 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#23954 <23954@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#23954 <23954@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test Reply-To: bug#23954 <23954@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2025 16:10:43 +0000 retitle 23954 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test reassign 23954 emacs submitter 23954 Tino Calancha severity 23954 normal thanks From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Jul 12 11:34:49 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2016 15:34:49 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48506 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzhx-0006eN-IO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:49 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40198) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzhv-0006e3-C3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzho-0006x3-Qb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:41 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzho-0006wu-Na for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzhm-0000B3-I9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:39 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzhl-0006wW-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]:36325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMzhl-0006wD-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:34:37 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id pp5so959255pac.3 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:34:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=pzrYeVhwd56iiQWatjtTIGnmkf4oXNK4mVjE1+Qzzys=; b=zzli5PVMd8UJjWiVyqG/IAVnVtOw4Oi9TavVrNMDLFbwiwZ0rzRxsAupEEjrLGj2NE 40B7Je3CeBsnORa6+rsPO59VrZs11dvDYxzCle+nRXPC+9lmMcsD/cdAyeAoqj4p7hG2 5U+uuxhHWdb5Wc3GR746o/5E2SH29hrT4WacyqOn9JMIWmnzkeplSUx7OSvLGpSW2eet +/wymnT9lSxVmM3GhLfuBqbhHoz4L1e5TlqSKKtAzo665Mbp/HvBf6YCdwscq1LKunfV fMs502I47gQ6bU4Wnr1wDu30yeHeoK36BsDLMaz1mnNRAQBjSPD1lN59ATkd18Yd664K lIOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=pzrYeVhwd56iiQWatjtTIGnmkf4oXNK4mVjE1+Qzzys=; b=X+1HxKIb6892Kv53MfWTvlI2tG+1JJZ9lU2p2Wud8ywtgD09qGg9r7+LoF1HXuvx/u BkjVVjMoz7hiN4kJsJohzujlZKnd/jc3adSyC5FatciNMMc7Ttz9I7W0W7d2fgL2wHzU ky85tsm9jyiM1c+0p+DQtRcpPd/wr0JoxtJrBQ0g+Ht0sfByTYljQk4EgPA04yoGNArc 4lcgJ70j/zn3uxK7eDjKnr+R6uSUDdvCwj5kYnpmNrNRSdjlPKNzO1VzgQaJ874ok5yf DNzr+dlNHOEGaRjGEZWhlOO6RsPeNhsMzy7yBjrhLGPXYeAcMWWSM5byvzY0iofYo7Ks 7ZGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKxJMSHhTybletU+F0BSMe+dzTolU/QOqq7V2O74aPpCGsZzAwoYfppa2zwMwKSVA== X-Received: by 10.66.21.132 with SMTP id v4mr4967430pae.54.1468337676157; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc ([240f:6e:c00e:1:6875:2e94:598b:96cb]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w67sm4571890pfw.41.2016.07.12.08.34.34 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:34:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:34:32 +0900 (JST) X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) The test 'erc-track--erc-faces-in' always fails but is not tagged as failed. While running the test 'char-property-alias-alist' is nil, so that 'face cannot be translated to 'font-lock-face in the call to 'erc-faces-in'. ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; >From c1ebac5d441de3154d3f786d1fff54d6c3acf9f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tino Calancha Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:26:04 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] Fix unexpected failing test * test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el (erc-track--erc-faces-in): Initialize 'char-property-alias-alist' (Bug#xxxxxx). --- test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el b/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el index 24dfcfb..641b307 100644 --- a/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el +++ b/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el @@ -108,8 +108,7 @@ "`erc-faces-in' should pick up both 'face and 'font-lock-face properties." (let ((str0 "is bold") (str1 "is bold") - ;;(char-property-alias-alist '((face font-lock-face))) - ) + (char-property-alias-alist '((face font-lock-face)))) (put-text-property 3 (length str0) 'font-lock-face '(bold erc-current-nick-face) str0) (put-text-property 3 (length str1) 'face -- 2.8.1 GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.20.6) of 2016-07-12 Repository revision: 5155144bd4cece3bab200a0eb613ffcdef523202 From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Jul 13 13:11:53 2016 Received: (at 23954) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jul 2016 17:11:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50065 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNNhR-0007Or-H8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48109) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bNNhQ-0007Oe-4V for 23954@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:52 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNNhK-0008Cc-8z for 23954@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:47 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNNhI-0008Be-Kq; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:44 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bNNhF-0001Yo-RA; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:41 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Tino Calancha Subject: Re: bug#23954: 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test References: X-Spook: constitution Smallpox FAA Hurricane Nogales Iran Ammonium X-Ran: :l0$-^'W'aAQv%H"[BZ~hVek_rt~$3}T%=i!)P[(*w5M!sV};VtaM_x%U;NOS{~s,X,;^I X-Hue: blue X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Tino Calancha's message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:34:32 +0900 (JST)") Message-ID: <07eg6xmpiq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23954 Cc: 23954@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) Tino Calancha wrote: > The test 'erc-track--erc-faces-in' always fails but is not tagged > as failed. I don't know what you mean by "not tagged as failed". It's been failing since 1efb20803. http://hydra.nixos.org/build/37443517 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-buildstatus/2016-07/msg00009.html > While running the test 'char-property-alias-alist' is nil, > so that 'face cannot be translated to 'font-lock-face in the > call to 'erc-faces-in'. Yet somehow it seemed to work from compiled code... From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 08:03:01 2016 Received: (at 23954) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2016 12:03:01 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQCgu-000501-Np for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:03:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38475) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQCgt-0004zo-2s for 23954@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:02:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQCgn-00055p-3k for 23954@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:02:53 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQCgg-000549-Lo; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:02:46 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bQCge-0004aa-OD; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:02:44 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: Tino Calancha Subject: Re: bug#23954: 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test References: <07eg6xmpiq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-Spook: emc Jet Dateline Chemical spill Customs and Border X-Ran: `MqNg;62HyGaqJN9[oq~|{G1XEMP,gR;vRot-ly36*/^oD*DjM'+43r:%n&E%@dkZ?$f66 X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:02:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <07eg6xmpiq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:11:41 -0400") Message-ID: <560rz19nf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23954 Cc: 23954@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -6.3 (------) It's bad to have persistently failing tests, because it can mask new failures. (eg several xref tests started failing in http://hydra.nixos.org/build/37558515, but there was no notification email due to this pre-existing failure.) So please consider applying your change to fix this. I see it is similar to what turn-on-font-lock does, so if explicitly turning on font-lock in this test also fixes it, that might be better. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 08:37:15 2016 Received: (at 23954) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2016 12:37:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59355 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQDE2-0005pT-Tc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:37:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52]:35753) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQDE1-0005pG-F0 for 23954@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:37:13 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id iw10so28848284pac.2 for <23954@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:37:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lZjYfHfvAaSeCFCE2HXA0l2p0zMkz4c3XNcF0xK6Oyk=; b=zqsDO8jJ7H/3bRfIbY9QF2SIfHtZZD41uWDQjIo78OtFXOP0oI8KV2vZcrXPjhFIHf FCIPz1UMmR8r/a+NNQgiNi5NY4yAYSQe+VbTkmsuWY1W6HO6YFrnK0Y3FFgbz30DLH1K Ol9wGj03IqHNLUY7BjdnQxpwP64sE+ywZ2wQ/4z8dO+7fHUPzw0bylKPkV3S+6VMDWaU sjB/90osEKGkaDbtEr3/pn0rFVxymtgQ6gUD5QXfZFDe+daC7Yo/uvIfNUoX68RQnwr4 0cS5EhoBDEXm8ILQ1X5AOYPf/YJLWLjJXMb8DmzAIymN+NoEO+RusMX35vMDV2DNuQ66 KSAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lZjYfHfvAaSeCFCE2HXA0l2p0zMkz4c3XNcF0xK6Oyk=; b=Y5B+sj3k5MAXKeS7lpJuLP8nU4mnQzdCuA6o7pN0kAtKYJwg9sex31Wse2+fd7PzQe Cy1+VkylH6cQn5LAh0349XRy9LnNW2Cy4YSQuJCqxJD6oBisaS6qD/ru/EJXtrnmnzV3 X8hiojfWNISV8Jp76req+r7uSPMCqROv4WDOYGzFgzREKGytuIPgUEfeExlOPS5t+cA3 RyDjQ6CEvpOpswo7p9aoV2fYc0YMhJn1dus40fmz02HKdeocCC88Ro+cFf7Uk1A5b5gE J/8/mC5UKdEP+POss2Jzn5yEF+4CLAVbzAeUbULFGxDpLptfGcsFxrvtK2ReBlKddfIN 88HA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJoaahSQ9Eny7oOgoI/GIc1xGkEI8pYxRxlhKLT6T1A4jPqNhN2ejR6cxGYfmCrXg== X-Received: by 10.66.219.68 with SMTP id pm4mr22332066pac.19.1469104627644; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.173]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y184sm12135077pfg.94.2016.07.21.05.37.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:37:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:37:04 +0900 (JST) X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#23954: 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test In-Reply-To: <07eg6xmpiq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Message-ID: References: <07eg6xmpiq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23954 Cc: 23954@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Glenn Morris wrote: > Tino Calancha wrote: > >> The test 'erc-track--erc-faces-in' always fails but is not tagged >> as failed. Sorry. I meant with that sentence that the test don't include ':expected-result :failed' From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 08:42:54 2016 Received: (at 23954) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2016 12:42:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQDJW-0005x9-Ii for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:42:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:35594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQDJS-0005wv-R7 for 23954@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:42:52 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f182.google.com with SMTP id x72so30210338pfd.2 for <23954@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:42:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :user-agent:mime-version; bh=PxCk/Gf+ueGkcaNcd+5QN9AGs7BqYe84BHk/o0+5IDc=; b=t7nG5SF1O3gNK6Y1ux1uF2hTKfPDsCWXR4fZ7L1x2Bj6KGneEciKojHlOaauFx2lO3 eYxi9WomBrBRKnxLYxwRje6/qPceV568i3pK7y5UNT1aNlg5EYb4V6pRuRO4o4l6kpPW WrP3s7yWZo1Ftf6rju7pAPpGR+PaFhcu+Dc4vTT7MhROO1MMCS3m7BDt3HpBNsH+977f 8qcEtquPYXq/4VEur1z2bKrvY3LBZby+p4XqNg4KuFDQy1FSr5dJjgJq1mEtwNFhpVeU Ayf8K1l44nGZeNl8B7CfYspLPj4reyVdGH37qasrbBQMV0GsPmPp0j3fmmFufsEjLg/h imog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:user-agent:mime-version; bh=PxCk/Gf+ueGkcaNcd+5QN9AGs7BqYe84BHk/o0+5IDc=; b=U+k2vi5L64IkibTVldWAkDHGgb6SpyRaZtSoA4bUiivoikRskq+gNukNE3mcOLMmqJ b89Y3zVEmGuhEphYa5iLYLGdbTKjcj44oUayCvtEStGh2oVIX7VouQOz4DP6CTbWnM8i oXMo6HznmBIcbzonSuaYgXXIbwHtXJuMsslMv5PzlDSheREGpT61qcgcAw02QVWZbWrX uksKHf1aAXeinlpHhuQT0IXXCz7zUMbKpuJ6E3k1sncD8JMRsUwXOisIq5Inc0EDkiNR pJj/mIu/ni1WJc4q7GyT2Ix9R6rSk1DTwIRaAqgPRVmGx0Ts2DSHvLw6rAC4UtQi7HX6 nnfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKo0/EmrBf+z6KC8sgfxS+6BsdpYJqlEUugg7jnlTNCABiRorHL87dwsaxTEIJ7fQ== X-Received: by 10.98.93.25 with SMTP id r25mr72843886pfb.122.1469104965068; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.164]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e187sm12189927pfg.43.2016.07.21.05.42.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:42:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:42:40 +0900 (JST) X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc To: Glenn Morris Subject: Re: bug#23954: 25.1.50; Unexpected failing test In-Reply-To: <560rz19nf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Message-ID: References: <07eg6xmpiq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <560rz19nf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23954 Cc: 23954@debbugs.gnu.org, Tino Calancha X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) On Thu, 21 Jul 2016, Glenn Morris wrote: > > It's bad to have persistently failing tests, because it can mask new failures. > (eg several xref tests started failing in > http://hydra.nixos.org/build/37558515, but there was no notification > email due to this pre-existing failure.) > > So please consider applying your change to fix this. Thanks for the replay. > I see it is similar to what turn-on-font-lock does, so if explicitly > turning on font-lock in this test also fixes it, that might be better. Yeah, for our purposes it is the same: set `char-property-alias-alist' to '((face font-lock-face)). I am going to apply following patch: diff --git a/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el b/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el index 24dfcfb..7cf3ef7 100644 --- a/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el +++ b/test/lisp/erc/erc-track-tests.el @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ (require 'ert) (require 'erc-track) +(require 'font-core) (ert-deftest erc-track--shorten-aggressive-nil () "Test non-aggressive erc track buffer name shortening." @@ -107,9 +108,12 @@ (ert-deftest erc-track--erc-faces-in () "`erc-faces-in' should pick up both 'face and 'font-lock-face properties." (let ((str0 "is bold") - (str1 "is bold") - ;;(char-property-alias-alist '((face font-lock-face))) - ) + (str1 "is bold")) + ;; Turn on Font Lock mode: this initialize `char-property-alias-alist' + ;; to '((face font-lock-face)). Note that `font-lock-mode' don't + ;; turn on the mode if the test is run on batch mode or if the + ;; buffer name starts with ?\s (Bug#23954). + (unless font-lock-mode (font-lock-default-function 1)) (put-text-property 3 (length str0) 'font-lock-face '(bold erc-current-nick-face) str0) (put-text-property 3 (length str1) 'face From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Thu Jul 21 08:59:18 2016 Received: (at 23954-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Jul 2016 12:59:18 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59381 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQDZO-0006P3-KA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:59:18 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:34377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bQDZM-0006On-Kd for 23954-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:59:16 -0400 Received: by mail-pa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id fi15so29040418pac.1 for <23954-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:date:to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=GBuDDOYXiKTYGCGbPS6fk/he+pMZU9g/ZkvWeAnBmjw=; b=wwQ9rn8+BQpgxBt1ymzQ/FwocAxBto5nUBPERM5/bQHopnsJH/RWpZQnmaFolnKEWi OK4syRv3mGvLHqp6ic6NOxrnI/iEo/9A8l9fT3RXsbpOREiqjnWZWCQzYRHw3SkbO7b1 HNqWzYD7aq1rgPtebwf2b+cF5igMZnljxOGaCtOEuDU6bBV0F66pNhb5CK0fwvO+zdtH EkeE6dbBth7ljrOVUUsR9t4/qTTAyFeMkBbEiJPI7/FkNuazPeQJFuf70MooK9QGyI8x kFh0m6bOrajM4ZCBlfY5SpV3QM1KuJIQ1ENw5t31DZ4idl6U0Jseoha2eGqw3OQ/vWfB pDoA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=GBuDDOYXiKTYGCGbPS6fk/he+pMZU9g/ZkvWeAnBmjw=; b=AbKmpaQi91rEz/3jzkWhy4OOljrmJ2Nn8kL6ciLqcWOjvP5fsoKHxZzYbNOa2+gWrZ PGHKK4OOKmsIopTjuC3wWiJRNJt4Ktv1AUSRZr8FTljtvuvzt+wFfDvOpX3LmSy18m5S VwQ0vQkz5gVJImo7Fmkqp7MPjks57c8FgaCRXb/XN1IPIYxT/Lr07owbW+O9nWTVfcd9 eA5thPvgsvNkk08c29RxYblK5V1x/BELph7XM1KIugyhEnRClUp05kpBbJ7Rp9nj2kJm ydjC+H72s34SA+DJ8RQ7rOJInp90bI+BnjVVg/TdHtC50p1enTTlXQeAZijlmW8yvzNl i8+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLNg4OdqJRp1OEi50dJ/icWqwc8B6eKDdRKiOIpxhg9msyLyW5e9smTxn3mYN/VUg== X-Received: by 10.66.191.234 with SMTP id hb10mr40815482pac.149.1469105950615; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from calancha-pc ([103.5.140.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c66sm12318509pfd.24.2016.07.21.05.59.08 for <23954-done@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 05:59:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Tino Calancha X-Google-Original-From: Tino Calancha Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 21:59:07 +0900 (JST) X-X-Sender: calancha@calancha-pc To: 23954-done@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Fixed in master branch [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.220.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tino.calancha[at]gmail.com) -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.220.42 listed in wl.mailspike.net] 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23954-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Fixed in master branch [...] Content analysis details: (1.3 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [209.85.220.42 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [209.85.220.42 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (tino.calancha[at]gmail.com) 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header 0.2 NO_SUBJECT Extra score for no subject -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid Fixed in master branch From unknown Sun Aug 17 09:10:43 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 11:24:04 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator