GNU bug report logs - #23945
25.1.50; Request for review: Gnus Cloud work in scratch/gnus-cloud

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#23945: closed (25.1.50; Request for review: Gnus Cloud work
 in scratch/gnus-cloud)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:57:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:55:53 -0400
with message-id <87h9bkbh9i.fsf <at> lifelogs.com>
and subject line Re: bug#23945: 25.1.50; Request for review: Gnus Cloud work in scratch/gnus-cloud
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23945,
regarding 25.1.50; Request for review: Gnus Cloud work in scratch/gnus-cloud
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
23945: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23945
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Teodor Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 25.1.50; Request for review: Gnus Cloud work in scratch/gnus-cloud
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:05:55 -0400

I've published the proposed changes to the Gnus Cloud code in the branch
`scratch/gnus-cloud' and would like to request a code review. It's a
single commit which I've tested over the last 2 weeks with the help of
other Gnus users.

I'll add documentation if the code is acceptable.

Thank you
Ted

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: 23945-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23945: 25.1.50;
 Request for review: Gnus Cloud work in scratch/gnus-cloud
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:55:53 -0400

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 21:36:12 -0400 Noam Postavsky <npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net> wrote: 

NP> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com> wrote:
>> Let me know, based on the docs, what the commit message should say. I
>> can't think of a good summary, since the work is really widespread in
>> order to make this package useful.

NP> Maybe something like "Bring gnus-cloud.el into working order", I
NP> gather from that thread that it was broken before, right? That's still
NP> not very descriptive but it looks like there's just a lot of little
NP> changes that aren't really tied together. Perhaps it would be better
NP> broken up into more commits (though that's probably not worth the
NP> trouble at this point).

All right... I squashed with the message you suggested. It's pushed so
I'll call this review done.

Ted

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.