GNU bug report logs - #23917
25.0.95; commit 3a9d6296b35e5317c497674d5725eb52699bd3b8 causing org-capture to error out

Previous Next

Packages: org-mode, emacs;

Reported by: Robert Pluim <rpluim <at> gmail.com>

Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 12:43:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Found in version 25.0.95

Fixed in version 25.1

Done: npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #89 received at 23917 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: nljlistbox2 <at> gmail.com, npostavs <at> users.sourceforge.net, jwiegley <at> gmail.com,
 rpluim <at> gmail.com, 23917 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, alex.bennee <at> linaro.org
Subject: Re: Please consider making Bug #23917 a blocker for 25.1 (was Re:
 org-capture: Capture template ā€˜g’: Match data clobbered
 by buffer modification hooks)
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 14:19:59 -0400
> Is it OK to adjust the match data before actually making the
> replacement?  If so, I think it's a simpler solution.
>> PS: I can think of one (theoretical) other/better way to fix this
>> problem: move the match-data adjustment so it's done within
>> replace_range before running the after-change-functions.
> Isn't that almost the same as what Noam suggested?

Yes, it's the same.  And yes, I like the idea, but I just don't know
what it would look like as a patch.  I have the impression that it could
prove either expensive in CPU time and backward incompatible
(e.g. adjust markers for every buffer modification), or require
extensive code surgery and/or breaking some abstractions.

This is just an impression, tho.  I think it'd definitely be the better
solution, so it's worth investigating anyway, if only for "master" rather
than for "emacs-25".


        Stefan




This bug report was last modified 8 years and 303 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.