GNU bug report logs -
#23665
spaces in keys: doc, --debug in LC_ALL=C
Previous Next
Reported by: Karl Berry <karl <at> freefriends.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 18:33:02 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: fixed
Done: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Hello Karl!
On 05/31/2016 02:32 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
> I run
> LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 sort --debug -k 2 /tmp/foo # or -k 2,2 et al.
> And get the nicely explanatory output for the "surprising" result:
[...]
Just to verify, the surprising result is in C locale?
I'm seeing the following, for "en_US.UTF-8" it's the order I'd expect, but the "C" is surprising:
$ cat -A k.txt
M Build/zfile$
M Master/mfile$
MM Build/afile$
$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 sort -k2 k.txt
MM Build/afile
M Build/zfile
M Master/mfile
$ LC_ALL=C sort -k2 k.txt
M Build/zfile
M Master/mfile
MM Build/afile
> But the information is just as valid in C as in UTF-8, so far as I can
> see. Thus it would be nice for it to be present.
If I understand correctly, one could argue the warning is even more important in C locale than in UTF-8 locales,
as collating rules for UTF-8 make leading spaces less significant.
As in:
$ cat -A s.txt
M A$
M B$
M D$
M C$
UTF-8 makes leading spaces less important:
$ LC_ALL=en_US.UTF-8 sort -k2 s.txt
M A
M B
M C
M D
in C locale, spaces (as simple bytes) do matter:
$ LC_ALL=C sort -k2 s.txt
M D
M B
M C
M A
-b skips leading spaces:
$ LC_ALL=C sort -k2b s.txt
M A
M B
M C
M D
> More importantly, I urge that the documentation for sort give an example
> of this. The idea that following blanks after the first become part of
> the next field is highly counter-intuitive.
I agree,
I can add the above example to the documentation (also possibly to the FAQ or Gotcha pages?).
What do you think?
The condition to print this message is here:
http://lingrok.org/xref/coreutils/src/sort.c#2435
I can try to suggest a patch to print it in C locale as well (hopefully tonight).
> It would also be nice if the definition of "key 1" was stated.
> Awfully easy to misread that as "field 1".
How about "leading blanks are significant in sort key [...]" ?
(in http://lingrok.org/xref/coreutils/src/sort.c#2439 )
regards,
- assaf
This bug report was last modified 6 years and 245 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.