From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:09:13 2025 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.509 (Entity 5.509) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: bug#2360 <2360@debbugs.gnu.org> To: bug#2360 <2360@debbugs.gnu.org> Subject: Status: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames Reply-To: bug#2360 <2360@debbugs.gnu.org> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:09:13 +0000 retitle 2360 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/fra= mes reassign 2360 emacs submitter 2360 Stephen Berman severity 2360 normal tag 2360 moreinfo thanks From stephen.berman@gmx.net Tue Feb 17 07:54:34 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 17 Feb 2009 15:54:34 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.0 tests=FOURLA autolearn=no version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1HFsVbo010202 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 07:54:32 -0800 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:48945 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LZSFE-0004gd-Se for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:52:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZSHE-0004ap-7J for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:54:29 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:34197) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZSHD-0004aX-L8 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:54:28 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2009 15:54:25 -0000 Received: from i59F57E55.versanet.de (EHLO escher.local.home) [89.245.126.85] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 17 Feb 2009 16:54:25 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+9/yZmBOK9K86DSubrOsvQ/oxTNKYXnfQ/LX76Es 8qAwgH3bgv/YAH Received: by escher.local.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7F2FC1D0FF5; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:23 +0100 (CET) From: Stephen Berman To: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames Sender: steve@escher.local.home Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.48 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) 1. emacs -Q -fn "Dejavu Sans Mono-10" 2. Sanity check: a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icons and observe that the tooltips have their normal appearance. b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame has its normal appearance, the type `C-x 5 0'. c. M-: (eq (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) => t 3. M-: (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icon and observe that the tooltip is translucent and very light, barely visible. b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame is likewise translucent and barely visible. Subsequent frames created by typing `C-x 5 2' in the first frame all have the same translucent appearance. However, if I type `C-x 5 0' in the first, normal-looking frame, thereby deleting it, then from the translucent frame type `C-x 5 2', then the newly created frame has its normal appearance, including tooltips, and typing `C-x 5 2' in this frame creates a normal-looking frame. (But now repeating step 3 again has the same shadowy results as before.) I don't know when this effect of redirect-frame-focus began (I guess since the unicode merge, though I only started seeing it recently after reactivating some old code I have that uses redirect-frame-focus); I do not see it with Emacs 22. Also, while I get the translucent tooltips with both the x and xft font backends and regardless of font used, the appearance of the translucent frame is more restricted: I see it with -fn "Dejavu Sans Mono-10" with both backends, but only with the xft backend with -fn "Dejavu Sans-10", -fn "Adobe Times-12" or -fn "Adobe Helvetica-12" (the latter two are not defined under the x backend); with other sizes of all of these fonts I don't get a translucent frame (but still get translucent tooltips). In GNU Emacs 23.0.90.3 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.4) of 2009-02-14 on escher Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10502000 Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: @im=local locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default-enable-multibyte-characters: t From jasonrumney@gmail.com Thu Feb 19 07:07:18 2009 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Feb 2009 15:07:19 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [140.186.70.10]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1JF7Fes017666 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:07:16 -0800 Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:40894 helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LaASY-0003bi-VR for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:05:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaAUb-0004lI-M3 for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:07:14 -0500 Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.186]:41291) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LaAUb-0004km-9r for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:07:13 -0500 Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j3so300119tid.10 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:07:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=37oDZnBaiiB6zAOe2Fe+xuTwV/fs99MrqkIvJaPTmT4=; b=NYPLQvHgj11ZGyU94Qukj2PA72waCPy7eOFhRIn1mdFdnprL0/zF66HQsLLt2XaZjB oTW09Y4JqUn0K66suuM3DZV4fbIF2j0kobg8sd9+qG2Spp27Rij+85QMrOb+Wda4yDtx 5SWG6n2ZkLMhFYo3SmCv8fnhlG8B8cUl5HDDU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mz1y1zZeLI9RjTxOxCpGmtXi1srb3KQazVouSTVoKlMeeuKcLcKjwuJ34EKM+Ptdqu +KE2zjDPsIXCZUmU2Geehc5ea9m9jHkbnGyTclxpybyM+UWnxh2VW85YZi57V27dq3UR 76b2XHfitxrVaqCWiuun8Xv/OxtdbJPQfhju4= Received: by 10.110.37.3 with SMTP id k3mr2283241tik.45.1235056030333; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.249.26? ([118.101.26.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm1187579tib.28.2009.02.19.07.07.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:07:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: Jason Rumney Message-ID: <499D7582.1080004@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:06:42 +0800 From: Jason Rumney User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Berman , 2360@debbugs.gnu.org CC: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2360: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames References: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> In-Reply-To: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) Stephen Berman wrote: > 3. M-: (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) > a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icon and observe that the > tooltip is translucent and very light, barely visible. > b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame is > likewise translucent and barely visible. > I can confirm that 3a is reproducible on Windows too (even without steps 1 and 2), but I do not see 3b (but that seemed to depend on font, font-size and font-backend in your tests, so maybe there is a different combination that can reproduce 3b on Windows). I would guess this was introduced when the transparency patch went in or some time after, rather than by the unicode merge. From stephen.berman@gmx.net Thu Feb 19 08:32:54 2009 Received: (at 2360) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 19 Feb 2009 16:32:54 +0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2008-06-10) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id n1JGWn9L011154 for <2360@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 08:32:50 -0800 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 19 Feb 2009 16:32:42 -0000 Received: from i59F54989.versanet.de (EHLO escher.local.home) [89.245.73.137] by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 19 Feb 2009 17:32:42 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20778731 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+BdB84EVWBnDzMYkGkcvCN9V0GNdz9XiFFSEGwlk DGjkKbPFijR2zE Received: by escher.local.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9B3A1D1155; Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:32:40 +0100 (CET) From: Stephen Berman To: Jason Rumney Cc: 2360@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: bug#2360: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames References: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> <499D7582.1080004@gnu.org> Sender: steve@escher.local.home Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:32:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <499D7582.1080004@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:06:42 +0800") Message-ID: <87prhel74n.fsf@escher.local.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.58 On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:06:42 +0800 Jason Rumney wrote: > Stephen Berman wrote: >> 3. M-: (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) >> a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icon and observe that the >> tooltip is translucent and very light, barely visible. >> b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame is >> likewise translucent and barely visible. >> > > > I can confirm that 3a is reproducible on Windows too (even without steps 1 and > 2), but I do not see 3b (but that seemed to depend on font, font-size and > font-backend in your tests, so maybe there is a different combination that can > reproduce 3b on Windows). > > I would guess this was introduced when the transparency patch went in or some > time after, rather than by the unicode merge. This seems likely; indeed, when I start Emacs like this: $ emacs -Q --eval "(setq default-frame-alist '((alpha . 30)))" and then type `C-x 5 2', the newly created frame has about the same appearance as what I see after calling redirect-frame-focus. (Interestingly, and something I failed to notice in my OP, the tooltips generated from the transparent frame are not transparent; i.e., in the case of my OP, only the tooltips of the first frame are transparent). Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 19 10:54:36 2021 Received: (at 2360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 14:54:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UfE-0005zF-4k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:54:36 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45838) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UfC-0005yx-Sr for 2360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:54:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=svP6NAkSHgu26a++K5H4zr8CBDboGh/zySvn9+2mgno=; b=R+wh/2g3qmgbZu2Han0QH69dXN Rmpn6XClNTimFtcZwWCAcQqAtDUE49I5nJvuLVhka3lFbElPVWqut1fEC88YQ+hDZJiSu+1RcPU7j LsORxEj5s6R1B9Fs2b48IGFV85H5lJf6rC4mh/itDuv5xgClkUHIpO9de5s84mpqqknE=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Uf4-0007wR-GK; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:28 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stephen Berman Subject: Re: bug#2360: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames References: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> X-Now-Playing: Colored Music's _Individual Beauty_: "We Are Only Dancin' (Previously Unreleased Version)" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:25 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> (Stephen Berman's message of "Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:23 +0100") Message-ID: <874kcqnyla.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stephen Berman writes: > 1. emacs -Q -fn "Dejavu Sans Mono-10" > 2. Sanity check: > a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icons and observe that the > tooltips have their normal appearance. > b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe th [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 2360 Cc: 2360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stephen Berman writes: > 1. emacs -Q -fn "Dejavu Sans Mono-10" > 2. Sanity check: > a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icons and observe that the > tooltips have their normal appearance. > b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame has its > normal appearance, the type `C-x 5 0'. > c. M-: (eq (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) > => t > 3. M-: (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) > a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icon and observe that the > tooltip is translucent and very light, barely visible. > b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame is > likewise translucent and barely visible. (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately wasn't resolved at the time.) I tried this recipe in Emacs 28 under Debian/bullseye, and I couldn't see anything unusual. Are you still seeing this bug in recent Emacs versions? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 19 10:54:42 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 14:54:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59749 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UfK-0005zZ-Dd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:54:42 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:45852) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UfI-0005zE-LH for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 10:54:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7KEFkBtk/T86Rr0NjHADW8mKmEklz5CtR3+qQP71Gus=; b=PXSpBaKx0JwIZtXEYBQh2o/mL7 Ns8vh+OExtDL/QUu0Sjxw0tejQbOuXwUy98xt+pc5OMPmp2iB/hjVmRTzPE2dYakokqzK/thkBsZr Aqv/u61LjohvFhFNhjh++q9kG96HDHF+BAlPIhMF10xnfmYv+moF+769Kv/QYQfeZCZw=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5UfB-0007wb-1i for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:35 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:32 +0200 Message-Id: <8735sanyl3.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #2360 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 2360 + moreinfo quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) tags 2360 + moreinfo quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 19 12:05:37 2021 Received: (at 2360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 16:05:37 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Vlw-0002Aw-Rj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:05:37 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:41659) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5Vlu-0002AR-1A for 2360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:05:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1626710728; bh=A2OzgyUSp5Vi52pkH+6w0FmEQUJRu4MlTe8E3XFaRSg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=knYqy/k1zNLvuZ0ygm6ElDLz9U7TYAc+Ldt8nJJYBwtqG9RnFPPtxV0G/C3J4nrcj VF/ZovkR2dG6QvbMr6pIZeIlNWrGS5cwEk+HBDkUnYP8Cc5Xk+ujUhBwl8GbkFC0r5 813uzUGRabGm9/xvlWnR8WRMCyyp6pXhmNAa2qF4= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from strobelfs ([178.1.124.244]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MZTmY-1laDWD32tq-00WVih; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:05:27 +0200 From: Stephen Berman To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: Re: bug#2360: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames References: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> <874kcqnyla.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:05:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874kcqnyla.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:25 +0200") Message-ID: <87bl6y70hq.fsf@rub.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:dtzBS74Eld9OkcG/7aGOgEVs5ub9NzEzYmWGZJJKcDuhl/5ua0c g03Umx6hoLh/+Uj+BKJ4Kx4nwefP20CHU23g9+k8miIUWm14Qqt+ce9yyHuLe0Xi0MmIuDD i+lmsLicAujVujEPjnTx3834+KFdrvlMzk8sKqdBV37zUuZy9szyuIJvfxjHhVeCciBoYgF R40Kjr9nKeyTHoW65p09Q== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:IF+9eeOBCkk=:2er86vBKZLnZjTJo6y17CW BWoquBgU1nERJ0AsYbvBCoz430Bu/j2hOWlzjECNTeqVV/n+Dfr60ICeqUyLIfGV1oThworje x50ol3YJFT17+9c8kwsDxPqdDrX9cLGPqwxi0OUbaTBf330a5YxonvER2d8vjQdzZjRaptZ3Q F+eXd4/kRBv1Q3rgPmA648q3NSpZkR8vYSmuMWuQrFUDZA+adT6Sewv/7wVlBwm+nayKDbKij xuo3IDewLGAojgJNZDdtVgOpcPGagZ84c+Qyp+xyGeygY7OAC6SjyYGG8zVZHaihus9q8Dt5P ofSkDZspL01jGCoeJ1J6jO+SkrOQlNXB3wPINnq+YUF2uAfX4FN+GtegLr2ohHeywU5LNZWqp IrlqQiNDtEBWQ98bRdRUF1ZJbtTPhLOrNCiFJRJQCqD1797t6QC+fQ9zuzcyEHa3MASkgChAb 62tce3jm+2+setsLrNAPEjF4Sr/ptIPEprz/mrBxk/NZlsIu3V5wyhQSWYHgjlu0uYx+8/OPR SHkPLvaBhgi5gYB9Cw8hXEboCQatH3Zom99DE3tf2qnoqw03rd4YwNGEbWHWg5A4T0GasvoZZ 5gAUFMGlWV/+g+RQA1318YKz6RO9+vqfFBGQs/edxSuBnFav1KtFK3PXxCHX8mRlhfRzEI4Im CvUkZHxNajU5MfVRC88cV+LgTY2McdJy1K3sUKLxy80TyVziKIQOiry8dcpDdF5i1SpYAeQew Pb+HVKFeeJWx2zNh0ATN2eljShU+5Ws5b3SophL4dMltIiK8oJcXM4zOoFOQ7dGMS87xO9fT1 7Qvyy26uBWw3YVqA4K/sUGx/PGkf5CvpXVdbtzZpEHQXLPNlpXgf/myc/yy+WWcsRZdGXQSUv I1nUSPJcbbyZqgx158BwqnXtfgTQoyaVDR3nwbu1IRybcaeM72q6XdFuSNDJb+zq2kB5F4lAV LIksiD0LwTBVWSlYgDgvezlaJe4Spc20XRJWa74H4RedFuO+b6WjW7OEW1cKhbjkchQw2NPbq 0+OTLojttJptSNwJAuVGDvlN8NjoIRG5qdR1aDLKRtW2SE8qp1X/MPJ9eeDan0E28ss1mJ7lt bSd1BcvQM1qPsKBS8PTLTSMJsYkSNXmzzMQc+R456UqhlI5fyt5Lo3RIg== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 2360 Cc: 2360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) On Mon, 19 Jul 2021 16:54:25 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> 1. emacs -Q -fn "Dejavu Sans Mono-10" >> 2. Sanity check: >> a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icons and observe that the >> tooltips have their normal appearance. >> b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame has its >> normal appearance, the type `C-x 5 0'. >> c. M-: (eq (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) >> => t >> 3. M-: (redirect-frame-focus (selected-frame) (previous-frame)) >> a. Move mouse cursor over a tool bar icon and observe that the >> tooltip is translucent and very light, barely visible. >> b. Type `C-x 5 2' and observe that the newly created frame is >> likewise translucent and barely visible. > > (I'm going through old bug reports that unfortunately wasn't resolved at > the time.) > > I tried this recipe in Emacs 28 under Debian/bullseye, and I couldn't > see anything unusual. Are you still seeing this bug in recent Emacs > versions? No. At the time I had observed the problem with the x and xft font backends; I currently only have a build of emacs-26 with the xft backend and cannot reproduce the problem there either. So I assume it was fixed, or anyway stopped being a problem, long ago. Thanks for looking at the report again, and feel free to close it. Steve Berman From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 19 12:24:44 2021 Received: (at 2360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 16:24:45 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60118 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5W4S-0004r0-NL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:24:44 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47214) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5W4R-0004qk-3v for 2360@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:24:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tkHbBp7mZruMu6iEMklDdNF8kW4XafWB+Vvu1oB41ac=; b=LNzxg7gr5a+dYiPMQE8PX4L0pD hyix9wxa7c0PZJyR6uqTRrZPNK3oqUl0zXVSlGxWof1RQAZivBvm7QMR3ixbHAyQ5SDx2KuUFeauk myxRvxEZYUJBLT9sJJVt0PABah/MJauX2x9O/raTVwzOmdaK+TjTPm6aOPVcVdBQBYoc=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5W4J-0000Lu-0u; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:24:37 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Stephen Berman Subject: Re: bug#2360: 23.0.90; redirect-frame-focus induces translucent tooltips/frames References: <87tz6toy8g.fsf@escher.local.home> <874kcqnyla.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl6y70hq.fsf@rub.de> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAgMAAAAqbBEUAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAADFBMVEVZVU6popZFQDv/ //8RJBwaAAAAAWJLR0QDEQxM8gAAAAd0SU1FB+UHExAYE2BSfgcAAAGqSURBVCjPNZHBatwwEIZ/ CavYOqlgh9CTYjAYP4UCXlh6UhepuLc0UOhjKMZbtnss2Z6dPal6yo687YAH/ZZm5tcnwMEgh7cA U6DMUVkFFABl5l6+/877QqFvDMO7LGqUwvFKq63UHG3QpZElrZVx6MEV2+HBew+J0NfCo/GWh8bh aDmyoGRWT/1Re2Wqr84PuVXjD2X1zExhb2IClwvLDuumoA7en7IQ3pSU/Jw9Cud01zTjnK0zsoNL t9czBHlWT6V/2WMhURj2yVs2QdAtOBW7yFzowjbo25kItMtmgT3SgGa/Ce+/GBRvdrwhshMBOYhN uLs7wBU/kSH5ccGixYnOdZ/rkRE9RWghbL1jT2SsbRQuYwG+f3t/n+svhTjwie1UIAevOIJPf/Sc 3Vx8EfmHqBe6EF4fJVYEdHnraOlaPIIRQxSUEtJM6EGYodqHc4g6bU+iympYQxtXQgKN0/OMNg+i WOPHOJR9oN86SRqE+yGz51cefvUYUsYohxB+JDlEjWtKaUZKMl0jIv6HTMjvfetJ49uUstIypUhN 0r9D6UqlOc70heEvpalxS178q4kAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMDctMTlUMTY6MjQ6 MTkrMDA6MDA+CC65AAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIxLTA3LTE5VDE2OjI0OjE5KzAwOjAw T1WWBQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: Aksak Maboul's _Before and After Bandits_: "Onze Dents-Son of l'Idiot (live)" Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:24:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87bl6y70hq.fsf@rub.de> (Stephen Berman's message of "Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:05:21 +0200") Message-ID: <874kcqjmpp.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Stephen Berman writes: > No. At the time I had observed the problem with the x and xft font > backends; I currently only have a build of emacs-26 with the xft > backend and cannot reproduce the problem there either. So I as [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 2360 Cc: 2360@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Stephen Berman writes: > No. At the time I had observed the problem with the x and xft font > backends; I currently only have a build of emacs-26 with the xft > backend and cannot reproduce the problem there either. So I assume it > was fixed, or anyway stopped being a problem, long ago. Thanks for > looking at the report again, and feel free to close it. Thanks for checking; I'm closing this report, then. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon Jul 19 12:24:55 2021 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2021 16:24:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60121 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5W4c-0004rN-Ul for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:24:55 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:47228) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1m5W4a-0004rA-Lk for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 12:24:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=u+tmKL70OAdxGJIsIjdBc1bbLV++BPhF6qE2YwaVz7o=; b=XMi8ahxSTjkgDSAaXtxmtyQnZq FdTJ8oZC8uHzd053kwBbp9dwyBUINe7Uvb2cbHDWy7E4k/fEMnzpMZE7tKsNiyuFnWQCafZ3FH4it 3rUv352j3B49eJhp8SufmIsh6016DOyhh3CX/bzA3kk52kYmB3baz6hEJdzqUAAyRews=; Received: from cm-84.212.220.105.getinternet.no ([84.212.220.105] helo=elva) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m5W4T-0000M5-3s for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:24:47 +0200 Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2021 18:24:44 +0200 Message-Id: <8735sajmpf.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #2360 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 2360 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 2360 quit From unknown Tue Jun 24 05:09:13 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 11:24:08 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator