GNU bug report logs - #23556
sort(1): misleading description of option -n

Previous Next

Package: coreutils;

Reported by: Carsten Hey <carsten <at> debian.org>

Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 18:29:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #17 received at 23556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Assaf Gordon <assafgordon <at> gmail.com>
To: 23556 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23556: sort(1): misleading description of option -n
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 16:41:23 -0600
close 23556
stop

(triaging old bugs)


On 2016-05-16 4:23 p.m., Carsten Hey wrote:
> * Assaf Gordon [2016-05-16 15:07 -0400]:
>>
>> IIUC, you are disputing the accuracy (or clarity) of the term "string
>> numerical value" on the manual page, and not the actual behavior of
>> "sort -n" …
> 
> Exactly.  It seems like many people have problems to understand mails
> that contain code, but are neither a patch nor complain about the
> behaviour of a program - maybe my wording was suboptimal too.  I'll
> consider this in future when I write similar mails.
> 
[...]


>> If you have a suggestion for improved wording, I'm sure they can be
>> considered for inclusion.
> 
> If I would not know that "string numeric value" is proper English,
> I wouldn't consider it to be correct, hence I'm likely the wrong person
> to suggest a concrete wording, …

With no further follow-ups in 2 years, I'm closing this bug.
Discussion can continue by replying to this thread,
and patches are always welcomed.

-assaf





This bug report was last modified 6 years and 211 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.