From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:43:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23472: Feature request: add "active" status to Edebug breakpoints Resent-From: Paul Pogonyshev Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 17:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 23472 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 23472@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146255716232552 (code B ref -1); Fri, 06 May 2016 17:53:01 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2016 17:52:42 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjvd-0008Sy-NZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:52:41 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42637) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjvc-0008Sl-Bq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:52:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjvN-00068a-P8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:52:32 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:37341) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjvM-000675-Iz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:52:25 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjvB-0001LU-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:52:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjux-00060W-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:52:05 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]:32904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ayjuw-0005rA-3S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2016 13:51:59 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v145so146956535oie.0 for ; Fri, 06 May 2016 10:51:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Jlv2ZD+cdu8MwpKOsSMCH5DWgTZr0sPtm942Acqcs+c=; b=tkFc1+XL9czgusCiTR/YIcnLpTRFKN211Eufxt9FzRL8p1ALol0ZwRUtfv0XP3QSmB ZGZcvfbQOkqjmAwiKpYEoGCuGpaaeKceO3LgqVVxBHDJd5ROrqs5GJlV+3FDALX0q2ti bIxkpGszcBn9sKtsinBhMOH9dUkhVw4Pb9Q05f+KJU53RE2iV6UH8Kz53yxT7RORu52i yBVVi28/GBiNbaErx9p3jBxQQaigc+rVqePuYhpyz3nk0uRPcydTXA3VZsv1cNXysDEb 9VWeXMd7kTjM0Y3SXHUa8A4+R+0CJJ7NiR05e2TbihL/oCl7kxXS05RoGNj5CfyjnUYR CCHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=Jlv2ZD+cdu8MwpKOsSMCH5DWgTZr0sPtm942Acqcs+c=; b=mCrtWxFLwwbTV/wgZ0BPuSLlhwmMYwMv9RE8wLlEhxHOr4rWGsetsygJAuGOanXj41 eUPVnFo6VBsWMxQYD4IwjpAuhFJQITsTikkRDyD4sEcj6sAPS7D467l9ua8pDw15WmaL +Lg6ymNC4p2AEPuo8B+UVkxvQTnEjvIanegoA8943M0ANYoFl6bFDw/BuvFzs5Ygu6/u eMLjOykGfs/XqoIKeOoSOE5SGgLHfJqG9pzkP4M8l42EUDxs/A2Z3MVOjsBAhwu2ve71 TeTcqS2uhcsIu8G8//JhNqAZzWxEsQGj3wNYN3aQ9NfQBhUhU4b2TtGVFCBA09Ucq81b WDQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWcPqnYCrK/DEthSqP3w0ati2EQM0Bo13XO0JhXrRYKN/yAomYCR8D3r4xW34bQ2h1hB0Mz9eStan7wYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.86.215 with SMTP id k206mr10642311oib.115.1462557100476; Fri, 06 May 2016 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.235.82 with HTTP; Fri, 6 May 2016 10:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 19:51:40 +0200 Message-ID: From: Paul Pogonyshev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Currently if you want to temporarily deactivate a breakpoint, you need to unset it. While this is not that bad for normal breakpoints, it becomes a major problem for conditional ones, because when you recreate it, you have retype or otherwise restore condition. Instead it should be possible to temporarily disable a breakpoint (i.e. without removing it completely), and then re-enable it again. Related to bug#23471: if this list is implemented, it should also be possible to activate/deactivate breakpoints from the list. From unknown Tue Jun 17 01:43:13 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23472: Feature request: add "active" status to Edebug breakpoints Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23472 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Paul Pogonyshev Cc: 23472@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 23472-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23472.157160618820825 (code B ref 23472); Sun, 20 Oct 2019 21:17:01 +0000 Received: (at 23472) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 21:16:28 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMIYu-0005Pp-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:16:28 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMIYr-0005Pd-Aa for 23472@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:16:26 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMIYn-0007kN-5H; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:16:23 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:16:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Paul Pogonyshev's message of "Fri, 6 May 2016 19:51:40 +0200") Message-ID: <8736fndsnv.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Paul Pogonyshev writes: > Currently if you want to temporarily deactivate a breakpoint, you need > to unset it. While this is not that bad for normal breakpoints, it > becomes a major problem for conditional ones, because wh [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Paul Pogonyshev writes: > Currently if you want to temporarily deactivate a breakpoint, you need > to unset it. While this is not that bad for normal breakpoints, it > becomes a major problem for conditional ones, because when you > recreate it, you have retype or otherwise restore condition. Instead > it should be possible to temporarily disable a breakpoint (i.e. > without removing it completely), and then re-enable it again. That's a good idea. I've now added this to Emacs 27. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Oct 20 17:16:33 2019 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2019 21:16:33 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55361 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMIYy-0005QB-Lb for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:16:32 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:56266) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iMIYv-0005Px-Et for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 17:16:29 -0400 Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMIYs-0007kU-MO for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:16:28 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2019 23:16:26 +0200 Message-Id: <871rv7dsnp.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #23472 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 23472 fixed close 23472 27.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 23472 fixed close 23472 27.1 quit