From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23400: Emacs 25.0.92.1: etags fails to handle file format generated by Exuberant Ctags 5.8 in etags emulation mode Resent-From: Robert Weiner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:34:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 23400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: 23400@debbugs.gnu.org X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.146194400626444 (code B ref -1); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 15:34:03 +0000 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 15:33:26 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awAQ2-0006sR-15 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:33:26 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9eN-0002Ol-C8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:44:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9e6-0008DN-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:44:02 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:49118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9e5-0008As-P8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:43:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36154) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9do-00048L-5d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:43:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9dZ-0007tq-By for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:43:28 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::242]:34778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aw9dY-0007ng-2y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:43:21 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-x242.google.com with SMTP id n2so6370496obo.1 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:43:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1tHbF0FKpCe5VsyXD9UhQiPBLNJOnL5daTMyA/DD7DU=; b=xT+f9/xVSaCL2h9iIjp0CZMIPn6QIhTXg1I1+L/RQ+Ifatz6CvERM2vFGr7RhKN1uA DLVm0TiYIuzKt5Go/m3vPrsyqi4W2hdk0PNEgGewYXAqxSCtN2xn196uOoaTlsDn6g9B RuOf7PAKdocBB9tu7s3l5mucTTURdMySlSiIxxERBqoOYBTAHxP7HN3s2mZp3MmQDJry KEp508IOUDn4AKo5P3QY2mXa96pZgbRgWVVsScF64n+pRudWcdQ9dWMqaXgkP2xmKvjK nTEVyuAbLx96rV5bXjTHP/RLj8Bw89WbJETr2AaaOMYb2huWjddPVkcjQ+Vbwhsg2REq TGYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1tHbF0FKpCe5VsyXD9UhQiPBLNJOnL5daTMyA/DD7DU=; b=D/rnb+doaG1UrLWu2R0y4K12yXY3eC05jCiQngfgZ3+7n7wJ+YmtJVgh+9N/alsHf0 i+7HVOCshDQRUmakAIKLa4bCUGTG6+mGfCqbkYIofji+Z3RcW8usUi1Ko6JITZ8GcwKm 0tY0Y6ejB48zRs7cEhfHeBLsQy1QYci2g1WqZAgUkhxfwh/DiIEeLCZVoFXwclM4rUSN OJHyi0s35jrdka0jiD+28scta+YgJ4hhj3HxU3wdU7hTU95I77GGHnQtB6dbdmcJa+Kz tL6CUJv9qVeL5qkvMzNHzdAKKqQlcZLrLch5z5Dsk6nTa/eYsm6T2Ayve8xsqVck4enx hw3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXK2BBCKIuyY+y32PGIk1suaSUlZbEj5w6mM5j2RMuGiI+cUM/EbQi4v4duxF7lmNqJ50pVPvlmebKjMg== X-Received: by 10.182.123.5 with SMTP id lw5mr9517624obb.3.1461940981927; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:43:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.83.135 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 07:42:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Weiner Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:42:32 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=f46d0444ec95e996220531a0a84f X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 11:33:24 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) --f46d0444ec95e996220531a0a84f Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444ec95e9961d0531a0a84d --f46d0444ec95e9961d0531a0a84d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Exuberant Ctags allows one to generate what is said to be an etags compatible TAGS file. However, a call to list-tags fails on such a file because it includes 2 lines of file names per file rather than one. Attached is a sample TAGS file that triggers the error with this call: (list-tags "hmouse-key.el") and an associated patch that fixes it. diff -u --label /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/etags.el.gz\~ --label /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/etags.el.gz /var/folders/8s/b7pm6fms2nsc1x2651dpvrd00000gn/T/jka-com77357KwE /var/folders/8s/b7pm6fms2nsc1x2651dpvrd00000gn/T/jka-com77357kER --- /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/etags.el.gz~ +++ /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/etags.el.gz @@ -1398,6 +1398,8 @@ (goto-func goto-tag-location-function) tag tag-info pt) (forward-line 1) + (if (looking-at "\177") + (forward-line 1)) (while (not (or (eobp) (looking-at "\f"))) ;; We used to use explicit tags when available, but the current goto-func ;; can only handle implicit tags. Diff finished. Fri Apr 29 10:23:18 2016 --f46d0444ec95e9961d0531a0a84d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Exuberant Ctags allows one to generate what is said to be = an etags compatible TAGS file.
However, a call to list-tags fails on su= ch a file because it includes 2 lines of file names per file rather than on= e.

Attached is a sample TAGS file that triggers th= e error with this call: (list-tags "hmouse-key.el")
and= an associated patch that fixes it.

diff -u -= -label /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/etags.el= .gz\~ --label /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/e= tags.el.gz /var/folders/8s/b7pm6fms2nsc1x2651dpvrd00000gn/T/jka-com77357KwE= /var/folders/8s/b7pm6fms2nsc1x2651dpvrd00000gn/T/jka-com77357kER
--- /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmodes/etags.el.g= z~
+++ /Applications/Emacs25.app/Contents/Resources/lisp/progmode= s/etags.el.gz
@@ -1398,6 +1398,8 @@
=C2=A0 =C2=A0(goto-func goto-tag-location= -function)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0tag tag-info pt)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(forward-line 1)
+ =C2=A0 =C2=A0(if (looking-at "\177")
+ (forward-line 1))
= =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0(while (not (or (eobp) (looking-at "\f")))
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0;; We used to use explicit tags when ava= ilable, but the current goto-func
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0;; c= an only handle implicit tags.

Diff finished.=C2=A0= Fri Apr 29 10:23:18 2016


--f46d0444ec95e9961d0531a0a84d-- --f46d0444ec95e996220531a0a84f Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=TAGS Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=TAGS Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_inltrdlf0 DApobW91c2Uta2V5LmVsLDEyMzcKf2htb3VzZS1rZXkuZWwBMSwwCihkZWZ1biBobW91c2Utc2V0 LWJpbmRpbmdzIChrZXktYmluZGluZy1saXN0KX9obW91c2Utc2V0LWJpbmRpbmdzATU4LDE5NDUK KGRlZnVuIGhtb3VzZS1zaGlmdC1idXR0b25zICgmb3B0aW9uYWwgYXJnKX9obW91c2Utc2hpZnQt YnV0dG9ucwE5MCwyODk5Cg== --f46d0444ec95e996220531a0a84f-- From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23400: Emacs 25.0.92.1: etags fails to handle file format generated by Exuberant Ctags 5.8 in etags emulation mode Resent-From: Andreas Schwab Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Robert Weiner Cc: 23400@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 23400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23400.146194730412045 (code B ref 23400); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:29:01 +0000 Received: (at 23400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 16:28:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55612 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awBHD-00038D-T6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:28:24 -0400 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:53847) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awBHD-000386-A5 for 23400@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:28:23 -0400 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qxJzB5ByRz3hj9q; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:28:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3qxJzB3YZTzvjMm; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:28:22 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BwEFOZlhqUqa; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:28:21 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: WG981mD4fHs9o3vVaWlYi55Am7eSB9+Tapz9E5DmgQmUsZEyAMyaK02OMwjMfG6D Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-14-55.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.14.55]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:28:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 817EB2C1AF0; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:28:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Andreas Schwab References: X-Yow: Give them RADAR-GUIDED SKEE-BALL LANES and VELVEETA BURRITOS!! Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:28:21 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Robert Weiner's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:42:32 -0400") Message-ID: <87shy45qhm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) Robert Weiner writes: > Exuberant Ctags allows one to generate what is said to be an etags > compatible TAGS file. > However, a call to list-tags fails on such a file because it includes 2 > lines of file names per file rather than one. Why is this not a bug in Exuberant Ctags? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23400: Emacs 25.0.92.1: etags fails to handle file format generated by Exuberant Ctags 5.8 in etags emulation mode Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Andreas Schwab , Robert Weiner Cc: 23400@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 23400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23400.146196161714394 (code B ref 23400); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 20:27:01 +0000 Received: (at 23400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 20:26:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55934 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awF04-0003k6-W8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:26:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f66.google.com ([74.125.82.66]:36673) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awF03-0003js-5d for 23400@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:26:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f66.google.com with SMTP id w143so7470218wmw.3 for <23400@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:26:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O4RZGMhFy2JWw2VjretJaC+elLvdPOF1ncQIHsFDB2c=; b=uXqkxSvIpmae/k96JMEq28GA4qYBPZClL8kSzxqkATL0R2nsJDrNSvsFey7wTDHAbe fqq0U5c3Zh4+QtZc7aGfWgtY9T96jU5VtsuIRsuxj7OOTZYdP027qISTug+9C1LjjIa5 0mlXqn/9TnAmF0hTaV+q28yWESDTVj6l/wDZpjK6lYPlTqRwJhJyXsuMqA9J87xCcPIs lIxa6riiY3tCvVJpdPYjqFdSC1g17hhxYV1xSvOZRPo5NYa1Hg+bmHM/CeHkbDgKYC3t 070brTNO1L2VVbUk/zGH+oQGowAEwx26S1TmJiQU2yqZZCrXKxUZCUb4+7IHF6XdW4I3 Rpug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O4RZGMhFy2JWw2VjretJaC+elLvdPOF1ncQIHsFDB2c=; b=LmSkV+ENewEmSkiMUCbcvSVFFeVt4prhhIAQVWoqM5TtFlsruKGY4UHI7pbKLCS5ve jYC31IS3bglj0Kt8FxVGhWb5rQ6/j0kY/rASevmwKvbc1oskoFpOx/iWZFOZd+VRnNwU F0lJI2nBeOli83VgiRitH4X188gjMQlWH6B9yti6viFKbNv2yutbBKys1JxzI+DcX6kL shF3wzNqqPjlHyaf+D9AnpmC/c9A0Rlx2a3BLewrwrYa3Yz17sisToNTfYNBwPtSPaio b2PjmKL8ZIndnzbPUCSs0WOj9RCP6Skt7RKbi6QWfmRO5YWVHcp2pVmZsqMpcvVB3XQI eCPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUWEpWwGX9kNyaDKTyzFOA/yqyTk57/0/04Oter1+QzUDGsUfqYruS9nUNZdgatJA== X-Received: by 10.28.230.137 with SMTP id e9mr6242158wmi.90.1461961609548; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r204sm4922849wmg.20.2016.04.29.13.26.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 13:26:48 -0700 (PDT) References: <87shy45qhm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <27da94bc-de09-2ce3-2a2f-319939a99853@yandex.ru> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 23:26:46 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87shy45qhm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On 04/29/2016 07:28 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: >> However, a call to list-tags fails on such a file because it includes 2 >> lines of file names per file rather than one. > > Why is this not a bug in Exuberant Ctags? Indeed. And Ctags 5.8 is very old. 'ctags --version' reports 'Exuberant Ctags 5.9~svn20110310' on my machine, and I've never seen the described problem with it. From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23400: Emacs 25.0.92.1: etags fails to handle file format generated by Exuberant Ctags 5.8 in etags emulation mode Resent-From: Robert Weiner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 15:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo To: Dmitry Gutov Cc: 23400@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab Received: via spool by 23400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23400.146211771524707 (code B ref 23400); Sun, 01 May 2016 15:49:02 +0000 Received: (at 23400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2016 15:48:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60826 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awtbn-0006QQ-Bt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 11:48:35 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:33712) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awtbm-0006QD-Bl for 23400@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 11:48:34 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id v145so133676763oie.0 for <23400@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 May 2016 08:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1FxEFaqiMkjpHxkm+deeZ60M5np8ovrtT0zrrF8VO5Y=; b=JGXBAXxZVyJiuYARp+sbX+Is0++uL+TKv7FBtKtmPdJzOR5v1Q9pYUJZpsjH7KO/ny 7BM4esRmSYAtvxFkmR3uCChqIRa0ZtrGM/VaCa305htCjrPNw9sFwNVShsuf6fnkR5Ua LE70+CKq/8wNXfJ+oWJUiyZU6NcIz4RKjMe0w8OBL7DSI9+gqnnY53tR6iTFFnGVDjIJ ODTcFHgz7ivgwcDmAiYl8mRyvmL+GCFpKL61AernWfCjFcV6SCcMT7uaI4g5E1qAPcZt 5Dl7JJBT0g+pP4etS09P2x2bKMhew2wA26VXfyrupkIVFk+PHQkoUWIaOap8RXalJo6u 7uOA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1FxEFaqiMkjpHxkm+deeZ60M5np8ovrtT0zrrF8VO5Y=; b=A0WNVa2+P61BjgCDon89/2Wxo/ULVjWqUcQ1syfb1EsBq2HABwkAYeyaAyo9gxApip ldV8bLKHNmpQ+Sp36R41IoVr2guUilEAuFZvoFTw1Fg/Zndxb7vSyvy4acKWvj3NkGtH IzgKvfdbG8GHJB/zrFiBZ4Hsamx4pc+7ZClrM0TR0Xvkudi6L19igYn3TCG/JbrPCXiN UgcFxL+yAOxW5PPjZPdD28w75r46rtfEEZh0OM+wTT8Ujji8v05ZJXTBO6gxpUHF5Hnb YTQBGEkrHKBVhj9hE9wxah7QdmlgBXvdKaFOzF51ztExAa3+hW31MfUN0DTqs5uTVbP6 z6lQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWy+MetU2PI4mBo/tbWRw08JuuUBJZg3bPvkQdo/LLuAMahyjD19Q0lC8hcx1pDeHdsziAhGhn9T9rSqg== X-Received: by 10.157.25.137 with SMTP id k9mr14059737otk.131.1462117708755; Sun, 01 May 2016 08:48:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.83.135 with HTTP; Sun, 1 May 2016 08:47:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <27da94bc-de09-2ce3-2a2f-319939a99853@yandex.ru> References: <87shy45qhm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <27da94bc-de09-2ce3-2a2f-319939a99853@yandex.ru> From: Robert Weiner Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 11:47:59 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c09b194a678ca0531c9ceaa X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) --94eb2c09b194a678ca0531c9ceaa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 04/29/2016 07:28 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > However, a call to list-tags fails on such a file because it includes 2 >>> lines of file names per file rather than one. >>> >> >> Why is this not a bug in Exuberant Ctags? >> > > Indeed. And Ctags 5.8 is very old. > The main Exhuberant CTags site is: http://ctags.sourceforge.net/ which shows a last released version of 5.8. The popular `brew' package manager for OS X installs version 5.8 as the latest. There are various forks of this code since it doesn't seem to be active anymore, but these are much harder for users to find and so many may choose V5.8 which has the issue I mentioned and patched. There is universal-ctags (version 0, based on V5.8) which fixes the problem I listed and has a separate web page: http://ctags.io. There is also a V5.9 fork that is included in some Linux distributions that can be found here: https://github.com/rgo/exuberant-ctags, but looks far from official. Dmitry mentioned that this also fixes the issue. So the issue is/was with a version of Exhuberant Ctags that is still the latest official release and the most popular Google search result. Most users who install this software themselves would most likely only find this version. The patch to fix the problem is simple but whether you want to apply it given all of this is left for you far more knowledgeable maintainers to decide. --94eb2c09b194a678ca0531c9ceaa Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On F= ri, Apr 29, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> = wrote:
On 04/29/2016 07:28 PM, Andreas= Schwab wrote:

However, a call to list-tags fails on such a file because it includes 2
lines of file names per file rather than one.

Why is this not a bug in Exuberant Ctags?

 Indeed. And Ctags 5.8 is very old.

The = main Exhuberant CTags site is: ht= tp://ctags.sourceforge.net/ which shows a last released version of 5.8.= =C2=A0 The popular `brew' package manager for OS X installs version 5.8= as the latest.
There are various forks of this code since it doe= sn't seem to be active anymore, but these are much harder for users to = find and so many may choose V5.8 which has the issue I mentioned and patche= d.
There is universal-ctags (version 0, based on V5.8) which fixe= s the problem I listed and has a separate web page: http://ctags.io.=C2=A0 There is also a V5.9 fork that is included = in some Linux distributions that can be found here:=C2=A0https://github.com/rgo/exuberant-ctags= , but looks far from official.=C2=A0 Dmitry mentioned that this also fixes = the issue.

So the issue is/was with a version of E= xhuberant Ctags that is still the latest official release and the most popu= lar Google search result.=C2=A0 Most users who install this software themse= lves would most likely only find this version.
The patch to fix t= he problem is simple but whether you want to apply it given all of this is = left for you far more knowledgeable maintainers to decide.

--94eb2c09b194a678ca0531c9ceaa-- From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23400: Emacs 25.0.92.1: etags fails to handle file format generated by Exuberant Ctags 5.8 in etags emulation mode Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 20:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Robert Weiner Cc: 23400@debbugs.gnu.org, Andreas Schwab Received: via spool by 23400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23400.146213420728911 (code B ref 23400); Sun, 01 May 2016 20:24:02 +0000 Received: (at 23400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2016 20:23:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32833 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awxtn-0007WF-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:23:27 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:34259) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awxtl-0007Vv-T5 for 23400@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 16:23:26 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f65.google.com with SMTP id n129so14489154wmn.1 for <23400@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 May 2016 13:23:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+IxvbQoyVUeWZsYMM0vyIxtAIpWgkPMXlDS/4LSw9M0=; b=o6FOrD2pXuWHb4bQAiP9H3m5q2c5z1OrzP0uDP8YSMe9GTafn2U1ZHkaRExpFU0iqG /n5W6o2uBM+vDXg7Xw3agTEY338t5DNy1sj6AeAN53jEHRAb5lq3JgWesvQ8dPDxaUs1 4kPhhF1yeN+PKFegNBPoR5x0qkHN+8B//lQ1fo+pPfu3TX8Qi9S6nvsLuslOoRGl1Pja QA8rncFc85qi7mC1U1Y05gafNsw+a5HHvhEVoVnKfvNG10/p2KCYWrHy/THtjW2z4iaZ aBSYMANqdxWtndM1VREj/z2Zi915PuQ7R5W2IZCMFY5ozI2aA1zroDMumM5Bn42PAbke wcuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+IxvbQoyVUeWZsYMM0vyIxtAIpWgkPMXlDS/4LSw9M0=; b=BZ0VXCUfhuNlc0G0Sj6xS0wnowt1+Hkuc/k5byBy6clt9JWlmyOKzN4RIgexkfQ3ZT QSjXoQ9wSmIwEG4XoDX2fwSH5MT7iM1fbla8uxzFPPoldEL/czT0/kHy8Ixq3LdPgCkW EQEzOPcUKsv6cn/4pzWJcllD28X86zJhVYoI1dNYKDuVcfI/N8TLTyx0Ie78eGrF/X9X ObjDvSFBG6oEuknHp803wRddzMGMau9ZXkTF9ryjCzLcCbiwxE0FEG4kK1ulacxfTn8A Mo6NvTGXoADVWPogiD6ah27PwWTlJZCTbWDppUCKwgCEE0kcsdCKJy8bhYJ8TJazsoar F0RQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXFkRz4zGgSsrydECqYj/vMvdwLjCqKHREP7HezFhYk6n2LlVE+6QHw7KB6FbPKxg== X-Received: by 10.28.12.8 with SMTP id 8mr15278429wmm.6.1462134200285; Sun, 01 May 2016 13:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([185.105.175.24]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q77sm14923971wmd.12.2016.05.01.13.23.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 01 May 2016 13:23:19 -0700 (PDT) References: <87shy45qhm.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <27da94bc-de09-2ce3-2a2f-319939a99853@yandex.ru> From: Dmitry Gutov Message-ID: <3eb5a885-7b56-e1a1-ab2d-d8a6dd50b157@yandex.ru> Date: Sun, 1 May 2016 23:23:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) On 05/01/2016 06:47 PM, Robert Weiner wrote: > The main Exhuberant CTags site is: http://ctags.sourceforge.net/ which > shows a last released version of 5.8. That doesn't mean it's the last version of the code produced by that project: https://sourceforge.net/p/ctags/code/816/log/?path=/trunk lists newer commits that continue up to the year 2014. It was my assumption that Ubuntu's version either used one of the later snapshots (like "~svn" in the version indicates), or included only minimal changes made by Ubuntu's maintainers. > The popular `brew' package > manager for OS X installs version 5.8 as the latest. Have you tried discussing that the Brew maintainers? > There is universal-ctags (version 0, based on V5.8) which fixes the > problem I listed and has a separate web page: http://ctags.io. Indeed, this project seems to be THE way forward for ctags. Any reason to believe that it isn't based on any of the subsequent version of code posted to the original project's SVN? > The patch to fix the problem is simple but whether you want to apply it > given all of this is left for you far more knowledgeable maintainers to > decide. I'm inclined toward "no", because: - The problem seems limited to `M-x list-tags', which is not really essential functionality. - ctags 5.8 clearly violates the established format. - The only generator of TAGS files that we officially support is our 'etags' program. - Adding a workaround for an old version of ctags in counterproductive in other ways: the sooner the user notices problems with the ctags they installed, the sooner they might go looking for a newer version. Which contains other improvements and bugfixes as well. From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 11 22:35:27 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Aug 2020 02:35:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5gbv-0001ih-AQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 22:35:27 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com ([209.85.219.181]:42360) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k5gbt-0001iQ-3p for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 22:35:26 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id a34so543018ybj.9 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:35:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8/FenDtKrq1w1xOrpdILNH86KMZqQ+VkmhyLuQV+oC4=; b=s1zuOWE4afXIU47rFPJDOMyaW9VVSI8SCRyX9l1Esm/D8FPFa+1G3HrfcPS5RTmlyk Epw1dFsvE3Z4D9KApoJyJ5Jepf/8389B57MYAySV+zXeJJ8fiB1aN5EhbRpetM7KHop6 diHAPJHaYd3FgfZBB0TTvhbijIHKn8AgpJA8vyFqEjFSG7+pwK3by7EdSxW6WTkDOi0i YgmVQ2ZMM5LrFIdWybqPW4Hp8Aar6JLCXOxhxCUyychzNBxlDAaIGX6GwjBl2Z/Yn+S1 FvJa+2wUio1cro/fWaEaR7+Y778twKiULa1EVbuZ4ydof9wy6aSN35BVwxGI9ei2BNnB woQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532frmrUYkmKg+iopCHZU8cOoYRrT3Tza2zvVtMdXWfKFZF0UrPa SpSR/iEIexfOiLuFGxQ9XDHGMianQSYcP5m4CKb2G9/UurFRYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJytk4GJPB3xF9d5UsEqGpCMbbsW8VpNvYI4JG0hlPnwsUhdGZWvfVRAprVjYQmJl1Nz9fivldd+MgBRgqq53mM= X-Received: by 2002:a25:b88b:: with SMTP id w11mr54958452ybj.129.1597199719604; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:35:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Stefan Kangas Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 04:35:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: To: control Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 23400 + patch thanks Content analysis details: (3.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.181 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] 1.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_VSHORT Very short body and From looks like 2 different emails 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "debbugs.gnu.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: tags 23400 + patch thanks Content analysis details: (2.0 points, 10.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2) [209.85.219.181 listed in wl.mailspike.net] -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [209.85.219.181 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (stefankangas[at]gmail.com) 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 PDS_TONAME_EQ_TOLOCAL_VSHORT Very short body and From looks like 2 different emails 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different 2.0 BLANK_SUBJECT Subject is present but empty -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply a widely-seen list manager tags 23400 + patch thanks From unknown Mon Aug 18 11:27:29 2025 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#23400: Emacs 25.0.92.1: etags fails to handle file format generated by Exuberant Ctags 5.8 in etags emulation mode Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23400 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Robert Weiner Cc: 23400@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 23400-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23400.159784386813377 (code B ref 23400); Wed, 19 Aug 2020 13:32:02 +0000 Received: (at 23400) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2020 13:31:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38593 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OBI-0003Th-4b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:31:08 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44874) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OBD-0003T4-Ii for 23400@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:31:06 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=A2s/dWlBwWbcnjLfO5wuLQliOrbNBe47Gn2Fqs+ZGi0=; b=eDMHHEVD1iduLAjxj0JDzU5kPM uBaJRRC1zEOiflREDFOj5WsBpOypSeck9pTAGQUjqRKK8nKuLoI1HzA2eeJancxIpuNFL1YPLTLHP 7hEfHrJ2M0PFBO3a9q+Rzg75FTElchML0EZnYddaRpEd6T793lBkXvIfaGmfsL7BxIKA=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OB3-00053r-Hg; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:30:57 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen References: X-Now-Playing: Pixies's _Come On Pilgrim_: "Vamos" Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:30:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Robert Weiner's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:42:32 -0400") Message-ID: <87imde4var.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Robert Weiner writes: > Exuberant Ctags allows one to generate what is said to be an etags > compatible TAGS file. However, a call to list-tags fails on such a > file because it includes 2 lines of file names per file rath [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Robert Weiner writes: > Exuberant Ctags allows one to generate what is said to be an etags > compatible TAGS file. However, a call to list-tags fails on such a > file because it includes 2 lines of file names per file rather than > one. Apparently brew still includes the 5.8 version of this ctags program, so it fixes a real problem. Dmitry objected to the patch because supporting this ctags project holds back progress for humanity, which is true, but since it fixes a problem seen in the wild, I applied it anyway. If anybody objects, feel free to revert. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Wed Aug 19 09:31:11 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Aug 2020 13:31:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38596 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OBL-0003Ty-BT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:31:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OBJ-0003TX-J9 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 09:31:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ayv57RWOR3kr8KzmhQac3TY3Iq+uZw5Tk5JBV9Pwefo=; b=ROWzRBP7MZkEWmfkdoQ0C923Qz p4yGm/8OBDf5j6HfUs9ZYPFvwu26g1Ph0/ZVWJC5STgQeiaFmD24J0jlX5nqZWVEKDPvLAej0NYHt ahYdEuqoH7+Yak6mCmQMOu1ha5jDab6u4v4AhZBnvb2z88ziwz58ici07NQbRaq6IsO0=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k8OBB-000545-Tj for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:31:04 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 15:31:01 +0200 Message-Id: <87h7sy4vai.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #23400 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: tags 23400 fixed close 23400 28.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) tags 23400 fixed close 23400 28.1 quit