GNU bug report logs - #23394
generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#23394: closed (generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed)
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 23:40:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:38:59 -0700
with message-id <57254213.9000804 <at> cs.ucla.edu>
and subject line Re: bug#23394: generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23394,
regarding generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
23394: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23394
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Chaitanya Koparkar <ckoparkar <at> live.in>
To: "bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 06:24:08 -0500

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0, NS appkit-1404.34 Version 10.11.3 (Build 15D21)) of 2016-04-17 built on Chaitanyas-Macbook-Pro.localRepository revision: 3de30674d7aa79c9f366f65c9f30aec2c8963b54Windowing system distributor 'Apple', version 10.3.1404Configured using: 'configure --with-ns'
Configured features:JPEG IMAGEMAGICK NOTIFY ACL LIBXML2 ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS NS
Important settings:  value of $LANG: en_IN.UTF-8  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
Steps to reproduce:
* Start emacs and open a buffer named "*scratch*"
* Run `(generate-new-buffer-name "*scratch*")`
* The expected return value is "*scratch*<2>"   but instead it returns "*scratch*<1>"
I'm guessing, this commit introduced it, https://github.com/emacs-mirror/emacs/commit/b4c7869e5e1bb0bb33379b25ff830e721761a7bf.
Note the `++count` vs  just `count`.
This is just a guess however and it could be completely wrong.
Thanks,Chaitanya 		 	   		  

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: Chaitanya Koparkar <ckoparkar <at> live.in>
Cc: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>, 23394-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23394: generate-new-buffer-name behaviour changed
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 16:38:59 -0700

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

Thanks for reporting the bug. I installed the attached patch to fix the typo.

[0001-Fix-generate-new-buffer-name-increment-typo.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.