GNU bug report logs - #23362
25.0.93; Unicode chars (such as 0x1F600) are not rendered correctly

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Peter Wang <ptr.wang <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 23362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Subject: bug#23362: 25.0.93; Unicode chars (such as 0x1F600) are not rendered correctly
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:14:38 +0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

The configuration In that screenshot is the only one EVAL-ed after  `Emacs -q -Q’

Maybe the non-default setting you mentioned is this configuration.


> 在 2016年4月25日，18:19，Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> 写道：
> 
>> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:07:45 +0900
>> From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
>> Cc: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>,
>> 	ptr.wang <at> gmail.com,
>> 	23362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> 
>> The change I made does not prevent emoji from being displayed with
>> other non-multicolor fonts.  Moreover, the appearance with the default
>> setting is the same between 24.5 and 25.0.93.  So I don't think we
>> need to provide a workaround.
> 
> Thanks, that's good to know.
> 
> However, there's something I still don't understand: how come the OP
> doesn't see any symbols at all (see the screenshots he provided)?
> IOW, if the default setting works fine, is there some non-default
> setting we should be telling users to avoid, in order to have these
> symbols displayed (albeit without colors)?

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.