GNU bug report logs - #23362
25.0.93; Unicode chars (such as 0x1F600) are not rendered correctly

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Peter Wang <ptr.wang <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:46:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug

Found in version 25.0.93

Done: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Cc: 23362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, ptr.wang <at> gmail.com
Subject: bug#23362: 25.0.93; Unicode chars (such as 0x1F600) are not rendered correctly
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:59:07 +0300
> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:40:16 +0900
> From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu <at> math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
> Cc: ptr.wang <at> gmail.com,
> 	23362 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > Thanks.  However, the OP seems to imply that the Emoji symbols are
> > rendered incorrectly, or not displayed at all, when multicolor fonts
> > are used, not just that the colors are not shown.  If that is true (is
> > it?), I'd suggest to have in NEWS a workaround (use a different
> > font?), not just a statement of the fact that we don't support these
> > fonts.
> 
> With the current 25.0.93, an attempt to display emoji (where only
> Apple Color Emoji provides its glyph) results in the same appearance
> (i.e., not displaying at all) regardless of the explicit font setting
> given by the OP.

But the original report in this bug, displayed on MS-Windows using the
Symbola font, shows the two emoji symbols for me, albeit devoid of any
color.  So if on OS X they don't display at all, that's something that
should be fixable by selecting some other font, such as Symbola, which
has glyphs for these symbols, no?  Or am I missing something here?




This bug report was last modified 9 years and 86 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.