From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun Apr 24 08:16:56 2016 Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2016 12:16:56 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auIy8-0006U4-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:56 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auIy6-0006Ts-JX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auIy0-0004eS-H3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:49 -0400 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:36674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auIy0-0004eO-EK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:48 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52927) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auIxz-0004sE-8B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:48 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auIxw-0004d8-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:47 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:53407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1auIxv-0004d1-QS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:16:43 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=stories) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1auIxm-0002yC-6h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:16:36 +0200 From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: 25.1.50; Unicode literals aren't handled correctly by some commands Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 14:16:33 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::11 X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: submit X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.4 (---) If you put point after the following expression and hit `C-x C-e': ?\N{HEAVY CHECK MARK} you'll get an error saying "(void-variable MARK})". And in an Emacs Lisp buffer, using forward/backward sexp commands, they do not skip past the entire expression. In GNU Emacs 25.1.50.35 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.4.2) of 2016-04-24 built on stories Repository revision: a28873ce734b3618b0e8f6892e65db24d2f18da8 Windowing system distributor 'The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.11204000 System Description: Debian GNU/Linux 7.9 (wheezy) Configured features: XPM JPEG TIFF GIF PNG RSVG IMAGEMAGICK SOUND GSETTINGS NOTIFY GNUTLS LIBXML2 FREETYPE LIBOTF XFT ZLIB TOOLKIT_SCROLL_BARS GTK3 X11 -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sun May 01 09:00:02 2016 Received: (at 23354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 May 2016 13:00:02 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59123 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awqyc-0005YN-A2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 09:00:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:34037) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awqyX-0005Y7-B0 for 23354@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 01 May 2016 08:59:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id m64so9549800lfd.1 for <23354@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 01 May 2016 05:59:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=d02cjyYow/RA7PdvqS8gSXtbjyuVFw+G4M2turf4haM=; b=nAnXDwj86R9BTu63z3GIgn34WdnNF+KtKacy9WnwuR4nBPdgLFEWDKidUTFyjlQWyb yjjqYRnajVqafnsW0FBzzaIk9jBvr/V4r+CbHZfO+7IBcX7e4t+qa2WxfbbvBV2h0q/+ am6eNgvzl7ISddvKtKqVFOXv0qkMKsGpQm8uB3Dh7NborgOMBQsuzWVfkHDo+nQoMecV 8Scw8Xc3lG5dHPYhE9DyvDb1sC1i8eVLA6uDUPaBhWvdLg+ObbnuEif5TX8y6gm5fnIa OIiebYdILKJJypiS/fr2EU+f88wzgYz9SENY4E4SiZNsQrnHHbzK/i8sXTKL0zp91Itq 7l+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=d02cjyYow/RA7PdvqS8gSXtbjyuVFw+G4M2turf4haM=; b=U64aUdBqdEpCCjqaqFV5trcGzA/2nYsQbU1Gx+77twuO1BOGyO/DPGQsTvcrLlzEF6 Ai4JgoXmkglVToUQBNme4mD39+Q2554sHq3FkY4IUKFczWfM2wAo7Ib7X9I8Nnujl6AA 94SNM1gsfh5yWGRbHguo/WLqpV9ufr5i9Vy7OjFGNMuFXUBk57Sok6MmaaQH6mD4CpJ7 WGsT37RInAlRQ0JVkD2jFUT59tA7F3hXNI3yTEbzXRsLEF1amdraZdEWKAPHK8KIQ6WW fGitZJpps1o8jW6Si1AajHmqhBGGw7N5LmYJXPNRSDT8XxQi4cHBBaOFGCQXuvwscWLV gJ9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXAwrtyjeUGjLKw+FAJdWs0m53q2Z2HYwhYc3oReYeX9OB6w6Apj8go8NTVPnaDb0eZTTkmIpXsoc/Plg== X-Received: by 10.112.129.129 with SMTP id nw1mr13526676lbb.23.1462107586958; Sun, 01 May 2016 05:59:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Philipp Stephani Date: Sun, 01 May 2016 12:59:37 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bug#23354: 25.1.50; Unicode literals aren't handled correctly by some commands To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , 23354@debbugs.gnu.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=047d7b3a7f145a4a120531c773ff X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23354 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) --047d7b3a7f145a4a120531c773ff Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7f145a4a0c0531c773fd --047d7b3a7f145a4a0c0531c773fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen schrieb am So., 24. Apr. 2016 um 14:17 Uhr: > > If you put point after the following expression and hit `C-x C-e': > > ?\N{HEAVY CHECK MARK} > > you'll get an error saying "(void-variable MARK})". And in an Emacs > Lisp buffer, using forward/backward sexp commands, they do not skip past > the entire expression. > > Thanks, I've attached a patch that should fix eval-print-last-expr. This doesn't fix backward-sexp, because I think that would be much harder. --047d7b3a7f145a4a0c0531c773fd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Lars M= agne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org&= gt; schrieb am So., 24. Apr. 2016 um 14:17=C2=A0Uhr:

If you put point after the following expression and hit `C-x C-e':

?\N{HEAVY CHECK MARK}

you'll get an error saying "(void-variable MARK})".=C2=A0 And= in an Emacs
Lisp buffer, using forward/backward sexp commands, they do not skip past the entire expression.


Thanks, I= 9;ve attached a patch that should fix eval-print-last-expr. This doesn'= t fix backward-sexp, because I think that would be much harder.=C2=A0
=
--047d7b3a7f145a4a0c0531c773fd-- --047d7b3a7f145a4a120531c773ff Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="0001-Detect-named-character-literals.patch" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0001-Detect-named-character-literals.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-ID: <1546c670f166af5fa341> X-Attachment-Id: 1546c670f166af5fa341 RnJvbSA2MmViMDdjNDRmNWI2YzFhZjI3OTIzYjVkZDk3MWY0NDI5MDA2ODA2IE1vbiBTZXAgMTcg MDA6MDA6MDAgMjAwMQpGcm9tOiBQaGlsaXBwIFN0ZXBoYW5pIDxwaHN0QGdvb2dsZS5jb20+CkRh dGU6IFN1biwgMSBNYXkgMjAxNiAxNDo1Mjo0OSArMDIwMApTdWJqZWN0OiBbUEFUQ0hdIERldGVj dCBuYW1lZCBjaGFyYWN0ZXIgbGl0ZXJhbHMuCgpGaXhlcyBCdWcjMjMzNTQuCgoqIGxpc3AvcHJv Z21vZGVzL2VsaXNwLW1vZGUuZWwgKGVsaXNwLS1wcmVjZWRpbmctc2V4cCk6IFNraXAgb3Zlcgpu YW1lZCBjaGFyYWN0ZXIgbGl0ZXJhbHMuCiogdGVzdC9saXNwL3Byb2dtb2Rlcy9lbGlzcC1tb2Rl LXRlc3RzLmVsCihlbGlzcC0tcHJlY2VkaW5nLXNleHAtLWNoYXItbmFtZSk6IEFkZCB0ZXN0IGZv ciBza2lwcGluZyBvdmVyCm5hbWVkIGNoYXJhY3RlciBsaXRlcmFscy4KLS0tCiBsaXNwL3Byb2dt b2Rlcy9lbGlzcC1tb2RlLmVsICAgICAgICAgICAgfCAxMSArKysrKysrKysrKwogdGVzdC9saXNw L3Byb2dtb2Rlcy9lbGlzcC1tb2RlLXRlc3RzLmVsIHwgIDYgKysrKysrCiAyIGZpbGVzIGNoYW5n ZWQsIDE3IGluc2VydGlvbnMoKykKCmRpZmYgLS1naXQgYS9saXNwL3Byb2dtb2Rlcy9lbGlzcC1t b2RlLmVsIGIvbGlzcC9wcm9nbW9kZXMvZWxpc3AtbW9kZS5lbAppbmRleCBjYTg1OTgwLi4xYzcy ODQ4IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS9saXNwL3Byb2dtb2Rlcy9lbGlzcC1tb2RlLmVsCisrKyBiL2xpc3Av cHJvZ21vZGVzL2VsaXNwLW1vZGUuZWwKQEAgLTEwNTEsNiArMTA1MSwxNyBAQCBlbGlzcC0tcHJl Y2VkaW5nLXNleHAKIAkgICAgICAoKG9yIChlcSAoZm9sbG93aW5nLWNoYXIpID9cJykKIAkJICAg KGVxIChwcmVjZWRpbmctY2hhcikgP1wnKSkKIAkgICAgICAgKHNldHEgbGVmdC1xdW90ZSA/XGAp KSkKKworICAgICAgICA7OyBXaGVuIGFmdGVyIGEgbmFtZWQgY2hhcmFjdGVyIGxpdGVyYWwsIHNr aXAgb3ZlciB0aGUgZW50aXJlCisgICAgICAgIDs7IGxpdGVyYWwsIG5vdCBvbmx5IGl0cyBsYXN0 IHdvcmQuCisgICAgICAgICh3aGVuICg9IChwcmVjZWRpbmctY2hhcikgP30pCisgICAgICAgICAg KGxldCAoKGJlZ2luIChzYXZlLWV4Y3Vyc2lvbgorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChi YWNrd2FyZC1jaGFyKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChza2lwLXN5bnRheC1iYWNr d2FyZCAidy0iKQorICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIChiYWNrd2FyZC1jaGFyIDMpCisg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgKHdoZW4gKGxvb2tpbmctYXQtcCAiXFxcXE57IikgKHBv aW50KSkpKSkKKyAgICAgICAgICAgICh3aGVuIGJlZ2luIChnb3RvLWNoYXIgYmVnaW4pKSkpCisK IAkoZm9yd2FyZC1zZXhwIC0xKQogCTs7IElmIHdlIHdlcmUgYWZ0ZXIgYD9cZScgKG9yIHNpbWls YXIgY2FzZSksCiAJOzsgdXNlIHRoZSB3aG9sZSB0aGluZywgbm90IGp1c3QgdGhlIGBlJy4KZGlm ZiAtLWdpdCBhL3Rlc3QvbGlzcC9wcm9nbW9kZXMvZWxpc3AtbW9kZS10ZXN0cy5lbCBiL3Rlc3Qv bGlzcC9wcm9nbW9kZXMvZWxpc3AtbW9kZS10ZXN0cy5lbAppbmRleCAxNjc5YWYzLi5hNzU2MmEw IDEwMDY0NAotLS0gYS90ZXN0L2xpc3AvcHJvZ21vZGVzL2VsaXNwLW1vZGUtdGVzdHMuZWwKKysr IGIvdGVzdC9saXNwL3Byb2dtb2Rlcy9lbGlzcC1tb2RlLXRlc3RzLmVsCkBAIC02NDEsNSArNjQx LDExIEBAIHhyZWYtZWxpc3Atb3ZlcmxvYWRhYmxlLXNlcGFyYXRlLWRlZmF1bHQKICAgKGVsaXNw LS14cmVmLWZpbmQtZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKGV2YWwgJyhwcm92aWRlICdzdGVwaGUtbGVha2UtZmVh dHVyZSkpKQogICBuaWwpCiAKKyhlcnQtZGVmdGVzdCBlbGlzcC0tcHJlY2VkaW5nLXNleHAtLWNo YXItbmFtZSAoKQorICAod2l0aC10ZW1wLWJ1ZmZlcgorICAgIChlbWFjcy1saXNwLW1vZGUpCisg ICAgKGluc2VydCAiP1xcTntIRUFWWSBDSEVDSyBNQVJLfSIpCisgICAgKHNob3VsZCAoZXF1YWwg KGVsaXNwLS1wcmVjZWRpbmctc2V4cCkgP1xOe0hFQVZZIENIRUNLIE1BUkt9KSkpKQorCiAocHJv dmlkZSAnZWxpc3AtbW9kZS10ZXN0cykKIDs7OyBlbGlzcC1tb2RlLXRlc3RzLmVsIGVuZHMgaGVy ZQotLSAKMi44LjEKCg== --047d7b3a7f145a4a120531c773ff-- From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Mon May 02 17:59:00 2016 Received: (at 23354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2016 21:59:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34300 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axLro-0001Cy-4C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:59:00 -0400 Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:54291) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axLrl-0001Cp-Dq for 23354@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 May 2016 17:58:58 -0400 Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axLri-0002xG-Gr; Mon, 02 May 2016 23:58:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Philipp Stephani Subject: Re: bug#23354: 25.1.50; Unicode literals aren't handled correctly by some commands References: Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 23:58:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Philipp Stephani's message of "Sun, 01 May 2016 12:59:37 +0000") Message-ID: <87inyw86ld.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23354 Cc: 23354@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Philipp Stephani writes: > Thanks, I've attached a patch that should fix eval-print-last-expr. This doesn't > fix backward-sexp, because I think that would be much harder. Thanks; applied. I hope somebody else can fix backward-sexp and friends. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 04 05:37:41 2020 Received: (at 23354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2020 09:37:41 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46848 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tO9-0004L6-6d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:37:41 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54120) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tO7-0004Kt-Cy for 23354@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:37:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=CDBlGIgvCNVvC9RvUvIS/aJ+EynPwjJ6O7kXd8ts0a8=; b=NOgbhFKl3S7r60c//yJWej+d7i Uw0cqU/vNGZx874nd4NVFOY9Bbh5ThoFkaejrU+EmYFu8X2437QeXcsXSP+86wBdAAqIZbgxgqh15 FHWNKnhsV52nAJiZOFoAj0whKrFpQTv4e8ZlcPEAtdcKvaTF2j965HUbREmPJtKXeYyo=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tNz-0006FM-2L; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:37:33 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Philipp Stephani Subject: Re: bug#23354: 25.1.50; Unicode literals aren't handled correctly by some commands References: <87inyw86ld.fsf@gnus.org> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:37:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87inyw86ld.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 02 May 2016 23:58:54 +0200") Message-ID: <87d046rbty.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philipp Stephani writes: > >> Thanks, I've attached a patch that should fix >> eval-print-last-expr. This doesn't >> fix backward-sexp, because I think that would be much har [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23354 Cc: 23354@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philipp Stephani writes: > >> Thanks, I've attached a patch that should fix >> eval-print-last-expr. This doesn't >> fix backward-sexp, because I think that would be much harder. > > Thanks; applied. I hope somebody else can fix backward-sexp and > friends. :-) I just checked whether things has changed -- and, no, backward-sexp and friends still do the wrong thing on Unicode literals like ?\N{HEAVY CHECK MARK} in Emacs Lisp buffers. In particular, backward-sexp after the final "}" skips to the start of "MARK", and forward-sexp at the start skips to the end of "HEAVY". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Aug 04 05:38:00 2020 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2020 09:38:00 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46851 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tOS-0004Lg-FD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:38:00 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:54134) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tOQ-0004LS-8g for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:37:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7t0cQhCZ9v64TqCv2osIl6yZ/4P4POexUzB7z97Uz18=; b=DKgYyi7ZAIrIBR14xZ7O/6MVm4 F8fs28CbTPh3h4SM6pkQiEwbkahC7xjpTTvffioiSEFfAZ/vxObGtvxWXPnSjpXsGy0gCYMu2DGPc bGMyX8taEOGnKEA19v3ArzhZYb0zZnTyq5QoFUhUSZtZj1xMIevAX18MEntG8JMHsIs4=; Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=xo) by quimby with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k2tOI-0006FV-H4 for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:37:52 +0200 Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:37:49 +0200 Message-Id: <87bljqrbte.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #23354 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: severity 23354 minor quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) severity 23354 minor quit From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 06 12:38:04 2022 Received: (at 23354) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2022 16:38:04 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49637 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nn0xv-0002Rk-Va for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2022 12:38:04 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38950) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nn0xu-0002RF-NS for 23354@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2022 12:38:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EzyVmGtZMpKV8b/XuKuEGQqM1fDXk4Y/rrfY79FCRDQ=; b=OG3uxZlvkKgDe26UInflyMaEdo YYuK2h67OL8pcRDsbOvtdgAU8a7/qdodpvuKoCwRFVMgHTLmorOZLpNdWR0wTpu4een5Eh4S3GLJj IID9Jcaf9ranPI/l43cJDzEd3yCfvrw1ESSIPhouDBeeQr6Exm8jTaiDifevFm4AsXiA=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nn0xm-0000DH-85; Fri, 06 May 2022 18:37:56 +0200 From: Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Philipp Stephani Subject: Re: bug#23354: 25.1.50; Unicode literals aren't handled correctly by some commands References: <87inyw86ld.fsf@gnus.org> <87d046rbty.fsf@gnus.org> X-Now-Playing: The Smiths's _Complete (5): The World Won't Listen_: "Ask" Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 18:37:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87d046rbty.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 04 Aug 2020 11:37:29 +0200") Message-ID: <87leveiplq.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I just checked whether things has changed -- and, no, backward-sexp and > friends still do the wrong thing on Unicode literals like > > ?\N{HEAVY CHECK MARK} > > in Emacs Lisp buffers. In particular [...] Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 23354 Cc: 23354@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I just checked whether things has changed -- and, no, backward-sexp and > friends still do the wrong thing on Unicode literals like > > ?\N{HEAVY CHECK MARK} > > in Emacs Lisp buffers. In particular, backward-sexp after the final "}" > skips to the start of "MARK", and forward-sexp at the start skips to the > end of "HEAVY". I've now fixed this in Emacs 29. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Fri May 06 12:38:11 2022 Received: (at control) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2022 16:38:11 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49640 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nn0y3-0002S5-6F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2022 12:38:11 -0400 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:38966) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nn0y2-0002Rs-7C for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2022 12:38:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Subject:From:To:Message-Id:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=YfVx/BRxS78E5NsPm21sGxL1hYWADJA+lOtIr1eG6Xo=; b=PtEniQeL4ad87NGEqG4ilXXS5J kn1ufIkPDrUu4LkiSZywIYvyhcnOS9dNLswr23t5krfgZN/NStQWlVNISIGp6TFItO5CWiap7dWJ9 cUkzGroMx9GUpHhUFayRYM2Y9sZOirBbGNyJopCPj1R3p+4fcuNspAvOy1Rm3+SfC8Zo=; Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nn0xu-0000DP-Eb for control@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2022 18:38:04 +0200 Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 18:38:00 +0200 Message-Id: <87k0ayiplj.fsf@gnus.org> To: control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Subject: control message for bug #23354 X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "quimby.gnus.org", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: close 23354 29.1 quit Content analysis details: (-2.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: control X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) close 23354 29.1 quit From unknown Thu Sep 11 18:37:21 2025 Received: (at fakecontrol) by fakecontrolmessage; To: internal_control@debbugs.gnu.org From: Debbugs Internal Request Subject: Internal Control Message-Id: bug archived. Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2022 11:24:07 +0000 User-Agent: Fakemail v42.6.9 # This is a fake control message. # # The action: # bug archived. thanks # This fakemail brought to you by your local debbugs # administrator