GNU bug report logs - #23303
24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#23303: closed (Re: bug#23303: 24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't
 support absolute column movement)
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:02:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#23303: 24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 23303 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
23303: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23303
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 23303-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23303: 24.5;
 [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:01:11 +0300

> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 01:09:24 +0200
> From: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
> 
> While testing out a program I noticed it was misbehaving in M-x
> ansi-term for the commands using the \e[0G sequence for moving the
> cursor to column 0.  Apparently this is because it doesn't have any code
> branch in `term-handle-ansi-escape' for this case.  I've attached a
> patch to fix this deficiency.

Thanks, installed on master.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 01:09:24 +0200

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

While testing out a program I noticed it was misbehaving in M-x
ansi-term for the commands using the \e[0G sequence for moving the
cursor to column 0.  Apparently this is because it doesn't have any code
branch in `term-handle-ansi-escape' for this case.  I've attached a
patch to fix this deficiency.

[0001-Support-E-G-sequence-for-absolute-column-movement.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.