GNU bug report logs - #23303
24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#23303: closed (24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute
 column movement)
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:02:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:01:11 +0300
with message-id <83wpnr54u0.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#23303: 24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23303,
regarding 24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
23303: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23303
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.5; [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 01:09:24 +0200

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

While testing out a program I noticed it was misbehaving in M-x
ansi-term for the commands using the \e[0G sequence for moving the
cursor to column 0.  Apparently this is because it doesn't have any code
branch in `term-handle-ansi-escape' for this case.  I've attached a
patch to fix this deficiency.

[0001-Support-E-G-sequence-for-absolute-column-movement.patch (text/x-diff, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 23303-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23303: 24.5;
 [PATCH] term.el doesn't support absolute column movement
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:01:11 +0300

> Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 01:09:24 +0200
> From: Vasilij Schneidermann <v.schneidermann <at> gmail.com>
> 
> While testing out a program I noticed it was misbehaving in M-x
> ansi-term for the commands using the \e[0G sequence for moving the
> cursor to column 0.  Apparently this is because it doesn't have any code
> branch in `term-handle-ansi-escape' for this case.  I've attached a
> patch to fix this deficiency.

Thanks, installed on master.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.