GNU bug report logs - #23274
Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#23274: closed (Misleading error message when running
 guix-daemon as unprivileged user)
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:23:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:18 +0100
with message-id <87zi6pw7yd.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #23274,
regarding Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
23274: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=23274
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as unprivileged user
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 21:22:37 -0400

When trying to start the guix-daemon as an unprivileged user, the
following error message is printed:

error: cannot bind to socket `/var/guix/daemon-socket/socket': Address already in use

Would it make sense to try to provide a more helpful error message?

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Martin Castillo <castilma <at> uni-bremen.de>
Cc: 23274-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#23274: Misleading error message when running guix-daemon as
 unprivileged user
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 17:22:18 +0100

Hi Martin,

Martin Castillo <castilma <at> uni-bremen.de> skribis:

>> “Address already in use” makes me directly think that there is already
>>another daemon running.
>
> This was in response to OP, saying that I don't think that needs to be changed.
>
> The rest was about testing it with root and I (half) expected an error message that explicitly says, that another daemon is already running. If this was right, op would be right. But this is not the case and it seems like it is wanted the way it is.
>
> So yes, there is no problem in my eyes, too. This can be closed.

OK, I had completely misunderstood, thanks for clarifying.  Closing!

Ludo’.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.